RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the proportion of patients choosing surgical versus medical castration to treat prostate cancer, before and after the National Health Fund (NHF) of Jamaica began to subsidize hormone therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI), Jamaica. The pathology database at UHWI was searched to identify patients who had prostate biopsies between January 2000 and December 2007. These were combined with records of biopsies at external institutions. Medical records of all patients with positive prostate biopsies were reviewed to determine if they had received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients were classified as having had surgical castration (bilateral orchiectomy) or medical castration. Chi-square statistics were used to determine the difference in proportions between those choosing medical versus surgical castration before and after March 2005, when the NHF began offering subsidies for ADT drugs. RESULTS: Of the 1,529 prostate biopsies performed during the study period, 680 (44.0%) cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed. Of these, 458 patients underwent ADT and had complete records available for analysis. The mean patient age was 72 years. During the entire study period, surgical castration was performed in 265 patients (58.0%) and medical castration in 193 (42.0%). A greater proportion of orchiectomies were performed before March 2005, rather than after (P < 0.001). Estrogens were the most common method of medical castration used before the NHF subsidy became available (62.0%); while luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues (38.0%) and antiandrogens (36.5%) were most often chosen afterwards. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical castration was more common than medical castration before March 2005. After the NHF began to subsidize the cost of drugs for hormone therapy, medical castration was chosen more often. Increased access to drugs for hormone therapy has changed treatment patterns in Jamaica.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/economia , Financiamento Governamental , Política de Saúde/economia , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Honorários por Prescrição de Medicamentos , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Antagonistas de Androgênios/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Androgênios/economia , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Biópsia , Estrogênios/administração & dosagem , Estrogênios/economia , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Jamaica/epidemiologia , Masculino , Orquiectomia/economia , Orquiectomia/psicologia , Orquiectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Preferência do Paciente , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the proportion of patients choosing surgical versus medical castration to treat prostate cancer, before and after the National Health Fund (NHF) of Jamaica began to subsidize hormone therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI), Jamaica. The pathology database at UHWI was searched to identify patients who had prostate biopsies between January 2000 and December 2007. These were combined with records of biopsies at external institutions. Medical records of all patients with positive prostate biopsies were reviewed to determine if they had received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients were classified as having had surgical castration (bilateral orchiectomy) or medical castration. Chi-square statistics were used to determine the difference in proportions between those choosing medical versus surgical castration before and after March 2005, when the NHF began offering subsidies for ADT drugs. RESULTS: Of the 1 529 prostate biopsies performed during the study period, 680 (44.0 percent) cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed. Of these, 458 patients underwent ADT and had complete records available for analysis. The mean patient age was 72 years. During the entire study period, surgical castration was performed in 265 patients (58.0 percent) and medical castration in 193 (42.0 percent). A greater proportion of orchiectomies were performed before March 2005, rather than after (P < 0.001). Estrogens were the most common method of medical castration used before the NHF subsidy became available (62.0 percent); while luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues (38.0 percent) and antiandrogens (36.5 percent) were most often chosen afterwards. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical castration was more common than medical castration before March 2005. After the NHF began to subsidize the cost of drugs for hormone therapy, medical castration was chosen more often. Increased access to drugs for hormone therapy has changed treatment patterns in Jamaica.
OBJETIVO: Comparar la proporción de pacientes que eligen la castración quirúrgica frente a la castración farmacológica para tratar el cáncer de próstata, antes y después de la creación de un subsidio del Fondo Nacional de Salud (NHF, por sus siglas en inglés) de Jamaica destinado a cubrir los costos de la hormonoterapia. MÉTODOS: Se llevó a cabo un examen retrospectivo en el Hospital Universitario de las Indias Occidentales, Jamaica. Se efectuó una búsqueda en la base de datos de enfermedades de dicho hospital para identificar a los pacientes a quienes se les había practicado una biopsia de próstata entre enero del 2000 y diciembre del 2007. Los datos se combinaron con los registros de biopsias llevadas a cabo en instituciones externas. Se estudiaron las historias clínicas de todos los pacientes con resultados positivos en la biopsia de próstata para determinar si habían recibido tratamiento de supresión androgénica. Los pacientes se clasificaron en dos grupos, según se hubieran tratado mediante castración quirúrgica (orquiectomía bilateral) o farmacológica. Se usó la prueba de la ji al cuadrado para determinar la diferencia en las proporciones entre los pacientes que escogieron la castración quirúrgica y los que escogieron la opción farmacológica antes y después de marzo del 2005, la fecha en la que el NHF empezó a subsidiar los medicamentos de supresión androgénica. RESULTADOS: Entre las 1 529 biopsias de próstata realizadas durante el período de estudio, hubo 680 (44,0 por ciento) casos con diagnóstico de cáncer de próstata. De estos, 458 pacientes habían recibido tratamiento de supresión androgénica y se disponía de sus registros completos para el análisis. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 72 años. Durante el período de estudio, se les practicó castración quirúrgica a 265 pacientes (58,0 por ciento) y castración farmacológica a 193 (42,0 por ciento). La proporción de orquiectomías fue mayor antes de marzo del 2005 que después de esa fecha (P < 0,001). Los estrógenos fueron el método de castración farmacológica más común antes de la creación del subsidio del NHF (62,0 por ciento); a partir de ese momento se eligieron con mayor frecuencia los análogos de la hormona liberadora de la hormona luteinizante (38,0 por ciento) y los antiandrógenos (36,5 por ciento). CONCLUSIONES: La castración quirúrgica era más común que la castración farmacológica antes de marzo del 2005. Después de que el NHF empezó a subsidiar el costo de los medicamentos para el tratamiento hormonal, la opción escogida con más frecuencia fue la castración farmacológica. El mayor acceso a los medicamentos usados en la hormonoterapia ha cambiado los patrones de tratamiento del cáncer de próstata en Jamaica.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/economia , Financiamento Governamental , Política de Saúde/economia , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Honorários por Prescrição de Medicamentos , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Antagonistas de Androgênios/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Androgênios/economia , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Biópsia , Estrogênios/administração & dosagem , Estrogênios/economia , Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Jamaica/epidemiologia , Orquiectomia/economia , Orquiectomia/psicologia , Orquiectomia , Preferência do Paciente , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
It exists controversies about if the effects and benefits of the esterified estrogens could be similar to those informed for equines, because its chemical composition and bioavailability are different. Esterified estrogens has not delta 8,9 dehydroestrone, and its absorption and level of maximum plasmatic concentrations are reached very fast. In United States of America and another countries, esterified estrogens has been marketed and using for treatment of climacteric syndrome and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, based on the pharmacopoiea of that country, but the Food and Drug administration (FDA) has not yet authorized up today, a generic version of conjugated estrogens. In Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) and another institutions of health sector in Mexico, starting in year 2000, it has been used esterified estrogens for medical treatment of climacteric and menopausal conditions. For this reason, in this paper we revised the most recent information about pharmacology, chemical composition, clinical use and costs of the conjugated estrogens with the purpose to guide the decisions to purchase this kind of drugs in Mexican heath institutions.