Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr ; 130(5): 808-13, 1997 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9152292

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the total costs and the physician time requirements for suture and staple repair of pediatric scalp lacerations. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty-eight children, 13 months to 16 years of age, coming to a children's hospital emergency department with simple scalp lacerations were prospectively randomly selected to receive staple or suture repair. Wound lengths, times required for initial wound care and closure, and equipment use were recorded. Patients returned in 1 week for suture or staple removal and wound reevaluation. The two methods were compared in terms of both time expended and costs of equipment and physician compensation. RESULTS: Forty-five children underwent staple repair and 43 underwent suture repair. There were no differences in age, sex, wound length, number of sutures or staples per centimeter, or physician experience. Stapling resulted in shorter wound closure times (65 vs 397 seconds; p < 0.0001) and shorter overall times for wound care and closure (395 vs 752 seconds; p < 0.0001). Staple repair was less expensive in terms of equipment ($12.55 vs $17.59; p < 0.0001) and total cost based on equipment and physician time ($23.55 vs $38.51; p < 0.0001). The follow-up rate was 91%, with no cosmetic or infectious complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Stapling is faster and less expensive than suturing in the repair of uncomplicated pediatric scalp lacerations, with no additional complications. Physicians who treat children with scalp lacerations should consider the use of stapling devices.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Couro Cabeludo/lesões , Grampeadores Cirúrgicos/economia , Suturas/economia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/economia
2.
Am J Surg ; 170(5): 451-2, 1995 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7485730

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A prospective trial was undertaken to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of stapled skin closure versus conventional nylon sutures in head and neck surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 20 consecutive patients who underwent extensive surgery in which their skin was closed with staples. Another group of 20 matched patients receiving a noncontinuous nylon suture closure was followed in parallel. RESULTS: The complications recorded occurred in 5 patients in the stapled group and 3 in the sutured group. Analysis of cosmetic results showed 16 patients (80%) in the stapled group with good wound appearance and 17 (85%) in the sutured group. The mean closure time was 5 minutes for the stapled group and 25 minutes for the sutured group. Cost was $19.75 for conventional closure and $22.00 for mechanical suture. CONCLUSION: The use of skin staples speeds up closure time by 80%, yields similar cosmetic results with no increase in complications, although at a slightly higher cost.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos , Cabeça/cirurgia , Pescoço/cirurgia , Grampeadores Cirúrgicos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Custos e Análise de Custo , Estética , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nylons , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia , Fístula das Glândulas Salivares/etiologia , Pele/patologia , Grampeadores Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Grampeadores Cirúrgicos/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Suturas/efeitos adversos , Suturas/economia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA