Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomised phase II study of conventional versus accelerated infusional chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in advanced breast cancer.
De Boer, R H; Eisen, T G; Ellis, P A; Johnston, S R D; Walsh, G; Ashley, S; Smith, I E.
Afiliación
  • De Boer RH; The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ann Oncol ; 13(6): 889-94, 2002 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12123334
BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allows cycles of conventional bolus chemotherapy to be accelerated with reduction in treatment time and a boost in dose intensity. Theoretically, this approach could be hazardous with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy, since G-CSF-stimulated neutrophil proliferation would be occurring in the face of continuous S-phase active 5-FU. We performed this phase II randomised study to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of conventional 3-weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and continuous infusional 5-FU (infusional ECF) to an accelerated 2-weekly schedule with G-CSF support, in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were randomised. with 14 in the accelerated arm. Patients received bolus epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (conventional arm) or every 2 weeks (accelerated arm) and 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion throughout. G-CSF 300 microg/day s.c. on days 10-12 was given each accelerated cycle. RESULTS: There were no treatment delays secondary to inadequate neutrophil or platelet recovery in either arm, with higher median day 1 neutrophil counts for each cycle in the accelerated arm compared with the conventional arm. Eighty-six per cent of the planned conventional chemotherapy cycles and 82% of the planned accelerated cycles were given. There were no major differences in toxicity between the arms, with the most common grade 3 toxicities being alopecia and stomatitis. Eight patients developed neutropenic sepsis (five in the accelerated arm and three in the conventional arm). Ten patients (77%) responded in the conventional arm and nine (64%) in the accelerated arm. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated infusional ECF with limited G-CSF support is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen with rapid haematological recovery. A 50% increase in relative dose intensity of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is achieved, while overall treatment time is reduced by 33%.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos / Hematopoyesis Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2002 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos / Hematopoyesis Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2002 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido