Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Socioeconomic inequalities in risk of congenital anomaly.
Vrijheid, M; Dolk, H; Stone, D; Abramsky, L; Alberman, E; Scott, J E.
Afiliación
  • Vrijheid M; Environmental Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. mvrijheid@lshtm.ac.uk
Arch Dis Child ; 82(5): 349-52, 2000 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10799420
AIMS: To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in the risk of congenital anomalies, focusing on risk of specific anomaly subgroups. METHODS: A total of 858 cases of congenital anomaly and 1764 non-malformed control births were collected between 1986 and 1993 from four UK congenital malformation registers, for the purposes of a European multicentre case control study on congenital anomaly risk near hazardous waste landfill sites. As a measure of socioeconomic status, cases and controls were given a value for the area level Carstairs deprivation index, by linking the postcode of residence at birth to census enumeration districts (areas of approximately 150 households). RESULTS: Risk of non-chromosomal anomalies increased with increasing socioeconomic deprivation. The risk in the most deprived quintile of the deprivation index was 40% higher than in the most affluent quintile. Some malformation subgroups also showed increasing risk with increasing deprivation: all cardiac defects, malformations of the cardiac septa, malformations of the digestive system, and multiple malformations. No evidence for socioeconomic variation was found for other non-chromosomal malformation groups, including neural tube defects and oral clefts. A decreasing risk with increasing deprivation found for all chromosomal malformations and Down's syndrome in unadjusted analyses, occurred mainly as a result of differences in the maternal age distribution between social classes. CONCLUSION: Our data, although based on limited numbers of cases and geographical coverage, suggest that more deprived populations have a higher risk of congenital anomalies of non-chromosomal origin and some specific anomalies. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore their aetiological implications.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anomalías Congénitas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Límite: Humans / Newborn País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Arch Dis Child Año: 2000 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anomalías Congénitas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Límite: Humans / Newborn País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Arch Dis Child Año: 2000 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido