Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lipids Health Dis ; 20(1): 124, 2021 Sep 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34587943

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Large observational studies have shown that small, dense LDL subfractions are related to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This study assessed the effects of two highly effective lipid-lowering therapies in the atherogenic subclasses of lipoproteins in subjects with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: Patients of both sexes admitted with their first myocardial infarction and submitted to pharmacoinvasive strategy (N = 101) were included and randomized using a central computerized system to receive a daily dose of simvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg or rosuvastatin 20 mg for 30 days. Intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions were analysed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Lipoprint System) on the first (D1) and 30th days (D30) of lipid-lowering therapy. Changes in LDL and IDL subfractions between D1 and D30 were compared between the lipid-lowering therapies (Mann-Whitney U test). RESULTS: The classic lipid profile was similar in both therapy arms at D1 and D30. At D30, the achievement of lipid goals was comparable between lipid-lowering therapies. Cholesterol content in atherogenic subclasses of LDL (p = 0.043) and IDL (p = 0.047) decreased more efficiently with simvastatin plus ezetimibe than with rosuvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Lipid-lowering therapy with simvastatin plus ezetimibe was associated with a better pattern of lipoprotein subfractions than rosuvastatin monotherapy. This finding was noted despite similar effects in the classic lipid profile and may contribute to residual cardiovascular risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02428374, registered on 28/09/2014.


Assuntos
Lipoproteínas/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Idoso , Aterosclerose , Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol , Ezetimiba/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Lipídeos/sangue , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rosuvastatina Cálcica/administração & dosagem , Sinvastatina/administração & dosagem , Sinvastatina/sangue
2.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev ; 4(3): 226-36, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27140803

RESUMO

Drug-drug interactions between canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, and glyburide, metformin, and simvastatin were evaluated in three phase-1 studies in healthy participants. In these open-label, fixed sequence studies, participants received: Study 1-glyburide 1.25 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 200 mg/day (Days 4-8), canagliflozin with glyburide (Day 9); Study 2-metformin 2,000 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 300 mg/day (Days 4-7), metformin with canagliflozin (Day 8); Study 3-simvastatin 40 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 300 mg/day (Days 2-6), simvastatin with canagliflozin (Day 7). Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed at prespecified intervals. Co-administration of canagliflozin and glyburide did not affect the overall exposure (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of glyburide and its metabolites (4-trans-hydroxy-glyburide and 3-cis-hydroxy-glyburide). Canagliflozin did not affect the peak concentration of metformin; however, AUC increased by 20%. Though Cmax and AUC were slightly increased for simvastatin (9% and 12%) and simvastatin acid (26% and 18%) following coadministration with canagliflozin, compared with simvastatin administration alone; however, no effect on active 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitory activity was observed. There were no serious adverse events or hypoglycemic episodes. No drug-drug interactions were observed between canagliflozin and glyburide, metformin, or simvastatin. All treatments were well-tolerated in healthy participants.


Assuntos
Canagliflozina/administração & dosagem , Glibureto/farmacocinética , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/farmacocinética , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacocinética , Metformina/farmacocinética , Sinvastatina/farmacocinética , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Argentina , Disponibilidade Biológica , Biotransformação , Canagliflozina/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Interações Medicamentosas , Feminino , Glibureto/administração & dosagem , Glibureto/efeitos adversos , Glibureto/sangue , Meia-Vida , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/sangue , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Hipoglicemiantes/sangue , Masculino , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Metformina/administração & dosagem , Metformina/efeitos adversos , Metformina/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Biológicos , Sinvastatina/administração & dosagem , Sinvastatina/efeitos adversos , Sinvastatina/sangue , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA