RESUMO
Recomenda ad referendum do Pleno do Conselho Nacional de Saúde ao MinisteÌrio da SauÌde: I - Tornar sem efeito, com base em dados de segurança definidos pela Anvisa e nas evideÌncias cientiÌficas, a Nota Informativa no 1/2021- SECOVID/GAB/SECOVID/MS; II - Manter a vacinaçaÌo de todos os adolescentes de 12 a 17 anos no Plano Nacional de VacinaçaÌo contra a Covid-19, sem desconsiderar a necessidade de priorizar, neste momento, aqueles com comorbidade, deficieÌncia permanente e em situaçaÌo de vulnerabilidade, inclusive socioeconoÌmica; III - Realizar uma campanha de miÌdia reforçando: a) a segurança das vacinas contra a Covid-19 incorporadas no PNI, inclusive em adolescentes de 12 a 17 anos, e, b) a importaÌncia da conclusaÌo do esquema vacinal completo (2a dose ou dose uÌnica); e IV - Disponibilizar, de forma imediata, a quantidade suficiente de doses para a vacinaçaÌo completa contra a Covid-19 de toda a populaçaÌo de 12 anos e mais.
Assuntos
Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Comorbidade , Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversosAssuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , Colômbia , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/normas , Prioridades em Saúde , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinação em Massa , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Seleção de PacientesRESUMO
Mandatory school vaccination policies with exclusion of unvaccinated students can be a powerful tool in ensuring high vaccination rates. Some parents may object to mandatory vaccination policies, claiming exemptions based on medical, religious, or philosophical reasons. Individual schools, school systems, or local or regional governments have different policies with respect to whether, and what kind of, exemptions may be allowed. In the setting of the current pandemic, questions regarding the acceptability of exemptions have resurfaced, as schools and local governments struggle with how to safely return children to school. Anticipating that school attendance will be facilitated by the development of a vaccine, school systems will face decisions about whether to mandate vaccination and whether to permit exemptions. The American Academy of Pediatrics promulgates policy favoring the elimination of nonmedical exemptions generally in schools. This discussion considers whether schools should eliminate nonmedical exemptions to vaccination as proposed in the American Academy of Pediatrics policy, ultimately concluding that broad elimination of exemptions is not justified and advocating a more nuanced approach that encourages school attendance while promoting vaccination and broader public health goals.
Assuntos
Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização/ética , Instituições Acadêmicas/ética , Recusa de Vacinação/ética , Vacinação/ética , Adolescente , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Criança , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Pais , Instituições Acadêmicas/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Recusa de Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
A National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) provides independent, evidence-based recommendations to the Ministry of Health for immunization programmes and policy formulation. In this article, we describe the structure, functioning and work processes of Chile's NITAG (CAVEI) and assess its functionality, quality of work processes and outputs, and integration of the committee into the Ministry of Health policy process using the Assessment tool for National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups. Among its strengths, CAVEI's administrative and work plasticity allows it to respond in a timely manner to the Ministry of Health's requests and proactively raise subjects for review. Representation of multiple areas of expertise within the committee makes CAVEI a robust and balanced entity for the development of evidence-based comprehensive recommendations. High ranking profile of the Secretariat structure furthers CAVEI's competences in policymaking and serves as a bridge between the committee and international initiatives in the field of immunizations.
Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinas/normas , Chile , Tomada de Decisões , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE/STUDY QUESTION: To examine racial/ethnic differences in influenza and pneumococcal vaccination receipt and nonreceipt among nursing home (NH) residents post implementation of federal vaccination policy. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING/STUDY DESIGN/DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: An analysis of a merged national cross-sectional dataset containing resident assessment, facility, and community data for years 2010-2013 was conducted. Logistic regressions omitting and including facility fixed effects were used to examine the influence of race and ethnicity (black, Hispanic, white) and black concentration on vaccination status across and within NHs. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Vaccination receipt of 107,874 residents in 742 NHs was examined. Blacks were less likely than whites to receive influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations (OR = 0.75; OR = 0.81, respectively, p-values <.001). The likelihood of not being offered the influenza vaccination was greater for blacks (OR=1.25, p = .004) and the likelihood of not being offered the pneumococcal vaccination was greater for Hispanics (OR = 1.65, p = .04) compared to whites. Fixed effects showed that within the same NH, Hispanics were more likely to receive both vaccinations compared to whites (OR=1.22, p = .004 (influenza); OR=1.34, p < .001 (pneumococcal)). Facilities highly concentrated with blacks accounted for large proportions of differences seen in vaccination receipt. CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic differences remain despite policy changes. Focused strategies aimed at NH personnel and racially segregated NHs are critical to improving vaccination delivery and eliminating disparities in care.
Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Resumen A pesar del enorme impacto de las vacunas en la salud de la población, éstas han sido y son objeto de cuestionamientos por grupos que las consideran innecesarias o inseguras y argumentan que las personas tienen el derecho a decidir sobre si éstas deben ser administradas o no. Sin embargo, el uso de vacunas tiene connotaciones distintas a otras decisiones en salud, ya que no vacunar impacta no sólo al individuo, sino también a la comunidad que lo rodea. El inmunizar a un alto porcentaje de la población permite limitar la circulación de los agentes infecciosos, logrando la llamada inmunidad comunitaria que protege a los no vacunados por razones médicas o porque son muy pequeños. Por esta razón muchos países han definido las vacunas como obligatorias. Como Comité Consultivo de Inmunizaciones nos parece que esta estrategia es correcta; sin embargo, debe ser acompañada por una política de educación de la población y personal de salud sobre los beneficios y riesgos reales de las vacunas. Así mismo es necesario introducir mejoras en el sistema de notificación de reacciones adversas a vacunas haciéndolo más accesible. Adicionalmente, se debe dar respuesta oportuna a los afectados por supuestas o reales reacciones a vacunas, y en los casos de eventos adversos graves efectivamente asociados a vacunas. entregar cobertura económica y acompañamiento. Finalmente, es esencial la coordinación entre los diferentes actores y comunicadores para transmitir mensajes que generen confianza y respondan a las inquietudes de la población de hoy en día.
Although vaccines have had a tremendous impact in public health they are questioned by certain groups that consider them unnecessary or unsafe and argue in favor of the right to decide to be vaccinated or not. However vaccines must have special considerations because unlike other medical decisions, not vaccinating has consequences not only for the individual but also for other members of the community. Immunizing a high proportion of the population limits the circulation of an infectious agent attaining what is called herd immunity that protects the susceptible members of the group. For this reason many countries consider vaccination mandatory as a responsibility of every citizen. This committee agrees with this view but thinks other strategies should be implemented as well, such as special educational efforts for the public and parents addressing benefits and real risks of vaccinating. Also health care professionals should be trained in vaccines. The notification system for adverse events currently available should be improved and be more accessible. Persons truly affected by adverse events due to vaccination should receive on time responses and be offered psychological and financial support. Finally all stakeholders should make coordinated efforts to work together to deliver messages that answer concerns on vaccines and bring confidence back to the public.
Assuntos
Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Vacinação/normas , Programas de Imunização/normas , Programas Obrigatórios/normas , Recusa de Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Chile , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Fatores de Risco , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Obrigatórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de SaúdeRESUMO
This study aimed to learn how middle-class parents in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, interpreted the country's prevailing vaccination requirements, based on their experiences with vaccinating, selectively vaccinating, or not vaccinating their children. A qualitative approach was used with in-depth interviews. The analytical process was guided by content analysis and the theoretical framework of the anthropology of the law and morality. For parents that vaccinated, Brazil's culture of immunization outweighed the feeling of compliance with the law; for selective parents, selection of vaccines was not perceived as deviating from the law. In both, the act of vaccinating their children was a matter of moral status. Meanwhile, the non-vaccinators, counter to the legal perspective, attributed their choice to care for the child on grounds that mandatory vaccination was contrary to their way of life; they experienced a feeling of social coercion and fear of legal impositions. Vaccination is an important practice in public health, but it can reveal tensions and conflicts from normative systems, whether moral, cultural, or legal.
Assuntos
Cultura , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Brasil , Pré-Escolar , Características da Família , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Poder Familiar , Responsabilidade Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , População UrbanaRESUMO
Although vaccines have had a tremendous impact in public health they are questioned by certain groups that consider them unnecessary or unsafe and argue in favor of the right to decide to be vaccinated or not. However vaccines must have special considerations because unlike other medical decisions, not vaccinating has consequences not only for the individual but also for other members of the community. Immunizing a high proportion of the population limits the circulation of an infectious agent attaining what is called herd immunity that protects the susceptible members of the group. For this reason many countries consider vaccination mandatory as a responsibility of every citizen. This committee agrees with this view but thinks other strategies should be implemented as well, such as special educational efforts for the public and parents addressing benefits and real risks of vaccinating. Also health care professionals should be trained in vaccines. The notification system for adverse events currently available should be improved and be more accessible. Persons truly affected by adverse events due to vaccination should receive on time responses and be offered psychological and financial support. Finally all stakeholders should make coordinated efforts to work together to deliver messages that answer concerns on vaccines and bring confidence back to the public.
Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/normas , Programas Obrigatórios/normas , Sociedades Médicas , Recusa de Vacinação , Vacinação/normas , Chile , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Obrigatórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Fatores de Risco , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Recusa de Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
Resumo: O objetivo deste estudo foi compreender como pais de camadas médias de São Paulo, Brasil, significam as normatizações da vacinação no país, a partir de suas vivências de vacinar, selecionar ou não vacinar os filhos. Foi realizada abordagem qualitativa por meio de entrevista em profundidade. O processo analítico guiou-se pela análise de conteúdo e pelo referencial teórico da antropologia do direito e da moral. Para os pais vacinadores, a cultura de vacinação se sobressaiu à percepção de cumprimento da lei; para os seletivos, a seleção de vacinas não foi percebida como ação desviante da lei. Em ambos, o ato de vacinar os filhos assumiu um status moral. Já os não vacinadores, em contraponto à perspectiva legal, atribuem essa escolha a um cuidado ao filho respaldado pela ilegitimidade que a vacinação assume para o modo de vida deles e vivenciam um cenário de coerção social e medo de imposições legais. A vacinação é uma prática importante no campo da Saúde Pública, porém, pode revelar tensões e conflitos oriundos de sistemas normativos, sejam eles de ordem moral, cultural ou legal.
Resumen: El objetivo de este estudio fue comprender como padres de clase media de São Paulo, Brasil, dan significado a las normativas de la vacunación en el país, a partir de sus vivencias al vacunar, o elegir no vacunar a los hijos. Se realizó un enfoque cualitativo mediante una entrevista en profundidad. El proceso analítico se guio por el análisis de contenido y por las referencias teóricas de la antropología del derecho y de la moral. Para los padres vacunadores, la cultura de vacunación sobresalió a la percepción de cumplimiento de la ley; para los selectivos, la selección de vacunas no fue percibida como una acción desviada de la ley. En ambos, el acto de vacunar a los hijos asumió un status moral. Por el contrario los no vacunadores, en contrapunto a la perspectiva legal, atribuyen esa elección a un cuidado al hijo, respaldado por la ilegitimidad que la vacunación asume para el modo de vida de ellos y vivencian un escenario de coerción social y miedo de imposiciones legales. La vacunación es una práctica importante en el campo de la salud pública, no obstante, puede revelar tensiones y conflictos oriundos de sistemas normativos, sean de orden moral, cultural o legal.
Abstract: This study aimed to learn how middle-class parents in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, interpreted the country's prevailing vaccination requirements, based on their experiences with vaccinating, selectively vaccinating, or not vaccinating their children. A qualitative approach was used with in-depth interviews. The analytical process was guided by content analysis and the theoretical framework of the anthropology of the law and morality. For parents that vaccinated, Brazil's culture of immunization outweighed the feeling of compliance with the law; for selective parents, selection of vaccines was not perceived as deviating from the law. In both, the act of vaccinating their children was a matter of moral status. Meanwhile, the non-vaccinators, counter to the legal perspective, attributed their choice to care for the child on grounds that mandatory vaccination was contrary to their way of life; they experienced a feeling of social coercion and fear of legal impositions. Vaccination is an important practice in public health, but it can reveal tensions and conflicts from normative systems, whether moral, cultural, or legal.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adulto , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinação , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização , Cultura , Responsabilidade Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , População Urbana , Brasil , Características da Família , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Entrevistas como Assunto , Poder FamiliarRESUMO
Dengue is a major global public health problem affecting Latin America and Mexico Prevention and control measures, focusing on epidemiological surveillance and vector control, have been partially effective and costly, thus, the development of a vaccine against dengue has created great expectations among health authorities and scientific communities worldwide. The CYD-TDV dengue vaccine produced by Sanofi-Pasteur is the only dengue vaccine evaluated in phase 3 controlled clinical trials. Notwithstanding the significant contribution to the development of a vaccine against dengue, the three phase 3 clinical studies of CYD-TDV and the meta-analysis of the long-term follow up of those studies, have provided evidence that this vaccine exhibited partial vaccine efficacy to protect against virologically confirmed dengue and lead to four considerations: a) adequate vaccine efficacy against dengue virus (DENV) infections 3 and 4, less vaccine efficacy against DENV 1 and no protection against infection by DENV 2; b) decreased vaccine efficacy in dengue seronegative individuals at the beginning of the vaccination; c) 83% and 90% protection against hospitalizations and severe forms of dengue, respectively, at 25 months follow-up; and d) increased hospitalization for dengue in the vaccinated group, in children under nine years of age at the time of vaccination, detected since the third year of follow-up. The benefit of the CYD-TDV vaccine can be summarized in the protection against infection by DENV 3 and 4, as well as protection for hospitalizations and severe cases in people over nine years, who have had previous dengue infection, working mainly as a booster. In this review we identified elements on efficacy and safety of this vaccine that must be taken into account in the licensing process and potential inclusion in the national vaccination program of Mexico. The available scientific evidence on the CYD-TDV vaccine shows merits, but also leads to relevant questions that should be answered to properly assess the safety profile of the product and the target populations of potential benefit. In this regard we consider it would be informative to complete the 6-year follow-up after starting vaccination, according to the company's own study protocol recommended by the World Health Organization. As with any new vaccine, the potential licensing and implementation of the CYD-TDV as part of Mexico's vaccination program, requires a clear definition of the balance between the expected benefits and risks. Particularly with a vaccine with variable efficacy and some signs of risk, in the probable case of licensing, the post-licensed period must involve the development of detailed protocols to immediately identify risks or any health event associated with vaccination.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra Dengue/uso terapêutico , Dengue/prevenção & controle , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitalização , Humanos , México , Saúde Pública , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinas Atenuadas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
El dengue es un importante problema de salud pública global, que afecta a América Latina y México. Las medidas de prevención y control centradas en vigilancia epidemiológica y control de vectores han resultado parcialmente efectivas y costosas, por lo que el desarrollo de una vacuna contra el dengue ha creado grandes expectativas entre las autoridades sanitarias y las comunidades científicas en el mundo. Sólo la vacuna CYD-TDV, producida por Sanofi-Pasteur, ha sido evaluada en ensayos clínicos controlados fase 3. No obstante a pesar de la importante contribución que esto significa para el desarrollo de una vacuna contra el dengue, los tres estudios clínicos fase 3 de CYD-TDV y el metaanálisis de seguimiento a largo plazo derivado de los mismos proporcionan evidencia de que esta vacuna tiene una eficacia parcial para proteger contra dengue virológicamente confirmado. Al respecto, surgen cuatro consideraciones: a) eficacia adecuada contra infecciones por virus de dengue (DENV) 3 y 4, menor eficacia contra infecciones por DENV 1 y prácticamente nula protección contra infecciones por DENV 2; b) disminución de la eficacia en individuos seronegativos a dengue al inicio de la vacunación; c) 83 y 90% de protección contra hospitalizaciones y formas de dengue grave, respectivamente, a 25 meses de seguimiento, y d) incremento de hospitalización por dengue, en el grupo de vacunados, en niños menores de nueve años de edad al momento de la vacunación, detectado a partir del tercer año de seguimiento. El beneficio de la vacuna CYD-TDV se puede resumir en la protección contra infecciones por DENV 3 y 4, así como en la protección de hospitalizaciones y casos graves en individuos mayores de nueve años y en quienes han tenido infección previa por dengue, pues funciona principalmente como una vacuna de refuerzo. En esta revisión se identificaron elementos sobre eficacia y seguridad de esta vacuna que deben ser tomados en cuenta ante el potencial registro e inclusión en el programa de vacunación en la población mexicana. La evidencia científica disponible sobre la vacuna CYD-TDV demuestra méritos, pero también da lugar a preguntas relevantes que deberían ser contestadas para evaluar apropiadamente el perfil de seguridad del producto, así como las poblaciones blanco de potencial beneficio. Al respecto, consideramos que sería informativo completar el seguimiento indicado de seis años después de iniciar la vacunación, de acuerdo con el protocolo propuesto en los propios estudios del fabricante como una recomendación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Al igual que con cualquier nueva vacuna, el potencial registro e implementación de uso de CYD-TDV en el programa nacional de vacunación de México requiere una definición clara de cuál es el balance entre los beneficios y riesgos esperados. En particular, ante una vacuna con eficacia variable y algunas señales de riesgo, en caso de aprobar el registro, se deben desarrollar protocolos de manejo de riesgos detallados que permitan identificar de manera oportuna cualquier evento de salud asociado con la vacunación.
Dengue is a major global public health problem affecting Latin America and Mexico Prevention and control measures, focusing on epidemiological surveillance and vector control, have been partially effective and costly, thus, the development of a vaccine against dengue has created great expectations among health authorities and scientific communities worldwide. The CYD-TDV dengue vaccine produced by Sanofi-Pasteur is the only dengue vaccine evaluated in phase 3 controlled clinical trials. Notwithstanding the significant contribution to the development of a vaccine against dengue, the three phase 3 clinical studies of CYD-TDV and the meta-analysis of the long-term follow up of those studies, have provided evidence that this vaccine exhibited partial vaccine efficacy to protect against virologically confirmed dengue and lead to four considerations: a) adequate vaccine efficacy against dengue virus (DENV) infections 3 and 4, less vaccine efficacy against DENV 1 and no protection against infection by DENV 2; b) decreased vaccine efficacy in dengue seronegative individuals at the beginning of the vaccination; c) 83% and 90% protection against hospitalizations and severe forms of dengue, respectively, at 25 months follow-up; and d) increased hospitalization for dengue in the vaccinated group, in children under nine years of age at the time of vaccination, detected since the third year of follow-up. The benefit of the CYD-TDV vaccine can be summarized in the protection against infection by DENV 3 and 4, as well as protection for hospitalizations and severe cases in people over nine years, who have had previous dengue infection, working mainly as a booster. In this review we identified elements on efficacy and safety of this vaccine that must be taken into account in the licensing process and potential inclusion in the national vaccination program of Mexico. The available scientific evidence on the CYD-TDV vaccine shows merits, but also leads to relevant questions that should be answered to properly assess the safety profile of the product and the target populations of potential benefit. In this regard we consider it would be informative to complete the 6-year follow-up after starting vaccination, according to the company's own study protocol recommended by the World Health Organization. As with any new vaccine, the potential licensing and implementation of the CYD-TDV as part of Mexico's vaccination program, requires a clear definition of the balance between the expected benefits and risks. Particularly with a vaccine with variable efficacy and some signs of risk, in the probable case of licensing, the post-licensed period must involve the development of detailed protocols to immediately identify risks or any health event associated with vaccination.
Assuntos
Humanos , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Dengue/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Dengue/uso terapêutico , Vacinas Atenuadas/uso terapêutico , Saúde Pública , Resultado do Tratamento , Hospitalização , MéxicoRESUMO
El Poder Legislativo chileno propone una ley que elimine el timerosal como preservante de las vacunas parenterales del Programa Nacional de Inmunizaciones, proyecto que el Poder Ejecutivo se ha propuesto vetar. El mundo científico informa mayoritariamente que la sospecha de neurotoxicidad atribuida al timerosal es infundada. Pese a ello, las autoridades médicas han oscilado entre sostener que la precaución sugiere apoyar la ley y en otros momentos han manifestando que es más precautorio mantener los programas de vacunación actualmente vigentes. Estas contradicciones y oposiciones ilustran que materias que conciernen a la ciudadanía, requieren una reflexión bioética acabada sobre las políticas públicas sanitarias. Han quedado claro las deficiencias de la deliberación política y la falta de participación social en decisiones que, dado el grado de incertidumbre involucrada en temas como inmunización, requieren no sólo la inclusión de la ciudadanía sino el respeto de la autonomía individual para aceptar o rechazar la inclusión en los programas de vacunación propuestos por las políticas sanitarias. La participación ciudadana en nuestro país se ve severamente limitada por la falta de instrumentos sociales como el plebiscito, el ombudsman y, especialmente, la desidia en crear la Comisión Nacional de Bioética exigida por la Ley 20.120 de 2006, una de cuyas funciones más importantes es mediar deliberativamente entre legos, expertos y políticos en la generación de políticas sanitarias legitimadas por la participación ciudadana.
Chilean legislators have voted to ban vaccines preserved with thiomersal, an initiative that the Executive has vetoed. Most scientific evidence has dismissed the alleged toxicity of this substance, in accordance with the formal and publicly expressed opinion of local experts, and yet, medical authorities have issued contradictory statements. Some have argued that the principle of precaution suggests eliminating thiomersal preserved vaccines; others have declared that current vaccines should be maintained to protect the population. From the perspective of bioethics, this polemic is another example of the shortcoming of the deliberation process leading to controversial laws in lieu of including citizens in the discussion of regulations that harbor uncertainties, and respect for individual autonomy to accept or reject public immunization programs. The Chilean legal system has been unwilling to implement participatory democratic procedures like plebiscites or institutions such as the ombudsman. In 2006 a law was enacted that creates a National Commission of Bioethics, but successive governments have failed to create such a commission, which is an efficient social instrument to conduct deliberation on bioethical issues that require a balanced participation of the public, experts, and politicians.
Assuntos
Humanos , Bioética , Conservantes Farmacêuticos , Timerosal , Vacinação em Massa/ética , Vacinação em Massa/legislação & jurisprudência , Chile , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Saúde Pública , Política Pública , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Participação SocialRESUMO
This article examines the Brazilian innovation policy for vaccines and its impact on infectious diseases, with emphasis on advances in translational science. The results indicate significant progress, with a rapid increase over the past two decades in the number of vaccine research groups, indicating scientific excellence. Advances and gaps in technological development and in public-private partnership initiatives were also identified. We stress the crucial role of partnerships, technology transfer, and targeted policies that could accelerate Brazil's participation in global vaccine research and development. We propose that new strategies should be urgently conceived to strengthen the links between the scientific and technological policies, the National Health System, and the National Immunizations Program in Brazil to provide access to low-cost vaccines to address major public health challenges. We also discuss the lessons learned from the Brazilian experience in the implementation of governmental policies on vaccine innovation that could be applicable to other developing countries.
Assuntos
Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , Vacinas , Brasil , Programas Governamentais , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Invenções , Saúde Pública , Parcerias Público-Privadas , Transferência de TecnologiaRESUMO
El personal de enfermería es quien inicia la investigaciónepidemiológica, evidenciándose ciertas debilidades en laejecución de acciones tendientes al control del ProgramaAmpliado de Inmunizaciones. Esta investigación tuvocomo objetivo determinar los conocimientos y prácticasde los profesionales de enfermería sobre la vigilancia deenfermedades Inmunoprevenibles por vacunas como rubéola-sarampión y poliomielitis.Se diseñó un estudio descriptivo de corte transversaly con el uso de un cuestionario previamente validado porjuicio de expertos y verificada la confiabilidad, se entrevistóa las 26 enfermeras que laboran en los ambulatorios delmunicipio Roscio. Se evidenció que 98% de los profesionalesencuestados conocían las enfermedades prevenibles porvacunas y un 73% sabían la existencia de las fichas para lavigilancia, no obstante solo en un 8% identifico correctamentela muestra adecuadas para investigar un caso sospechosode poliomielitis. De esta manera, se concluye la existenciade debilidades en la vigilancia epidemiológica ya que nonotifican, ni realizan acciones en el tiempo adecuado pordesconocimiento de aspectos fundamentales en la Vigilancia.AU)
Nursing staff initiates the epidemiological research; certain weaknesses have been seenin the performance of actions aiming to control the Extended Immunization Program.The objective of this research was to determine the knowledge and practices of nursingstaff regarding surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases such as rubella, measles andpoliomyelitis.A descriptive transversal study was designed and a questionnaire validated by expertsÆjudgment was used after reliability was verified to interview 26 nurses who work atambulatory centers in the municipality of Roscio.It was observed that 98% of the interviewed professionals knew of these vaccine-preventable diseases and 73% knew there were surveillance forms; however, only 8%could identify the adequate sample to investigate a suspicious case of poliomyelitis. Thus,we conclude that there are weaknesses in epidemiological surveillance since nurses donot report or take actions within the appropriate period of time because they ignorefundamental aspects of Surveillance.AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Monitoramento Epidemiológico/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Imunização/normas , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , VenezuelaRESUMO
El personal de enfermería es quien inicia la investigaciónepidemiológica, evidenciándose ciertas debilidades en laejecución de acciones tendientes al control del ProgramaAmpliado de Inmunizaciones. Esta investigación tuvocomo objetivo determinar los conocimientos y prácticasde los profesionales de enfermería sobre la vigilancia deenfermedades Inmunoprevenibles por vacunas como rubéola-sarampión y poliomielitis.Se diseñó un estudio descriptivo de corte transversaly con el uso de un cuestionario previamente validado porjuicio de expertos y verificada la confiabilidad, se entrevistóa las 26 enfermeras que laboran en los ambulatorios delmunicipio Roscio. Se evidenció que 98% de los profesionalesencuestados conocían las enfermedades prevenibles porvacunas y un 73% sabían la existencia de las fichas para lavigilancia, no obstante solo en un 8% identifico correctamentela muestra adecuadas para investigar un caso sospechosode poliomielitis. De esta manera, se concluye la existenciade debilidades en la vigilancia epidemiológica ya que nonotifican, ni realizan acciones en el tiempo adecuado pordesconocimiento de aspectos fundamentales en la Vigilancia.
Nursing staff initiates the epidemiological research; certain weaknesses have been seenin the performance of actions aiming to control the Extended Immunization Program.The objective of this research was to determine the knowledge and practices of nursingstaff regarding surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases such as rubella, measles andpoliomyelitis.A descriptive transversal study was designed and a questionnaire validated by expertsjudgment was used after reliability was verified to interview 26 nurses who work atambulatory centers in the municipality of Roscio.It was observed that 98% of the interviewed professionals knew of these vaccine-preventable diseases and 73% knew there were surveillance forms; however, only 8%could identify the adequate sample to investigate a suspicious case of poliomyelitis. Thus,we conclude that there are weaknesses in epidemiological surveillance since nurses donot report or take actions within the appropriate period of time because they ignorefundamental aspects of Surveillance.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização/normas , Programas de Imunização , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Monitoramento Epidemiológico/estatística & dados numéricos , VenezuelaRESUMO
Meningococcal disease is characterized by a marked variation in incidence and serogroup distribution by region and over time. In several European countries, Canada and Australia, immunization programs, including universal vaccination of infants or toddlers with catch-up campaigns in children and adolescents, aimed at controlling disease caused by meningococcal serogroup C have been successful in reducing disease incidence through direct and indirect protection. More recently, meningococcal conjugate vaccines targeting disease caused by serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y have been licensed and are being used in adolescent programs in the USA and Canada while a mass immunization campaign against serogroup A disease has been implemented in Africa. Positive results from clinical trials using vaccines against serogroup B disease in various age groups suggest the possibility of providing broader protection against serogroup B disease than is provided by the currently used outer membrane vesicle vaccines. The purpose of our review of meningococcal epidemiology and assessment of existing policies is to set the stage for future policy decisions. Vaccination policies to prevent meningococcal disease in different regions of the world should be based on quality information from enhanced surveillance systems.
Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/legislação & jurisprudência , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/normas , Geografia , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Infecções Meningocócicas/imunologia , Infecções Meningocócicas/microbiologia , Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Neisseria meningitidis/imunologia , Neisseria meningitidis/patogenicidade , ViagemAssuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Esquemas de Imunização , Imunoterapia/mortalidade , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Immunizations are an important component to pediatric primary care. New Mexico is a relatively poor and rural state which has sometimes struggled to achieve and maintain its childhood immunization rates. We evaluated New Mexico's immunization rates between 1996 and 2006. Specifically, we examined the increase in immunization rates between 2002 and 2004, and how this increase may have been associated with Medicaid enrollment levels, as opposed to changes in government policies concerning immunization practices. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This study examines trends in childhood immunization coverage rates relative to Medicaid enrollment among those receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) in New Mexico. Information on health policy changes and immunization coverage was obtained from state governmental sources and the National Immunization Survey. We found statistically significant correlations varying from 0.86 to 0.93 between immunization rates and Medicaid enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: New Mexico's improvement and subsequent deterioration in immunization rates corresponded with changing Medicaid coverage, rather than the state's efforts to change immunization practices. Maintaining high Medicaid enrollment levels may be important for achieving high childhood immunization levels.