RESUMO
Rifaximin, an oral antimicrobial, has many advantages because it is selective intestine, has minimal adverse effects and is used for the treatment of some diseases such as hepatic encephalopathy, irritable bowel syndrome, travelers' diarrhea, ulcerative colitis, Clostridium difficile and acute diarrhea. Rifaximin in the form of 200 mg tablets is commercially available. The crystalline α form is therapeutically safe and effective. In most of the official compendia, rifaximin has no monograph and in none of them is there a monograph for rifaximin tablets. The literature, however, contemplates this gap with varied methods. The literature presents some methods for evaluation of rifaximin in both biological fluid and pharmaceutical product. High performance liquid chromatography stands out for the evaluation of rifaximin. Most of the methods reported in the literature are for pharmaceuticals products. They use (1) toxic organic solvents, harmful to the operator and the environment, and/or (2) buffer solution, which has a shorter service life and requires time-consuming washes of the chromatographic system generating more waste. So, this work aims to discuss (i) properties; (ii) applications; (iii) polymorphism and (iv) analytical methods of rifaximin by the look of green chemistry. This review shows an extremely current topic of great importance to the chemical-pharmaceutical area and everything it involves, since the analytical process until the impact on the environment in which it is embedded.
Assuntos
Rifamicinas/análise , Animais , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Humanos , Rifamicinas/síntese química , RifaximinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Guedes-Pinto paste (GPP) is an iodoform paste used in most dental schools in Brazil. The paste is a composite of medicines (Rifocort , camphorated paramonochlorophenol [PMCC], and iodoform) used for endodontic treatment of primary teeth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion variability of GPP components when mixed by undergraduate dentistry students and pediatric dentists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was divided into 4 groups: G1 (15 undergraduate students), G2 (15 specialists in Pediatric Dentistry), G3 (15 professors with clinical activity), and G4 (7 professors-researchers). All volunteers prepared GPP according to the original specifications: the same visual proportion for each component. The components were weighed using an analytical balance and the percentage was calculated. RESULT: After normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) and homogeneity tests (Levene test), the data were submitted to analysis of variance and intraclass correlation coefficient tests (P<0.05). The percentage means of each respective group were as follows: Rifocort 20.2%, 20.8%, 26.7%, 27.3%; camphorated PMCC 9.2%, 8.1%, 6.7%, 5.1%; and the iodoform 70.6%, 71.1%, 64.7%, 67.6%. There were no significant differences between groups for the component percentages. There was a high intraclass correlation coefficient (G1 0.945; G2 0.951; G3 0.921; and G4 0.870). CONCLUSION: The proportion of GPP was similar in all the groups, allowing us to conclude that ideal GPP proportion, based on the entire group mean, was 23.8% of Rifocort® ; 7.0% of camphorated PMCC; and 69.2% of iodoform.