RESUMO
El proceso de desarrollo profesional del psiquiatra lo hace especialmente vulnerable al agotamiento físico y emocional, puesto que el sujeto es la herramienta misma de atención en la relación médica. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal mediante una encuesta electrónica anónima para psiquiatras y estudiantes de posgrado de Psiquiatría de Uruguay, pertenecientes a la Sociedad Uruguaya de Psiquiatría y a la Asociación de Psiquiatras del Interior, con el objetivo de identificar y describir las características sociodemográficas y de trabajo del médico con especialización en Psiquiatría, así como elementos de burnout y la percepción del bienestar en Uruguay en el año 2019. Se identificó la influencia del multiempleo y la presencia de burnout en el entorno del 10 % de los profesionales. La mitad de los encuestados trabaja en la capital y área metropolitana del país, contribuyendo a la inhomogeneidad de la asistencia. Aún estando inmersos en el modelo de recuperación en el contexto de la nueva ley de salud mental es escaso el porcentaje de profesionales que se desempeña en el área de rehabilitación de personas con trastornos mentales graves.
Psychiatrists' professional development process renders them specially vulnerable to physical and emotional exhaustion due to the fact that psychiatrists themselves become a treatment tool in the clinical relationship. With the aim of identifying and describing socio-demographic and work features as well as burnout elements and well-being perception, a descriptive crosssectional study was carried out by means of an anonymous electronic survey for psychiatrists and medical doctors specializing in psychiatry in postgraduate courses belonging to the Sociedad Uruguaya de Psiquiatría and the Asociación de Psiquiatras del Interior in 2019. Influence of multi-employment and burnout was identified in 10% of the cases. Half of the assessed psychiatrists work in the capital city and metropolitan area, contributing to non homogeneous care. Only a small percentage work in rehabilitation, even if the new mental health law emphasizes this model of care for severe mental disorders.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudantes de Medicina , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Educação de Pós-Graduação , Satisfação no Emprego , Uruguai/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Fatores SociodemográficosAssuntos
Sintomas Comportamentais/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Centros Comunitários de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/economia , Criança , Centros Comunitários de Saúde Mental/economia , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/economia , Saúde Mental/economia , Peru/epidemiologia , Psiquiatria/economia , Saúde Pública/economiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The opioid epidemic is a severe problem in the world, especially in the United States, where prescription opioid overdose accounts for a quarter of drug overdose deaths. OBJECTIVE: To describe psychiatrists' prescription of opioid, benzodiazepine, and buprenorphine in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of the 2016 Medicare Part D claims data and analyzed psychiatrists' prescriptions of: 1) opioids; 2) benzodiazepines, whose concurrent prescription with opioids can cause overdose death; 3) buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist for treating opioid addiction; 4) and naltrexone microsphere, a once-monthly injectable opioid antagonist to prevent relapse to opioid dependence. Prescribers with 11 or more claims were included in the analysis. RESULTS: In Medicare Part D in 2016, there were a total of 1,131,550 prescribers accounting for 1,480,972,766 total prescriptions and 78,145,305 opioid prescriptions, including 25,528 psychiatrists (2.6% of all prescribers) accounting for 44,684,504 total prescriptions (3.0% of all prescriptions) and 131,115 opioid prescriptions (0.2% of all opioid prescriptions). Psychiatrists accounted for 17.3% of benzodiazepine, 16.3% of buprenorphine, and 33.4% of naltrexone microsphere prescriptions. The opioid prescription rate of psychiatrists was much lower than that of all prescribers (0.3 vs 5.3%). The buprenorphine prescription rate of psychiatrists was much higher than that of all prescribers (2.3 vs. 0.1%). There was a substantial geographical variation across the United States. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that, proportionally, psychiatrists have lower rates of opioid prescription and higher rates of benzodiazepine and buprenorphine prescription.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part D/estatística & dados numéricos , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders found among victims of disaster, kidnapping, accidents, sexual assaults and war in Indonesia. However, lacking and unequal distribution of psychiatric medical personnel remains a barrier to its management. This review aims to introduce and evaluate the potential contribution of telepsychiatry to the management of PTSD based on published literature. METHODS: Original studies were obtained from PubMed, Science Direct, ProQuest, High Wire, and Elsevier Clinical Key databases. RESULTS: A total of 125 articles were found, of which 15 articles (12 randomized controlled trials, 2 open trials and 1 pilot study) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 991 subjects were found with a follow-up period ranging between 5 weeks and 18 months. Telepsychiatry is an innovative use of technology to aid the delivery of PTSD treatments in areas difficult to reach. The quality of care given by telepsychiatry both through video conferencing as well as web- and application-based is comparable to that of face-to-face therapy. Patient satisfaction, quality of doctor-patient relationship also remains high, with lower costs and shorter therapeutic time when compared to face-to-face therapy. CONCLUSION: Various studies have shown that telepsychiatry is an effective solution for the management of PTSD. Studies have also reported that the quality of treatment through telepsychiatry is as effective as face-to-face therapy, with greater efficiency. Countries, especially those with a low patient-to-mental health professional ratio, should be encouraged to develop telepsychiatry systems to manage PTSD.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Psiquiatria/economia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/economia , Telemedicina/economiaRESUMO
This study is based on Gerardo Ruiz's doctoral thesis on the information seeking patterns of psychiatrists in Mexico City, which he completed in January 2018 from the Autonomous National University of Mexico. The paper presents the key findings from a survey and interview involving 92 psychiatrists to identify the differing roles and information behaviours of three types of mental health practitioners. Similarities and divergences were found in their behavioural patterns in obtaining information to make clinical decisions, depending on purpose for the sought information which aligned to the role of the psychiatrist and on the information contexts of institutions in which they work. The implications for practice highlighted in this study focus on the influencing factors of time and availability of sources in enabling the mental health specialist to search, disseminate and evaluate information to be used in clinical practice, as well as to have in place broader communication with colleagues in order to enrich clinical care for better diagnosis and treatment.F.J.
Assuntos
Comportamento de Busca de Informação , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/normas , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , México , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Abstract Introduction The opioid epidemic is a severe problem in the world, especially in the United States, where prescription opioid overdose accounts for a quarter of drug overdose deaths. Objective To describe psychiatrists' prescription of opioid, benzodiazepine, and buprenorphine in the United States. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of the 2016 Medicare Part D claims data and analyzed psychiatrists' prescriptions of: 1) opioids; 2) benzodiazepines, whose concurrent prescription with opioids can cause overdose death; 3) buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist for treating opioid addiction; 4) and naltrexone microsphere, a once-monthly injectable opioid antagonist to prevent relapse to opioid dependence. Prescribers with 11 or more claims were included in the analysis. Results In Medicare Part D in 2016, there were a total of 1,131,550 prescribers accounting for 1,480,972,766 total prescriptions and 78,145,305 opioid prescriptions, including 25,528 psychiatrists (2.6% of all prescribers) accounting for 44,684,504 total prescriptions (3.0% of all prescriptions) and 131,115 opioid prescriptions (0.2% of all opioid prescriptions). Psychiatrists accounted for 17.3% of benzodiazepine, 16.3% of buprenorphine, and 33.4% of naltrexone microsphere prescriptions. The opioid prescription rate of psychiatrists was much lower than that of all prescribers (0.3 vs 5.3%). The buprenorphine prescription rate of psychiatrists was much higher than that of all prescribers (2.3 vs. 0.1%). There was a substantial geographical variation across the United States. Conclusions The results show that, proportionally, psychiatrists have lower rates of opioid prescription and higher rates of benzodiazepine and buprenorphine prescription.
Assuntos
Adulto , Humanos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Medicare Part D/estatística & dados numéricos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos , Estudos Transversais , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Abstract Introduction Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders found among victims of disaster, kidnapping, accidents, sexual assaults and war in Indonesia. However, lacking and unequal distribution of psychiatric medical personnel remains a barrier to its management. This review aims to introduce and evaluate the potential contribution of telepsychiatry to the management of PTSD based on published literature. Methods Original studies were obtained from PubMed, Science Direct, ProQuest, High Wire, and Elsevier Clinical Key databases. Results A total of 125 articles were found, of which 15 articles (12 randomized controlled trials, 2 open trials and 1 pilot study) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 991 subjects were found with a follow-up period ranging between 5 weeks and 18 months. Telepsychiatry is an innovative use of technology to aid the delivery of PTSD treatments in areas difficult to reach. The quality of care given by telepsychiatry both through video conferencing as well as web- and application-based is comparable to that of face-to-face therapy. Patient satisfaction, quality of doctor-patient relationship also remains high, with lower costs and shorter therapeutic time when compared to face-to-face therapy. Conclusion Various studies have shown that telepsychiatry is an effective solution for the management of PTSD. Studies have also reported that the quality of treatment through telepsychiatry is as effective as face-to-face therapy, with greater efficiency. Countries, especially those with a low patient-to-mental health professional ratio, should be encouraged to develop telepsychiatry systems to manage PTSD.
Assuntos
Humanos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/economia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/economia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Telemedicina/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess demographic data and characteristics of children and adolescents with pediatric chronic diseases (PCD), according to the number of specialties/patient. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study with 16,237 PCD patients at outpatient clinics in one year. Data were analyzed by an electronic data system, according to the number of physician appointments for PCD. This study assessed: demographic data, follow-up characteristics, types of medical specialty, diagnosis (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems - ICD-10), number of day hospital clinic visits, and acute complications. RESULTS: Patients followed by ≥3 specialties simultaneously showed a significantly higher duration of follow-up compared to those followed by ≤2 specialties [2.1 (0.4-16.4) vs. 1.4 (0.1-16.2) years; p<0.001] and a higher number of appointments in all specialties. The most prevalent medical areas in patients followed by ≥3 specialties were: Psychiatry (Odds Ratio - OR=8.0; confidence interval of 95% - 95%CI 6-10.7; p<0.001), Palliative/Pain Care (OR=7.4; 95%CI 5.7-9.7; p<0.001), Infectious Disease (OR=7.0; 95%CI 6.4-7.8; p<0.001) and Nutrology (OR=6.9; 95%CI 5.6-8.4; p<0.001). Logistic regressions demonstrated that PCD patients followed by ≥3 specialties were associated with high risk for: number of appointments/patient (OR=9.2; 95%CI 8.0-10.5; p<0.001), day hospital clinic visits (OR=4.8; 95%CI 3.8-5.9; p<0.001), emergency department visits (OR=3.2; 95%CI 2.9-3.5; p<0.001), hospitalizations (OR=3.0; 95%CI 2.7-3.3; p<0.001), intensive care admissions (OR=2.5; 95%CI 2.1-3.0; p<0.001), and deaths (OR=2.8; 95%CI 1.9-4.0; p<0.001). The diagnosis of asthma, obesity, chronic pain, and transplant was significantly higher in patients followed by ≥3 specialties. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that PCD patients who required simultaneous care from multiple medical specialties had complex and severe diseases, with specific diagnoses.
Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/tendências , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Medicina/normas , Adolescente , Agendamento de Consultas , Brasil/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Morte , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Distúrbios Nutricionais/epidemiologia , Manejo da Dor/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective: To assess demographic data and characteristics of children and adolescents with pediatric chronic diseases (PCD), according to the number of specialties/patient. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study with 16,237 PCD patients at outpatient clinics in one year. Data were analyzed by an electronic data system, according to the number of physician appointments for PCD. This study assessed: demographic data, follow-up characteristics, types of medical specialty, diagnosis (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems - ICD-10), number of day hospital clinic visits, and acute complications. Results: Patients followed by ≥3 specialties simultaneously showed a significantly higher duration of follow-up compared to those followed by ≤2 specialties [2.1 (0.4-16.4) vs. 1.4 (0.1-16.2) years; p<0.001] and a higher number of appointments in all specialties. The most prevalent medical areas in patients followed by ≥3 specialties were: Psychiatry (Odds Ratio - OR=8.0; confidence interval of 95% - 95%CI 6-10.7; p<0.001), Palliative/Pain Care (OR=7.4; 95%CI 5.7-9.7; p<0.001), Infectious Disease (OR=7.0; 95%CI 6.4-7.8; p<0.001) and Nutrology (OR=6.9; 95%CI 5.6-8.4; p<0.001). Logistic regressions demonstrated that PCD patients followed by ≥3 specialties were associated with high risk for: number of appointments/patient (OR=9.2; 95%CI 8.0-10.5; p<0.001), day hospital clinic visits (OR=4.8; 95%CI 3.8-5.9; p<0.001), emergency department visits (OR=3.2; 95%CI 2.9-3.5; p<0.001), hospitalizations (OR=3.0; 95%CI 2.7-3.3; p<0.001), intensive care admissions (OR=2.5; 95%CI 2.1-3.0; p<0.001), and deaths (OR=2.8; 95%CI 1.9-4.0; p<0.001). The diagnosis of asthma, obesity, chronic pain, and transplant was significantly higher in patients followed by ≥3 specialties. Conclusions: The present study showed that PCD patients who required simultaneous care from multiple medical specialties had complex and severe diseases, with specific diagnoses.
