Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in cancer patients treated with denosumab VS. zoledronic acid: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Limones, Alvaro; Sáez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel; Angulo Díaz-Parreño, Santiago; Helm, Alexandra; Bornstein, Michael M; Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro.
Afiliación
  • Limones, Alvaro; Complutense University of Madrid. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Orofacial Prosthesis. Madrid. Spain
  • Sáez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel; Complutense University of Madrid. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Dental Clinical Specialties. Madrid. Spain
  • Angulo Díaz-Parreño, Santiago; San Pablo CEU University. Department of Statistics and Applied Mathematics. Madrid. Spain
  • Helm, Alexandra; Complutense University of Madrid. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Dental Clinical Specialties. Madrid. Spain
  • Bornstein, Michael M; The University of Hong Kong. Faculty of Dentistry. Applied Oral Sciences & Community Dental Care. Hong Kong. China
  • Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro; Complutense University of Madrid. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Orofacial Prosthesis. Madrid. Spain
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 25(3): e326-e336, mayo 2020. tab, graf
Article en En | IBECS | ID: ibc-196318
Biblioteca responsable: ES1.1
Ubicación: BNCS
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to analyse the incidence, risk ratio (RR) and prognoses of two types of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ): denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (DRONJ) and Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (BRONJ) in cancer patients under treatment with deno-sumab or zoledronic acid (ZA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic and manual search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until May 2019. Assessment of the identified studies, risk of bias and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The incidence of DRONJ and BRONJ and the RR to develop MRONJ were calculated at 1 year, 2 years and 3 years of exposure. It was also calculated the odds ratio (OR) of their respective prognoses. They were calculated normalizing the values of the individual studies to 1 year, 2 years or 3 years when necessary through robust regression models using a statistical program. RESULTS: From 1.277 references identified, 8 RCTs were included, which comprised a total of 13.857 patients with a variety of neoplasms. The incidence of DRONJ in cancer patients under treatment with denosumab ranged from 0.5 to 2.1% after 1 year, 1.1 to 3.0% after 2 years, and 1.3 to 3.2% after 3 years of exposure. The incidence of BRONJ in cancer patients under treatment with ZA ranged from 0.4 to 1.6% after 1 year of exposure, 0.8 to 2.1% after 2 years, and 1.0 to 2.3% after 3 years of exposure. Statistically significant differences were found between de-nosumab and ZA in the risk of developing MRONJ after 1, 2 and 3 years of exposure. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in terms of patient prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab is associated with a significantly higher risk of developing MRONJ compared to ZA. Nevertheless, no differences were found in its prognoses
RESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Osteonecrosis / Enfermedades Maxilomandibulares / Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos / Denosumab / Ácido Zoledrónico Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Osteonecrosis / Enfermedades Maxilomandibulares / Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos / Denosumab / Ácido Zoledrónico Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article