RESUMO
A evolução contínua das áreas cirúrgicas se deve a estudos e pesquisas, avanços tecnológicos e desenvolvimento de equipamentos mais avançados. A cirurgia minimamente invasiva, incluindo a videolaparoscopia, histeroscopia e cirurgia robótica, tem sido impactada significativamente pelos avanços cirúrgicos. As técnicas minimamente invasivas têm se tornado padrão-ouro no diagnóstico e tratamento de doenças ginecológicas, proporcionando benefícios como redução do tempo cirúrgico, menor dor no pós-operatório e melhoria na qualidade de vida. O treinamento adequado do cirurgião e da equipe é fundamental para o sucesso do tratamento cirúrgico, e o desenvolvimento tecnológico e aprimoramento dos equipamentos impulsionam a cirurgia minimamente invasiva como uma área específica da Ginecologia. Métodos seguros de treinamento, como laboratórios de simulação, permitem o aprimoramento gradual das habilidades dos cirurgiões em formação, preparando-os para uma prática segura e eficaz. A literatura fornece ferramentas e conceitos para o treinamento em cirurgia minimamente invasiva, visando formar residentes e novos cirurgiões.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/história , Ensino/educação , Desenvolvimento Tecnológico , Oncologia Cirúrgica/tendências , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/educaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgery is the main treatment for the majority of solid cancers. Studies investigating surgical interventions are a critical asset in improving patient health outcomes. We aim to analyze the temporal and spatial distribution of the surgical treatment of Brazil's 5 most common types of cancer. METHODS: The selected cancers were stomach, colorectal and rectosigmoid junction, bronchial and lung, breast, and prostatic. Surgical data were collected from the DATASUS database from 2013 to 2019. Statistical analyses included linear regression tests with a significance level of .05. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2019, 19.72% of the diagnoses of all cancers were treated surgically. Only breast cancer didn't have a significant linear increase in surgeries (P = .702). Prostatic cancer had the highest annual increase rate and breast the lowest. Analyzing the Brazilian regions, the Southeast had the highest incidence of oncological surgeries, and the Midwest had the lowest. DISCUSSION: Brazil's surgical oncology scenario is progressing positively through the analyzed period. The analysis of the 5 most common types of cancer in Brazil and their progression over the years provides an idea of the cancer surgery capacity in Brazil. There were disparities between the Brazilian regions in all types of cancer. Our study is the first step to better comprehending cancer care in Brazil and the access issues that some areas have. With that, it will be possible to provide better care to cancer patients needing surgical treatment.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Oncologia Cirúrgica , Humanos , Masculino , Brasil/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Cirurgia Colorretal , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Oncologia Cirúrgica/tendências , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , FemininoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As the COVID-19 pandemic moves from rich to poor nations, the healthcare systems of developing countries have to deal with this extra burden. As cancer care cannot stop and surgery is the main mechanism for cure and palliation, it is important to provide safe and rational access to cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: From April 1st to May 1st, the committee of the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO) was responsible for reviewing the literature and writing recommendations for perioperative cancer care in the context of limited resources during the pandemic. The recommendations were submitted to the BSSO board of directors. The orientations that were not consensual were removed and the suggestions were added to the text. From May 15 to 30th, the committee revised the recommendations, aligned them with the objectives of the work and standardize the text. DISCUSSION: The rational use of resources to reduce the risk of surgical cancer patients being operated on during the incubation period of a corona virus infection is important in this context. Prevalence of corona virus in the region, the need for surgery, surgical complexity, patient age and comorbidities, and availability of corona virus testing are central aspects in this matter and are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: We present a protocol, focused on the patients' outcomes, for safe and rational use of resources to reduce the risk of surgical cancer patients being operated on during the virus incubation period, in the context of areas with limited resources.