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar dados demográficos e características de crianças e adolescentes com doenças crônicas pediátricas, de acordo com o número de especialidades/paciente. Métodos: Realizou-se um estudo transversal com 16.237 pacientes com doenças crônicas pediátricas durante um ano. A análise foi feita em um sistema eletrônico, de acordo com número de consultas médicas para doenças crônicas pediátricas. Este estudo avaliou dados demográficos, características do seguimento, tipos de especialidades médicas, diagnóstico (10ª Revisão da Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados com a Saúde - CID-10), número de visitas e complicações agudas. Resultados: Os pacientes acompanhados por três ou mais especialidades simultaneamente tiveram seguimento de maior duração comparados com aqueles seguidos por ≤2 especialidades [2,1 (0,4-16,4) vs. 1,4 (0,1-16,2) anos; p<0,001], bem como maior número de consultas em todas as especialidades. As áreas médicas mais comuns em pacientes acompanhados por ≥3 especialidades foram: psiquiatria (Odds Ratio - OR=8,0; intervalo de confiança de 95% - IC95% 6-10,7; p<0,001); dor/cuidados paliativos (OR=7,4; IC95% 5,7-9,7; p<0,001); doenças infecciosas (OR=7,0; IC95% 6,4-7,8; p<0,001); nutrologia (OR=6,9; IC95% 5,6-8,4; p<0,001). As regressões logísticas mostraram que os pacientes com doenças crônicas pediátricas seguidos por ≥3 especialidades tinham alto risco para: maior número de consultas/paciente (OR=9,2; IC95% 8,0-10,5; p<0,001); atendimentos em hospital-dia (OR=4,8; 95%IC3,8-5,9; p<0,001); atendimentos em pronto-socorro (OR=3,2; IC95% 2,9-3,5; p<0,001); hospitalizações (OR=3,0; IC95%2,7-3,3; p<0,001); internação em terapia intensiva (OR=2,5; IC95% 2,1-3,0; p<0,001); óbitos (OR=2,8; IC95%1,9-4,0; p<0,001). Os diagnósticos de asma, obesidade, dor crônica, transplante e infecção do trato urinário foram mais frequentes nos pacientes seguidos por três ou mais especialidades. Conclusões: O presente estudo mostrou que pacientes com doenças crônicas pediátricas que necessitaram de múltiplas especialidades médicas simultaneamente apresentavam doenças complexas e graves, com diagnósticos específicos.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Assistência ao Convalescente/tendências , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Agendamento de Consultas , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Brasil/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Morte , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Manejo da Dor/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Distúrbios Nutricionais/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Objective: To examine the relationship between psychiatrists' religious/spiritual beliefs and their attitudes regarding religion and spirituality in clinical practice. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of religion/spirituality (R/S) in clinical practice was conducted with 121 psychiatrists from the largest academic hospital complex in Brazil. Results: When asked about their R/S beliefs, participants were more likely to consider themselves as spiritual rather than religious. A total of 64.2% considered their religious beliefs to influence their clinical practice and 50% reported that they frequently enquired about their patients' R/S. The most common barriers to approaching patients' religiosity were: lack of time (27.4%), fear of exceeding the role of the doctor (25%), and lack of training (19.1%). Those who were less religious or spiritual were also less likely to find difficulties in addressing a patient's R/S. Conclusion: Differences in psychiatrists' religious and spiritual beliefs are associated with different attitudes concerning their approach to R/S. The results suggest that medical practice may lead to a religious conflict among devout psychiatrists, making them question their faith. Training might be of importance for handling R/S in clinical practice and for raising awareness about potential evaluative biases in the assessment of patients' religiosity.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Relações Médico-Paciente , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Religião e Medicina , Cultura , Espiritualidade , Religião e Psicologia , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Hospitais Universitários , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Psychiatrists may be at an increased risk of suicide, since they encounter stressful factors in their everyday activities in addition to the sociodemographic factors for suicidal ideation reported for Mexican population. AIM OF THE STUDY: To determine whether experiences inherent to the profession were related to the self-report of suicidal ideation among Mexican psychiatrists or could be attributed to factors previously reported in the general population (age, marital status, presence of a mental disorder and not having received specialized treatment). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study with 288 psychiatrists from Mexico who participated through an online survey where current working activities, self-reported mental health conditions (major depression, anxiety, burnout and suicidal ideation) and professional adversities (assaults, lawsuits, patients with suicidal ideation or who had committed suicide, perceived discrimination and social support) throughout the professional lifespan were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-two psychiatrists (7.6%) reported having had suicidal ideation at some point in their training in psychiatry or their professional lives as psychiatrists. Depression and burnout were the most important predictors for suicidal ideation while greater satisfaction with social support was the most important protector, followed by being married/living together and having other physicians in the family. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatrist represent a risk population for suicidal ideation. As such, detection and attention are essential. Psychiatrists need to be encouraged to pursue healthy, lasting interpersonal relationships and seek professional help when required.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Ideação Suicida , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Proteção , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , AutorrelatoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between psychiatrists' religious/spiritual beliefs and their attitudes regarding religion and spirituality in clinical practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of religion/spirituality (R/S) in clinical practice was conducted with 121 psychiatrists from the largest academic hospital complex in Brazil. RESULTS: When asked about their R/S beliefs, participants were more likely to consider themselves as spiritual rather than religious. A total of 64.2% considered their religious beliefs to influence their clinical practice and 50% reported that they frequently enquired about their patients' R/S. The most common barriers to approaching patients' religiosity were: lack of time (27.4%), fear of exceeding the role of the doctor (25%), and lack of training (19.1%). Those who were less religious or spiritual were also less likely to find difficulties in addressing a patient's R/S. CONCLUSION: Differences in psychiatrists' religious and spiritual beliefs are associated with different attitudes concerning their approach to R/S. The results suggest that medical practice may lead to a religious conflict among devout psychiatrists, making them question their faith. Training might be of importance for handling R/S in clinical practice and for raising awareness about potential evaluative biases in the assessment of patients' religiosity.
Assuntos
Cultura , Relações Médico-Paciente , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Religião e Medicina , Espiritualidade , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Religião e Psicologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Objective: The mind-brain problem (MBP) has marked implications for psychiatry, but has been poorly discussed in the psychiatric literature. This paper evaluates the presentation of the MBP in the three leading general psychiatry journals during the last 20 years. Methods: Systematic review of articles on the MBP published in the three general psychiatry journals with the highest impact factor from 1995 to 2015. The content of these articles was analyzed and discussed in the light of contemporary debates on the MBP. Results: Twenty-three papers, usually written by prestigious authors, explicitly discussed the MBP and received many citations (mean = 130). The two main categories were critiques of dualism and defenses of physicalism (mind as a brain product). These papers revealed several misrepresentations of theoretical positions and lacked relevant contemporary literature. Without further discussion or evidence, they presented the MBP as solved, dualism as an old-fashioned or superstitious idea, and physicalism as the only rational and empirically confirmed option. Conclusion: The MBP has not been properly presented and discussed in the three leading psychiatric journals in the last 20 years. The few articles on the topic have been highly cited, but reveal misrepresentations and lack of careful philosophical discussion, as well as a strong bias against dualism and toward a materialist/physicalist approach to psychiatry.
Assuntos
Humanos , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicofisiologia , Publicações/estatística & dados numéricos , Encéfalo/fisiologia , Neurociências , Estado de Consciência/fisiologia , Fator de Impacto de RevistasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The mind-brain problem (MBP) has marked implications for psychiatry, but has been poorly discussed in the psychiatric literature. This paper evaluates the presentation of the MBP in the three leading general psychiatry journals during the last 20 years. METHODS: Systematic review of articles on the MBP published in the three general psychiatry journals with the highest impact factor from 1995 to 2015. The content of these articles was analyzed and discussed in the light of contemporary debates on the MBP. RESULTS: Twenty-three papers, usually written by prestigious authors, explicitly discussed the MBP and received many citations (mean = 130). The two main categories were critiques of dualism and defenses of physicalism (mind as a brain product). These papers revealed several misrepresentations of theoretical positions and lacked relevant contemporary literature. Without further discussion or evidence, they presented the MBP as solved, dualism as an old-fashioned or superstitious idea, and physicalism as the only rational and empirically confirmed option. CONCLUSION: The MBP has not been properly presented and discussed in the three leading psychiatric journals in the last 20 years. The few articles on the topic have been highly cited, but reveal misrepresentations and lack of careful philosophical discussion, as well as a strong bias against dualism and toward a materialist/physicalist approach to psychiatry.
Assuntos
Encéfalo/fisiologia , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicofisiologia , Publicações/estatística & dados numéricos , Estado de Consciência/fisiologia , Humanos , Fator de Impacto de Revistas , NeurociênciasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Medical residency programs are traditionally known for long working hours, which can be associated with a poor quality of sleep and daytime sleepiness. However, few studies have focused on this theme. Our objective was to investigate sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, and their relation with anxiety, social phobia, and depressive symptoms. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study involved 59 psychiatry residents. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were used to measure the quality of sleep and excessive daytime sleepiness ([EDS] and ESS > 10), respectively. RESULTS: Among the 59 psychiatry residents, 59.3% had poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5) and 28.8% had EDS. Poor sleep quality was associated with higher EDS (P = 0.03) and the year of residency program (P = 0.03). Only 20% of residents with poor sleep had consulted at least once for sleep problems; 54.2% had used medications for sleep; and 16.9% were using medications at the time of interview. Only 30% obtained medication during medical consultations. Poor sleep was associated with irregular sleep hours (P = 0.001) and long periods lying down without sleep (P = 0.03). Poor sleep quality was also associated with high scores of anxiety symptoms (P < 0.001) and social phobia symptoms (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Psychiatry residents frequently have poor sleep quality and EDS. Considering that sleep disorders can affect quality of life, predispose to metabolic syndrome, and be associated with worse performance at work, attention to this clinical problem is needed.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fobia Social/epidemiologia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Psiquiatria/educação , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Whilst formal coercion in psychiatry is regulated by legislation, other interventions that are often referred to as informal coercion are less regulated. It remains unclear to what extent these interventions are, and how they are used, in mental healthcare. This paper aims to identify the attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals towards the use of informal coercion across countries with differing sociocultural contexts. METHOD: Focus groups with mental health professionals were conducted in ten countries with different sociocultural contexts (Canada, Chile, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom). RESULTS: Five common themes were identified: (a) a belief that informal coercion is effective; (b) an often uncomfortable feeling using it; (c) an explicit as well as (d) implicit dissonance between attitudes and practice-with wider use of informal coercion than is thought right in theory; (e) a link to principles of paternalism and responsibility versus respect for the patient's autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: A disapproval of informal coercion in theory is often overridden in practice. This dissonance occurs across different sociocultural contexts, tends to make professionals feel uneasy, and requires more debate and guidance.
