Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 72(5): 317-324, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28591345

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of amfepramone, fenproporex and mazindol as a monotherapy for the treatment of obese or overweight patients. A systematic review of primary studies was conducted, followed by a direct meta-analysis (random effect) and mixed treatment comparison. Medline and other databases were searched. Heterogeneity was explored through I2 associated with a p-value. Of 739 identified publications, 25 were included in the meta-analysis. The global evaluation of Cochrane resulted in 19 studies with a high level of bias and six with unclear risk. Due to the lack of information in primary studies, direct meta-analyses were conducted only for amfepramone and mazindol. Compared to placebo, amfepramone resulted in higher weight loss in the short-term (<180 days; mean difference (MD) -1.281 kg; p<0.05; I2: 0.0%; p=0.379) and long-term (≥180 days; MD -6.518 kg; p<0.05; I2: 0.0%; p=0.719). Only studies with long-term follow up reported efficacy in terms of abdominal circumference and 5-10% weight reduction. These results corroborated the finding that the efficacy of amfepramone is greater than that of placebo. Treatment with mazindol showed greater short-term weight loss than that with placebo (MD -1.721 kg; p<0.05; I2: 0.9%; p=0.388). However, metabolic outcomes were poorly described, preventing a meta-analysis. A mixed treatment comparison corroborated the direct meta-analysis. Considering the high level of risk of bias and the absence of important published outcomes for anti-obesity therapy assessments, this study found that the evaluated drugs showed poor evidence of efficacy in the treatment of overweight and obese patients. Robust safety data were not identified to suggest changes in their regulatory status.


Assuntos
Depressores do Apetite/uso terapêutico , Dietilpropiona/uso terapêutico , Mazindol/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Sobrepeso/tratamento farmacológico , Depressores do Apetite/metabolismo , Dietilpropiona/metabolismo , Humanos , Mazindol/metabolismo , Obesidade/metabolismo , Sobrepeso/metabolismo , Viés de Publicação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
Clinics ; Clinics;72(5): 317-324, May 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-840075

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of amfepramone, fenproporex and mazindol as a monotherapy for the treatment of obese or overweight patients. A systematic review of primary studies was conducted, followed by a direct meta-analysis (random effect) and mixed treatment comparison. Medline and other databases were searched. Heterogeneity was explored through I2 associated with a p-value. Of 739 identified publications, 25 were included in the meta-analysis. The global evaluation of Cochrane resulted in 19 studies with a high level of bias and six with unclear risk. Due to the lack of information in primary studies, direct meta-analyses were conducted only for amfepramone and mazindol. Compared to placebo, amfepramone resulted in higher weight loss in the short-term (<180 days; mean difference (MD) -1.281 kg; p<0.05; I2: 0.0%; p=0.379) and long-term (≥180 days; MD -6.518 kg; p<0.05; I2: 0.0%; p=0.719). Only studies with long-term follow up reported efficacy in terms of abdominal circumference and 5-10% weight reduction. These results corroborated the finding that the efficacy of amfepramone is greater than that of placebo. Treatment with mazindol showed greater short-term weight loss than that with placebo (MD -1.721 kg; p<0.05; I2: 0.9%; p=0.388). However, metabolic outcomes were poorly described, preventing a meta-analysis. A mixed treatment comparison corroborated the direct meta-analysis. Considering the high level of risk of bias and the absence of important published outcomes for anti-obesity therapy assessments, this study found that the evaluated drugs showed poor evidence of efficacy in the treatment of overweight and obese patients. Robust safety data were not identified to suggest changes in their regulatory status.


Assuntos
Humanos , Depressores do Apetite/uso terapêutico , Dietilpropiona/uso terapêutico , Mazindol/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Sobrepeso/tratamento farmacológico , Depressores do Apetite/metabolismo , Dietilpropiona/metabolismo , Mazindol/metabolismo , Obesidade/metabolismo , Sobrepeso/metabolismo , Viés de Publicação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos
3.
Neurosci Lett ; 167(1-2): 195-7, 1994 Feb 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8177524

RESUMO

Ligand binding to dopamine uptake sites, D1 and D2 dopamine receptors was measured autoradiographically in brain sections of mice exposed to intermittent hypobaric hypoxia (450 Torr; 4,300 m) for 14 days and compared to sea level controls. Desipramine-insensitive [3H]mazindol, [3H]SCH23390 and [3H]YM-09151-2 were used respectively for the labeling of the three binding sites. After 14 days, the striatum of hypoxic mice showed a significant 21% increase in dopamine uptake sites, one of the loci of action of cocaine. A similar (28%) but non-significant increase was found in the ventral tegmental area. No changes were seen in the activities of D1 or D2 receptors in several areas examined including the substantia nigra and the striatum.


Assuntos
Corpo Estriado/metabolismo , Dopamina/farmacocinética , Hipóxia/metabolismo , Animais , Autorradiografia , Benzamidas/metabolismo , Benzazepinas/metabolismo , Sítios de Ligação , Desipramina/farmacologia , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Dopamina D2 , Masculino , Mazindol/metabolismo , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Receptores de Dopamina D1/metabolismo , Receptores de Dopamina D2/metabolismo , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA