RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk of respiratory adverse effects in patients with solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors) in combination with radiation therapy. METHODS: We selected eligible studies through the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ). The data was analyzed by using Rstudio. RESULTS: Among 3737 studies, 26 clinical trials, including 2670 patients, were qualified for the meta-analysis. We evaluated the incidence rates of adverse respiratory events, including cough, pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections, and others: grades 1-5 cough, 0.176 (95%CI: 0.113-0.274, I2 = 92.36%); grades 1-5 pneumonitis, 0.118 (95%CI: 0.067-0.198, I2 = 88.64%); grades 1-5 upper respiratory tract infection, 0.064 (95%CI: 0.049-0.080, I2 = 0.98%); grades 3-5 cough, 0.050 (95%CI: 0.012-0.204, I2 = 8.90%); grades 3-5 pneumonitis, 0.052 (95%CI: 0.031-0.078, I2 = 83.86%); grades 3-5 upper respiratory tract infection, 0.040 (95%CI: 0.007-0.249, I2 = 45.31%). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that ICI combined with radiotherapy for solid tumors can produce respiratory adverse effects. ICIs combination treatment, a tumor located in the chest, is more likely to cause adverse reactions, and SBRT treatment and synchronous treatment will bring less incidence of adverse reactions. This study provide insights for clinicians to balance the risks of radiotherapy in the course of treating oncology patients.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologiaRESUMO
Background: The first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma has evolved significantly. This study aimed to identify the most beneficial regimen. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from July 2012 to August 2024 across the following four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. This search focused on phase III prospective randomized controlled trials that compared first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Results: Seventeen studies involving 10322 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Of the studies we included, twelve studies were global multicenter clinical studies, four were initiated in China, and one was initiated in Korea. The results of our statistical analysis suggest that Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil (HAIC-FO) demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefits compared with most treatments, including various immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKIs). In terms of OS, HAIC had shown similar efficacy with sorafenib plus FOLFOX (HR, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.37-2.09) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib (HR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.30-1.56). Notably, immune-related treatments, such as ICIs combined with anti-VEGF therapies, also showed improved OS compared with anti-VEGF-TKIs alone. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), HAIC-FO outperformed anti-VEGF-TKI monotherapy, ICI monotherapy, and several ICI combinations. However, it was not superior to lenvatinib plus TACE or lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab. Based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) values, HAIC-FO was ranked the most effective in terms of OS (SUCRA = 0.961) and objective response rate (ORR) (SUCRA = 0.971). The results of the subgroup analysis suggested that HAIC-FO achieved the best OS benefit in the macrovascular invasion (MVI) and extrahepatic spread (EHS) subgroup (SUCRA = 0.99) and that tremelimumab combined with durvalumab achieved the best OS benefit in the Asian subgroup (SUCRA = 0.88). Conclusion: This systematic review and network meta-analysis suggest that HAIC-based therapies may become a potential first-line treatment option for advanced HCC, especially for patients in Mainland China with MVI and EHS. Additionally, immune-related treatments may be more suitable for Asian populations.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Metanálise em Rede , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, particularly when diagnosed at an unresectable stage. Traditional treatments for advanced HCC have limited efficacy, prompting the exploration of combination therapies. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents in patients with unresectable HCC. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science, including studies up to June 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing combination therapy (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents) to monotherapy or standard treatments in unresectable HCC patients were included. Data were synthesized using random-effects models, with pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and risk ratios (RRs) for objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). Results: Five Phase III RCTs involving 1515 patients were included. Combination therapy significantly improved OS (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.60-0.85) and PFS (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.77) compared to monotherapy or standard treatments. The pooled OR for ORR was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.57-2.11), indicating a higher response rate with combination therapy. However, the risk of AEs was also higher in the combination therapy group (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent benefits across different types of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents, with no significant publication bias detected. Conclusions: The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents offers significant benefits in improving OS and PFS in patients with unresectable HCC, although it is associated with an increased risk of adverse events.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese , Antígeno B7-H1 , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies, and gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy have shown significant antitumor activity as first-line therapy against biliary tract cancer. This study evaluated their efficacy and safety as non-first-line therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC). METHODS: Patients with advanced GBC who received lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies and GEMOX chemotherapy as a non-first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients with advanced GBC were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 11.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-20.9) months, and the ORR was 36.1%. The median OS and PFS were 15.1 (95% CI: 3.2-26.9) and 6.1 (95% CI: 4.9-7.2) months, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 75% and 61.1%, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression had significantly longer PFS and OS than those without PD-L1 expression. Additionally, patients with a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5.57 had a longer OS than those with an NLR ≥ 5.57. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with 61.1% experiencing grade 3 or 4 AEs, including myelosuppression (13.9%) and fatigue (13.3%), alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase levels (8.3%), and diarrhea (8.3%). No grade 5 AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with lenvatinib and GEMOX chemotherapy are effective and well-tolerated as a non-first-line therapy in advanced GBC. PD-L1 expression and baseline NLR may potentially predict treatment efficacy.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Desoxicitidina , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar , Compostos de Fenilureia , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 , Quinolinas , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Quinolinas/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Gencitabina , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Compostos OrganoplatínicosRESUMO
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, long-term prognosis and safety of combining chemotherapy with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Methods: In this single arm phase II trial, twenty-nine patients with advanced BTC were included, all of whom received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy combined with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as the first-line treatment. And the study analyzed anti-tumor efficacy, long-term prognosis, and adverse reactions. Results: Among the patients, 0 patient achieved complete response, 18 patients (62.1%) achieved partial response, 8 patients (27.6%) had stable disease, and 3 patients (10.3%) experienced progressive disease. The corresponding objective response rate (ORR) was 18/29 (62.1%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 26/29 (89.7%). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.0 -21.8) and the median progress free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.8- 12.6). The 1-year OS and PFS were 65% (95% CI: 0.479-0.864) and 41% (95% CI: 0.234-0.656), respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions was 27/29 (93.1%), and the incidence of grade III/IV adverse reactions was 5/29 (17.2%). Conclusion: The combination of chemotherapy, regorafenib, and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC may has good anti-tumor efficacy without causing serious adverse reactions, and can significantly improve the long-term prognosis.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Compostos de Fenilureia , Piridinas , Humanos , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/mortalidade , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Gencitabina , Prognóstico , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
Background: A multitude of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in both the initial and subsequent treatment settings for patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have provided clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of immunotherapy with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In light of these findings, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized the use of several ICIs in specific subpopulations of mCRC patients. Nevertheless, there remains a dearth of direct comparative RCTs evaluating various treatment options. Consequently, the most effective ICI therapeutic strategy for microsatellite-stable (MSS) subgroup and microsatellite instability (MSI) subgroup in the first- and second-line therapies remains undefined. To address this gap, the present study employs a Bayesian network meta-analysis to ascertain the most effective first- and second-line ICI therapeutic strategies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with the retrieval date ranging from the databases' inception to August 20, 2024. A total of 875 studies were identified, and seven were ultimately included in the analysis after a screening process. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted on the basis of the search results. Results: This comprehensive analysis, comprising seven RCTs, evaluated first-line and second-line immunotherapy regimens in 1,358 patients diagnosed with mCRC. The treatments under investigation consisted of five initial treatments, including three focusing on MSS patients and two on MSI patients, as well as two secondary immunotherapy regimens, both focusing on MSS patients. A total of 1051 individuals underwent first-line treatment, while 307 received second-line treatment. The application of ICIs proved to offer varying degrees clinical benefits when compared to standard-of-care therapy alone, both in two subgroups of the first and the second treatment phases. Of particular note is the performance of Nivolumab combination with ipilimumab, which demonstrated superior efficacy in improving progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.34),. Moreover, the treatment demonstrated an optimal safety profile, with a relatively low risk of adverse events (OR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.56), compared to other first-line treatment modalities for MSI subgroup. Regarding MSS subgroup, the improvement of PFS by Nivolumab plus standard-of-care (SOC) was relatively significant (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.02). In the realm of second-line therapies for MSS subgroup, the administration of Atezolizumab plus SOC has proven to be an effective approach for prolonging PFS, exhibiting an HR of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.44-0.99). These findings underscore the clinical benefits and safety profiles of ICIs in the treatment of mCRC across various treatment lines. Conclusions: The clinical application of ICIs in both first- and second-line treatment strategies for patients with mCRC yields substantial therapeutic benefits. A detailed assessment in this study indicates that first-line treatment with Nivolumab combination with ipilimumab may represent an efficacious and well-tolerated therapeutic approach for MSI subgroup. In terms of MSS subgroup in first-line therapy, Nivolumab plus SOC may be a relative superior choice. In the context of second-line therapy for MSS subgroup, it is evident that a combination of Atezolizumab and SOC represents a preferable option for enhancing PFS. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that other ICIs treatment regimens also exhibit great value in various aspects, with the potential to inform the development of future clinical treatment guidelines and provide a stronger rationale for the selection of ICIs in both first- and second-line therapeutic strategies for mCRC. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42024543400.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Imunoterapia , Metanálise em Rede , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/imunologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Metástase Neoplásica , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Teorema de BayesRESUMO
Background: Radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy is a standard method for treating locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely applied in the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer, metastatic cervical cancer or LACC. The efficacy and safety of radiotherapy plus immunotherapy for LACC require further investigation. The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to analyze the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) combined with ICIs for treating LACC on the basis of the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: We comprehensively searched electronic databases to identify RCTs that focused on CCRT plus ICIs for LACC treatment. The outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). A standard method for systematic review and meta-analysis was used. Review Manager 5.4 was used for data combination and analyses. Results: Three RCTs involving 1882 participants with LACC were identified and included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. CCRT plus ICIs improved the rates of PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: CI: 0.64, 0.91, P = 0.002) and OS (HR: 0.7695% CI (95% CI 0.58-0.99, P = 0.04) in patients with LACC. Compared with the control group, the CCRT plus immunotherapy group had an increased ORR (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.02,1.85, P=0.04). The two methods had similar rates (HR=1.99, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.43; P=0.07) of treatment-related grade 3 or higher AEs. The CCRT plus immunotherapy group had a higher rate than did the control group (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.38, 5.21; P=0.004) in terms of any grade immunotherapy-related AEs. Conclusions: CCRT plus ICIs is efficacious and safe for the management of LACC. The addition of ICIs to CCRT improved the rates of PFS and OS in patients with LACC. The adverse effects of immunotherapy-related AEs should be strictly examined and managed in a timely manner.
Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/imunologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Feminino , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
In recent years, with the extensive application of immunotherapy in clinical practice, it has achieved encouraging therapeutic effects. While enhancing clinical efficacy, however, it can also cause autoimmune damage, triggering immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Reports of immunotherapy-induced gastritis have been increasing annually, but due to its atypical clinical symptoms, early diag-nosis poses a certain challenge. Furthermore, it can lead to severe complications such as gastric bleeding, elevating the risk of adverse outcomes for solid tumor patients if immunotherapy is interrupted. Therefore, gaining a thorough under-standing of the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of immune-related gastritis is of utmost importance for early identification, diagnosis, and treatment. Additionally, the treatment of immune-related gastritis should be personalized according to the specific condition of each patient. For patients with grade 2-3 irAEs, restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy may be considered when symptoms subside to grade 0-1. When restarting ICIs therapy, it is often recommended to use different types of ICIs. For grade 4 irAEs, permanent discontinuation of the medication is necessary.
Assuntos
Gastrite , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Gastrite/imunologia , Gastrite/induzido quimicamente , Gastrite/diagnóstico , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/imunologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To date, no meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and adjuvant immunotherapies (IMTs) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients using reconstructed individual patient data (IPD). This study aims to fill that gap by assessing the efficacy and safety profiles of these treatments in such patients. METHODS: This study employed a systematic approach for identifying relevant literature from the PubMed and EMBASE databases. We included articles published in English from the inception of these databases until November 11, 2023, focusing specifically on appropriate phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To reconstruct survival curves, we utilized a semiautomated tool, WebPlotDigitizer, in conjunction with a novel shiny application integrated with R software. For adverse events (AEs), the summary measures were incidences, expressed as a 95% confidence interval (CI), calculated using a random-effects model with a logit transformation. RESULTS: The analysis included 8 RCTs with a total of 9119 patients. Compared to adjuvant TKIs, adjuvant IMTs showed a similar disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95% CI [0.98-1.09], Pâ =â .281). However, the overall survival (OS) rates between the 2 groups couldn't be directly compared due to unmatched control groups in the IMT and TKI studies. Against placebo, adjuvant IMTs demonstrated superior DFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI [0.71-0.94], Pâ =â .004) but comparable OS (HR 0.79, 95% CI [0.59-1.06], Pâ =â .120). Against placebo, adjuvant TKIs showed superior DFS (HR 0.85, 95% CI [0.79-0.92], Pâ <â .0001) and marginally better OS (HR 0.89, 95% CI [0.80-0.996], Pâ =â .042). Regarding severe AEs and discontinuation rates due to AEs, adjuvant IMTs had a significantly lower incidence of severe AEs (25% [320/1282] vs 59% [2192/3716], odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 95% CI [0.20-0.27], Pâ <â .0001) and a markedly better discontinuation rate (39% [499/1282] vs 52% [2068/4018], OR 0.60, 95% CI [0.53-0.68], Pâ <â .0001) compared to TKIs. CONCLUSION: This paper presents a thorough analysis of DFS, OS, and treatment-related AEs across various groups in RCC patients, offering a valuable resource for clinicians in everyday practice. Our findings indicate that while adjuvant IMTs and adjuvant TKIs demonstrate similar DFS, IMTs are notably superior in terms of safety and compliance.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias Renais , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Intervalo Livre de DoençaAssuntos
Resistência à Insulina , Humanos , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce immune-related adverse events, including endocrine dysfunctions, which can have serious consequences on patient health and quality of life. The clinical course and characteristics of immune-related hypophysitis (irH) are not well established. This study aimed to analyze the clinical course and characteristics of irH. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed data from electronic medical records of Asan Medical Center, spanning January 2017 through June 2021. It included adult patients with solid tumors who underwent thyroid and adrenal function tests, along with gonadotropin and/or growth hormone evaluations, following the initiation of ICI treatment within the same period. The study explored the clinical characteristics of ICI-treated patients with and without irH, the incidence of irH, the time to irH onset, and the associated hormonal changes. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included in this analysis. Clinical characteristics did not differ significantly between the irH (n = 13) and non-irH (n = 8) groups. Deficiency rates in the irH group were 23.1% for thyroid-stimulating hormone (n = 3), 76.9% for adrenocorticotropic hormone (n = 10), 61.5% for gonadotropin (n = 8), and 15.4% for growth hormone (n = 2). The overall incidence was 0.9 per person-year, with 6-month and 1-year cumulative incidences of 38.8% and 57.1%, respectively. The median time from ICI initiation to irH diagnosis was 7.7 months. Time to levothyroxine replacement was shorter in the irH group. CONCLUSION: The findings provide evidence that could facilitate the prediction of ICI-induced irH based on clinical course and characteristics.
Assuntos
Hipofisite , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipofisite/induzido quimicamente , Hipofisite/epidemiologia , Hipofisite/diagnóstico , Idoso , Adulto , Incidência , Fatores de Tempo , Hormônio Adrenocorticotrópico/sangue , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/imunologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related pneumonitis (ICI-P) risk factors. However, the relationship between imaging patterns and immunotherapy outcomes, and treatment strategies remain unclear in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ILAs. We retrospectively evaluated patients with ILAs-complicated NSCLC who received ICI therapy. ILAs were subcategorized as non-subpleural, subpleural non-fibrotic, and subpleural fibrotic (SF) based on the 2020 position paper by the Fleischner Society. We investigated ICI-P incidence, ICI-P risk factors, lung cancer prognosis, and ILAs radiological progression. Of the 481 ICI-treated patients, 79 (16.4%) had ILAs (45 non-SF and 34 SF). The ICI-P cumulative incidence (hazard ratio, 4.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.90-10.98; p = 0.001) and any grade and grade ≥ 3 ICI-P incidences were higher in patients with SF-ILAs than in those with non-SF-ILAs (all grades: 7/45 [15.6%)] vs. 18/34 [52.9%]; p < 0.001; grade ≥ 3: 1/45 [2.2%] vs. 10/34 [29.4%]; p = 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, SF-ILAs independently predicted ICI-P (odds ratio, 5.35; 95% CI 1.62-17.61; p = 0.006). Patients with SF-ILAs had shorter progression-free and overall survival and higher ICI-P-related respiratory failure death rates than those with non-SF-ILAs. Approximately 2.5 times more patients with SF-ILAs showed progression by the 2-year follow-up than those with non-SF-ILAs. SF-ILAs is an independent strong predictor of ICI-P development in patients with NSCLC, may increase ICI-P severity, worsen prognosis, and accelerate ILAs progression. ILAs subcategorization is an important treatment strategy for patients with lung cancer treated with ICIs.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/etiologia , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Resultado do Tratamento , AdultoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although the patient survival rate for many malignancies has been improved with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), some patients experience various immune-related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs impact several organ systems, including the kidney. With anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy (pembrolizumab), kidney-related adverse events occur relatively rarely compared with other irAEs. However, the occurrence of AKI usually leads to anti-PD-1 therapy interruption or discontinuation. Therefore, there is an urgent need to clarify the mechanisms of renal irAEs (R-irAEs) to facilitate early management. This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in R-irAEs. METHODS: PBMCs were collected from three patients who developed R-irAEs after anti-PD-1 therapy and three patients who did not. The PBMCs were subjected to scRNA-seq to identify cell clusters and differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses were performed to investigate the most active biological processes in immune cells. RESULTS: Fifteen cell clusters were identified across the two groups. FOS, RPS26, and JUN were the top three upregulated genes in CD4+ T cells. The DEGs in CD4+ T cells were enriched in Th17 differentiation, Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation, NF-kappa B, Nod-like receptor, TNF, IL-17, apoptosis, and NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity signaling pathways. RPS26, TRBV25-1, and JUN were the top three upregulated genes in CD8+ T cells. The DEGs in CD8+ T cells were enriched in Th17 cell differentiation, antigen processing and presentation, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, the intestinal immune network for IgA production, the T-cell receptor signalling pathway, Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation, the phagosome, and cell adhesion molecules. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, R-irAEs are associated with immune cell dysfunction. DEGs and their enriched pathways identified in CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells play important roles in the development of renal irAEs related to anti-PD-1 therapy. These findings offer fresh perspectives on the pathogenesis of renal damage caused by anti-PD-1 therapy.
Assuntos
Leucócitos Mononucleares , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Análise de Célula Única , Humanos , Leucócitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Masculino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Feminino , Idoso , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Análise de Sequência de RNA , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (PI) have shown promising results in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, substantial evidence from large-scale studies is still lacking for their use in the perioperative setting (neoadjuvant plus adjuvant). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the integration of perioperative PI (PPI) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable NSCLC. METHODS: To identify appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we thoroughly explored six different databases. The primary endpoint was survival, while the secondary measures included pathological responses and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Six RCTs involving 2941 patients were included. The PPI group significantly improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62 [0.51, 0.77]), event-free survival (EFS) (HR: 0.57 [0.51, 0.64]), pathological complete response (risk ratio [RR]: 5.81 [4.47, 7.57]), and major pathological response (RR: 2.60 [1.77, 3.82]). Benefits in EFS were seen across all subgroups. OS rates at 12-48 months and EFS rates at 6-48 months were higher in the PPI cohort. Furthermore, the advantages in OS and EFS increased with prolonged survival times. The PPI group also exhibited higher rates of surgery and R0 resections. However, the PPI group experienced more grade 3-5 AEs, serious AEs, and treatment discontinuations due to AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of perioperative PI with neoadjuvant chemotherapy can significantly improve survival and pathological responses for resectable NSCLC. However, the increased incidence of grade 3-5 AEs must be carefully evaluated.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inibidoresRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical course and the risk of chronicity of neurologic immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are not well documented. This study aimed to characterize the clinical course of n-irAEs and assess the prevalence of chronic events. METHODS: This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study included patients with n-irAEs identified at 7 Italian hospitals. The clinical course of n-irAEs was categorized into fulminant (if resulted in death within 12 weeks), monophasic (if resolved within 12 weeks), and chronic (if persisted beyond 12 weeks). Chronic n-irAEs were further subdivided into active (if there was indirect evidence of ongoing inflammation [i.e., required ongoing immunosuppression, relapsed on steroid tapering, or exhibited neurologic progression]) and inactive (if patients had neurologic sequelae without ongoing inflammation). Comparisons between groups and time-to-death analyses were performed. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included (median age: 69 years [IQR 62-75]; 53 [80%] men). n-irAEs involved the peripheral nervous system in 48 patients (73%), the central nervous system in 14 (21%), and both in 4 (6%). Twelve patients (18%) had a fulminant course, with the risk being significantly higher in those with concurrent myocarditis (OR 5.4; 95% CI [1.02-28.31]). Among 54 patients with a nonfulminant course, 23 (43%) had a monophasic n-irAE and 31 (57%) had a chronic n-irAE, of which 16 of 31 (52%) were chronic active (due to ongoing immunosuppression [69%], relapses at corticosteroid tapering [19%], or neurologic disease progression [12%]) and 15 of 31 (48%) were chronic inactive. In patients with chronic inactive n-irAEs, neurologic sequelae included cerebellar ataxia (33%), neuromuscular weakness (27%), visual loss (13%), sensory disturbances (13%), focal neurologic signs (7%), and cognitive impairment (7%). Compared with patients with monophasic events, those with chronic n-irAEs had a higher rate of severe neurologic disability at the last evaluation (p < 0.01), shorter survival (p < 0.01), and higher overall mortality (p < 0.01), primarily due to cancer progression. DISCUSSION: More than half of the patients with n-irAEs who survived the acute phase developed a chronic condition. Patients with chronic n-irAEs were at higher risk of death, mainly due to cancer progression. Future studies are needed to further characterize chronic n-irAEs and identify optimal long-term management strategies.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/induzido quimicamente , Doença Crônica , Itália/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tri-combination therapy based on hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of infusion fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-HAIC) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have been proven effective. However, whether it was best for these HCC patients to start with the most potent therapeutic pattern was still under debate. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-HAIC combined with systemic therapies in the patterns of sequential and concurrent schedules. METHODS: This real-world study included 117 unresectable HCC patients who initially received either FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy (HAIC group, n = 44) or concurrent ICIs and TKIs (ConHAIC group, n = 73) from March 2020 and June 2022, during the period of FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy in HAIC group, patients in the HAIC group (n = 30) experienced progressive disease (PD) would have their treatment pattern converted from the FOLFOX-HAIC monotherapy to the combination of FOLFOX-HAIC plus ICIs and TKIs sequentially (SeqHAIC group). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as primary outcomes, were compared between patients in the SeqHAIC and ConHAIC groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the SeqHAIC group was 24.92 months (95% CI, 12.74-37.09 months) and of the ConHAIC group was 17.87 months (95% CI, 16.85-18.89 months) and no significant difference was observed in both PFS (HR, 1.572; 95% CI, 0.848-2.916; p = 0.151) and OS (HR, 1.212; 95% CI, 0.574-2.561; p = 0.614) between the SeqHAIC and the ConHAIC groups. As for the tumor responses, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding tumor responses, overall response rates (p = 0.658) and disease control rates (p = 0.641) were 50.0%, 45.2%, and 83.3%, 89.0% for the SeqHAIC and the ConHAIC groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that sequential systemic ICIs and TKIs in combination with FOLFOX-HAIC provides similar long-term prognosis and better tolerability compared to concurrent therapy for locally advanced HCC patients. Prospective studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to validate these findings.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Fluoruracila , Leucovorina , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Adulto , Compostos Organoplatínicos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Infusões Intra-Arteriais , Oxaliplatina/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversosRESUMO
This case report discusses a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treated with low-dose azathioprine who developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). PML is a rare, severe, demyelinating disease linked to John Cunningham polyomavirus (JCV) reactivation.Treated with pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, the patient initially improved. However, after the fourth dose, her condition rapidly worsened resulting in treatment discontinuation and death. Similar cases highlight the complex interplay of factors in PML development in SLE patients, including immunosuppression and genetic factors. The use of pembrolizumab in PML and SLE necessitates careful consideration of potential complications.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Leucoencefalopatia Multifocal Progressiva , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Humanos , Leucoencefalopatia Multifocal Progressiva/induzido quimicamente , Leucoencefalopatia Multifocal Progressiva/diagnóstico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/complicações , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Evolução Fatal , Vírus JC/isolamento & purificação , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Azatioprina/efeitos adversos , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Imageamento por Ressonância MagnéticaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (ICI-P) is a condition associated with high mortality, necessitating prompt recognition and treatment initiation. This study aimed to assess the impact of implementing a clinical care pathway algorithm on reducing the time to treatment for ICI-P. METHODS: Patients with lung cancer and suspected ICI-P were enrolled, and a multimodal intervention promoting algorithm use was implemented in two phases. Pre- and post-intervention analyses were conducted to evaluate the primary outcome of time from ICI-P diagnosis to treatment initiation. RESULTS: Of the 82 patients admitted with suspected ICI-P, 73.17% were confirmed to have ICI-P, predominantly associated with non-small cell lung cancer (91.67%) and stage IV disease (95%). Pembrolizumab was the most commonly used immune checkpoint inhibitor (55%). The mean times to treatment were 2.37 days in the pre-intervention phase, 3.07 days (p = 0.46), and 1.27 days (p = 0.40) in the post-intervention phases 1 and 2, respectively. Utilization of the immunotoxicity order set significantly increased from 0 to 27.27% (p = 0.04) after phase 2. While there were no significant changes in ICU admissions or inpatient mortality, outpatient pulmonology follow-ups increased statistically significantly, demonstrating enhanced continuity of care. The overall mortality for patients with ICI-P was 22%, underscoring the urgency of optimizing management strategies. Notably, all patients discharged on high-dose corticosteroids received appropriate gastrointestinal prophylaxis and prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia infections at the end of phase 2. CONCLUSION: Implementing a clinical care pathway algorithm for managing severe ICI-P in hospitalized lung cancer patients standardizes practices, reducing variability in management.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Procedimentos Clínicos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Pneumonia , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/etiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacologiaRESUMO
Objective: This study aimed to identify the effectiveness and safety of PD-1 blockades among elderly patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) clinically. Methods: A total of 78 elderly patients with previously treated metastatic ESCC aged ≥65 years who received PD-1 blockades monotherapy were included retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, therapeutic effectiveness and adverse reactions of the elderly patients who underwent PD-1 blockade therapy were recorded. Regular follow-up was conducted for all patients. The analysis aimed to identify potential risk factors for OS by examining the correlation between prognosis and subgroups based on baseline characteristics. Results: The median age of the 78 elderly patients was 73 years, ranging from 65 to 87 years. Among the 78 patients, 18 cases showed partial response, 26 cases had stable disease, 29 cases experienced progressive disease and 5 cases were not assessable for response, yielding an ORR of 23.1%, a DCR of 56.4%. The prognostic outcomes indicated that among the 78 patients with metastatic ESCC who received PD-1 blockades, the median PFS was 3.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64-4.56], and the median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 6.02-15.78), 24-month OS rate was 22.7% (95% CI: 12.8-34.2%). In terms of the safety profile, among the 78 patients with metastatic ESCC during PD-1 blockades single-agent treatment, a total of 61 patients (78.2%) experienced any grade adverse reactions and the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse reactions were 20.5%. Briefly, the common adverse reactions manifested as fatigue (32.1%), gastrointestinal reaction (24.4%), diarrhea (19.2%), anemia (17.9%) and rash (16.7%). Overall tolerability of PD-1 blockade monotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic ESCC was acceptable and manageable. Conclusion: PD-1 blockades single agent demonstrated encouraging effectiveness and acceptable safety profile for elderly patients with previously treated metastatic ESCC in clinical practice. Prospective study should be performed to elucidate the conclusion in this study subsequently.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Estudos de Viabilidade , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 , Humanos , Idoso , Masculino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Metástase NeoplásicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dual inhibition using anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) checkpoint inhibitors has proven effective in many cancers. However, its efficacy in rare solid cancers remains unclear. Desmoid tumors are ultrarare soft-tissue tumors, traditionally treated with surgery. This study reviews the first results of using ipilimumab and nivolumab in the desmoid tumor cohort of the SWOG S1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART) trial. METHODS: DART is a prospective/open-label/multicenter (1,016 US sites)/multicohort phase II trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) that opened at 1,016 US sites. The primary endpoint included overall response rate (ORR) defined as confirmed complete (CR) and partial responses (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR; stable disease (SD) ≥6 months plus CR and PR) and toxicity. RESULTS: Sixteen evaluable patients (median age: 37) with desmoid tumors and a median of 1.5 prior therapies (with no prior exposure to immunotherapy) were analyzed. The tumors varied in location (eight abdomen, three lower limb, two upper limb, two pelvis, and one neck). ORR was 18.8% (3/16; 3 confirmed PR): 40% regression (PFS 30+ months), 83% regression (PFS 16 months) and 71% regression (PFS 8.4 months). Seven additional patients (43.8%) had prolonged SD over 6 months (PFS: 16.5, 22.4+, 22.6, 30.1, 38.2+, 48.3+ and 60.7+ months). Overall CBR was 62.5% (10/16). Median PFS was 19.4 months, with 6-month PFS of 73% and 1-year PFS of 67%. All patients were alive at 1 year; median OS was not assessable, as 13 patients were alive at analysis. Common adverse events included fatigue, nausea and hypothyroidism, with 50% experiencing grade 3-4 events. There were no grade 5 events. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab in desmoid tumors yielded an ORR of 18.8% and a CBR of 62.5% with durable responses seen. This is the first prospective study exploring the efficacy of this combination in this rare disease. Ongoing studies aim to identify markers for response and resistance. Expanded trials are necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02834013.