RESUMO

Importance: Currently there is no standard therapy to improve cancer-related anorexia, hampering survival. Mirtazapine has been suggested as a feasible option in this context. Objectives: To assess the effect of mirtazapine on appetite and energy consumption in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial including adults was performed in a tertiary cancer care center from August 2018 to May 2022 with a follow-up of 8 weeks. Overall, 134 patients were screened; 114 were assessed for eligibility and 28 were excluded. Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive mirtazapine, 15 mg, or placebo for 2 weeks followed by a dose escalation to 30 mg until week 8 or placebo. Both groups received nutritional assessment and dietary advice. Main outcomes and measures: Appetite was assessed by the Anorexia Cachexia Scale and energy intake. Dietary parameters were evaluated at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks, with a 24-hour dietary recall, and energy quantification based on the Mexican system of nutritional equivalents. Results: A total of 86 patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to the placebo (n = 43) or the mirtazapine group (n = 43). The mean (SD) age was 63.5 (11.2) years, 41 were women (57.7%) and had adenocarcinoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale score of 1, stage IV NSCLC, and were receiving first-line treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There was no difference in appetite scores in patients who received mirtazapine or placebo after 4 and 8 weeks. After 4 weeks, mirtazapine significantly increased energy intake (379.3 kcal; 95% CI, 1382.6-576.1; P < .001) including proteins (22.5 g; 95% CI, 11.5-33.4; P = .001), carbohydrates (43.4 g; 95% CI, 13.1-73.8; P = .006), and fats (13.2 g; 95% CI, 6.0-20.4; P = .006). Fats intake was significantly higher in patients in the mirtazapine group (14.5 g vs 0.7 g; P = .02) after 8 weeks. The mirtazapine group significantly decreased the proportion of patients with sarcopenia (82.8% vs 57.1%, P = .03) at 8 weeks. Patients on mirtazapine tolerated the treatment well, but reported a higher perception of nightmares at 2 weeks based on a 10 cm VAS score (0 [25th-75th percentile, 0-1] vs 0 [25th-75th percentile, 0-0] in the control group; P = .009) but this finding was nonsignificant after 4 and 8 weeks. Conclusion and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of patients with advanced NSCLC, there was no difference in appetite scores in all patients who received mirtazapine or placebo, but the mirtazapine group had a significant increase in energy intake through the 4- and 8-week follow-up, mainly in fat intake, which is a better and crucial source of energy. The addition of mirtazapine in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and anorexia may help these patients achieve their energy requirements and improve health-related quality of life, specifically emotional and cognitive functioning. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04748523.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Since ancient times cannabis has been used for recreational and medicinal purposes. It is a significant source of chemical compounds, most of them called phytocannabinoids. These compounds have several physiological effects and produce their effects primarily by binding to endogenous cannabinoid receptors such as CB1 and CB2, among others. Cannabis has potential therapeutic properties and its preparations have been used as traditional remedies to treat pain and emesis. Synthetic cannabinoids are used clinically as analgesics, antispastics, antiemetics, and appetite stimulants. Significant cannabis toxicity is rare in adults; however, it can produce countless acute and chronic side effects. The quality of the evidence in this field is limited by the short duration of the trials, poor sample sizes, lack of a control group, and the existence of bias in most of the reviewed studies. Therefore, a larger number of studies with better methodological quality is required to support the safe use of this therapy. The decision to include cannabinoids as a treatment for any of the conditions described will depend on the evidence, the use of previous therapies, and the type of patient.

El cannabis se ha utilizado desde la antigüedad con fines recreativos y medicinales. Es una fuente muy rica de compuestos químicos, la mayoría denominados fitocannabinoides, que tienen una variedad de efectos fisiológicos, principalmente por su unión a receptores cannabinoides endógenos como el CB1 y CB2, entre otros. El cannabis tiene propiedades terapéuticas potenciales y sus preparaciones se han utilizado como remedios tradicionales para tratar el dolor y la emesis. Los cannabinoides sintéticos se utilizan clínicamente como analgésicos, antiespasmódico, antieméticos y estimulantes del apetito. La toxicidad significativa del cannabis es poco común en los adultos, sin embargo, puede tener múltiples efectos adversos agudos y crónicos. La calidad de la evidencia en este campo se ha visto limitada por la corta duración de los estudios, los reducidos tamaños de las muestras, la falta de grupos de control y la existencia de sesgos en la mayoría de los estudios revisados. En este contexto, son necesarios más estudios de mejor calidad metodológica para apoyar el uso seguro de esta terapia en otras enfermedades. La decisión de incorporar los cannabinoides como terapia en alguna de las condiciones descritas depende de la evidencia, el uso de terapias previas y el tipo de paciente.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The incidence of neoplastic diseases has increased worldwide, with an estimated global burden of 19.3 million incident cases and 10 million deaths in 2020-a considerable increase compared with 9.6 million deaths in 2018. One of the most prevalent problems faced by patients with cancer and their physicians is malnutrition. It is estimated that patients with cancer have important nutritional alterations in 25% to 70% of cases, which directly affects many spheres of patient care and well-being, including quality of life, treatment toxicity, and survival outcomes. Despite the overwhelming need to address this pressing issue, current evidence in terms of pharmacologic interventions for cancer-related anorexia remains inconclusive, and there is no current standard of care for patients with cancer-related anorexia. Nonetheless, international guidelines recommend promoting anabolism through nutritional, physical, and pharmacologic therapies. In this review, the available information is summarized regarding pharmacologic therapies to treat cancer-related anorexia and findings are highlighted from a clinical stance.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Feeding problems during childhood have been described over time by various authors. In 2013, Avoi dant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) was included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Ma nual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5), as a new diagnosis within the Feeding and Eating di sorders, to describe a group of patients with avoidant or restrictive eating behaviors unrelated to body image disorder or weight loss desire. ARFID may appear as significant weight loss and/or nutritional deficiency and/or a marked interference in psychosocial functioning. There are three forms of pre sentation, which can co-occur or occur independently. The first one includes children with sensory aversions (selective), who reject certain foods due to their taste, texture, smell, or shape; the second one includes those children with poor appetite or limited intake (limited intake); and the third one includes those children who reject certain foods or stop eating as a result of a traumatic event (aversi- ve). Due to the recent incorporation of ARFID into the DSM-5, there is a lack of information regar ding its treatment. The purpose of this review is to clarify diagnostic criteria and to describe targeted management and treatment interventions with a multidisciplinary approach, without deepening on the treatment of organic medical causes.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the administration of cyproheptadine was able to induce weight gain in patients with cystic fibrosis. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in two centers in Brazil. Twenty-five patients with cystic fibrosis between 5 and 18 years completed the study. Patients were randomized into two groups, to receive either cyproheptadine 4 mg three times per day for 12 weeks or placebo. All data were collected at the beginning and at the end of the study period and included weight, height and spirometry. RESULTS: Average weight gain was 0.67 kg in the placebo group and 1.61 kg in the cyproheptadine group (p = 0.036). Body mass index (BMI) decreased 0.07 kg/m(2); in the placebo group and increased 0.46 kg/m(2); in the intervention group (p = 0.027). The change in BMI for age (z score) was -0.19 in the placebo group and +0.20 in the cyproheptadine group (p = 0.003). BMI z score decreased 0.19 in the placebo group and increased 0.2 in the cyproheptadine group (p = 0.003). Changes in pulmonary function were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: Use of cyproheptadine in cystic fibrosis patients was well tolerated, showing a significant weight gain and a significant increase in BMI after 12 weeks. A clinically relevant effect size for weight/age (z score) and body mass index for age (z score) was found. Such findings suggest that the prescription of cyproheptadine can be an alternative approach for patients who need nutritional support for a short period of time.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar se a administração de ciproheptadina é capaz de induzir ganho de peso em pacientes com fibrose cística. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado um estudo duplo-cego, controlado com placebo em dois centros no Brasil. Vinte e cinco pacientes com fibrose cística entre 5 e 18 anos completaram o estudo. Os pacientes foram randomizados em dois grupos, para receber ciproheptadina 4 mg três vezes por dia durante 12 semanas ou placebo. Todos os dados foram coletados no início e no final do período de estudo e incluíram peso, altura e espirometria. RESULTADOS: O ganho de peso médio foi de 0,67 kg e 1,61 kg nos grupos placebo e ciproheptadina, respectivamente (p = 0,036). O índice de massa corporal (IMC) diminuiu 0,07 kg/m² no grupo placebo e aumentou 0,46 kg/m² no grupo intervenção (p = 0,027). A mudança no IMC para a idade (escore z) foi de -0,19 no grupo placebo e 0,20 no grupo ciproheptadina (p = 0,003). O IMC escore z diminuiu 0,19 no grupo placebo e aumentou 0,2 no grupo ciproheptadina (p = 0,003). Alterações na função pulmonar não foram estatisticamente diferentes. CONCLUSÃO: O uso de ciproheptadina em pacientes com fibrose cística foi bem tolerado, apresentando um ganho de peso significativo e um aumento no IMC após 12 semanas. Foi encontrado um tamanho de efeito clinicamente relevante para o peso/idade (escore z) e IMC para idade (escore z). Tais achados sugerem que a prescrição de ciproheptadina pode ser uma abordagem alternativa para pacientes que precisam de suporte nutricional por um curto período de tempo.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the administration of cyproheptadine was able to induce weight gain in patients with cystic fibrosis. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in two centers in Brazil. Twenty-five patients with cystic fibrosis between 5 and 18 years completed the study. Patients were randomized into two groups, to receive either cyproheptadine 4 mg three times per day for 12 weeks or placebo. All data were collected at the beginning and at the end of the study period and included weight, height and spirometry. RESULTS: Average weight gain was 0.67 kg in the placebo group and 1.61 kg in the cyproheptadine group (p = 0.036). Body mass index (BMI) decreased 0.07 kg/m² in the placebo group and increased 0.46 kg/m² in the intervention group (p = 0,027). The change in BMI for age (z score) was -0.19 in the placebo group and +0.20 in the cyproheptadine group (p = 0.003). BMI z score decreased 0.19 in the placebo group and increased 0.2 in the cyproheptadine group (p = 0.003). Changes in pulmonary function were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: Use of cyproheptadine in cystic fibrosis patients was well tolerated, showing a significant weight gain and a significant increase in BMI after 12 weeks. A clinically relevant effect size for weight/age (z score) and body mass index for age (z score) was found. Such findings suggest that the prescription of cyproheptadine can be an alternative approach for patients who need nutritional support for a short period of time.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize current knowledge about nutritional aspects in the final stage of life, with emphasis on mechanisms and clinical diagnosis, ethical aspects and management. RECENT FINDINGS: The most recent advances on the subject include new mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology, use of therapeutic approach combined with n-3 fatty acids and the active intervention of the patient in decision making. SUMMARY: The nutritional deterioration in a patient who passes the last stages of his life constitutes a subject area to varied analysis and considerations. For this reason, there exist an increasing number of investigations, particularly in the areas of pathophysiology and of therapeutics. The aspects related to quality of life, cultural context and bioethics, add more complexity to the subject.

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Megestrol acetate (MA) is currently used to improve appetite and to increase weight in cancer-associated anorexia. In 1993 MA was approved by the USA's Federal Drug Administration for the treatment of anorexia, cachexia, or unexplained weight loss in patients with AIDS. The mechanism by which MA increases appetite is unknown, and its effectiveness for anorexia and cachexia in neoplastic and AIDS patients is under investigation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of MA in palliating anorexia-cachexia syndrome in patients with cancer, AIDS and other underlying pathologies. SEARCH STRATEGY: Studies were sought thorough an extensive search of the electronic databases, journals, reference lists, contact with investigators and other search strategies outlined in the methods. The most recent search was carried out on October 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included in the review if they assessed megestrol acetate compared to placebo or other drug treatments in randomized controlled trials of patients with a clinical diagnosis of anorexia-cachexia related to cancer, AIDS or another underlying pathology. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction was conducted by two independent authors, and methodological quality evaluated. Quantitative analyses were performed using appetite and quality of life as a dichotomous variable, and weight gain was analysed as continuous and dichotomous variables. Studies with more than 50% of patients lost to follow-up were excluded from the analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty trials met the inclusion criteria (4123 patients). Twenty-one trials compared MA at different doses with placebo; four compared different doses of MA versus other drugs; two compared MA with other drugs and placebo; and three compared different doses of MA. For all patient conditions, meta-analysis showed a benefit of MA compared with placebo, particularly with regard to appetite improvement and weight gain in cancer patients. Analysing quality of life, clinical and statistical heterogeneity was found and discussed. There was insufficient information to define the optimal dose of MA. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that MA improves appetite and weight gain in patients with cancer. No overall conclusion about quality of life (QOL) could be drawn due to heterogeneity. The small number of patients, methodological shortcomings and poor reporting have not allowed us to recommend megestrol acetate in AIDS patients or with other underlying pathologies.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Symptoms and laboratory evidence of adrenal suppression developed in 2 children with the human immunodeficiency virus after megestrol acetate (MA) therapy was discontinued; both required transient glucocorticoid replacement therapy. High-dose corticotropin stimulation testing performed on children with the human immunodeficiency virus treated or not treated with MA showed that baseline and post-corticotropin cortisol levels were extremely low in 7 of 10 treated patients and normal in 10 of 10 members of a control group (P <.01). MA may suppress adrenal function, and replacement glucocorticoids may prevent or relieve associated symptoms at times of severe stress or on discontinuation of MA therapy.

Assuntos