RESUMO

Studies in vertebrates and invertebrates have proved the instructive role that different biogenic amines play in the neural representation of rewards and punishments during associative learning. Results from diverse arthropods and using different learning paradigms initially agreed that dopamine (DA) is needed for aversive learning and octopamine (OA) is needed for appetitive learning. However, the notion that both amines constitute separate pathways for appetitive and aversive learning is changing. Here, we asked whether DA, so far only involved in aversive memory formation in honey bees, does also modulate appetitive memory. Using the well characterized appetitive olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex (PER), we show that DA impairs appetitive memory consolidation. In addition, we found that blocking DA receptors enhances appetitive memory. These results are consistent with the view that aversive and appetitive components interact during learning and memory formation to ensure adaptive behavior.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The authors assessed the behavioral effects of dopamine (DA) receptor antagonists, Cis (Z) flupentixol and S(+)-raclopride L-tartrate, on conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by paced mating behavior. Ovariectomized female rats of the Wistar strain were used. The administration of amphetamine (1 mg/kg) induced a clear CPP that was completely blocked by the DA antagonists flupentixol (0.25 mg/kg) or raclopride (0.125 mg/kg). These doses had no effect on motor coordination. Female rats that mated in a pacing chamber developed a clear CPP. Neither flupentixol nor raclopride blocked the reward state induced by paced mating behavior. These results indicate that DA is not involved in the reward state induced by paced mating behavior in female rats.

Assuntos

RESUMO

El estudio fue realizado en 80 pacientes ambulatorios del Servicio de Psiquiatría del Hospital Salvador (Santiago, Chile) con diagnóstico de esquizofrenia crónica según los criterios del DSM-IV. 40 pacientes fueron tratados con decanoato de flupentixol (como monoterapia neuroléptica). Los 40 restantes (grupo control) fueron tratados con uno o más de los siguientes neurolépticos: clorpromazina, haloperidol, tioridazina, decanoato de flufenazina. Ambos grupos fueron evaluados en entrevistas psiquiátricas y psicológicas utilizando 7 escalas estandarizadas. El uso de decanoato de flupentixol redujo los síntomas positivos y negativos que caracterizan a la esquizofrenia, corroborado por escalas BPRS y CGI.La adhesión al tratamiento con decanoato de flupentixol fue mejor y los efectos colaterales fueron escasos. El grupo control requirió el uso de uno o más neurolépticos para lograr la estabilización o reducción de los síntomas, con la consecuente presentación de efectos colaterales en un mayor número de casos. Finalmente, los resultados positivos obtenidos con decanoato de flupentixol están relacionados con la intensidad de la sintomatología. La efectividad de la medicación fue interior en los pacientes que desarrollaron crisis psicóticas y/o en los pacientes resistentes al tratamiento neuroléptico

Assuntos

RESUMO

A procedure for analyzing effects of drugs on distractibility is proposed. Rats are trained to traverse a straight runway with a sucrose solution as reinforcement. Once the response has been acquired, an additional runway ending in an empty box is connected. The time spent investigating this additional runway is the measure of distractibility. Amphetamine, 1 mg/kg i.p., increased distractibility. In rats that were never reinforced, amphetamine at a dose of 1 mg/kg reduced the time spent in the additional runway. This shows that the effects of amphetamine in the reinforced animals cannot be interpreted as enhanced exploration. Furthermore, the benzodiazepines diazepam (2 and 4 mg/kg, i.p.) and chlordiazepoxide (2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.), known to enhance exploration of novel environments, did not affect the time spent in the additional runway in sucrose-reinforced animals. It was concluded that the procedure indeed is a model of distractibility. The dopamine antagonist cis(Z)-flupenthixol, at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg, i.p., blocked the effects of amphetamine, 1 mg/kg. Flupenthixol itself, in doses of 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg, did not affect the time spent in the additional runway. This suggests that enhanced dopaminergic activity indeed is responsible for the effects. This proposal is further supported by experiments showing that the noradrenaline precursor dihydroxyphenylserine (10 mg/kg + carbidopa, 50 mg/kg, both i.p.) and the noradrenergic neurotoxin DSP4 (50 mg/kg, i.p.) had no effect on distractibility. Moreover, amfonelic acid, a dopamine releaser with slight or no effect on noradrenergic neurotransmission, had effects very similar to those of amphetamine when given in doses of 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg, i.p. A lower dose, 0.125 mg/ kg, was ineffective. Taken together, these data suggest that enhanced dopaminergic neurotransmission increases distractibility in the rat. However, both amphetamine and amfonelic acid may stimulate serotonin release. Until serotonergic drugs have been tested, a contribution of this transmitter cannot be ruled out. The distraction procedure may constitute an animal model of some kinds of disordered information processing.

Assuntos

Assuntos