RESUMO
Optimizing doses for multiple indications is challenging. The pooled approach of finding a single optimal biological dose (OBD) for all indications ignores that dose-response or dose-toxicity curves may differ between indications, resulting in varying OBDs. Conversely, indication-specific dose optimization often requires a large sample size. To address this challenge, we propose a Randomized two-stage basket trial design that Optimizes doses in Multiple Indications (ROMI). In stage 1, for each indication, response and toxicity are evaluated for a high dose, which may be a previously obtained maximum tolerated dose, with a rule that stops accrual to indications where the high dose is unsafe or ineffective. Indications not terminated proceed to stage 2, where patients are randomized between the high dose and a specified lower dose. A latent-cluster Bayesian hierarchical model is employed to borrow information between indications, while considering the potential heterogeneity of OBD across indications. Indication-specific utilities are used to quantify response-toxicity trade-offs. At the end of stage 2, for each indication with at least one acceptable dose, the dose with highest posterior mean utility is selected as optimal. Two versions of ROMI are presented, one using only stage 2 data for dose optimization and the other optimizing doses using data from both stages. Simulations show that both versions have desirable operating characteristics compared to designs that either ignore indications or optimize dose independently for each indication.
Assuntos
Teorema de Bayes , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Simulação por Computador , Tamanho da Amostra , Modelos Estatísticos , Biometria/métodosRESUMO
The US Food and Drug Administration launched Project Optimus to reform the dose optimization and dose selection paradigm in oncology drug development, calling for the paradigm shift from finding the maximum tolerated dose to the identification of optimal biological dose (OBD). Motivated by a real-world drug development program, we propose a master-protocol-based platform trial design to simultaneously identify OBDs of a new drug, combined with standards of care or other novel agents, in multiple indications. We propose a Bayesian latent subgroup model to accommodate the treatment heterogeneity across indications, and employ Bayesian hierarchical models to borrow information within subgroups. At each interim analysis, we update the subgroup membership and dose-toxicity and -efficacy estimates, as well as the estimate of the utility for risk-benefit tradeoff, based on the observed data across treatment arms to inform the arm-specific decision of dose escalation and de-escalation and identify the OBD for each arm of a combination partner and an indication. The simulation study shows that the proposed design has desirable operating characteristics, providing a highly flexible and efficient way for dose optimization. The design has great potential to shorten the drug development timeline, save costs by reducing overlapping infrastructure, and speed up regulatory approval.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Teorema de Bayes , Simulação por Computador , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/métodos , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Estatísticos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos de Pesquisa , Biometria/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint blockade with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies has demonstrated efficacy in multiple tumor types. Nofazinlimab is a humanized rat antibody targeting PD-1. A first-in-human study of nofazinlimab conducted in Australia found no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached in the range of 1-10 mg/kg. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated nofazinlimab for multiple advanced malignancies in Chinese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a phase 1a/1b, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation/expansion trial. In phase 1a, patients received an abbreviated dose escalation of nofazinlimab at 60 mg and 200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) to determine DLTs and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In phase 1b, patients received the RP2D (monotherapy/combination) in six arms by tumor type; DLTs were evaluated for nofazinlimab plus lenvatinib in the unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) arm. Safety (continuously monitored in patients who received nofazinlimab) and efficacy (patients with measurable baseline disease) were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 107 patients were eligible and received nofazinlimab. In phase 1a, no DLTs were observed; the RP2D was 200mg Q3W. In phase 1b, no DLTs were observed with nofazinlimab plus lenvatinib. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in the first-in-human study (NCT03475251). In phase 1b, 21/88 (23.9%) patients achieved confirmed objective responses, 26 (29.5%) had stable disease, and 9/20 (45.0%) patients with uHCC achieved confirmed objective responses to nofazinlimab plus lenvatinib. CONCLUSIONS: Nofazinlimab was well tolerated in Chinese patients. Preliminary efficacy was encouraging, particularly for nofazinlimab plus lenvatinib in uHCC, which is being studied in an ongoing phase 3 trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03809767; registered 18 January 2019.
Assuntos
Linfoma , Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linfoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Adulto , China , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacologia , Dose Máxima Tolerável , População do Leste AsiáticoRESUMO
Aim: This first-in-human study evaluated safety and efficacy of CD40 agonist MEDI5083 with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.Methods: Patients received MEDI5083 (3-7.5 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks × 4 doses) and durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks) either sequentially (N = 29) or concurrently (N = 9). Primary end point was safety; secondary end points included efficacy.Results: Thirty-eight patients received treatment. Most common adverse events (AEs) were injection-site reaction (ISR; sequential: 86%; concurrent: 100%), fatigue (41%; 33%), nausea (20.7%; 55.6%) and decreased appetite (24.1%; 33.3%). Nine patients had MEDI5083-related grade ≥3 AEs with ISR being the most common. Two patients experienced dose limiting toxicities (ISR). One death occurred due to a MEDI5083-related AE. MEDI5083 maximum tolerated dose was 5 mg. Objective response rate was 2.8% (1 partial response and 11 stable disease).Conclusion: MEDI5083 toxicity profile limits its further development.
MEDI5083 is a molecule that was designed as a potential anticancer medication. Once inside the body, MEDI5083 connects to specific proteins found on the surface of immune cells and cancer cells. It can boost the immune system of the body in multiple ways to help kill cancer cells. In this clinical study, 38 patients with various types of cancers (bladder, breast, colon, head and neck, kidney, lung, and pancreas) were treated with MEDI5083 together with another anticancer medicine called durvalumab. MEDI5083 was given to patients as an injection under the skin once every 2 weeks. Durvalumab was given to patients as an infusion once every 4 weeks. The study monitored whether treatment caused unwanted side effects and whether MEDI5083 was able to shrink the size of tumors.A total of 34 of 38 patients who received treatment experienced unwanted reactions at the site of MEDI5083 treatment injection. These symptoms were long lasting and did not go away with an applied steroid treatment. A total of 5 of 38 patients experienced extreme tiredness and 4 of 38 patients experienced fever. Of 38 patients enrolled, 6 discontinued treatment because of a MEDI5083-related side effect. Only one patient had a decrease in the size of their cancer mass with treatment. Because of safety concerns, this study was not completed. The injectable form of MEDI5083 is not being further tested in patients with cancer.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Antígenos CD40 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Antígenos CD40/agonistas , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but with limited efficacy. We aimed to explore the feasibility of adding the PARP inhibitor fuzuloparib to mFOLFIRINOX in the locally advanced/metastatic (LA/M) setting. METHODS: This was the dose-escalation and -expansion, phase 1b portion of a phase 1b/2 study. Patients were given oral fuzuloparib at escalating doses starting at 30 mg twice daily (BID) plus intravenous mFOLFIRINOX q2w for 8-12 cycles, followed by maintenance fuzuloparib at 150 mg BID. Cohorts at the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and lower dose of fuzuloparib were expanded. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), MTD, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). RESULTS: As of data cutoff on Jan 15, 2023, 39 patients were recruited. 12 patients were enrolled during dose escalation (30 mg [n = 4]; 60 mg [n = 6]; 100 mg [n = 2]). DLT occurred in 1 patient in 60 mg cohort and 1 patient in 100 mg cohort. 60 mg BID was determined to be the MTD, and then 60 and 30 mg cohorts were expanded to 22 and 15 patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were hematologic toxicities. Efficacy in 60 mg cohort seemed to be most favorable, with an objective response rate of 50.0% (95% CI, 26.0-74.0) and disease control rate of 94.4% (95% CI, 72.7-99.9). CONCLUSIONS: First-line fuzuloparib plus mFOLFIRINOX followed by maintenance fuzuloparib was generally safe and showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in patients with LA/M pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The RP2D of fuzuloparib combination was 60 mg BID. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04228601.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Oxaliplatina/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Irinotecano/uso terapêutico , Irinotecano/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of pevonedistat, a first in class inhibitor of NEDD8 activating enzyme, in combination with irinotecan (IRN) and temozolomide (TMZ) in children with cancer. METHODS: This Phase 1 study used a rolling 6 design to evaluate escalating doses of pevonedistat in combination with standard doses of IRN and TMZ in pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory solid or CNS tumors. During cycle 1, pevonedistat was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 10, and 12, with IRN (IV, 50 mg/m2) and TMZ (orally, 100 mg/m2), on days 8-12 of a 28-day cycle. In subsequent cycles, pevonedistat was administered on days 1, 3, and 5, with IRN/TMZ on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Thirty patients enrolled; all were eligible and evaluable for toxicity. Six patients each enrolled on pevonedistat dose levels (DL) 1 (15 mg/m2), 2 (20 mg/m2), 3 (25 mg/m2) and 4 (35 mg/m2) as well as an expanded pharmacokinetic (PK) cohort at DL4. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not exceeded. 2/12 (17 %) patients treated at the RP2D (35 mg/m2) experienced a cycle 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT). IRN is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of pevonedistat. Two patients had a partial response and 6 patients had prolonged stable disease (> 6 cycles). CONCLUSIONS: Pevonedistat in combination with IRN/TMZ is well tolerated in children with solid or CNS tumors. The RP2D of pevonedistat is 35 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, 5 in combination with IRN/TMZ.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Ciclopentanos , Neoplasias , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Criança , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Escolar , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Ciclopentanos/administração & dosagem , Ciclopentanos/uso terapêutico , Ciclopentanos/farmacologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Irinotecano/administração & dosagem , Irinotecano/uso terapêutico , Temozolomida/administração & dosagem , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto Jovem , Proteína NEDD8RESUMO
This phase 1a study assesses ESG401 in patients with heavily pretreated locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, focusing on metastatic breast cancer. Forty patients are enrolled: three experience dose-limiting toxicities, establishing the maximum tolerated dose at 16 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events are neutropenia and leukopenia. Among 38 efficacy-evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) is 34.2%, the disease control rate (DCR) is 65.8%, and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) is 50.0% (including stable disease for at least 6 months). The median progression-free survival is 5.1 months, and the median duration of response is 6.3 months. In patients receiving therapeutically relevant doses, the ORR, DCR, and CBR are 40.6%, 75.0%, and 56.3%, respectively. ESG401 demonstrates a favorable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in this heavily treated population. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04892342).
Assuntos
Antígenos de Neoplasias , Imunoconjugados , Metástase Neoplásica , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Imunoconjugados/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Adulto , Masculino , Antígenos de Neoplasias/imunologia , Moléculas de Adesão Celular , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patologia , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Intervalo Livre de ProgressãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: LHC165 is a Toll-like receptor (TLR)-7 agonist that generates an effective tumor antigen-specific T-cell adaptive immune response as well as durable antitumor responses. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of LHC165 single agent (SA) ± spartalizumab [PDR001; anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)] in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase I/Ib, open-label, dose-escalation/expansion study, patients received LHC165 SA 100-600 µg biweekly through intratumoral (IT) injection and LHC165 600 µg biweekly + spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W through intravenous (IV) infusion. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled: 21 patients received LHC165 SA, and 24 patients received LHC165 + spartalizumab. The median duration of exposure was 8 weeks (range 2-129 weeks). No maximum tolerated dose was reached. Recommended dose expansion was established as LHC165 600 µg biweekly as SA and in combination with spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W. The most common drug-related adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia (22.2%), pruritus (13.3%), chills (11.1%), and asthenia (4.4%). The only serious AE (SAE) suspected to be related to the study drug was grade 3 pancreatitis (n = 1). Across all tumor types, overall response rate and disease control were 6.7% and 17.8%, respectively. Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) and immune-related PFS was 1.7 months. LHC165 serum PK demonstrated an initial rapid release followed by a slower release due to continued release of LHC165 from the injection site. CONCLUSIONS: LHC165 demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability both as SA and in combination with spartalizumab, and evidence of limited antitumor activity was seen in adult patients with relapsed/refractory or metastatic solid tumors.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Neoplasias , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacocinética , Adulto , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics of simlukafusp alfa (FAP-IL2v), an immunocytokine containing an anti-fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) antibody and an IL2 variant, administered alone or with the PDL1 inhibitor atezolizumab, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study, patients received i.v. FAP-IL2v at 10 or 15/20 mg alone or 10 mg when combined with i.v. atezolizumab. The primary objectives were identification of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), recommended dose, and maximum tolerated dose, and evaluation of the safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics of FAP-IL2v alone and combined with atezolizumab. RESULTS: All 11 patients experienced adverse events (AE) during FAP-IL2v treatment. Although most AEs were of mild severity, four treatment-related AEs led to study treatment discontinuation in two patients: one with infusion-related reaction, hypotension, and capillary leak syndrome, and the other with increased aspartate aminotransferase. No AE-related deaths occurred. One DLT (grade 3 hypotension) occurred in a patient receiving FAP-IL2v 15/20 mg alone. The recommended dose and maximum tolerated dose could not be determined. The pharmacokinetics of FAP-IL2v remained similar with or without atezolizumab. The study was terminated early as FAP-IL2v development was discontinued because of portfolio prioritization (not for efficacy/safety reasons). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the safety/tolerability of FAP-IL2v 10 mg alone and in combination with atezolizumab in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors; one DLT (hypotension) occurred with FAP-IL2v 15/20 mg. However, dose escalation of FAP-IL2v was not conducted because of early study termination. SIGNIFICANCE: This phase I study assessed the safety/tolerability and PK of simlukafusp alfa alone or combined with atezolizumab in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. No notable differences in PK were noted with the combination versus simlukafusp alfa alone; however, high-dose simlukafusp alfa treatment was associated with recombinant IL2-related toxicity, despite the drug's FAP targeting and IL2Rßγ-biased IL2 variant design.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Interleucina-2 , Neoplasias , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , População do Leste Asiático , Interleucina-2/administração & dosagem , Interleucina-2/efeitos adversos , Interleucina-2/farmacocinética , Japão , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Historically, dose selection of anticancer drugs has mainly been based on establishing the maximum tolerated dose in phase 1 clinical trials with a traditional 3 plus 3 design. In the era of targeted therapies and immune-modulating agents, this approach does not necessarily lead to selection of the most favourable dose. This strategy can introduce potentially avoidable toxicity or inconvenience for patients. Multiple changes in drug development could lead to more rational dose selection, such as use of better predictive preclinical models, adaptive and randomised trial design, evaluation of multiple dose levels in late-phase development, assessment of target activity and saturation, and early biomarker use for efficacy and safety evaluation. In this Review, we evaluate the rationale and validation of dose selection in each phase of drug development for anticancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration from Jan 1, 2020, to June 30, 2023, and give recommendations for dose optimisation to improve safety and patient convenience. In our evaluation, we classified 20 (65%) of the 31 recently registered anticancer agents as potential candidates for dose optimisation, which could be achieved either by reducing the dose (n=10 [32%]) or adjusting the dosage regimen (n=10 [32%]). Dose selection seemed to be adequately justified for nine (29%) of the drugs, whereas the reviewed data were inconclusive for formulating a recommendation on dose optimisation for two (6%) of the drugs.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Neoplasias , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Relação Dose-Resposta a DrogaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38) is a key target on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. This multi-centre, Phase 1, single-agent study (NCT04000282) investigated SAR442085, a novel fragment crystallisable (Fc)-modified anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), with enhanced affinity towards Fc-gamma receptor on effector cells in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (RR) MM. METHODS: This study comprised two parts: Part-A (dose-escalation involving anti-CD38 mAb pre-treated and naïve patients) and Part-B (dose expansion). Primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). RESULTS: Thirty-seven heavily pre-treated patients were treated in Part A. Part-B (dose-expansion) was not studied. Seven dose-limiting toxicities were reported at DL3, DL5, DL6, and DL7. RP2D was determined to be 5-7·5 mg/kg. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events were infusion-related reactions in 70·3% (26/37) patients. Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia was reported in 48·6% (18/37). Overall response rate was 70% in anti-CD38 mAb naïve and 4% in anti-CD38 pre-treated patients, with a median progression-free survival of 7·62 (95%CI: 2·858; not calculable) months and 2·79 (95%CI: 1·150; 4·172) months and, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of SAR442085 was promising in anti-CD38 mAb naïve patients but did not extend to the larger cohort of anti-CD38 mAb pre-treated patients. This observation, along with transient high-grade thrombocytopenia, could potentially limit its clinical use.
Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , ADP-Ribosil Ciclase 1/antagonistas & inibidores , ADP-Ribosil Ciclase 1/imunologia , Recidiva , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The selection of appropriate starting dose and suitable method to predict an efficacious dose for novel oncology drug in the early clinical development stage poses significant challenges. The traditional methods of using body surface area transformation from toxicology studies to predict the first-in human (FIH) starting dose, or simply selecting the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) as efficacious dose or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), are usually inadequate and risky for novel oncology drugs.Due to the regulatory efforts aimed at improving dose optimisation in oncology drug development, clinical dose selection is now shifting away from these traditional methods towards a comprehensive benefit/risk assessment-based approach. Quantitative pharmacology analysis (QPA) plays a crucial role in this new paradigm. This mini-review summarises the use of QPA in selecting the starting dose for oncology FIH studies and potential efficacious doses for expansion or phase 2 trials. QPA allows for a more rational and scientifically based approach to dose selection by integrating information across studies and development phases.In conclusion, the application of QPA in oncology drug development has the potential to significantly enhance the success rates of clinical trials and ultimately support clinical decision-making, particularly in dose selection.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Humanos , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos/métodos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Outcomes are poor for patients with large B-cell lymphoma who relapse after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR19). CD22 is a nearly universally expressed B-cell surface antigen and the efficacy of a CD22-directed CAR T-cell therapy (CAR22) in large B-cell lymphoma is unknown, which was what we aimed to examine in this study. METHODS: In this single centre, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trial, we intravenously administered CAR22 at two dose levels (1 million and 3 million CAR22-positive T cells per kg of bodyweight) to adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who relapsed after CAR19 or had CD19-negative large B-cell lymphoma. The primary endpoints were manufacturing feasibility, safety measured by the incidence and severity of adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities, and identification of the maximum tolerated dose (ie, the recommended phase 2 dose). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04088890) and is active, but closed for enrolment. FINDINGS: From Oct 17, 2019, to Oct 19, 2022, a total of 41 patients were assessed for eligibility; however, one patient withdrew. 40 patients underwent leukapheresis and 38 (95%) had CAR T-cell products manufactured successfully. The median age was 65 years (range 25-84), 17 (45%) were women, 32 (84%) had elevated pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase, 11 (29%) had refractory disease to all previous therapies, and patients had received a median of four lines of previous therapy (range 3-8). Of the 38 patients treated, 37 (97%) had relapsed after previous CAR19. The identified maximum tolerated dose was 1 million CAR T cells per kg. Of 29 patients who received the maximum tolerated dose, no patients developed a dose-limiting toxicity or grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, or immune effector cell-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome. INTERPRETATION: This trial identifies CD22 as an immunotherapeutic target in large B-cell lymphoma and demonstrates the durable clinical activity of CAR22 in patients with disease progression after CAR19 therapy. Although these findings are promising, it is essential to recognise that this is a phase 1 dose-finding study. Further investigations are warranted to establish the long-term efficacy and to delineate the patient subgroups that will derive the most benefit from this therapeutic approach. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Stanford Cancer Institute, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Lymph & Co, and the European Hematology Association.
Assuntos
Antígenos CD19 , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Lectina 2 Semelhante a Ig de Ligação ao Ácido Siálico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antígenos CD19/imunologia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/imunologia , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/imunologia , Lectina 2 Semelhante a Ig de Ligação ao Ácido Siálico/imunologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
This phase 1b study aimed to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of HR070803, a novel nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan, in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with pretreated advanced solid tumors. This study consisted of dose-escalation and expansion stages. Dose escalation was performed with a traditional 3 + 3 design; patients received intravenous infusion of HR070803 from 60 to 80 mg/m2, followed by leucovorin (200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (2000 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. In the expansion stage, patients received treatments at selected tolerable dose. Fifteen patients received treatments at 60 mg/m2 (n = 12) and 80 mg/m2 (n = 3). DLTs occurred in 2 patients at 80 mg/m2 (grade 2 neutropenia that resulted in a dose delay of ≥ 7 days, n = 1; grade 3 febrile neutropenia, n = 1). The MTD was determined to be 60 mg/m2. The most frequent HR070803related adverse events included anorexia, leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, exhibited lower maximum plasma concentrations and a prolonged terminal half-life when irinotecan was administered via nanoliposome compared to conventional injection. Overall, 4 patients achieved a partial response (confirmed, n = 2), and 9 had stable disease. The MTD of HR070803 was 60 mg/m2 when infused with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. Nanoliposomal encapsulation modified the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and SN-38. HR070803 with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor efficacy in advanced solid tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05086848. Retrospectively registered on Oct. 12, 2021.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Fluoruracila , Irinotecano , Leucovorina , Lipossomos , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Neoplasias , Humanos , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/farmacocinética , Leucovorina/efeitos adversos , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/farmacocinética , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Irinotecano/farmacocinética , Irinotecano/administração & dosagem , Irinotecano/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Relação Dose-Resposta a DrogaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) oncogene exerts oncogenic activities in many cancers and represents a potential therapeutic target. This trial evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of alrizomadlin (APG-115), a novel MDM2/p53 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed advanced solid tumors who had progressed to standard treatment or lacked effective therapies were recruited. Alrizomadlin was administered once daily every other day for 21 days of a 28-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were enrolled and treated with alrizomadlin; 57.1% were male and the median age was 47 (25-60) years. The maximum tolerated dose of alrizomadlin was 150 mg and the recommended phase II dose was 100 mg. One patient in the 200-mg cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity of thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33.3%), lymphocytopenia (33.3%), neutropenia (23.8%), and anemia (23.8%). Alrizomadlin demonstrated approximately linear pharmacokinetics (dose range 100-200 mg) and was associated with increased plasma macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1, indicative of p53 pathway activation. Of the 20 assessable patients, 2 [10%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2% to 31.7%] patients achieved partial response and 10 (50%, 95% CI 27.2% to 72.8%) showed stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 6.1 (95% CI 1.7-10.4) months, which was significantly longer in patients with wild-type versus mutant TP53 (7.9 versus 2.2 months, respectively; P < 0.001). Among patients with MDM2 amplification and wild-type TP53, the overall response rate was 25% (2/8) and the disease control rate was 100% (8/8). CONCLUSIONS: Alrizomadlin had an acceptable safety profile and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in MDM2-amplified and TP53 wild-type tumors. This study supports further exploration of alrizomadlin with recommended doses of 100 mg q.o.d. in 21 days on and 7 days off regimen.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-mdm2 , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53 , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-mdm2/antagonistas & inibidores , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/metabolismo , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The multi-centre two-stage SCALOP-2 trial (ISRCTN50083238) assessed whether dose escalation of consolidative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or concurrent sensitization using the protease inhibitor nelfinavir improve outcomes in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) following four cycles of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. METHODS: In stage 1, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of nelfinavir concurrent with standard-dose CRT (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) was identified from a cohort of 27 patients. In stage 2, 159 patients were enrolled in an open-label randomized controlled comparison of standard versus high dose (60 Gy in 30 fractions) CRT, with or without nelfinavir at MTD. Primary outcomes following dose escalation and nelfinavir use were respectively overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS: High dose CRT did not improve OS (16.9 (60 % confidence interval, CI 16.2-17.7) vs. 15.6 (60 %CI 14.3-18.2) months; adjusted hazard ratio, HR 1.13 (60 %CI 0.91-1.40; p = 0.68)). Similarly, median PFS was not improved by nelfinavir (10.0 (60 %CI 9.9-10.2) vs. 11.1 (60 %CI 10.3-12.8) months; adjusted HR 1.71 (60 %CI 1.38-2.12; p = 0.98)). Local progression at 12 months was numerically lower with high-dose CRT than with standard dose CRT (n = 11/46 (23.9 %) vs. n = 15/45 (33.3 %)). Neither nelfinavir nor radiotherapy dose escalation impacted on treatment compliance or grade 3/4 adverse event rate. There were no sustained differences in HRQoL scores between treatment groups over 28 weeks post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-escalated CRT may improve local tumour control and is well tolerated when used as consolidative treatment in LAPC but does not impact OS. Nelfinavir use does not improve PFS.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Quimiorradioterapia , Nelfinavir , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Nelfinavir/uso terapêutico , Nelfinavir/administração & dosagem , Nelfinavir/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Gencitabina , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Qualidade de Vida , Albuminas/administração & dosagem , Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Albuminas/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Inibidores de Proteases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteases/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteases/administração & dosagemRESUMO
PURPOSE: The combination of bevacizumab and FOLFIRINOX is used in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (RASm-mCRC). Regorafenib, an oral multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has antiangiogenic properties, cytostatic effects and also true cytotoxic effects, unlike bevacizumab. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the regorafenib-FOLFIRINOX combination in patients with RASm-mCRC. METHODS: The FOLFIRINOX-R trial was a phase 1/2 study where the dose-escalation part (3 + 3 design with three dose levels, DLs) was completed before its early termination. FOLFIRINOX (14-day cycle) included oxaliplatin (standard dose), folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (150 or 180 mg/m²). Regorafenib (120 or 160 mg daily) was given from day 4 to day 10 of each cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was studied in the first three cycles. Eligibility criteria included ECOG performance status ≤ 1 and not previously treated RASm-mCRC. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (median age: 65 years; min-max: 40-76) were enrolled. DLT could not be evaluated in one patient (DL3) due to poor observance. The median treatment duration and median follow-up were 6.2 (min-max: 2.3-10) and 13.4 (min-max: 3.8-18.0) months, respectively. Dose was modified in 12/13 (92%) patients. One grade 3 hypokalemia occurred at DL2. MTD was not reached at DL3. Grade 3 diarrhea was recorded in 7/13 patients (13 events) equally distributed in all DLs. CONCLUSION: The RP2D for this regorafenib-FFX combination could not be determined due to a high prevalence of grade 3 diarrhea related to treatment as advised by our Independent Data Monitoring Committee. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03828799.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Colorretais , Fluoruracila , Irinotecano , Leucovorina , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Oxaliplatina , Compostos de Fenilureia , Piridinas , Humanos , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Irinotecano/administração & dosagem , Irinotecano/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Mutação , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Metástase NeoplásicaRESUMO
Recurrent high-grade gliomas (rHGGs) have a dismal prognosis, where the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IV terameprocol (5 days/month), a transcriptional inhibitor of specificity protein 1 (Sp1)-regulated proteins, is 1,700 mg/day with median area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of 31.3 µg∗h/mL. Given potentially increased efficacy with sustained systemic exposure and challenging logistics of daily IV therapy, here we investigate oral terameprocol for rHGGs in a multicenter, phase 1 trial (GATOR). Using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, we enroll 20 patients, with median age 60 years (range 31-80), 70% male, and median one relapse (range 1-3). Fasting patients tolerate 1,200 mg/day (n = 3), 2,400 mg/day (n = 6), 3,600 mg/day (n = 3), and 6,000 mg/day (n = 2) oral doses without major toxicities. However, increased dosage does not lead to increased systemic exposure, including in fed state (6,000 mg/day, n = 4), with maximal AUC <5 µg∗h/mL. These findings warrant trials investigating approaches that provide sustained systemic levels of transcription inhibitors to exploit their therapeutic potential. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02575794).
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Glioma/tratamento farmacológico , Glioma/patologia , Adulto , Feminino , Idoso , Administração Oral , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Gradação de Tumores , Dose Máxima TolerávelRESUMO
AIMS: To present the final results of a phase I trial on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with primary or metastatic tumors in different extracranial sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DESTROY-2 trial, planned as a prospective dose escalation study in oligometastatic (one to five lesions) cancer patients relied on the delivery of a single high dose of radiation utilizing high-precision technology. The primary study endpoint was the definition of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SRS-VMAT. The secondary objectives of the study were the evaluation of safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes. All patients consecutively observed at our radiotherapy unit matching the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Each enrolled subject was included in a different phase I study arm, depending on the tumor site and the disease stage (lung, liver, bone, other), and sequentially assigned to a particular dose level. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty seven lesions in 164 consecutive patients (male/female: 97/67, median age: 68 years; range: 29-92) were treated. The main primary tumors were: prostate cancer (60 patients), colorectal cancer (47 patients), and breast cancer (39 patients). The maximum planned dose level was achieved in all study arms, and the MTD was not exceeded. 34 Gy, 32 Gy, 24 Gy, and 24 Gy were established as the single-fraction doses for treating lung, liver, bone, and other extracranial lesions, respectively. The prescribed BED 2Gyα/ß:10 to the planning target volume ranged from 26.4 Gy to 149.6 Gy. Twenty-seven patients (16.5%) experienced grade 1-2 and only one grade 3 acute toxicity, which was a pulmonary one. In terms of late toxicity, we registered only 5 toxicity>G2: a G3 gastro-intestinal one, three G3 bone toxicity, and a G3 laryngeal toxicity. The overall response was available for 199 lesions: 107 complete response (53.8%), 50 partial response (25.1%), and 31 stable disease (15.6%), leading to an overall response rate of 94.5%. Progression was registered only in 11 cases (5.5%). The overall response rate in each arm ranged from 88.6% to 96.4%. The overall two-year local control, distant metastasis free survival, disease free survival, and overall survival were 81.7%, 33.0%, 25.4%, and 78.7% respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the planned doses of 34 Gy, 32 Gy, 24 Gy, and 24 Gy were successfully administered as single-fractions for the treatment of lung, liver, bone, and other extracranial lesions, respectively, in a prospective SRS dose-escalation trial. No dose-limiting toxicities were registered, and minimal acute and late toxicity were reported. New indications for SRS are currently being studied in oligoprogressive patients receiving targeted drugs or in combination with immunotherapy. The DESTROY-2 trial represents, in our opinion, a credible starting point for future modern radiosurgery trials.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Radiocirurgia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Humanos , Masculino , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Neoplasias/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Dosagem RadioterapêuticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) remains the primary objective for the majority of dose-finding oncology trials. Whilst MTD determination often relies upon clinicians to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) experienced by patients during the trial, research suggests that clinicians may underreport patient's adverse events. Therefore, contemporary practice may be exposed to recommending intolerable doses to patients for further investigation in subsequent trials. There is increasing interest in patients self-assessing their own symptoms using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in dose-finding trials. DESIGN: We present Utility-PRO-Continual Reassessment Method (U-PRO-CRM), a novel trial design which simultaneously uses clinician-rated and patient-rated DLTs (Clinician-DLTs and Patient-DLTs, respectively) to make dose (de-)escalation decisions and to recommend an MTD. U-PRO-CRM contains the published PRO-CRM as a special case and provides greater flexibility to trade-off the rate of Patient-DLTs and Clinician-DLTs to find an optimal dose. We present simulation results for U-PRO-CRM. RESULTS: For specified trade-offs between Clinician-DLT and Patient-DLT rate, U-PRO-CRM outperforms the PRO-CRM design by identifying the true MTD more often. In the special case where U-PRO-CRM generalises to PRO-CRM, U-PRO-CRM performs as well as its published counterpart. U-PRO-CRM minimises the number of patients overdosed whilst maintaining a similar proportion of patients allocated to the true MTD. CONCLUSIONS: By using a utility-based dose selection approach, U-PRO-CRM offers the flexibility to define a trade-off between the risk of patient-rated and clinician-rated DLTs for an optimal dose. Patient-centric dose-finding strategies, which integrate PROs, are poised to assume an ever more pivotal role in significantly advancing our understanding of treatment tolerability. This bears significant implications in shaping the future landscape of early-phase trials.