Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21658, 2021 11 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34737323

RESUMO

More than one year since Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak, the gold standard technique for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection is still the RT-qPCR. This is a limitation to increase testing capacities, particularly at developing countries, as expensive reagents and equipment are required. We developed a two steps end point RT-PCR reaction with SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (N) gene and Ribonuclease P (RNase P) specific primers where viral amplicons were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. We carried out a clinical performance and analytical sensitivity evaluation for this two-steps end point RT-PCR method with 242 nasopharyngeal samples using the CDC RT-qPCR protocol as a gold standard technique. With a specificity of 95.8%, a sensitivity of 95.1%, and a limit of detection of 20 viral RNA copies/uL, this two steps end point RT-PCR assay is an affordable and reliable method for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This protocol would allow to extend COVID-19 diagnosis to basic molecular biology laboratories with a potential positive impact in surveillance programs at developing countries.


Assuntos
Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/genética , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/economia , Teste para COVID-19/métodos , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo de Coronavírus/genética , Primers do DNA , Eletroforese em Gel de Ágar/métodos , Humanos , Laboratórios , Nasofaringe/virologia , RNA Viral/genética , Ribonuclease P/genética , Ribonuclease P/metabolismo , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
J Virol Methods ; 293: 114131, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33798606

RESUMO

The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared a pandemic of COVID-19, the disease caused by the recently described SARS-CoV-2. The relevance and importance of mass diagnosis in order to find the asymptomatic individuals is widely recognized as a mandatory tool to reinforce the control measures for monitoring virus circulation and reduce the spreading of SARS-CoV-2. Here, we described quickness and cheaper strategies of direct RT-qPCR (in the absence of RNA isolation) and compared the results to those obtained using standard RNA isolation procedure. The tests varied using pure, diluted samples, combined with Proteinase K (PK) or Lysis Buffer. Our findings showed consistently that PK pre-treated samples in the absence of RNA extraction procedures presents similar results to those obtained by standard RNA isolation procedures. On average, 16 samples extracted with the MagMAX™ CORE Kit, take around 2 h, costing an average of USD 5, the pre-treatment of samples using PK, on the other hand, would cut the value to less than USD 0.30 and reduce the time of procedure in more than 1 ½ hours. The present study suggests the use of PK treatment instead of RNA isolation in order to reduce costs and time in processing samples for molecular diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.


Assuntos
Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Endopeptidase K/farmacologia , RNA Viral/análise , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/economia , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética
3.
Virus Res ; 290: 198173, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979475

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The CDC protocol for SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR diagnosis (2019-nCoV CDC kit) is considered a gold standard worldwide; based on three different FAM probes (N1 and N2 for viral detection; RP for RNA extraction quality control), three reactions per sample are needed for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. RESULTS: We herein describe a sample pooling protocol: pooling 3 RNA extractions into a single PCR reaction; we tested this protocol with 114 specimens grouped in 38 pools and found no significant differences for N1 and N2 Ct values between pool and single sample PCR reaction. CONCLUSION: This pool of three protocol has a sensitivity of 100 % compared to the standard single sample protocol. For a typical 96-well plate, this pool assay allows 96 samples processing, speeding up diagnosis and reducing cost while maintaining clinical performance, particularly useful for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis at developing countries.


Assuntos
Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/economia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Humanos , Nasofaringe/virologia , RNA Viral/genética , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Manejo de Espécimes/normas , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA