Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cir Cir ; 91(6): 824-828, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38096868

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Determine the effectiveness of endoscopy in cochlear implantation as compared to microscopy. METHOD: Study comparing microscopy and endoscopy in cochlear implant placement in 34 patients (23 endoscopic implants and 20 implants via microscopy), between 2014 and 2019, at the Centro Medico Naval, Mexico City. The study was performed under informed consent and according to the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). RESULTS: Of the 34 patients, 12 were children or adolescents and 22 were adults. The visualization of the round window classified via microscopy per St. Thomas Hospital's classification showed that type IIB prevailed in 30.2% of patients, and type III in 41.9%, and when using the endoscope, the round window was observed in full in 82.6% of patients (type I), and type IIA was only observed in 17.4% (four patients). The number of attempts made to place the cochlear implant was greater with the microscope. The time to insertion of the electrode was 1.6 minutes. No differences were observed (p > 0.05) in the number of inpatient days. Cochleostomy was more frequent when using the microscope. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy is an effective resource in cochlear implantation for posterior tympanotomy, with no complications observed, offering greater safety in inserting the electrode through the round window.


OBJETIVO: Determinar la efectividad de la endoscopía en la implantación coclear en comparación con la técnica microscópica. MÉTODO: Se comparó la microscopía frente a la endoscopía en la colocación de implante coclear en 34 pacientes (23 endoscópicos y 20 microscópicos), del año 2014 al año 2019, en el Centro Médico Naval de la Ciudad de México. El estudio se realizó bajo consentimiento informado y apegado a las normas del Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. RESULTADOS: De los 34 pacientes, 12 eran niños o adolescentes y 22 eran adultos. La visualización de la ventana redonda fue clasificada con microscopio según la clasificación del St. Thomas Hospital, predominando la tipo IIB (30.2%) y la III (41.9%), y al utilizar el endoscopio se observó completa en el 82.6% (tipo I) y tipo IIA en tan solo el 17.4% (cuatro pacientes). El número de intentos en la colocación del implante coclear fue mayor con el microscopio. El tiempo en el que se insertó el electrodo fue de 1.6 minutos. No hubo diferencias (p > 0.05) en la estancia hospitalaria. Fue más frecuente la cocleostomía cuando se uso el microscopio. CONCLUSIONES: La endoscopía es un instrumento efectivo en la implantación coclear por timpanotomía posterior, sin presentarse complicaciones y dando mayor seguridad para insertar el electrodo por la ventana redonda.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Criança , Adulto , Adolescente , Humanos , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , México
2.
Audiol Neurootol ; 22(1): 50-55, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28641288

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to describe the dimensions of the crista fenestra and determine its presence by means of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) for the purpose of cochlear implantation via the round window approach. METHODS: A series of 10 adult human temporal bones underwent high-resolution CT scanning and were further dissected for microscopic study of the round window niche. RESULTS: In all of the specimens, the round window membrane was fully visualized after the complete removal of bony overhangs. The crista fenestra was identified as a sharp bony crest located in the anterior and inferior borders of the niche; its area ranged from 0.28 to 0.80 mm2 (mean 0.51 ± 0.18). The proportion of the area occupied by the crista fenestra in the whole circumference of the round window ranged from 23 to 50% (mean 36%). We found a moderate positive correlation between the area of the niche and the dimensions of the crista fenestra (Spearman rho: 0.491). In every case, high-resolution CT scanning was unable to determine the presence of the crista fenestra. CONCLUSION: The crista fenestra occupies a variable but expressive area within the bony round window niche. Narrower round window niches tended to house smaller crests. The presence of the crista fenestra is an important obstacle to adequate access to the scala tympani. Nevertheless, a high-resolution CT scan provides no additional preoperative information with regard to its presence for the purpose of surgical access to the scala tympani via the round window niche.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/métodos , Janela da Cóclea/diagnóstico por imagem , Rampa do Tímpano/diagnóstico por imagem , Implantes Cocleares , Humanos , Janela da Cóclea/anatomia & histologia , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia , Rampa do Tímpano/anatomia & histologia , Rampa do Tímpano/cirurgia , Osso Temporal/anatomia & histologia , Osso Temporal/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso Temporal/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
3.
Biomed Res Int ; 2015: 236364, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26236719

RESUMO

HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to evaluate whether there is a difference in the degree of intracochlear trauma when the cochlear implant electrode arrays is inserted through different quadrants of the round window membrane. BACKGROUND: The benefits of residual hearing preservation in cochlear implant recipients have promoted the development of atraumatic surgeries. Minimal trauma during electrode insertion is crucial for residual hearing preservation. METHODS: In total, 25 fresh human temporal bones were subjected to mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy. The cochlear implant electrode array was inserted through the anterosuperior quadrant of the round window membrane in 50% of the bones and through the anteroinferior quadrant in the remaining 50%. The temporal bones were dehydrated, embedded in epoxy, serially polished, stained, viewed through a stereomicroscope, and photographed with the electrode arrays in situ. The resulting images were analyzed for signs of intracochlear trauma. RESULTS: Histological examinations revealed varying degrees of damage to the intracochlear structures, although the incidence and severity of intracochlear trauma were not influenced by the quadrant of insertion. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and severity of intracochlear trauma were similar in all samples, irrespective of electrode array insertion through the anterosuperior or anteroinferior quadrant of the round window membrane.


Assuntos
Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia , Membrana Basilar/patologia , Cóclea/diagnóstico por imagem , Cóclea/cirurgia , Orelha Média/patologia , Humanos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
4.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.);81(2): 190-196, Mar-Apr/2015. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-745806

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Electroacoustic stimulation is an excellent option for people with residual hearing in the low frequencies, who obtain insufficient benefit with hearing aids. To be effective, the subject's residual hearing should be preserved during cochlear implant surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hearing preservation in patients that underwent implant placement and to compare the results in accordance with the approach to the inner ear. METHODS: 19 subjects underwent a soft surgical technique, and the electrode MED-EL FLEX(tm) EAS, designed to be atraumatic, was used. We evaluated pre- and postoperative tonal audiometric tests with an average of 18.4 months after implantation, to measure the rate of hearing preservation. RESULTS: 17 patients had total or partial preservation of residual hearing; 5 had total hearing preservation and two individuals had no preservation of hearing. The insertion of the electrode occurred through a cochleostomy in 3 patients, and in 2 of these there was no hearing preservation; the other 16 patients experienced electrode insertion through a round window approach. All patients benefited from the cochlear implant, even those who are only using electrical stimulation. CONCLUSION: The hearing preservation occurred in 89.4% of cases. There was no significant difference between the forms of inner ear approach. .


INTRODUÇÃO: A estimulação eletroacústica é uma excelente opção para pessoas com audição residual nas baixas frequências, que obtêm benefício insuficiente com aparelhos auditivos. Para ser eficaz, a audição residual deve ser preservada durante a cirurgia de implante coclear. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a preservação auditiva de pacientes implantados e comparar os resultados de acordo com a abordagem da orelha interna. MÉTODO: 19 indivíduos foram implantados com uma técnica cirúrgica para preservação auditiva, tendo sido utilizado o eletrodo MED-EL FLEXTM EAS, concebido para ser atraumático. Foram avaliados os exames audiométricos tonais no pré e pós-operatório, com uma média de 18,4 meses após o implante para medir a taxa de preservação da audição residual. RESULTADOS: 17 pacientes tiveram preservação total ou parcial da audição residual; cinco obtiveram preservação da audição total e dois indivíduos não tiveram preservação da audição. A inserção do eletrodo ocorreu por cocleostomia em 3 pacientes; em 2 destes pacientes não houve preservação da audição. Os outros 16 pacientes foram submetidos à abordagem pela janela redonda. Todos os pacientes foram beneficiados com o implante coclear, mesmo aqueles pacientes que utilizando apenas estimulação elétrica. CONCLUSÃO: A preservação auditiva ocorreu em 89,4% dos casos. Não houve diferença significativa entre as formas de abordagem da orelha interna. .


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Implante Coclear/métodos , Implantes Cocleares , Perda Auditiva Unilateral/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Unilateral/cirurgia , Limiar Auditivo , Estimulação Elétrica , Testes Auditivos , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Ajuste de Prótese , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia , Percepção da Fala , Membrana Timpânica/cirurgia
5.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 81(2): 190-6, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25649137

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Electroacoustic stimulation is an excellent option for people with residual hearing in the low frequencies, who obtain insufficient benefit with hearing aids. To be effective, the subject's residual hearing should be preserved during cochlear implant surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hearing preservation in patients that underwent implant placement and to compare the results in accordance with the approach to the inner ear. METHODS: 19 subjects underwent a soft surgical technique, and the electrode MED-EL FLEX™ EAS, designed to be atraumatic, was used. We evaluated pre- and postoperative tonal audiometric tests with an average of 18.4 months after implantation, to measure the rate of hearing preservation. RESULTS: 17 patients had total or partial preservation of residual hearing; 5 had total hearing preservation and two individuals had no preservation of hearing. The insertion of the electrode occurred through a cochleostomy in 3 patients, and in 2 of these there was no hearing preservation; the other 16 patients experienced electrode insertion through a round window approach. All patients benefited from the cochlear implant, even those who are only using electrical stimulation. CONCLUSION: The hearing preservation occurred in 89.4% of cases. There was no significant difference between the forms of inner ear approach.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/métodos , Implantes Cocleares , Perda Auditiva Unilateral/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Unilateral/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Limiar Auditivo , Estimulação Elétrica , Feminino , Testes Auditivos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Ajuste de Prótese , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia , Percepção da Fala , Membrana Timpânica/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Otol Neurotol ; 35(3): 437-41, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24492140

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In 2009, we had introduced the active middle ear implant (aMEI) round window coupling in patients undergoing a subtotal petrosectomy and reported our first results. In the current study, we evaluated the long-term firmness of the vibranting floating mass transducer (FMT) within the round window niche, the long-term audiologic results and the patient's perspective of wearing the speech processor over time. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Of 10 patients, 6 female and 1 male patients (age range from 30 to 71 yr) had undergone subtotal petrosectomy with aMEI round window vibroplasty and were available for a long-term follow-up. Indications were recurrent or chronic ear infections with preserved inner ear function and inability for ossicular chain reconstruction. A thin piece of fascia was placed between the FMT and the round window membrane once the round window niche had been enlarged by drilling. The operative cavity was filled with fat and a muscle flap in all cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Audiologic evaluations included pre- and postoperative pure-tone audiometry, Freiburger syllable and numeric tests. All patients underwent preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Postoperative follow-up included CT scans at 1 and preferentially 3 to 5 years to confirm the correct positioning of the FMT and the complete removal of the underlaying pathology. Subjective benefit was rated by the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile. RESULTS: There were no immediate postoperative complications. CT scans confirmed the correct and durable positioning of the FMT. Audiometric tests revealed a stable and adequate functional gain in all patients with limited adjustments over time. Subjective rating reached a high satisfaction score, and all patients remained long-term implant users. One patient developed a skin necrosis over the implant because of excessive pressure exerted by the retaining magnet of the headpiece. Revision was performed using local skin flaps with preservation of the functioning implant. CONCLUSION: Our radiologic, audiometric, and subjective data show stable long-term results of round window vibroplasty in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy, and we continue to recommend this treatment option instead of another mastoid revision procedure.