Assuntos
Coerção , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Paternalismo , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/métodos , Adulto , Canadá , Chile , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , México , Enfermagem Psiquiátrica/métodos , Enfermagem Psiquiátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicologia Clínica/métodos , Psicologia Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Social/métodos , Serviço Social/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
This review explores the literature related to career choice of psychiatry in Brazil through selection of scientific articles published in the period from 1999 to 2013 in the MEDLINE and SciELO databases. There are currently 145 medical schools in Brazil, the highest concentration being in the more developed areas. In 2005, there were 6,003 psychiatrists working in Brazil, a rate of 3.3 psychiatrists per 100,000 inhabitants, with unequal distribution across the geographical regions of the country: a rate of 4.5 psychiatrists/100,000 inhabitants in the southern region, and less than one psychiatrist per 100,000 inhabitants in the northern region. The south and south-east regions comprise 56% of the national population and 76% of the residency posts in psychiatry. In 2013, 27% of the residency posts in psychiatry were not filled, particularly in the north and north-east areas, where the shortage of professionals is more pronounced. The number of specialized doctors is far below what is needed to cover the burden attributed to neuropsychiatric disorders in the country. The main hypotheses to explain this imbalance in Brazil are the relatively low exposure to the speciality during undergraduate course work, the stigma attached to mental disorders, and the poor organization of mental healthcare services.
Assuntos
Psiquiatria , Brasil , Comparação Transcultural , Humanos , Psiquiatria/educação , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: An important issue concerning the worldwide fight against stigma is the evaluation of psychiatrists' beliefs and attitudes toward schizophrenia and mental illness in general. However, there is as yet no consensus on this matter in the literature, and results vary according to the stigma dimension assessed and to the cultural background of the sample. The aim of this investigation was to search for profiles of stigmatizing beliefs related to schizophrenia in a national sample of psychiatrists in Brazil. METHODS: A sample of 1414 psychiatrists were recruited from among those attending the 2009 Brazilian Congress of Psychiatry. A questionnaire was applied in face-to-face interviews. The questionnaire addressed four stigma dimensions, all in reference to individuals with schizophrenia: stereotypes, restrictions, perceived prejudice and social distance. Stigma item scores were included in latent profile analyses; the resulting profiles were entered into multinomial logistic regression models with sociodemographics, in order to identify significant correlates. RESULTS: Three profiles were identified. The "no stigma" subjects (n = 337) characterized individuals with schizophrenia in a positive light, disagreed with restrictions, and displayed a low level of social distance. The "unobtrusive stigma" subjects (n = 471) were significantly younger and displayed the lowest level of social distance, although most of them agreed with involuntary admission and demonstrated a high level of perceived prejudice. The "great stigma" subjects (n = 606) negatively stereotyped individuals with schizophrenia, agreed with restrictions and scored the highest on the perceived prejudice and social distance dimensions. In comparison with the first two profiles, this last profile comprised a significantly larger number of individuals who were in frequent contact with a family member suffering from a psychiatric disorder, as well as comprising more individuals who had no such family member. CONCLUSIONS: Our study not only provides additional data related to an under-researched area but also reveals that psychiatrists are a heterogeneous group regarding stigma toward schizophrenia. The presence of different stigma profiles should be evaluated in further studies; this could enable anti-stigma initiatives to be specifically designed to effectively target the stigmatizing group.
Assuntos
Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Esquizofrenia , Estereotipagem , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Brasil/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Preconceito/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Findings on stigmatizing attitudes toward individuals with schizophrenia have been inconsistent in comparisons between mental health professionals and members of the general public. In this regard, it is important to obtain data from understudied sociocultural settings, and to examine how attitudes toward mental illness vary in such settings. Nationwide samples of 1015 general population individuals and 1414 psychiatrists from Brazil were recruited between 2009 and 2010. Respondents from the general population were asked to identify an unlabeled schizophrenia case vignette. Psychiatrists were instructed to consider "someone with stabilized schizophrenia". Stereotypes, perceived prejudice and social distance were assessed. For the general population, stigma determinants replicated findings from the literature. The level of the vignette's identification constituted an important correlate. For psychiatrists, determinants correlated in the opposite direction. When both samples were compared, psychiatrists showed the highest scores in stereotypes and perceived prejudice; for the general population, the better they recognized the vignette, the higher they scored in those dimensions. Psychiatrists reported the lowest social distance scores compared with members of the general population. Knowledge about schizophrenia thus constituted an important determinant of stigma; consequently, factors influencing stigma should be further investigated in the general population and in psychiatrists as well.