RESUMO

Abstract Objective: To summarize data of clinical trials that used silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to prevent and treat caries lesions and dentinal hypersensitivity. Material and Methods: Six electronic databases were searched in May 2022. The concentration of SDF, type of usage (alone/combined), dentition, anterior/posterior teeth, tooth region, dental tissue, number of the treated surfaces, the intervention environment, participants' age, frequency and duration of SDF application, purpose, and outcome were the extracted variables. The type of study, year of publication, authors, journals, and country were also investigated. Results: From 8860 articles, S3 were selected. Most were randomized (n=38), that applied 38% SDF (n=43), alone (n=44), on multiple surfaces (n=44), only in dentin (n=36), of the crown (n=46) of anterior and posterior (n=36) primary teeth (n=39). The studies were preferably carried out outside the clinic (n=3l), only in children (n=33), with reapplication of SDF (n=30), but did not inform the duration of application (n= 19). SDF was most used to treat (n=46) only caries lesions (n=50). They were published between 2001 and 2022, mainly in the Journal of Dentistry (n=10). China (n=19) and Lo E.GM (n=19) were the countries and authors that published the most, respectively. Conclusion: The silver diamine fluoride 38% alone was most used to treat caries lesions in the dentin of the crown of all primary teeth, preferably applied on multiple surfaces, requiring re application, and outside the clinic.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: To identify the prevalence, severity, hypersensitivity, and distribution of Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) among university students in Brazil. Material and Methods: 179 participants answered an anamnesis with twenty questions about the presence or absence of habits associated with NCCL. The participants' teeth were evaluated to identify the presence or absence of the lesion, its classification, involved surfaces, severity, hypersensitivity, and tooth wear index. A hypersensitivity test was performed with ice water. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and simple logistic regression (p<0.01). Results: 179 participants answered an anamnesis with twenty questions about the presence or absence of habits associated with NCCL. The participants' teeth were evaluated to identify the presence or absence of the lesion, its classification, involved surfaces, severity, hypersensitivity, and tooth wear index. A hypersensitivity test was performed with ice water. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and simple logistic regression (p<0.01). Conclusion: The prevalence of NCCL was 15.1% and abfraction was the most frequent lesion. Premolars were the teeth most affected by non-carious cervical lesions.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the desensitizing effect of toothpaste for sensitive teeth on patient tooth sensitivity and on bleaching efficacy of the 38% hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent used for in-office bleaching compared to a regular toothpaste in a randomized clinical trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-eight patients having maxillary right central incisors with darkness greater than A1 were selected for the present double-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: the placebo group, which used regular toothpaste, and the experimental group, which used sensitivity toothpaste. The intervention consisted of applying toothpaste with the aid of an individual tray for a period of 4 minutes daily, starting one week before the first bleaching session and interrupting use immediately after the second session. After allocation to one of the groups, individuals received in-office dental bleaching with a 40-minute application of 38% hydrogen peroxide for two sessions with an interval of one week. The incidence and intensity of sensitivity were assessed using a visual analogue scale and a numeric analogue scale. Sensitivity was measured immediately before each session, 1 hour, 24 hours, and 48 hours after each bleaching session and four weeks after the second bleaching session. Tooth shade was evaluated using a spectrophotometer and by comparison with the VITA Classical Shade Guide (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). Tooth shade was evaluated before the first bleaching session, one week after the first bleaching session, one week after the second bleaching session and four weeks after the second bleaching session. Participants and professionals who performed the bleaching, shade, and sensitivity assessments were blinded to the group of patients they were treating or assessing. For the incidence of hypersensitivity, the results were evaluated by comparing the groups at different evaluation times with the Mann-Whitney test for comparison between groups, the Friedman test for repeated measures, and the Tukey test for comparison of times. Shade change on the guide was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test for comparison between groups and the Wilcoxon test for comparison between times. Shade change by the spectrophotometer was analyzed using the t-test for comparison between groups and the paired t-test for comparison between times. All analyses were performed with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: There was no difference in the pattern of dental hypersensitivity between groups. For all shade measures, there was no difference between the bleaching results, and no statistically significant difference was observed between the study groups. CONCLUSION: The use of arginine-based desensitizing toothpaste did not interfere with the bleaching ability of hydrogen peroxide and was not effective in reducing the sensitivity caused by in-office tooth bleaching.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of cervical dentin hypersensitivity in patients after corrective orthodontic treatment has been poorly studied, although such hypersensitivity is very common. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in patients who received corrective orthodontic treatment, the impact of general oral problems on quality of life, and the impact of hypersensitivity on the quality of life of this population. METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study evaluated 232 patients who finished orthodontic treatment between 2000 and 2020 for self-reported hypersensitivity and clinically diagnosed hypersensitivity. The following tests were used: tactile, evaporative (bellows), evaporative (triple syringe), and thermal. The patients were also evaluated regarding their quality of life using questionnaires (Oral Health Impact Profile-14 and Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire). We evaluated data with nonparametric statistics. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypersensitivity was higher in women and in those aged <30 years; the most affected teeth were the mandibular incisors and premolars; different diagnostic tests for hypersensitivity may indicate different prevalence values; patients with hypersensitivity had a lower quality of life in most of the domains of both of the tests that were used. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of hypersensitivity among patients after orthodontic treatment may be higher than in the general population. Further investigation is needed to indicate the possible factors associated with orthodontic tooth movement.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introdução: A hipersensibilidade dentinária (HD) consiste em uma condição clínica caracterizada por dor localizada, curta e aguda, resultante de estímulos exógenos. Objetivo: Esse estudo objetivou realizar uma revisão da literatura sobre os aspectos relevantes vinculados à HD, como etiologia, diagnóstico, mecanismos biológicos, medidas preventivas e terapêuticas. Metodologia: Foi realizada a busca eletrônica de publicações nas bases de dados Scielo, PubMed, Periódicos Capes, Lilacs e Medline, utilizando os seguintes descritores: "dentin", "dentin sensitivy", "treatment". Os estudos foram publicados no período de 2010 a 2020. Resultados: Observou-se que a HD acomete cerca de 9-55% da população, principalmente indivíduos entre a terceira e quarta décadas de vida, apresentando maior prevalência no sexo feminino, afetando especialmente as regiões vestibulares dos caninos, pré-molares superiores e sequencialmente os incisivos e molares inferiores. O diagnóstico é determinado a partir de testes de sensibilidade, como o mecânico ou a desidratação. O tratamento dispõe de inúmeras propostas baseadas na obliteração dos túbulos dentinários como forma de impossibilitar a movimentação líquida intratubular ou restrição neural dos mecanorreceptores pulpares. Conclusão: Embora os aspectos clínicos sejam bem estabelecidos na literatura, a importância de um correto diagnóstico é essencial para um plano de tratamento adequado, por se tratar de uma condição de etiologia multifatorial... (AU)

Introduction: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) consists of a clinical condition characterized by localized, hort and acute pain, resulting from exogenous stimulus. Objective: This study aimed to conduct a narrative literature review on the relevant aspects linked to DH, such as etiology, diagnosis, biological mechanisms, preventive and therapeutic approaches. Methodology: The electronic search for publications was carried out in the Scielo, PubMed, Capes, Lilacs and Medline databases, using the following descriptors: "dentin", "dentin sensitivy", "treatment". The studies were published in the period from 2010 to 2020. Results: It was observed that DH affects about 9-55% of the population, mainly belonging to the third and fourth decade of life, with higher prevalence in females, especially affecting the vestibular regions of the canines, upper premolars and sequentially the incisors and molars lower. The diagnosis is determined based on sensitivity tests, such as mechanical or dehydration. The treatment has numerous proposals based on the obliteration of the dentinal tubules as a way of preventing the intratubular liquid movement or neural restriction of the pulp mechanoreceptors. Conclusion: Although the clinical aspects are well established in the literature, the importance of a correct diagnosis is essential for an adequate treatment plan, as it is a multifactorial condition... (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is defined as high sensitivity of the vital dentin when exposed to thermal, chemical or tactile stimuli. Two mechanisms are required for the occurrence of DH: (1) the dentin must be exposed and (2) the dentinal tubules must be open and connected to the pulp. Molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) is a qualitative abnormality of a genetic origin that affects tooth enamel and, in most cases, is accompanied by DH. The control of tooth sensitivity is fundamental to the successful treatment of MIH. The aim of the proposed randomised, controlled, clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of different protocols for the control of DH in patients with teeth affected by MIH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: One hundred and forty patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be allocated to four groups. Group 1 will be the control group (placebo). In Group 2, sensitive teeth will be sealed with PermaSeal (Ultradent). In Group 3, sensitive teeth will receive low-level laser (LLL, AsGaAl) at a wavelength of 780 nm (Laser XT Therapy, DMC, São Carlos, Brazil). In Group 4, sensitive teeth will be treated with both LLL and PermaSeal (Ultradent). DH will be evaluated 15 min after the application of the treatments and the patients will be reevaluated 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the treatments. The primary outcome of this study is change in pain/sensitivity, when evaluated through a Visual Analogue Scale, to determine the effectiveness of the proposed treatments, as well as differences among the evaluation times for each proposed treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been ethically approved by the local medical ethical committee (protocol number: 4.020.261). Results will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04407702.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This randomized triple-blind clinical trial, split-mouth design, evaluated the application effect of the desensitizing gel before and after in-office bleaching on tooth sensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In one group, the desensitizing gel was applied for 10 min before the bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide, and then application of placebo gel after (n = 90). In the other group, the desensitizing gel was applied before and after the bleaching procedure for 10 min (n = 90). The primary outcome was pain intensity assessed with a numeric rating scale and a visual analog scale. Color was evaluated by means of a digital spectrophotometer and a shade guides. RESULTS: The proportion of patients that experienced pain in the side of before application was 90% (95% CI 82 to 94.6%), while the side of before and after was 93% (95% CI 86.2 to 96.9%), without significant difference between groups (OR = 0.25; 95% CI 0.005 to 2.52; p = 0.37). Pain was correlated in both groups, for the NRS scale (p < 0.0001) and the VAS scale (p < 0.0001) in all assessment periods. Significant whitening was detected, and no significant difference of color change was observed between groups (p > 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the desensitizing agent did not influence the effectiveness of bleaching, but it was not efficient in reducing the sensitivity, when applied before the procedure, or before and after. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of a desensitizing gel before or after in-office bleaching does not reduce incidence or intensity of tooth sensitivity.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The objectives of this double-blind randomized clinical trial were to compare (a) the clinical times and (b) the occurrence and severity of postoperative sensitivity, of posterior restoration that used a universal adhesive, in a self-etch or selective enamel-etching technique, along with incremental or bulk-fill composites (presented in syringes or capsules). A total of 295 posterior restorations were placed according to the following groups: SETB - self-etch/bulk-fill in syringe; SETC - self-etch/bulk-fill in capsules; SETI - self-etch/incremental; SEEB - selective enamel-etching/bulk-fill in syringe; SEEC - selective enamel-etching/bulk-fill in capsules; and SEEI - selective enamel-etching/incremental. Clinical time was assessed by a reason (s/mm3) between the total volume of resin inserted and the total time required to perform the restorations. Postoperative sensitivity was evaluated using two scales (Numeric Rating Scale and Visual Analogue Scale). Mean clinical time results, analyzed by Wald's Chi-square, showed significant statistical differences among all groups (p<0.001), indicating that the restorative strategy affected the time required for the restoration. A generalized estimating equation model statistical analysis, performed to compare postoperative sensitivity, showed that neither the restorative technique, the adhesive strategy nor the presentation mode of the bulk-fill composite affected the overall risk of postoperative sensitivity (4.06 [2.22-6.81]). The use of bulk-fill composite, presented in capsules or syringes, is less time consuming and does not increase the risk or intensity of postoperative sensitivity relative to the traditional incremental technique.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract The objectives of this double-blind randomized clinical trial were to compare (a) the clinical times and (b) the occurrence and severity of postoperative sensitivity, of posterior restoration that used a universal adhesive, in a self-etch or selective enamel-etching technique, along with incremental or bulk-fill composites (presented in syringes or capsules). A total of 295 posterior restorations were placed according to the following groups: SETB - self-etch/bulk-fill in syringe; SETC - self-etch/bulk-fill in capsules; SETI - self-etch/incremental; SEEB - selective enamel-etching/bulk-fill in syringe; SEEC - selective enamel-etching/bulk-fill in capsules; and SEEI - selective enamel-etching/incremental. Clinical time was assessed by a reason (s/mm3) between the total volume of resin inserted and the total time required to perform the restorations. Postoperative sensitivity was evaluated using two scales (Numeric Rating Scale and Visual Analogue Scale). Mean clinical time results, analyzed by Wald's Chi-square, showed significant statistical differences among all groups (p<0.001), indicating that the restorative strategy affected the time required for the restoration. A generalized estimating equation model statistical analysis, performed to compare postoperative sensitivity, showed that neither the restorative technique, the adhesive strategy nor the presentation mode of the bulk-fill composite affected the overall risk of postoperative sensitivity (4.06 [2.22-6.81]). The use of bulk-fill composite, presented in capsules or syringes, is less time consuming and does not increase the risk or intensity of postoperative sensitivity relative to the traditional incremental technique.

Assuntos

RESUMO

La exposición de dentina radicular asociada a una recesión gingival puede producir dolor ante distintos estímulos, situación que puede difi cultar la vida cotidiana de los pacientes que lo padecen, además de presentar complicaciones estéticas que pueden afectar la autoestima. La hipersensibilidad dentinaria tiene una etiología asociada a múltiples factores, siendo el principal factor de riesgo la recesión gingival, situación clínica común que se observa en gran parte de la población. El propósito de esta revisión es reunir distintos conceptos que expliquen la asociación que mantienen estas dos patologías, sus etiologías, el cuadro clínico que presenta la hipersensibilidad dentinaria para poder realizar un diagnóstico diferencial y las distintas opciones de tratamiento para realizar un adecuado manejo de esta condición que incluyen desde recursos terapéuticos que buscan resolver la sintomatología hasta procedimientos quirúrgicos que resultan más invasivos y que se enfocan en tratar el factor predisponente como es la recesión gingival misma (AU)

Dentin exposure level periodontal tissues can cause pain to diff erent stimuli, a situation which can hinder the daily lives of patients who suff er, in addition to having aesthetic complications that can damage self-esteem. Dental hypersensitivity has a multifactorial etiology associated being the main risk factor gingival recession, the common clinical situation observed in much of the population. The purpose of this review is to bring together various concepts that explain the association that maintain these two pathologies, their etiologies, clinical picture presented dentine hypersensitivity to perform a diff erential diagnosis and treatment options for proper management of this condition ranging from therapeutic procedure seeking to resolve the symptoms to surgical procedures that are more invasive and that focus on treating the predisposing factor such as the gingival recession itself (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study aimed to identify the factors associated to the cervical dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in Brazilian adult population. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty patients (67.2% women and 32.8% men) were assessed by questionnaire and thermal test with ice. Participants marked in a visual analogue scale (VAS) the intensity of pain, and a calibrated examiner (ICC 0.990) measured the scores using a caliper. Pain scores above 0.5 mm were considered sensitive teeth. The DH associated factors were investigated by clinical examination. The association between variables was assessed by Spearman correlation and the Chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to determine the variables that predict DH (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 24.08 years. In this population, 8958 teeth were evaluated, of those 3037 (33.9%) were diagnosed sensitive. The most prevalent associated factors to DH were abnormal tooth positioning (9.0%), occlusal trauma (6.5%) and gingival recession (5.6%). The erosion predicted significantly the DH on both simple (OR 7.85, p < 0.001) and multiple(OR 4.36, p < 0.001) analysis. CONCLUSION: The exposure of dentinal tubules by erosion is probably the major predictor of dentin hypersensitivity. The healthy tooth is able to protect against DH.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In-office tooth whitening treatment using violet light emited diode (LED) (405 nm) is a novel bleaching method that causes less sensitivity while offering the same effectiveness as the gold standard (35% hydrogen peroxide, H2O2). This study describes a protocol for the first randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the effects of the two methods. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eighty patients will be divided into four groups: G1 violet LED; G2 violet LED +35% carbamide peroxide; G3 35% H2O2 and G4 violet LED +gingivoplasty. Colour will be measured at baseline, immediately after the first session and at the 15 and 180 days follow-up using the Vita Classical and the digital Easyshade V spectrophotometer (Vita, Zahnfabrik, Germany). Sensitivity after whitening will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale at baseline and at each session in all groups and in all follow-ups. The tissue removed during gingivoplasty (G4) will be submitted to immunohistochemical analysis for the determination of inflammatory changes caused by violet LED. The Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) will be evaluated before, as well as at established time point controls. The results will be expressed as mean and SD values. After determining the normality of the data, a one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance will be used for the comparison of data with normal distribution and the Kruskal-Wallis test will be used for data with non-normal distribution. A p<0.05 will be considered indicative of statistical significance. After determining the normality of the data, the Kruskal-Wallis test will be used for non-parametric data. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and the Wilcoxon test will be used for comparing data from the PIDAQ. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of UniversidadeNove de Julho (certificate: 2.034.518). The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03192852; Pre-results.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Desensitizing agents are usually included in the composition of bleaching agents to reduce bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity (TS). This randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluated the risk and intensity of TS and color change after at-home bleaching with a desensitizing-containing (3% potassium nitrate and 0.2% sodium fluoride) and desensitizing-free 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) gel (Whiteness Perfect, FGM). METHODS: A triple-blind, within-person RCT was conducted on 60 caries-free adult patients. Each participant used the gel in a bleaching tray for 3 h daily for 21 days in both the upper and lower dental arches. The absolute risk and intensity of TS were assessed daily through the 0-10 VAS and NRS scale for 21 days. Color change was recorded using shade guides (Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide) and the Easyshade spectrophotometer at baseline, weekly and 30 days after the end of the bleaching. The risk and intensity of TS were evaluated by the McNemar and Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests, respectively. Color change (ΔSGU and ΔE) were evaluated by the Mann-Whitney test and a paired t-test, respectively (α = 0.05). RESULTS: No difference in the TS and color change was observed (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride in 10% carbamide peroxide at-home bleaching gel tested in this study did not reduce the TS and did not affect color change (RBR-4M6YR2).

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This randomized double-blind clinical trial compared tooth sensitivity (TS), bleaching efficacy, and cytokine levels after applying in-office bleaching treatments containing 15% and 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP15% and HP35%, respectively). METHODS: Twenty-five volunteers were randomly assigned to receive HP15% or HP35% treatment. The bleaching agent was applied in three 15-min applications per session. Two bleaching sessions were separated by a 1-week interval. The participants scored TS using a visual analog scale and numerical rating scale. Bleaching efficacy was determined by subjective and objective methods. Gingival crevicular fluid was collected from three jaws sites per patient for the analysis of fluid volume. Flow cytometry was used to analyze gingival crevicular fluid levels of interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor, and interferon-gamma. All measurements were obtained before and after bleaching. All data were statistically analyzed (α=0.05). RESULTS: The absolute risk and intensity of TS was higher for HP35% than for HP15% (p>0.002). One month post-bleaching, HP35% produced more bleaching than HP15% (p=0.02). However patient perception (p=0.06) and patient satisfaction (p=0.53) with regard to bleaching were not significantly different. No significant differences existed in the gingival fluid volume (p>0.38) or in any cytokine level (p>0.05) for either HP concentration. CONCLUSION: Treatment: with HP35% is more effective than HP15%, but generates a greater risk and intensity of TS. No inflammatory changes occurred despite the difference in the HP concentrations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Hydrogen peroxide at a lower concentration (e.g., 15%) should be considered a good treatment alternative for in-office bleaching because the higher concentration for in-office bleaching generates a greater risk and intensity of TS for patients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental effect and sensitivity of at-home dental bleaching with 10% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty volunteers with A2 or darker central incisors were selected for this study. Was used 10% H2O2 for thirty minutes twice a day, for two weeks. Shade evaluation was assessed visually by the value-oriented shade guide Vita Classical shade guide, Vita Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER and by the Easyshade spectrophotometer at baseline, during bleaching (first and second weeks), and post-bleaching (one month). The perceptions of sensitivity were recorded by the patients through the numerical rating scale (0 to 4) and 0 to 10 visual analog scales daily. Data from the shade guide units was subjected to a one way repeated measures (RM) analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (a = 5%). The overall AE, absolute risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity were calculated as well as the 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: The absolute risk of tooth sensitivity was 65% and the intensity was mild. Data from ASGU and AE after 1 month of bleaching for H2O2 10% showed significant whitening, 4 units for Vita Classical, 5 units for Vita Bleachedguide and 9.7 units for spectrophotometer. CONCLUSION: At-home bleaching using 10% hydrogen peroxide is effective in 14 days of bleaching. The most common adverse events were mild tooth sensitivity, and no subjects discontinued use early because of a treatment-related adverse event. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: At-home dental bleaching with 10% hydrogen peroxide gel reduces the time of use of the tray, maintaining the effectiveness with low intensity of dental sensitivity. Brazilian clinical trials registry (REBEC) RBR-45xmzj.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Communication between pulp and periodontal tissue has been well established. However, it is unknown when periodontal disease begins to affect the clinical response of pulp tissue. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of periodontal severity on pulp sensibility by means of electric and thermal cold testing. METHODS: The teeth assessed in this study were allocated into 3 groups considering radiographic alveolar bone loss (ABL) as follows: slight periodontitis (SP, ABL ≤7 mm without reaching the apex, n = 25), moderate periodontitis (ABL >7 mm without reaching the apex, n = 23), and severe periodontitis (SvP, ABL >7 reaching the apex, n = 8). Gingival recession (GR), probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were also measured. RESULTS: The results showed higher levels of PD and CAL in the SvP group compared with the SP group (P < .05), with no significant difference in GR (P > .05). The SvP group showed significant ABL compared with the other groups (P > .05). The SP group showed a significant number of teeth with a positive pulp response, whereas the SvP group showed a significant number of teeth with a negative pulp response (P < .05); no significant differences were observed between the thermal cold and electric tests (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that pulp clinical involvement with a negative response to thermal cold and electric testing occurs only in the most advanced stage of chronic periodontitis with apical involvement.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: la hiperestesia dentinaria se caracteriza por un dolor intenso y breve asociado a la exposición de estímulos térmicos, táctiles, osmóticos o químicos. De prevalencia creciente, reduce la calidad de vida del paciente. Objetivo: evaluar la eficacia, aceptabilidad y tolerancia de un dentífrico con dióxido de silicio obliterante, nitrato potásico y monofluorofosfato sódico en pacientes con hiperestesia dentinaria. Métodos: estudio observacional y longitudinal (n= 22) en el que se aplicó el dentífrico 3 veces/día durante 28 días. Se realizó una evaluación clínica, antes y después de la aplicación, a las 48 horas, a las 96 horas y los días 7, 14, 21 y 28 del estudio. Se evaluó su eficacia en términos de reducción de la hipersensibilidad dental determinada mediante técnica táctil (escala de calificación verbal) y de chorro de aire (escala de Schiff). En cada visita se valoró la tolerancia del producto. Los pacientes valoraron el grado de hipersensibilidad y su percepción del producto mediante un cuestionario de evaluación subjetiva. El estudio se realizó bajo los principios de Buena Práctica Clínica. Resultados: la hipersensibilidad dental se redujo en todos los puntos temporales del estudio y fue significativa (p< 0,05) a partir del día 5. Esta mejoría fue sostenida y aumentó a medida que avanzó el tratamiento. El día 29 la hipersensibilidad media se redujo en un 85 por ciento respecto al valor basal en todos los pacientes. El 91 por ciento de los participantes opinó que el dentífrico había cumplido sus expectativas. No se observó ninguna reacción adversa derivada del uso del producto. Conclusiones: el dentífrico, administrado 3 veces/día, consiguió una reducción de la hipersensibilidad dental, significativa a partir del día 5, que fue aumentando con el tiempo. El producto presentó muy buena aceptabilidad y tolerancia(AU)

Introduction: dentin hypersensitivity is characterized by sharp pain of short duration associated with exposure to thermal, tactile, osmotic or chemical stimuli. Dentin hypersensitivity is a disorder of growing prevalence which reduces the quality of life of patients. Objective: evaluate the efficacy, acceptability and tolerance of a toothpaste with precipitated silica, potassium nitrate and sodium monofluorophosphate in patients with dentin hypersensitivity. Methods: an observational longitudinal study was conducted (n= 22) in which the toothpaste was applied 3 times a day for 28 days. Clinical assessment was performed before and after the application, at 48 hours, at 96 hours and on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 of the study. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of dental hypersensitivity reduction as determined by tactile (Verbal Rating Scale) and air jet (Schiff scale) techniques. Tolerance to the product was assessed in every visit. Patients ranked the degree of hypersensitivity and their perception of the product by means of a subjective assessment questionnaire. The study complied with Good Clinical Practice principles. Results: areduction was observed in dental hypersensitivity at all time points throughout the study, and it was significant (p< 0,05) as of day 5. This improvement was sustained and increased as treatment progressed. On day 29 mean hypersensitivity had reduced 85 percent with respect to baseline value in all patients. 91 percent of the patients stated that the toothpaste had met their expectations. No adverse reaction attributable to the product was observed. Conclusions: applied 3 times/day, the toothpaste obtained a reduction in dental hypersensitivity, which was significant as of day 5. This improvement increased over time. The product had very good acceptability and tolerance(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the nociceptive response induced by dentin hypersensitivity after dental erosion in rats that were exhibited to unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS)-induced depressive-like behavior. DESIGN: Adult male rats were subjected to UCMS (depression [D] group) or not (no depression [ND] group) for 30days and received either acidic solution to induce dental erosion (E) or water (W), thus forming the WND, END, WD, and ED groups. After the end of treatment, depressive-like parameters (i.e., sucrose preference and immobility in the forced swim test) and dentin hypersensitivity were evaluated. Plasma tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and corticosterone levels were measured, and astrocytic glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression was evaluated in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and hypothalamus. RESULTS: Administration of the acidic solution potentiated dentin hypersensitivity and increased corticosterone levels in the ED group compared with the WD group. TNF-α levels only increased in the WD group. The ED group exhibited an increase in astrocytic GFAP expression in the hypothalamus and prefrontal cortex but decreases in the hippocampus. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that UCMS exacerbated the nociceptive response associated with dentin hypersensitivity, concomitant with an increase in plasma corticosterone levels. Hypothalamic and prefrontal cortex astrogliosis in the ED group may be attributable to the increase in corticosterone associated to UCMS procedure. The reduction of astrocytic GFAP expression in the hippocampus in the ED group supports the association between dentin hypersensitivity and depression.

Assuntos

RESUMO

El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar el nivel de información que poseen los odontólogos periodoncistas con respecto a la aparición de hipersensibilidad dentinaria posterior a los procedimientos quirúrgicos, identificar cuál es la cirugía que más la genera, así como los tratamientos más utilizados en el manejo de la entidad. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de campo, de tipo descriptivo y transversal. La muestra estuvo conformada por 86 periodoncistasque corresponden al 30 por cienot de la población que integra la Sociedad Venezolana de Periodontología. La información se recolectó con un instrumento tipo encuesta. Resultados: El 89,53 por ciento manifestó que sus pacientes refieren hipersensibilidaddentinaria posterior a la realización de procedimientos quirúrgicos periodontales. La cirugía para reducción de sacos ocupó el primer lugar en generar hipersensibilidaddentinaria con un 57,14 por ciento. Un 96.10 por ciento de los especialistas entrevistados confirmó la utilización de algún tratamiento para la hipersensibilidad dentinaria. En relación a el tratamiento más utilizado, el 53,24 por ciento aplicó pastas desensibilizantes posterior a la fase periodontal quirúrgica. Conclusiones: Los resultados obtenidos en esta investigación indican que el nivel de información que poseen los profesionales de la periodontología en relación a la hipersensibilidaddentinaria posterior a la cirugía periodontal es elevado debido a la alta prevalencia de esta afección en la población tratada. El procedimiento quirúrgico más asociado a la hipersensibilidad dentinaria fue la cirugía para reducción de sacos. La aplicación de pastas desensibilizantes fue el tratamiento más utilizado paracontrolarla.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a monogenic disease that affects millions of people worldwide. This study analyzed the effectiveness of bleaching and tooth sensitivity after in-office bleaching in patients with SCD. Forty volunteers were randomly assigned to four groups of 10 patients each (five with the SCD and five healthy controls) and treated using in-office bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide and different light activation protocols. No statistically significant difference was observed with relation to presence of tooth sensitivity, with or without use of a source of light for peroxide activation, and all bleaching therapies were effective, regardless of the technique employed and the presence/absence of sickle cell disease. The data showed that in-office dental bleaching is a viable alternative for improvement of oral esthetics for patients with SCD.

A doença falciforme (DF) é a doença monogênica e afeta milhões de pessoas em todo o mundo. Este estudo analisou a eficácia do clareamento e a presença de sensibilidade dentinária após clareamento dental em portadores de DF. Quarenta voluntários distribuídos aleatoriamente em quatro grupos com diferentes fontes de luz foram submetidos à técnica de clareamento em consultório, utilizando peróxido de hidrogênio a 35%. Não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas em relação á presença de sensibilidade, com ou sem a utilização de uma fonte de luz para acelerar a ativação do peróxido e todos os clareamentos foram efetivos, independentemente da técnica utilizada e da presença/ausência de DF. Os dados mostraram que o clareamento dental em consultório, utilizando peróxido de hidrogênio a 35% é uma alternativa viável para melhoria da estética em pacientes com DF.

Assuntos