RESUMO
RESUMEN ¿Se puede hablar de ciencia cuando nos referimos a la cirugía? No, de acuerdo con la epistemología clásica, que dice que para que una disciplina sea considerada científica debe alcanzar requisitos que la cirugía parecería no cumplir. Esto es, ser parte de un paradigma y crear conocimiento científico. Por lo que, si queremos afirmar la cientificidad de la cirugía, debemos investigar la existencia de ejem plares que podrían ser paradigmáticos, ya que son ellos los que fundamentan su estructura epistémi ca. Junto a esto debemos demostrar que su práctica crea conocimiento científico. Para ello, postulamos cinco objetivos que la cirugía debe cumplir. Además, a los personajes históricos clásicos a quienes se les atribuye haber fundado la cirugía moderna ‒Ambrosio Paré y John Hunter‒, solo pudieron alcanzar los tres primeros. Pero esto no basta para que se considere a la cirugía como parte de la ciencia. Debimos avanzar en la historia y encontrar esos ejemplares paradigmáticos. El primero corresponde al trabajo de investigación en fase animal, previa a la realización de la primera gastrectomía exitosa rea lizada en seres humanos por el cirujano alemán Theodor Billroth, en el año 1882. El segundo corres ponde a la investigación en fisiología tiroidea realizada por Emil T. Kocher, con la que ganó el premio Nobel en Medicina y Fisiología en año 1909. Se hace un análisis del desarrollo epistémico de la cirugía a partir de ellos y se evalúan las consecuen cias mediante el concepto de ciclo epistémico. Hipótesis clave para entender la creación del conoci miento científico a partir de disciplinas técnicas como la cirugía.
ABSTRACT Can we talk about science when we speak about surgery? Not, accordingly to classical epistemology. To consider a discipline as scientific, it must meet certain requirements that surgery would not seem to satisfy: being part of a paradigm and creating scientific knowledge. Therefore, if we want to affirm the scientific nature of surgery, we must investigate the existence of exemplars that could be paradigmatic, since they are the ones that support its epistemic structure. Along with this, we must demonstrate that their practice creates scientific knowledge. We've postulated five objectives that surgery had to satisfy. We've seen in classic history, that the main characters which are considered founders of modern surgery -Ambrosio Pare and John Hunter- were only able to reach the first three, and as we'll see, were not enough to consider surgery as part of science. Moving forward in history, we are able to find the first paradigmatic exemplars. The first corresponds to the research work in the animal phase, prior to the first successful human gastrectomy performed by the German surgeon Theodor Billroth, in 1882. The second corresponds to the research in thyroid's physiology carried out by Emil T. Kocher; thanks to this, he won the Nobel Prize in medicine and phy siology in 1909. An analysis of the epistemic development of surgery is made from them, and the consequences are analyzed using the concept of the epistemic cycle. Those key hypotheses are important to understand the creation of scientific knowledge in technical disciplines as surgery.
Assuntos
História do Século XVIII , História do Século XIX , Filosofia Médica , Cirurgia Geral/história , Ciência/história , Gastroenterostomia/história , Conhecimento , História da MedicinaRESUMO
Christian Albert Theodor Billroth, a German surgeon of great artistry and immense culture and promoter of abdominal surgery, who drove the length of the physiology of the surgical field through the use of experimental surgery, is considered the leading German medical figure of the second half of the 19th century in Europe. His works and techniques transcended through time and continue to be implemented (albeit with modifications). He founded a new school of surgery based in criticism, the influence of which affected the development of numerous European and American surgeons. He was also a born artist who excelled in the music field, with many interests in music criticism and public events.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/história , Endoscopia/história , Gastroenterostomia/história , Alemanha , História do Século XIX , Laringectomia/história , Tireoidectomia/históriaRESUMO
The author reviews the treatment of duodenal ulcer from its beginnings with gastroenterostomy one hundred years ago. He points out that treatment has changed as it was better understood that hypersecretion of acid was an important ulcerogenic factor. The Sippy regime, with diet and alkali to neutralize acid, and the resection and vagotomy were introduced. He discusses some aspects of the history of these therapies in Panama and points out the importance of the introduction of H2 receptors blocker and other drugs still under investigation.
Assuntos
Úlcera Duodenal/história , Antiulcerosos/história , Úlcera Duodenal/terapia , Gastroenterostomia/história , Gastrostomia/história , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , Humanos , Panamá , Vagotomia/históriaRESUMO
Hemos repasado el tratamiento de la úlcera duodenal desde sus inicios, hace cien años, con la gastroenterostomía. Se señala cómo el tratamiento varió cuando se entendió mejor que la hipersecreción de ácido era factor ulcerogénico. Se introdujo el tratamiento de Sippy, con álcalis y dieta, para neutralizar el ácido; y en cirugía, la resección y la vagotomía. Se hacen algunas consideraciones sobre la historia de estos tratamientos en Panamá. Finalmente, se señala la importancia de los bloqueadores de los receptores H2 y de otros medicamentos todavía en estudio