Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
1.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 49(4): e4878, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27007650

RESUMO

This study aimed to compare the totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques regarding their rates of success and complications in patients with kidney stones. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Forty-four patients (24 men; mean age: 50.40±2.02 years) received totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL; no nephrostomy catheter or ureteral catheter after PCNL) and 40 patients (18 men; mean age: 49.95 ± 13.38 years) underwent standard PCNL (a nephrostomy catheter and ureteral catheter were used after PCNL). All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. Postoperative changes in hemoglobin, the blood transfusion rate, changes in creatinine levels, operation time, analgesic need, hospitalization time, and complication rate were compared between the groups. No significant differences were observed in age, gender, stone size, and surgery side between the groups (P<0.05). The operation time was significantly lower in the totally tubeless PCNL group than in the standard PCNL group (P=0.005). Pethidine requirements were significantly higher in the standard PCNL group than the totally tubeless PCNL group (P=0.007). Hospitalization time was significantly higher in the standard PCNL group than in the totally tubeless PCNL group (P<0.0001). The complication rate was 15% in the standard PCNL group and 9.1% in the totally tubeless PCNL group (P=0.73). The totally tubeless PCNL technique is safe and effective, even for patients with staghorn stones. This technique is associated with decreased pain, analgesic needs, and operative and hospitalization time. We believe that a normal peristaltic ureter is the best drainage tube.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Duração da Cirurgia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Actas Urol Esp ; 40(2): 115-8, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26614436

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over time, the prone position has been shown to be effective and safe for performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. One of its disadvantages, however, is the inability to simultaneously perform an ureteroscopy after positioning the patient, which is feasible in the supine position. Our objective is to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing flexible ureteroscopy with the patient in the prone position. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a case of percutaneous nephrolithotomy of partial staghorn calculi in the prone position during which access to the middle calyx was not possible. It was therefore necessary to conduct flexible ureteroscopy. The 64-year-old female patient had consulted for lumbar pain of 6 months of evolution. RESULTS: We performed percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position. After extracting calculi from the inner calyx and renal pelvis, access to the fragments located in the middle calyx could not be achieved. Rather than performing a new puncture, we decided to enter in a retrograde manner with a flexible ureteroscope, succeeding in extracting the residual calculi, leaving the patient completely free of calculi. CONCLUSION: In our case, the implementation of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy was feasible without changing the patient's original position.


Assuntos
Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Posicionamento do Paciente , Decúbito Ventral , Ureteroscópios , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ureteroscopia
3.
Rev. bras. pesqui. méd. biol ; Braz. j. med. biol. res;49(4): e4878, 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-951661

RESUMO

This study aimed to compare the totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques regarding their rates of success and complications in patients with kidney stones. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Forty-four patients (24 men; mean age: 50.40±2.02 years) received totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL; no nephrostomy catheter or ureteral catheter after PCNL) and 40 patients (18 men; mean age: 49.95±13.38 years) underwent standard PCNL (a nephrostomy catheter and ureteral catheter were used after PCNL). All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. Postoperative changes in hemoglobin, the blood transfusion rate, changes in creatinine levels, operation time, analgesic need, hospitalization time, and complication rate were compared between the groups. No significant differences were observed in age, gender, stone size, and surgery side between the groups (P<0.05). The operation time was significantly lower in the totally tubeless PCNL group than in the standard PCNL group (P=0.005). Pethidine requirements were significantly higher in the standard PCNL group than the totally tubeless PCNL group (P=0.007). Hospitalization time was significantly higher in the standard PCNL group than in the totally tubeless PCNL group (P<0.0001). The complication rate was 15% in the standard PCNL group and 9.1% in the totally tubeless PCNL group (P=0.73). The totally tubeless PCNL technique is safe and effective, even for patients with staghorn stones. This technique is associated with decreased pain, analgesic needs, and operative and hospitalization time. We believe that a normal peristaltic ureter is the best drainage tube.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento , Duração da Cirurgia , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Tempo de Internação
4.
Int Braz J Urol ; 41(5): 953-8, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26689521

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficiency of a novel device coupled with ultrassound for renal percutaneous puncture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After establishing hydronephrosis, ten pigs had three calyxes of each kidney punctured by the same urology resident, with and without the new device ("Punctiometer"). Time for procedure completion, number of attempts to reach the calyx, puncture precision and puncture complications were recorded in both groups and compared. RESULTS: Puncture success on the first attempt was achieved in 25 punctures (83%) with the Punctiometer and in 13 punctures (43%) without the Punctiometer (p=0.011). The mean time required to perform three punctures in each kidney was 14.5 minutes with the Punctiometer and 22.4 minutes without the Punctiometer (p=0.025). The only complications noted were renal hematomas. In the Punctiometer group, all kidneys had small hematomas. In the no Punctiometer group 80% had small hematomas, 10% had a medium hematoma and 10% had a big hematoma. There was no difference in complications between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Punctiometer is an effective device to increase the likelihood of an accurate renal calyx puncture during PCNL, with a shorter time required to perform the procedure.


Assuntos
Cálices Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Punções/instrumentação , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/instrumentação , Animais , Desenho de Equipamento , Modelos Animais , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Punções/métodos , Distribuição Aleatória , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Suínos , Fatores de Tempo , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
5.
Int Braz J Urol ; 41(5): 1014-9, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26689529

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report our technique that helps locate the guidewire into the ureter enabling safe dilatation during PCNL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases in which the guidewire failed to pass into the ureter following successful puncture of the desired calyx were subjected to this technique. A second guidewire was passed through the outer sheath of a 9 Fr. metallic dilator cannula, passed over the first guidewire. The cannula and outer sheath were removed, followed by percutaneous passage of a 6/7.5 Fr ureteroscope between the two guidewires, monitoring its progress through both the endoscopic and fluoroscopic monitors. Once the stone was visualized in the calyx a guidewire was passed through the working channel and maneuvered past the stone into the pelvis and ureter under direct endoscopic vision. This was followed by routine tract dilatation. RESULTS: This technique was employed in 85 out of 675 cases of PCNL carried out at our institute between Jan 2010 to June 2014. The mean time required for our technique, calculated from the point of introduction of the ureteroscope untill the successful passage of the guidewire down into the ureter was 95 seconds. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications as a result of this technique. Guidewire could be successfully passed into the ureter in 82 out of 85 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the ureteroscope introduced percutaneously through the puncture site in PCNL, is a safe and effective technique that helps in maneuvering the guidewire down into the ureter, which subsequently enables safe dilatation.


Assuntos
Dilatação/métodos , Cálices Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Ureter/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Dilatação/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Punções/instrumentação , Punções/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureteroscópios , Adulto Jovem
6.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(5): 1014-1019, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-767041

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To report our technique that helps locate the guidewire into the ureter enabling safe dilatation during PCNL. Materials and Methods: Cases in which the guidewire failed to pass into the ureter following successful puncture of the desired calyx were subjected to this technique. A second guidewire was passed through the outer sheath of a 9 Fr. metallic dilator cannula, passed over the first guidewire. The cannula and outer sheath were removed, followed by percutaneous passage of a 6/7.5 Fr ureteroscope between the two guidewires, monitoring its progress through both the endoscopic and fluoroscopic monitors. Once the stone was visualized in the calyx a guidewire was passed through the working channel and maneuvered past the stone into the pelvis and ureter under direct endoscopic vision. This was followed by routine tract dilatation. Results: This technique was employed in 85 out of 675 cases of PCNL carried out at our institute between Jan 2010 to June 2014. The mean time required for our technique, calculated from the point of introduction of the ureteroscope untill the successful passage of the guidewire down into the ureter was 95 seconds. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications as a result of this technique. Guidewire could be successfully passed into the ureter in 82 out of 85 cases. Conclusions: Use of the ureteroscope introduced percutaneously through the puncture site in PCNL, is a safe and effective technique that helps in maneuvering the guidewire down into the ureter, which subsequently enables safe dilatation.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Dilatação/métodos , Cálices Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Ureter/cirurgia , Dilatação/instrumentação , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Punções/instrumentação , Punções/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureteroscópios
7.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(5): 953-958, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-767052

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency of a novel device coupled with ultrassound for renal percutaneous puncture. Materials and Methods: After establishing hydronephrosis, ten pigs had three calyxes of each kidney punctured by the same urology resident, with and without the new device ("Punctiometer"). Time for procedure completion, number of attempts to reach the calyx, puncture precision and puncture complications were recorded in both groups and compared. Results: Puncture success on the first attempt was achieved in 25 punctures (83%) with the Punctiometer and in 13 punctures (43%) without the Punctiometer (p=0.011). The mean time required to perform three punctures in each kidney was 14.5 minutes with the Punctiometer and 22.4 minutes without the Punctiometer (p=0.025). The only complications noted were renal hematomas. In the Punctiometer group, all kidneys had small hematomas. In the no Punctiometer group 80% had small hematomas, 10% had a medium hematoma and 10% had a big hematoma. There was no difference in complications between both groups. Conclusions: The Punctiometer is an effective device to increase the likelihood of an accurate renal calyx puncture during PCNL, with a shorter time required to perform the procedure.


Assuntos
Animais , Cálices Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Punções/instrumentação , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Modelos Animais , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Punções/métodos , Distribuição Aleatória , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Suínos , Fatores de Tempo , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
8.
Int Braz J Urol ; 40(5): 650-5, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25498276

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the outcomes of pneumatic (PL), ultrasonic (UL) and combined (PL/UL) lithotripsy performed in percutaneous lithotripsy (PNL) according to success rates and stone clearence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 512 patients treated with PNL between April 2010 and April 2013 were evaluated. Postoperative stone analysis revealed as calcium oxalate in 408 of these patients. The operation notes of 355 patients recorded in detail with complete parameters were reviewed. According to stone disintegration method, patients were divided into three groups: PL only in Group I, UL only in Group II, and UL/PL combination in Group III. Number of patients was 155, 110 and 90, respectively. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy screening time was significantly shorter in group II, and III compared to group I (p<0.001). The failure rates were 13.5% (21 patients) for group I, 3.6% (4 patients) for group II, and 3.3% (3 patients) for group III. There was a significant statistical difference in favor of group II and III by means of success (p=0.023). Group II and III had larger FSA, and this was statistically significant (p=0.032). Stone disintegration time (SDT) was 64.0 ± 41.92 minutes for group I, 49.5 ± 34.63 for group II, and 37.7 ± 16.89 for group III. Group III has a statistically significant shorter SDT (p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that, in cases with high stone burden, where faster and efficient lithotripsy is needed, combined ultrasonic / pneumatic lithotripter may be the ideal choice and in suitable cases ultrasonic lithotripter usage provides important advantages to the surgeon.


Assuntos
Terapia Combinada/instrumentação , Cálculos Renais/terapia , Litotripsia/instrumentação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Litotripsia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Int Braz J Urol ; 40(5): 690-6, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25498281

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We investigated the characteristics and management of patients with intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2007 and July 2013, 4148 patients with urolithiasis underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in our hospital. Intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube occurred in two of these patients. Another patient with intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube, who underwent PCNL in another hospital, was transferred to our hospital. The data of the three patients were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube following PCNL was 0.5% (2/4148) at our hospital. A solitary kidney was present in one of the three patients. The tip of tube was located into the inferior vena cava (IVC) in two patients and into the renal vein in one patient. All three patients were successfully managed with strict bed rest, intravenous antibiotics and one-step (one patient) or two-step (two patients) tube withdrawal under close monitoring. None of the patients underwent antithrombotic therapy. The original operations were performed successfully under close observation in two patients and changed to another operation in one patient. All patients were discharged uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube following PCNL is 0.5% at our hospital. Intravenous nephrostomy tube misplacement is an uncommon complication of PCNL. A solitary kidney may render patients susceptible to this complication. Most patients may be managed conservatively with strict bed rest, intravenous antibiotics and one-step or two-step tube withdrawal under close monitoring.


Assuntos
Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Urolitíase/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Litotripsia/instrumentação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Veias Renais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Cateteres Urinários/efeitos adversos , Urografia , Veia Cava Inferior
10.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(5): 650-655, 12/2014. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-731126

RESUMO

Purpose We aimed to compare the outcomes of pneumatic (PL), ultrasonic (UL) and combined (PL/UL) lithotripsy performed in percutaneous lithotripsy (PNL) according to success rates and stone clearence. Materials and Methods The medical records of 512 patients treated with PNL between April 2010 and April 2013 were evaluated. Postoperative stone analysis revealed as calcium oxalate in 408 of these patients. The operation notes of 355 patients recorded in detail with complete parameters were reviewed. According to stone disintegration method, patients were divided into three groups: PL only in Group I, UL only in Group II, and UL/PL combination in Group III. Number of patients was 155, 110 and 90, respectively. Results Fluoroscopy screening time was significantly shorter in group II, and III compared to group I (p<0.001). The failure rates were 13.5% (21 patients) for group I, 3.6% (4 patients) for group II, and 3.3% (3 patients) for group III. There was a significant statistical difference in favor of group II and III by means of success (p=0.023). Group II and III had larger FSA, and this was statistically significant (p=0.032). Stone disintegration time (SDT) was 64.0±41.92 minutes for group I, 49.5±34.63 for group II, and 37.7±16.89 for group III. Group III has a statistically significant shorter SDT (p=0.011). Conclusions We concluded that, in cases with high stone burden, where faster and efficient lithotripsy is needed, combined ultrasonic / pneumatic lithotripter may be the ideal choice and in suitable cases ultrasonic lithotripter usage provides important advantages to the surgeon. .


Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Combinada/instrumentação , Cálculos Renais/terapia , Litotripsia/instrumentação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Análise de Variância , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Fluoroscopia , Tempo de Internação , Litotripsia/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(5): 690-696, 12/2014. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-731129

RESUMO

Purpose We investigated the characteristics and management of patients with intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube. Materials and Methods Between July 2007 and July 2013, 4148 patients with urolithiasis underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in our hospital. Intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube occurred in two of these patients. Another patient with intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube, who underwent PCNL in another hospital, was transferred to our hospital. The data of the three patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results The incidence of intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube following PCNL was 0.5% (2/4148) at our hospital. A solitary kidney was present in one of the three patients. The tip of tube was located into the inferior vena cava (IVC) in two patients and into the renal vein in one patient. All three patients were successfully managed with strict bed rest, intravenous antibiotics and one-step (one patient) or two-step (two patients) tube withdrawal under close monitoring. None of the patients underwent antithrombotic therapy. The original operations were performed successfully under close observation in two patients and changed to another operation in one patient. All patients were discharged uneventfully. Conclusions The incidence of intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube following PCNL is 0.5% at our hospital. Intravenous nephrostomy tube misplacement is an uncommon complication of PCNL. A solitary kidney may render patients susceptible to this complication. Most patients may be managed conservatively with strict bed rest, intravenous antibiotics and one-step or two-step tube withdrawal under close monitoring. .


Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Urolitíase/cirurgia , Litotripsia/instrumentação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Veias Renais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Urografia , Cateteres Urinários/efeitos adversos , Veia Cava Inferior
12.
Int Braz J Urol ; 40(2): 204-11, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24856487

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Tubeless PCNL has been utilized to shorten hospital stay and improve patient postoperative pain control. Prior studies have excluded those patients with significant bleeding or other complications. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of tubeless PCNL in all patients irrespective of intraoperative outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the charts of patients who underwent PCNL at our institute was performed. Patients were assigned to one endourologist Who routinely performed tubeless PCNL and to a second endourologist who routinely left a small-bore pigtail nephrostomy. Preoperative demographics operative and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Out of 159 patients included, 83 patients had tubeless PCNL while 76 patients had standard PCNL. There was no difference between groups regarding age, gender, ASA score, number, maximum diameter of stones, number of calyces involved, Stone density (HU), laterality and use of preoperative narcotics. While staghorn stones were more common in patients who underwent standard PCNL (p = 0.008). Tubeless patients had less number of access tracts (p ≤ 0.001), shorter hospital stay (1.7 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.001) when compared to standard PCNL group. Multivariable analysis controlling for confounding factors including staghorn calculi and number of accesses confirmed that tubeless PCNL was associated with shorter hospital stay and less postoperative pain. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our report confirms the previous reports of shorter hospital stay, less pain and analgesia as compared to standard PCNL, and establishes its safety irrespective of bleeding, perforation, extravasation or other intraoperative issues that have previously been utilized as exclusionary criteria for this approach.


Assuntos
Complicações Intraoperatórias , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adulto , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(2): 204-211, Mar-Apr/2014. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-711694

RESUMO

IntroductionTubeless PCNL has been utilized to shorten hospital stay and improve patient postoperative pain control. Prior studies have excluded those patients with significant bleeding or other complications. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of tubeless PCNL in all patients irrespective of intraoperative outcome.Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of the charts of patients who underwent PCNL at our institute was performed. Patients were assigned to one endourologist who routinely performed tubeless PCNL and to a second endourologist who routinely left a small-bore pigtail nephrostomy. Preoperative demographics operative and postoperative outcomes were compared.ResultsOut of 159 patients included, 83 patients had tubeless PCNL while 76 patients had standard PCNL. There was no difference between groups regarding age, gender, ASA score, number, maximum diameter of stones, number of calyces involved, stone density (HU), laterality and use of preoperative narcotics. While staghorn stones were more common in patients who underwent standard PCNL (p = 0.008). Tubeless patients had less number of access tracts (p ≤ 0.001), shorter hospital stay (1.7 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.001) when compared to standard PCNL group. Multivariable analysis controlling for confounding factors including staghorn calculi and number of accesses confirmed that tubeless PCNL was associated with shorter hospital stay and less postoperative pain. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups.ConclusionOur report confirms the previous reports of shorter hospital stay, less pain and analgesia as compared to standard PCNL, and establishes its safety irrespective of bleeding, perforation, extravasation or other intraoperative issues that have previously been utilized as exclusionary criteria for this approach.


Assuntos
Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Índice de Massa Corporal , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Multivariada , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Int Braz J Urol ; 40(1): 125-6; discussion 126, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24642160

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of large renal stones in children can be challenging often requiring combination therapy and multiple procedures. The purpose of this video is to describe our technique of robotic nephrolithotomy and pyelolithotomy for complex renal stone disease in children, and to demonstrate the utility of the robotic ultrasound probe to aid with stone localization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Robotic nephrolithotomy/pyelolithotomy was carried out in four consecutive patients. A robotic ultrasound probe (Hitachi-Aloka, Tokyo, Japan) under console surgeon control was used in all cases. RESULTS: Two patients underwent robotic pyelolithotomy, one patient underwent robotic nephrolithotomy, whilst the fourth patient underwent robotic pyelolithotomy and nephrolithotomy along with Y-V pyeloplasty for concurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Mean operative time, blood loss and hospital stay was 216 minutes, 37.5 mL and 2 days, respectively. The robotic ultrasound probe aided identification of calculi within the kidney in all cases. For nephroli¬thotomy it was helpful in planning the incision for nephrotomy. After nephrotomy or pyelotomy, stones were removed using a combination of robotic Maryland forceps, fenestrated grasper or Prograsp. Antegrade nephroscopy introduced through a laparoscopic port was used in all patients for confirmation of residual stone status. Two patients did not require a ureteral stent in the post-operative period. One patient had a minor complication (Clavien Grade 2 - dislodged malecot catheter). All patients were stone free at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic nephrolithotomy and pyelolithotomy with utilization of the robotic ultrasound probe offers a one-stop solution for complex renal stones with excellent stone-free rates.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Robótica , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Pelve Renal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Duração da Cirurgia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/instrumentação
15.
Urolithiasis ; 41(3): 253-6, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23525631

RESUMO

The conventional technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) ends by placing a nephrostomy tube within the access tract. However, feasibility and safety of tubeless PNL have been widely demonstrated. In this modification, a ureteral stent is usually left in place instead of the nephrostomy tube. The aim of this study is to compare the use of a postoperative indwelling double-J stent versus an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter in patients undergoing tubeless PNL. Sixty-eight patients undergoing tubeless PNL were randomized either for a postoperative double-J stent (group 1) or for an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter (group 2). Outcomes evaluated included postoperative pain, hospital stay length, incidence of hemorrhagic complications, residual lithiasis and urinary leakage. Groups were similar according to age, sex, body mass index and stone burden. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative pain, incidence of perirenal hematomas, residual lithiasis and urinary leakage. However, patients in group 1 presented longer hospital stays (3.7 ± 1.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3 days; p < 0.001) and greater hematocrit drops (4.9 ± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.8 %; p < 0.001). Our results confirm that among patients undergoing tubeless PNL, both alternatives (i.e. leaving a double-J stent or an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter) are reliable and safe. However, further considerations, like the need of double-J stent removal under cystoscopy, need to be taken into account when deciding which modality to use.


Assuntos
Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Urinários/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Litotripsia/instrumentação , Litotripsia/métodos , Morbidade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos
16.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 38(6): 795-801, Nov-Dec/2012. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-666015

RESUMO

Purpose

To compare totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy procedures on many parameters. Materials and Methods

Percutaneous nephrolitotomy was performed on 195 patients between June 2009 and May 2012. The data of those patients were evaluated retrospectively. Totally tubeless cases were enrolled to Group 1, and Group 2 consisted of non-tubeless cases (re-entry or Foley catheter). Results

Group 1 included 85 cases and group 2 a total of 110 patients. Paper tracing values for the kidney stones were 321.25 ± 102.4 mm2 and 324.10 ± 169.5 mm2 respectively. Mean fluoroscopy time was 4.9 ± 1.9 min and 5.08 ± 2.7 min, mean operation time was 78.8 ± 27.9 min and 81.9 ± 28.77 min and mean decrease in hematocrit was 2.6 ± 1.6 and 3.74 ± 1.9 respectively. All these comparisons were statistically significant. Length of hospitalization was 1.6 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 1.5 days for Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Mean superficial pain score was 5.8 ± 1.6 and 6.7 ± 1.2 respectively for both groups after 1 hour. At 6 hours, the scores changed to 3.87 ± 1.22 and 4.84 ± 1.3 respectively. The analgesic dose was 1.00 ± 0.7 and 1.53 ± 0.6 for the groups respectively at 6 hours. All the statistical differences were significant for these three parameters. Conclusions

We believe that, because of their post operative patient comfort and decreased length of hospital stay, totally tubeless procedures should be considered as an alternative to standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy. .


Assuntos
Humanos , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Duração da Cirurgia , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cateterismo Urinário
17.
Int Braz J Urol ; 38(6): 795-800; discussion 801, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23302416

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy procedures on many parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Percutaneous nephrolitotomy was performed on 195 patients between June 2009 and May 2012. The data of those patients were evaluated retrospectively. Totally tubeless cases were enrolled to Group 1, and Group 2 consisted of non-tubeless cases (re-entry or Foley catheter). RESULTS: Group 1 included 85 cases and group 2 a total of 110 patients. Paper tracing values for the kidney stones were 321.25 ± 102.4 mm(2) and 324.10 ± 169.5 mm(2) respectively. Mean fluoroscopy time was 4.9 ± 1.9 min and 5.08 ± 2.7 min, mean operation time was 78.8 ± 27.9 min and 81.9 ± 28.77 min and mean decrease in hematocrit was 2.6 ± 1.6 and 3.74 ± 1.9 respectively. All these comparisons were statistically significant. Length of hospitalization was 1.6 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 1.5 days for Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Mean superficial pain score was 5.8 ± 1.6 and 6.7 ± 1.2 respectively for both groups after 1 hour. At 6 hours, the scores changed to 3.87 ± 1.22 and 4.84 ± 1.3 respectively. The analgesic dose was 1.00 ± 0.7 and 1.53 ± 0.6 for the groups respectively at 6 hours. All the statistical differences were significant for these three parameters. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that, because of their post operative patient comfort and decreased length of hospital stay, totally tubeless procedures should be considered as an alternative to standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Duração da Cirurgia , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cateterismo Urinário
18.
Urol Res ; 39(6): 477-81, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21337032

RESUMO

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL) is an established technique for the treatment of renal calculi. Some reports have challenged the need for a nephrostomy tube at the end of the procedure, arguing that it accounts for a longer hospital stay and increased postoperative pain. During the last years, several series have addressed the feasibility and safety of tubeless PNL, where a double-J ureteral stent is left in place after the end of intervention instead of a nephrostomy tube. The aim of our study was to compare conventional versus tubeless PNL in terms of postoperative morbidity. Eighty-five patients who underwent PNL at a single center met the inclusion criteria (complete intraoperative stone clearance, no evidence of active intraoperative bleeding, single percutaneous access, and operative time shorter than 2 h) and were randomized at the end of the procedure to have placed either a nephrostomy tube (group 1) or a double-J ureteral stent (group 2). Outcomes assessed were postoperative pain, bleeding complications, leakage complications, and length of hospital stay. The patients in the tubeless group had a shorter hospital stay (3.7 vs. 5.8 days; P < 0.001), and less postoperative pain at postoperative days 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). No significant difference in bleeding or leakage complications was observed. This study supports the feasibility and safety of tubeless PNL in a selected group of the patients, suggesting some intraoperative criteria to be considered when performing it. However, further controlled studies will have to determine its impact on stone-free rates prior to be considered the standard technique in these selected cases.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais/terapia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Segurança do Paciente , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
19.
Int Braz J Urol ; 36(6): 738-46; discussion 746-8, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21176281

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To design a simple, cost-effective system for gaining rapid and accurate calyceal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The design consists of a low-cost, light-weight, portable mechanical gantry with a needle guiding device. Using C-arm fluoroscopy, two images of the contrast-filled renal collecting system are obtained: at 0-degrees (perpendicular to the kidney) and 20-degrees. These images are relayed to a laptop computer containing the software and graphic user interface for selecting the targeted calyx. The software provides numerical settings for the 3 axes of the gantry, which are used to position the needle guiding device. The needle is advanced through the guide to the depth calculated by the software, thus puncturing the targeted calyx. Testing of the system was performed on 2 target types: 1) radiolucent plastic tubes the approximate size of a renal calyx (5 or 10 mm in diameter, 30 mm in length); and 2) foam-occluded, contrast-filled porcine kidneys. RESULTS: Tests using target type 1 with 10 mm diameter (n=14) and 5 mm diameter (n=7) tubes resulted in a 100% targeting success rate, with a mean procedure duration of 10 minutes. Tests using target type 2 (n=2) were both successful, with accurate puncturing of the selected renal calyx, and a mean procedure duration of 15 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical gantry system described in this paper is low-cost, portable, light-weight, and simple to set up and operate. C-arm fluoroscopy is limited to two images, thus reducing radiation exposure significantly. Testing of the system showed an extremely high degree of accuracy in gaining precise access to a targeted renal calyx.


Assuntos
Cálices Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Desenho de Equipamento , Fluoroscopia , Agulhas , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Robótica/instrumentação , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Fatores de Tempo
20.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 36(6): 738-748, Dec. 2010. ilus, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-572425

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To design a simple, cost-effective system for gaining rapid and accurate calyceal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The design consists of a low-cost, light-weight, portable mechanical gantry with a needle guiding device. Using C-arm fluoroscopy, two images of the contrast-filled renal collecting system are obtained: at 0-degrees (perpendicular to the kidney) and 20-degrees. These images are relayed to a laptop computer containing the software and graphic user interface for selecting the targeted calyx. The software provides numerical settings for the 3 axes of the gantry, which are used to position the needle guiding device. The needle is advanced through the guide to the depth calculated by the software, thus puncturing the targeted calyx. Testing of the system was performed on 2 target types: 1) radiolucent plastic tubes the approximate size of a renal calyx (5 or 10 mm in diameter, 30 mm in length); and 2) foam-occluded, contrast-filled porcine kidneys. RESULTS: Tests using target type 1 with 10 mm diameter (n = 14) and 5 mm diameter (n = 7) tubes resulted in a 100 percent targeting success rate, with a mean procedure duration of 10 minutes. Tests using target type 2 (n = 2) were both successful, with accurate puncturing of the selected renal calyx, and a mean procedure duration of 15 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical gantry system described in this paper is low-cost, portable, light-weight, and simple to set up and operate. C-arm fluoroscopy is limited to two images, thus reducing radiation exposure significantly. Testing of the system showed an extremely high degree of accuracy in gaining precise access to a targeted renal calyx.


Assuntos
Cálices Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Desenho de Equipamento , Fluoroscopia , Agulhas , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Robótica/instrumentação , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA