Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Public Health Rep ; 131(2): 320-30, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26957667

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We described the following among U.S. primary care physicians: (1) perceived importance of vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices relative to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) preventive services, (2) attitudes toward the U.S. adult immunization schedule, and (3) awareness and use of Medicare preventive service visits. METHODS: We conducted an Internet and mail survey from March to June 2012 among national networks of general internists and family physicians. RESULTS: We received responses from 352 of 445 (79%) general internists and 255 of 409 (62%) family physicians. For a 67-year-old hypothetical patient, 540/606 (89%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 87, 92) of physicians ranked seasonal influenza vaccine and 487/607 (80%, 95% CI 77, 83) ranked pneumococcal vaccine as very important, whereas 381/604 (63%, 95% CI 59, 67) ranked Tdap/Td vaccine and 288/607 (47%, 95% CI 43, 51) ranked herpes zoster vaccine as very important (p<0.001). All Grade A USPSTF recommendations were considered more important than Tdap/Td and herpes zoster vaccines. For the hypothetical patient aged 30 years, the number and percentage of physicians who reported that the Tdap/Td vaccine (377/604; 62%, 95% CI 59, 66) is very important was greater than the number and percentage who reported that the seasonal influenza vaccine (263/605; 43%, 95% CI 40, 47) is very important (p<0.001), and all Grade A and Grade B USPSTF recommendations were more often reported as very important than was any vaccine. A total of 172 of 587 physicians (29%) found aspects of the adult immunization schedule confusing. Among physicians aware of "Welcome to Medicare" and annual wellness visits, 492/514 (96%, 95% CI 94, 97) and 329/496 (66%, 95% CI 62, 70), respectively, reported having conducted fewer than 10 such visits in the previous month. CONCLUSIONS: Despite lack of prioritization of vaccines by ACIP, physicians are prioritizing some vaccines over others and ranking some vaccines below other preventive services. These attitudes and confusion about the immunization schedule may result in missed opportunities for vaccination. Medicare preventive visits are not being used widely despite offering a venue for delivery of preventive services, including vaccinations.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Esquemas de Imunização , Seguro Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Médicos de Atenção Primária/psicologia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinas/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/economia , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/normas , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/economia , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/normas , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/economia , Vacinas contra Influenza/normas , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro Saúde/economia , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Medicare/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/economia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/normas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/economia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/métodos , Estados Unidos , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA