RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with previous trabeculectomy or a drainage device. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 108 consecutive DMEK performed between October 2013 and December 2015. All eyes were divided into 3 groups: surgical treatment (ST) group, medical treatment (MT) group, and control group. Visual improvement, endothelial cell loss, and postoperative complications, including rejection, graft failure, and intraocular pressure elevation (≥25 mm Hg) were evaluated. RESULTS: The length of follow-up was 9.7 ± 7.3 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved postoperatively in 85.3% of the ST group, 100% of the MT group, and 93% of the control (P = 0.24). Significantly more lines of BCVA were gained in the ST and MT groups (8.1 ± 8.1 and 9.2 ± 6.3 lines, respectively) than in the control (4.8 ± 5.6 lines, P < 0.05). The mean time to BCVA was 2.9 ± 2.8 months for the ST group, 4.7 ± 5.3 months for the MT group, and 3.0 ± 3.3 months for the control (P = 0.75). Endothelial cell loss was greater in the ST group (44.6 ± 17.8%) than in the MT group (29.9 ± 12.0%) and the control group (32.7 ± 11.3%, P = 0.001). There was one primary failure and no secondary graft failures. The overall rejection rate was 0.9%. Postoperative intraocular pressure elevation was less common in the ST group (14.7%) and control (23.3%) than in the MT group (50.0%, P = 0.04). There was no difference in the air injection rate among all groups (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK in eyes with previous trabeculectomy and drainage device can result in very good short-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Doenças da Córnea/cirurgia , Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior , Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Trabeculectomia , Idoso , Contagem de Células , Doenças da Córnea/fisiopatologia , Perda de Células Endoteliais da Córnea/fisiopatologia , Endotélio Corneano/patologia , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/fisiologia , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular/fisiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acuidade Visual/fisiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) when an experienced DSAEK surgeon transitions to DMEK while following 2 published endothelial keratoplasty surgical techniques. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 200 eyes of 132 patients with Fuchs corneal dystrophy that underwent endothelial keratoplasty performed by one surgeon. Published, standardized techniques were followed for both DSAEK and DMEK. Postoperative complications were recorded. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), intraocular pressure, and central endothelial cell loss (ECL) were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications. One DSAEK and 5 DMEK grafts developed graft detachment requiring rebubbling (P = 0.097). No iatrogenic primary graft failures occurred in the DSAEK group compared with one in the DMEK group. No pupil block episodes occurred in the DSAEK group compared with one in the DMEK group. Posterior synechiae formation occurred 15 times in the DMEK group and did not occur in the DSAEK group (P < 0.001). At 6 months, BSCVA was better in the DMEK group than in the DSAEK group (20/24; logMAR = 0.0844-20/32; logMAR = 0.2063) (P < 0.001). More eyes reached 20/20 or better BSCVA in the DMEK group compared with DSAEK (54.5%-13%) (P < 0.011). At 6 months, ECL was higher in the DMEK group than in the DSAEK group (31.9%-19.9%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Complications can be minimized and excellent outcomes can be achieved, without a steep learning curve, when an experienced DSAEK surgeon transitions to DMEK following a standardized technique. Six-month vision outcomes are better in the DMEK group; however, the rate of a newly described complication, posterior synechiae formation, and 6-month ECL are higher in the DMEK group than in the DSAEK group.
Assuntos
Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior/métodos , Distrofia Endotelial de Fuchs/cirurgia , Curva de Aprendizado , Oftalmologistas , Idoso , Contagem de Células , Perda de Células Endoteliais da Córnea/fisiopatologia , Endotélio Corneano/patologia , Feminino , Distrofia Endotelial de Fuchs/fisiopatologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/fisiologia , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular/fisiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acuidade Visual/fisiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with glaucoma drainage devices. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 24 cases performed by a single surgeon (S.B.H.) on 20 eyes. Data were gathered on demographics, ocular history, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes. Outcome measures included primary graft failure, secondary graft failure, endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), intraocular pressure, and visual acuity. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 30.3 ± 19.6 months, there was no occurrence of primary graft failure, and the rate of secondary graft failure was 29%. Survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, were 87% [95% confidence interval (CI): 65%-96%], 80% (95% CI: 55%-92%), and 70% (95% CI: 39%-88%). Compared with ECD of the donor lenticule, endothelial cell loss was 49 ± 16% (n = 21) at postoperative month 3, 59 ± 16% (n = 20) at month 6, 61 ± 20% (n = 16) at month 12, and stabilized at 75 ± 17% (n = 9) by month 18. Compared with CCT during the visit before surgery, CCT decreased to 83 ± 18% (n = 18) at postoperative month 3 and gradually increased to 95 ± 11% (n = 6) at month 24. There were 4 (17%) cases of intraocular pressure elevation above 25 mm Hg. Improved visual acuity occurred in 71% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with corneal edema secondary to endothelial dysfunction in the presence of a previous glaucoma drainage device is a successful procedure. However, intermediate term endothelial cell loss is significant, as is the graft failure rate.