RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare self-esteem scores in 12 to 16-year-old adolescents with different Angle malocclusion types in a Peruvian sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 276 adolescents (159, 52 and 65 with Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions, respectively) from Trujillo, Peru. Participants were asked to complete the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and were also clinically examined, so as to have Angle malocclusion classification determined. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare RSES scores among adolescents with Class I, II and III malocclusions, with participants' demographic factors being controlled. RESULTS: Mean RSES scores for adolescents with Class I, II and III malocclusions were 20.47 ± 3.96, 21.96 ± 3.27 and 21.26 ± 4.81, respectively. The ANCOVA test showed that adolescents with Class II malocclusion had a significantly higher RSES score than those with Class I malocclusion, but there were no differences between other malocclusion groups. Supplemental analysis suggested that only those with Class II, Division 2 malocclusion might have greater self-esteem when compared to adolescents with Class I malocclusion. CONCLUSION: This study shows that, in general, self-esteem did not vary according to adolescents' malocclusion in the sample studied. Surprisingly, only adolescents with Class II malocclusion, particularly Class II, Division 2, reported better self-esteem than those with Class I malocclusion. A more detailed analysis assessing the impact of anterior occlusal features should be conducted.
Assuntos
Comparação Transcultural , Má Oclusão Classe III de Angle/psicologia , Má Oclusão Classe II de Angle/psicologia , Má Oclusão Classe I de Angle/psicologia , Autoimagem , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , PeruRESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare self-esteem scores in 12 to 16-year-old adolescents with different Angle malocclusion types in a Peruvian sample. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 276 adolescents (159, 52 and 65 with Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions, respectively) from Trujillo, Peru. Participants were asked to complete the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and were also clinically examined, so as to have Angle malocclusion classification determined. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare RSES scores among adolescents with Class I, II and III malocclusions, with participants' demographic factors being controlled. Results: Mean RSES scores for adolescents with Class I, II and III malocclusions were 20.47 ± 3.96, 21.96 ± 3.27 and 21.26 ± 4.81, respectively. The ANCOVA test showed that adolescents with Class II malocclusion had a significantly higher RSES score than those with Class I malocclusion, but there were no differences between other malocclusion groups. Supplemental analysis suggested that only those with Class II, Division 2 malocclusion might have greater self-esteem when compared to adolescents with Class I malocclusion. Conclusion: This study shows that, in general, self-esteem did not vary according to adolescents' malocclusion in the sample studied. Surprisingly, only adolescents with Class II malocclusion, particularly Class II, Division 2, reported better self-esteem than those with Class I malocclusion. A more detailed analysis assessing the impact of anterior occlusal features should be conducted.
RESUMO Objetivo: comparar os escores relacionados à autoestima de adolescentes com 12 a 16 anos de idade, portadores de diferentes tipos de má oclusão de Angle, em uma amostra de peruanos. Métodos: um estudo transversal foi conduzido com uma amostra de 276 adolescentes (159, 52 e 65, respectivamente, com má oclusão de Classe I, II e III de Angle) da cidade de Trujillo, Peru. Os participantes foram instruídos a completar a Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg (Rosenberg self-esteem scale, ou RSES), e também foram submetidos a exames clínicos para determinar qual sua má oclusão, segundo a classificação de Angle. A análise de covariância (ANCOVA) foi utilizada para comparar os escores da RSES dos adolescentes com más oclusões de Classes I, II e III, controlando-se os fatores demográficos dos participantes. Resultados: as médias dos escores da RSES dos adolescentes com Classes I, II e III foram, respectivamente: 20,47 ± 3,96, 21,96 ± 3,27 e 21,26 ± 4,81. O teste ANCOVA revelou que o escore da RSES dos adolescentes com Classe II foi significativamente maior do que o escore dos adolescentes com Classe I, mas não houve diferenças entre os outros grupos de más oclusões. Uma análise adicional sugeriu que podem ser somente os adolescentes Classe II, subdivisão 2, que apresentam autoestima mais elevada, quando comparados aos adolescentes Classe I. Conclusão: esse estudo mostrou que, no geral, a autoestima dos adolescentes incluídos na amostra estudada não variou em função da má oclusão apresentada. Inesperadamente, apenas os adolescentes com Classe II - especialmente os com Classe II, subdivisão 2 - relataram apresentar uma autoestima mais elevada do que os adolescentes com Classe I. Uma análise mais detalhada deve ser conduzida, avaliando qual característica oclusal da região anterior tem mais impacto.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Autoimagem , Comparação Transcultural , Má Oclusão Classe I de Angle/psicologia , Má Oclusão Classe II de Angle/psicologia , Má Oclusão Classe III de Angle/psicologia , Peru , Estudos TransversaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with patient satisfaction at least 5 years after orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 209 orthodontic patients were included in the study. All subjects were treated with upper and lower fixed orthodontic appliances. Dental casts (n = 627) were examined using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index pretreatment (T1), at the end of treatment (T2) and at a long-term follow-up (mean, 8.5 years; T3). At T3, a Dental Impact on Daily Living questionnaire was used to assess the long-term effects of orthodontic treatment on daily living and satisfaction with the dentition. Multiple regression analyses were used to quantify associations between patient satisfaction and changes produced by the orthodontic treatment (PAR T2-T1), posttreatment stability (PAR T3), age at the start of treatment (T1), treatment duration (T2-T1), gender, and extraction. RESULTS: Orthodontic treatment produced a significant improvement of 94.2% in the PAR Index (T2-T1), but this change was not associated with the level of satisfaction when the patient was questioned at least 5 years after treatment. Regression analysis showed that satisfaction was significantly associated only with the long-term posttreatment PAR index (r(2) = 0.125, P < .0001). No significant association was observed with the severity of malocclusion at the beginning (PAR-T1) or end of the orthodontic treatment (PAR-T2), age at T1, the amount of time taken during orthodontic treatment, gender, or extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Over the long term, patient satisfaction is slightly associated with the stability of the orthodontic treatment regardless of the initial occlusal condition or the final result of the orthodontic treatment.
Assuntos
Ortodontia Corretiva/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Má Oclusão Classe I de Angle/psicologia , Má Oclusão Classe I de Angle/terapia , Má Oclusão Classe II de Angle/psicologia , Má Oclusão Classe II de Angle/terapia , Revisão dos Cuidados de Saúde por Pares , Recidiva , Análise de Regressão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Extração Dentária/psicologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence, intensity, and extent of condition-specific oral impacts on quality of life attributed to malocclusion by Brazilian adolescents with normal occlusion and those with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups of 55 adolescents were configured such that each group represented normal occlusion, as well as Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion. No radiographs were taken. Adolescents aged 15 to 16 years were selected from those attending all secondary schools in Bauru (Sao Paulo, Brazil). The Oral Impacts on Daily Performances index was used to collect data on condition-specific impacts (CSIs) attributed to malocclusion. The prevalence, as well as the intensity and extent, of CSIs was compared among the four groups with the use of Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively. RESULTS: Groups were comparable according to sex, age, and socioeconomic status. The prevalence of CSI was significantly different between groups (P = .039). Class II and III malocclusion groups reported a higher prevalence of CSI than those with normal occlusion and Class I malocclusion. However, the intensity and extent of CSI were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence, but not the intensity and extent, of CSIs attributed to malocclusion differed among groups with different malocclusions. The present findings support the concept that malocclusion has physical, psychological, and social effects on quality of life.