Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pneumococcal Vaccination in Adults: What Can We Learn From Observational Studies That Evaluated PCV13 and PPV23 Effectiveness in the Same Population?
Dunne, Eileen M; Cilloniz, Catia; von Mollendorf, Claire; Lewnard, Joseph; Grant, Lindsay R; Slack, Mary P. E; Jodar, Luis; Theilacker, Christian; Gessner, Bradford D.
Afiliación
  • Dunne, Eileen M; Pfizer Vaccines. Collegeville. USA
  • Cilloniz, Catia; Continental University. Faculty of Health Sciences. Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Huancayo. Peru
  • von Mollendorf, Claire; Murdoch Children's Research Institute. Infection and Immunity. The University of Melbourne. Parkville. Australia
  • Lewnard, Joseph; University of California. School of Public Health. Division of Epidemiology. Berkeley. USA
  • Grant, Lindsay R; Pfizer Vaccines. Collegeville. USA
  • Slack, Mary P. E; Griffith University. School of Medicine & Dentistry. Australia
  • Jodar, Luis; Pfizer Vaccines. Collegeville. USA
  • Theilacker, Christian; Pfizer Vaccines. Collegeville. USA
  • Gessner, Bradford D; Pfizer Vaccines. Collegeville. USA
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 59(3): 157-164, mar. 2023. ilus, tab, graf
Article en En | IBECS | ID: ibc-216957
Biblioteca responsable: ES1.1
Ubicación: ES15.1 - BNCS
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Fifteen and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV15; PCV20) were recently licensed to prevent pneumococcal disease in adults. In the absence of efficacy or effectiveness data for these new vaccines, studies comparing 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) and PCV13 might help inform decision-making on how to best implement expanded-valency PCVs. Comparing PPV23 and PCV13 is problematic, as no head-to-head clinical trials evaluated efficacy. Comparing effectiveness results across observational studies that vary by population, design, and outcomes is difficult. To address these limitations, we undertook a narrative review of studies that assessed PPV23 and PCV13 vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the same adult populations. Methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar and screened 525 studies using a standardized evaluation framework. Results: Nine studies met inclusion criteria, all from high-income countries. None evaluated invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) alone. VE against vaccine-type pneumococcal pneumonia ranged from 2 to 6% for PPV23 and 41 to 71% for PCV13. VE against pneumococcal pneumonia or severe pneumococcal disease (IPD or pneumococcal pneumonia) ranged from −10 to 11% for PPV23, 40 to 79% for PCV13, and 39 to 83% for sequential PCV13/PPV23. VE against all-cause pneumonia or lower respiratory tract infection ranged from −8 to 3% for PPV23 and 9 to 12% for PCV13. Conclusions: Overall, PCV13 demonstrated better protection than PPV23 against pneumococcal disease and all-cause respiratory outcomes in the included studies. Where evaluated, sequential PCV13/PPV23 vaccination showed little benefit over PCV13 alone. Results support the use of PCVs to protect against pneumococcal disease and respiratory infections in adults. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Infecciones Neumocócicas / Neumonía Neumocócica Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Infecciones Neumocócicas / Neumonía Neumocócica Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article