Assuntos
Orelha Média/cirurgia , Perda Auditiva Condutiva-Neurossensorial Mista/cirurgia , Prótese Ossicular , Substituição Ossicular , Osso Petroso/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Audiometria de Tons Puros , Limiar Auditivo/fisiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Perda Auditiva Condutiva-Neurossensorial Mista/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos , Satisfação do Paciente , Janela da Cóclea/fisiopatologia , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
São Paulo; s.n; 2014. [97] p. ilus, tab.
Tese em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-719941

RESUMO

INTRODUÇÃO: A ampliação dos critérios de indicação para cirurgia do implante coclear e os benefícios da preservação da audição residual no pósoperatório estimularam o desenvolvimento de técnicas cirúrgicas atraumáticas. Minimizar os traumas intracocleares durante a inserção do feixe de eletrodos do implante coclear é um passo fundamental para este intuito. O objetivo deste trabalho é avaliar se o trauma intracoclear é diferente quando o feixe de eletrodos do implante coclear é inserido através do quadrante anterossuperior ou anteroinferior da membrana da janela redonda. MÉTODOS: Vinte e cinco ossos temporais frescos de cadáveres humanos foram submetidos à timpanomastoidectomia padrão. Após exposição adequada da membrana da janela redonda, em metade dos ossos o feixe de eletrodos do implante coclear foi inserido via quadrante anterossuperior da membrana da janela redonda, e na outra metade via quadrante anteroinferior. Os ossos temporais foram desidratados e embebidos em epóxi, com o feixe de eletrodos in situ. As peças foram serialmente polidas, tingidas e visualizadas por meio de estereomicroscópio para avaliar o trauma intracoclear causado pela inserção do feixe de eletrodos. As imagens foram fotografadas. RESULTADOS: Em treze ossos temporais o feixe de eletrodos do implante coclear foi inserido via quadrante anterossuperior da membrana da janela redonda, e em doze ossos via quadrante anteroinferior. Obteve-se 372 superfícies. As análises histológicas revelaram diferentes graus de traumas às estruturas intracocleares. Os resultados mostraram que a inserção do feixe de eletrodos via quadrante anterossuperior ou anteroinferior acarretam a mesma frequência de trauma intracoclear. CONCLUSÕES: A presença de trauma intracoclear e a severidade dos traumas ocorridos no tocante à inserção do feixe de eletrodos de implante coclear pelo quadrante anterossuperior e anteroinferior da membrana da janela redonda não apresentou diferença estatisticamente significativa...


INTRODUCTION: The expansion of the indication criteria for cochlear implant surgery and the benefits of preserving residual hearing postoperatively have stimulated the development of atraumatic surgeries. Minimizing the intracochlear traumas during the electrodes insertion is a critical step for this aim. The objective of this study is to assess whether there is a difference in intracochlear trauma when the cochlear implant electrode array is inserted through the anterior-superior or anterior-inferior quadrants of the round window membrane. METHODS: Twenty-five fresh human temporal bones were submitted to standard tympanomastoidectomy. After adequate exposure of the round window membrane, in half of the bones the cochlear implant electrode array was inserted via anterior-superior quadrant of round window membrane and in the other half via anterior-inferior quadrant. The temporal bones were dehydrated and embedded in epoxy with the electrodes array in situ. The specimens were serially polished, stained and viewed through a stereomicroscope to assess the intracochlear trauma caused by insertion of the electrode array. Resulting images were documented. RESULTS: In thirteen temporal bones the cochlear implant electrode array was inserted via anterior-superior quadrant of round window membrane and in twelve bones via anterior-inferior quadrant. Three hundred and seventy two surfaces were obtained. Histological examinations revealed varying degrees of damage to the intracohlear structures. The results showed that the insertion of the electrode array via anterior-superior or anterior-inferior quadrant lead to the same frequency of intracochlear trauma. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of intracochlear trauma and severity of traumas regarding the insertion of cochlear implant electrode array via anterior-superior and via anterior-inferior quadrant of the round window membrane showed no statistically significant difference. However, it was observed that surgical exposure...


Assuntos
Humanos , Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Cóclea/lesões , Orelha Interna , Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia , Janela da Cóclea/lesões , Osso Temporal/anatomia & histologia , Osso Temporal/cirurgia , Cadáver , Humanos
8.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 78(4): 71-5, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22936140

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: There are two techniques for cochlear implant (CI) electrode placement: cochleostomy and the round window (RW) approach. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare neural response telemetry (NRT) results immediately after surgery to check for possible differences on auditory nerve stimulation between these two techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional study. Twenty-three patients were enrolled. Six patients underwent surgery by cochleostomy and 17 had it through the RW approach. RESULTS: Mean charge units (MCU) for high frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 190.4 (± 29.2) while cochleostomy patients averaged 187.8 (± 32.7); p = 0.71. MCU for mid frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 192.5 (± 22) while cochleostomy patients averaged 178.5 (± 18.5); p = 0.23. MCU for low frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 183.3 (± 25) while cochleostomy patients averaged 163.8 (± 19.3); p = 0.19. CONCLUSION: This study showed no differences in the action potential of the distal portion of the auditory nerve in patients with multichannel cochlear implants submitted to surgery by cochleostomy or through the RW approach, using the implant itself to generate stimuli and record responses. Both techniques equally stimulate the cochlear nerve. Therefore, the choice of approach can be made based on the surgeon's own preference and experience.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/métodos , Surdez/cirurgia , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cóclea/cirurgia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Telemetria , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
9.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.);78(4): 71-75, jul.-ago. 2012. tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-646774

RESUMO

Existem duas técnicas para inserção dos eletrodos do implante coclear (IC): Via cocleostomia ou via janela redonda (JR). OBJETIVO: Comparar a telemetria de resposta neural (NRT) no pós-operatório imediato, verificando se há diferenças na estimulação do nervo auditivo entre estas duas técnicas. MÉTODOS: Prospectivo e transversal. Foram avaliados 23 pacientes. Seis submetidos à cirurgia via cocleostomia e 17 via JR. RESULTADOS: Comparação das unidades de corrente médias (UCM) para sons agudos: via JR com média de 190,4 (± 29,2) e via cocleostomia 187,8 (± 32,7), p = 0,71. Comparação das UCM para sons intermediários: via JR, média de 192,5 (± 22) e via cocleostomia 178,5 (± 18.5), p = 0,23. Comparação das UCM para sons graves: via JR, média de 183,3 (± 25) e via cocleostomia 163,8 (± 19,3), p = 0,19. CONCLUSÃO: Este estudo não mostrou diferença na captação do potencial de ação da porção distal do nervo auditivo em pacientes usuários do implante coclear multicanal submetidos à cirurgia via cocleostomia ou via JR, utilizando o próprio implante para eliciar o estímulo e gravar as respostas. Portanto, ambas as técnicas estimulam de maneira igual o nervo coclear, e baseado nisto conclui-se, também, que realizar o implante coclear via cocleostomia ou RW é uma escolha que depende da experiência cirúrgica e opção do cirurgião.


There are two techniques for cochlear implant (CI) electrode placement: cochleostomy and the round window (RW) approach. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare neural response telemetry (NRT) results immediately after surgery to check for possible differences on auditory nerve stimulation between these two techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional study. Twenty-three patients were enrolled. Six patients underwent surgery by cochleostomy and 17 had it through the RW approach. RESULTS: Mean charge units (MCU) for high frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 190.4 (± 29.2) while cochleostomy patients averaged 187.8 (± 32.7); p = 0.71. MCU for mid frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 192.5 (± 22) while cochleostomy patients averaged 178.5 (± 18.5); p = 0.23. MCU for low frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 183.3 (± 25) while cochleostomy patients averaged 163.8 (± 19.3); p = 0.19. CONCLUSION: This study showed no differences in the action potential of the distal portion of the auditory nerve in patients with multichannel cochlear implants submitted to surgery by cochleostomy or through the RW approach, using the implant itself to generate stimuli and record responses. Both techniques equally stimulate the cochlear nerve. Therefore, the choice of approach can be made based on the surgeon's own preference and experience.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Implante Coclear/métodos , Surdez/cirurgia , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia , Estudos Transversais , Cóclea/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Telemetria , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 76(2): 178-84, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20549077

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Perilymphatic fistulas still represent a major treatment challenge. In some cases, its surgical closure can reduce auditory and vestibular sequelae. AIM: To compare the behavior of cochlear window perilymphatic fistulas in guinea pigs as to their natural evolution and immediate surgical closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental study. Forty guinea pigs were submitted to cochlear window membrane lesion and randomly broken down into two groups: open fistula (OF) and surgically closed fistula (SCF). We found the summation potential (SP) and action potential (AP) latencies and amplitudes and the SP/AP ratio at three times: pre-fistula (PRE), immediate post-fistula (IPF) and late post-fistula (LPF). RESULTS: There was a significant drop in amplitudes and raise in SP and AP latencies among the times studied. As to the SP/AP ratios, there was a reduction between PRE and IPF, both were significant. There was no behavior difference between the OF and SCF. CONCLUSIONS: Within the time frame considered, guinea pigs submitted to cochlear window membrane lesions evolved with a worsening in potentials and latencies. Despite the partial improvement in electrophysiological parameters, surgical closure did not prove statistically more effective than natural evolution.


Assuntos
Fístula/cirurgia , Doenças do Labirinto/cirurgia , Perilinfa , Janela da Cóclea/lesões , Animais , Audiometria de Resposta Evocada , Cobaias , Masculino , Tempo de Reação , Remissão Espontânea , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia
11.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.);76(2): 178-184, mar.-abr. 2010. graf, tab
Artigo em Inglês, Português | LILACS | ID: lil-548318

RESUMO

As fístulas perilinfáticas ainda constituem um grande desafio quanto ao seu tratamento. Em alguns casos, seu fechamento cirúrgico pode reduzir as sequelas auditivas e vestibulares. OBJETIVO: Comparar o comportamento de fístulas perilinfáticas de janela coclear em cobaias quanto à evolução natural e fechamento cirúrgico imediato. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Estudo experimental. Quarenta cobaias foram submetidas à lesão da membrana da janela coclear e divididas em dois grupos aleatoriamente: fístula aberta (FA) e fístula fechada cirurgicamente (FF). Foram determinadas as amplitudes e latências do potencial de somação (PS) e do potencial de ação (PA) e da relação PS/PA em três momentos: pré-fístula (PRÉ), pós-fístula imediato (PFI) e pós-fístula tardio (PFT). RESULTADOS: Observou-se significativa queda das amplitudes e aumento das latências do PS e PA entre os momentos considerados. Quanto à relação PS/PA, houve diminuição entre PRÉ e PFI mas aumento entre PFI e PFT, ambos significantes. Não houve diferença de comportamento entre os grupos FA e FF. CONCLUSÕES: No período considerado, cobaias submetidas a lesões da membrana da janela coclear evoluíram com piora dos potenciais e latências. Apesar da melhora parcial dos parâmetros eletrofisiológicos o fechamento cirúrgico não se mostrou estatisticamente mais efetivo que a evolução natural das mesmas.


Perilymphatic fistulas still represent a major treatment challenge. In some cases, its surgical closure can reduce auditory and vestibular sequelae. AIM: to compare the behavior of cochlear window perilymphatic fistulas in guinea pigs as to their natural evolution and immediate surgical closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental study. Forty guinea pigs were submitted to cochlear window membrane lesion and randomly broken down into two groups: open fistula (OF) and surgically closed fistula (SCF). We found the summation potential (SP) and action potential (AP) latencies and amplitudes and the SP/AP ratio at three times: pre-fistula (PRE), immediate post-fistula (IPF) and late post-fistula (LPF). RESULTS: There was a significant drop in amplitudes and raise in SP and AP latencies among the times studied. As to the SP/AP ratios, there was a reduction between PRE and IPF, both were significant. There was no behavior difference between the OF and SCF. CONCLUSIONS: Within the time frame considered, guinea pigs submitted to cochlear window membrane lesions evolved with a worsening in potentials and latencies. Despite the partial improvement in electrophysiological parameters, surgical closure did not prove statistically more effective than natural evolution.


Assuntos
Animais , Cobaias , Masculino , Fístula/cirurgia , Doenças do Labirinto/cirurgia , Perilinfa , Janela da Cóclea/lesões , Audiometria de Resposta Evocada , Tempo de Reação , Remissão Espontânea , Janela da Cóclea/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA