RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Conestat alfa, a recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor, is a multi-target inhibitor of inflammatory cascades including the complement, the kinin-kallikrein and the contact activation system. The study objective is to investigate the efficacy and safety of conestat alfa in improving disease severity and short-term outcome in COVID-19 patients with pulmonary disease. TRIAL DESIGN: This study is an investigator-initiated, randomized (2:1 ratio), open-label, parallel-group, controlled, multi-center, phase 2a clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: This trial is conducted in 3 hospitals in Switzerland, 1 hospital in Brazil and 1 hospital in Mexico (academic and non-academic). All patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection requiring hospitalization for at least 3 calendar days for severe COVID-19 will be screened for study eligibility. INCLUSION CRITERIA: - Signed informed consent - Age 18-85 years - Evidence of pulmonary involvement on CT scan or X-ray of the chest - Duration of symptoms associated with COVID-19 ≤ 10 days - At least one of the following risk factors for progression to mechanical ventilation on the day of enrolment: 1) Arterial hypertension 2) ≥ 50 years 3) Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) 4) History of cardiovascular disease 5) Chronic pulmonary disease 6) Chronic renal disease 7) C-reactive protein > 35mg/L 8) Oxygen saturation at rest of ≤ 94% when breathing ambient air Exclusion criteria: - Incapacity or inability to provide informed consent - Contraindications to the class of drugs under investigation (C1 esterase inhibitor) - Treatment with tocilizumab or another IL-6R or IL-6 inhibitor before enrolment - History or suspicion of allergy to rabbits - Pregnancy or breast feeding - Active or anticipated treatment with any other complement inhibitor - Liver cirrhosis (any Child-Pugh score) - Admission to an ICU on the day or anticipated within the next 24 hours of enrolment - Invasive or non-invasive ventilation - Participation in another study with any investigational drug within the 30 days prior to enrolment - Enrolment of the study investigators, their family members, employees and other closely related or dependent persons INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Patients randomized to the experimental arm will receive conestat alfa in addition to standard of care (SOC). Conestat alfa (8400 U followed by 4200 U every 8 hours) will be administered as a slow intravenous injection (5-10 minutes) over a 72-hour period (i.e. 9 administrations in total). The first conestat alfa treatment will be administered on the day of enrolment. The control group will receive SOC only. SOC treatment will be administered according to local institutional guidelines, including supplemental oxygen, antibiotics, corticosteroids, remdesivir, and anticoagulation. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint of this trial is disease severity on day 7 after enrolment assessed by an adapted WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement (score 0 will be omitted and score 6 and 7 will be combined) from 1 (no limitation of activities) to 7 (death). Secondary outcomes include (i) the time to clinical improvement (time from randomization to an improvement of two points on the WHO ordinal scale or discharge from hospital) within 14 days after enrolment, (ii) the proportion of participants alive and not having required invasive or non-invasive ventilation at 14 days after enrolment and (iii) the proportion of subjects without an acute lung injury (defined by PaO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤300mmHg) within 14 days after enrolment. Exploratory outcomes include virological clearance, C1 esterase inhibitor pharmacokinetics and changes in routine laboratory parameters and inflammatory proteins. RANDOMISATION: Subjects will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with conestat alfa in addition to SOC or SOC only. Randomization is performed via an interactive web response system (SecuTrial®). BLINDING (MASKING): In this open-label trial, participants, caregivers and outcome assessors are not blinded to group assignment. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): We will randomise approximately 120 individuals (80 in the active treatment arm, 40 in the SOC group). Two interim analyses after 40 and 80 patients are planned according to the Pocock adjusted levels αp = 0.0221. The results of the interim analysis will allow adjustment of the sample size (Lehmacher, Wassmer, 1999). TRIAL STATUS: PROTECT-COVID-19 protocol version 3.0 (July 07 2020). Participant recruitment started on July 30 2020 in one center (Basel, Switzerland, first participant included on August 06 2020). In four of five study centers patients are actively recruited. Participation of the fifth study center (Mexico) is anticipated by mid December 2020. Completion of trial recruitment depends on the development of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, number: NCT04414631 , registered on 4 June 2020 FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest of expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/administração & dosagem , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/virologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/efeitos adversos , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/farmacocinética , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas/métodos , Masculino , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Projetos Piloto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacocinética , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Suíça , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, enters the cells through a mechanism dependent on its binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a protein highly expressed in the lungs. The putative viral-induced inhibition of ACE2 could result in the defective degradation of bradykinin, a potent inflammatory substance. We hypothesize that increased bradykinin in the lungs is an important mechanism driving the development of pneumonia and respiratory failure in COVID-19. METHODS: This is a phase II, single-center, three-armed parallel-group, open-label, active control superiority randomized clinical trial. One hundred eighty eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either the inhibitor of C1e/kallikrein 20 U/kg intravenously on day 1 and day 4 plus standard care; or icatibant 30 mg subcutaneously, three doses/day for 4 days plus standard care; or standard care alone, as recommended in the clinical trials published to date, which includes supplemental oxygen, non-invasive and invasive ventilation, antibiotic agents, anti-inflammatory agents, prophylactic antithrombotic therapy, vasopressor support, and renal replacement therapy. DISCUSSION: Accumulation of bradykinin in the lungs is a common side effect of ACE inhibitors leading to cough. In animal models, the inactivation of ACE2 leads to severe acute pneumonitis in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and the inhibition of bradykinin almost completely restores the lung structure. We believe that inhibition of bradykinin in severe COVID-19 patients could reduce the lung inflammatory response, impacting positively on the severity of disease and mortality rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry Universal Trial Number (UTN) U1111-1250-1843. Registered on May/5/2020.
Assuntos
Bradicinina/análogos & derivados , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/administração & dosagem , Insuficiência Respiratória/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2/metabolismo , Bradicinina/administração & dosagem , Bradicinina/efeitos adversos , Bradicinina/antagonistas & inibidores , Bradicinina/imunologia , Bradicinina/metabolismo , Antagonistas de Receptor B2 da Bradicinina/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Receptor B2 da Bradicinina/efeitos adversos , Brasil , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/virologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Injeções Subcutâneas , Calicreínas/antagonistas & inibidores , Calicreínas/metabolismo , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Insuficiência Respiratória/imunologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/virologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The benefits of the worldwide approval of new drugs for the treatment of acute C1-INH-HAE attacks may still not reach all patients. Identifying the current barriers in the access to medication, as well as conducting a detailed assessment of the progress in this area, is essential to achieve universal treatment. Two hundred and twenty five patients registered in the Argentina Hereditary Angioedema Patient Association (AHAEPA) were randomly selected and invited to participate in a web based questionnaire on accessibility to icatibant and pdC1-INH, self-treatment, delay to treatment, and coverage. The data retrieved was compared to our previous reports in 2008 and 2013. We collected 156/225 answers. One hundred and eighteen (76%) patients have either pdC1-INH (n = 86), icatibant (n = 10) or both (n = 22), while 38 (24%) do not have access to treatment. In 2008, 26% had access while 82% had it in 2013. Thirty-two subjects (22%) self-inject themselves, similar to 29% in 2013, even though between studies, widespread self-injection training activities have taken place. However, considering injections by proxy, home treatment reached 56%. Only half of the patients decide to receive treatment early during the attack. Ninety-nine patients (63%) have full coverage, thirty (19%) have no coverage at all and the rest only obtain partial reimbursement. Twenty-nine families (31%) share a single treatment dose of the medication, better than 36% in 2013. Argentina's C1-INH-HAE patients had a sustained improvement in their access to medication. Efforts should continue to further improve accessibility and optimal management of HAE acute attacks to all patients in the country.
Assuntos
Angioedemas Hereditários/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Bradicinina/análogos & derivados , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/administração & dosagem , Inativadores do Complemento/administração & dosagem , Argentina , Bradicinina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The benefits of the worldwide approval of new drugs for the treatment of acute C1-INH-HAE attacks may still not reach all patients. Identifying the current barriers in the access to medication, as well as conducting a detailed assessment of the progress in this area, is essential to achieve universal treatment. Two hundred and twenty five patients registered in the Argentina Hereditary Angioedema Patient Association (AHAEPA) were randomly selected and invited to participate in a web based questionnaire on accessibility to icatibant and pdC1-INH, self-treatment, delay to treatment, and coverage. The data retrieved was compared to our previous reports in 2008 and 2013. We collected 156/225 answers. One hundred and eighteen (76%) patients have either pdC1-INH (n = 86), icatibant (n = 10) or both (n = 22), while 38 (24%) do not have access to treatment. In 2008, 26% had access while 82% had it in 2013. Thirty-two subjects (22%) self-inject themselves, similar to 29% in 2013, even though between studies, widespread self-injection training activities have taken place. However, considering injections by proxy, home treatment reached 56%. Only half of the patients decide to receive treatment early during the attack. Ninety-nine patients (63%) have full coverage, thirty (19%) have no coverage at all and the rest only obtain partial reimbursement. Twenty-nine families (31%) share a single treatment dose of the medication, better than 36% in 2013. Argentina's C1-INH-HAE patients had a sustained improvement in their access to medication. Efforts should continue to further improve accessibility and optimal management of HAE acute attacks to all patients in the country.
La aprobación mundial de los medicamentos para el ataque agudo del angioedema hereditario (HAE) no beneficia a todos los pacientes. Es necesario conocer las barreras de acceso a la medicación para el tratamiento universal. Doscientos veinticinco pacientes, registrados en la Asociación de Pacientes con Angioedema Hereditario (AHAEPA), fueron encuestados por internet acerca de su accesibilidad al icatibant y al concentrado del inhibidor de C1 (pdC1-INH), a la auto inyección de la medicación, al retraso del tratamiento y a la cobertura del medicamento. Comparamos esta información con la obtenida en nuestros estudios de 2008 y 2013. Recolectamos 156/225 respuestas. Ciento dieciocho (76%) pacientes tienen pdC1-INH (n = 86), icatibant (n = 10) o ambos (n = 22), mientras que 38 (24%) no tienen medicación. En 2008, 26% tenían acceso y en 2013, 82%. Treinta y dos (22%) se autoinyectan la medicación, similar al 29% en 2013. Sumando las aplicaciones por profesionales de la salud o familiares en la casa, el tratamiento fuera de las instituciones médicas alcanza el 56%. Solo la mitad decide tratarse tempranamente. Noventa y nueve (63%) tiene cobertura del 100%, 30 (19%) no tiene ningún tipo de cobertura, y el resto la tiene en forma parcial. Veintinueve familias (31%), solo tienen una dosis de tratamiento para todos, mejor que el 36% en 2013. Los pacientes con C1-INH-HAE han tenido una mejoría sustancial en el acceso a la medicación. Igualmente, los esfuerzos deben continuar para mejorar la accesibilidad y tratamiento óptimo de todos.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Bradicinina/análogos & derivados , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/administração & dosagem , Inativadores do Complemento/administração & dosagem , Angioedemas Hereditários/tratamento farmacológico , Argentina , Bradicinina/administração & dosagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Hereditary angioedema is a rare disease with great heterogeneity of symptoms such as edema of the skin, gastro-intestinal mucosa and larynx or pharynx. Even though there are three types, the most frequent is type I, which is a result from a deficiency of the complement C1 inhibitor. The severity of its symptoms along with the low prevalence of the disease and the need for appropriate specific treatment make the diagnosis and treatment of the pathology an outstanding subject for the family physician. The present is the case of a male teenager with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency since he was six months old, angioedema on arms and legs since 11 years old and diagnosed with hereditary angioedema type I one year after. The definitive diagnosis of the disease enabled an appropriate treatment which consists in preventing outbreaks that may compromise the patient's life and, if they occur, administration of complement C1 inhibitor.
El angioedema hereditario es una enfermedad rara, de gran heterogeneidad en los síntomas, manifestándose con edema a nivel cutáneo, mucosa gastrointestinal y de laringe/faringe. Aunque existen tres variedades, el tipo I es el más frecuente y es provocado por una deficiencia en la síntesis del complemento C1 inhibidor. La gravedad de la clínica, junto a la baja prevalencia de la enfermedad y la necesidad de un tratamiento específico, hacen que el diagnóstico y tratamiento de dicha patología sea aún una asignatura pendiente para el médico de familia en atención primaria. Presentamos el caso de un adolescente varón con déficit de α-1 antitripsina desde los seis meses de edad, con aparición de angioedemas en piernas y brazos a los 11 años, diagnosticado de angioedema hereditario tipo I un año después. El diagnóstico definitivo de la enfermedad permitió instaurar un tratamiento adecuado a su patología, que consiste en la prevención de brotes que puedan comprometer la vida del paciente y, en el caso de que aparezcan, en la administración del complemento C1 inhibidor.
Assuntos
Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/administração & dosagem , Angioedema Hereditário Tipos I e II/diagnóstico , Deficiência de alfa 1-Antitripsina/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Angioedema Hereditário Tipos I e II/terapia , Humanos , MasculinoAssuntos
Alergia e Imunologia/organização & administração , Angioedemas Hereditários/diagnóstico , Angioedemas Hereditários/terapia , Cooperação Internacional , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Angioedemas Hereditários/classificação , Angioedemas Hereditários/prevenção & controle , Antagonistas de Receptor B2 da Bradicinina/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Receptor B2 da Bradicinina/farmacologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/administração & dosagem , Danazol/administração & dosagem , Danazol/efeitos adversos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Calicreínas/antagonistas & inibidores , Masculino , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Peptídeos/administração & dosagem , Peptídeos/farmacologia , Gravidez , Proteínas Recombinantes , Apoio SocialRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of Cinryze (nanofiltered C1-esterase inhibitor [C1 INH-nf]) for the acute management and prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks in the subgroup of children and adolescents who participated in 2 placebo-controlled and 2 open-label extension studies. STUDY DESIGN: In the acute-attack treatment studies, the efficacy of 1000 U of C1 INH-nf (with an additional 1000 U given 1 hour later if needed) was assessed based on the time to the start of symptomatic relief and the proportion of patients experiencing relief within 4 hours of therapy. In the prophylaxis studies, C1 INH-nf 1000 U was given twice weekly, and efficacy was based on the frequency of attacks. RESULTS: Across 4 studies, 46 children received a total of 2237 C1 INH-nf infusions. The median time to the start of unequivocal relief in the acute-attack treatment study (n = 12) was 30 minutes with C1 INH-nf, compared with 2 hours for placebo. In the open-label extension (n = 22), clinical relief began within 4 hours of therapy in 89% of attacks. In the prophylaxis study (n = 4), the number of attacks was reduced by approximately 2-fold with C1 INH-nf compared with placebo. In the prophylaxis open-label extension (n = 23), the median monthly attack rate decreased from 3.0 before treatment to 0.39 with C1 INH-nf use. CONCLUSION: In children, C1 INH-nf was well tolerated, provided relief from symptoms of hereditary angioedema attacks, and reduced the rate of attacks.