RESUMO
Central Giant Cell Lesion (CGCL) is an uncommon benign jaw lesion, with uncertain etiology, and a variable clinical behavior. Studies of molecular markers of CGCL, may help understanding better the nature and behavior of this lesion, and eventually may represent a definitive target to pharmacological approach in the treatment of CGCL. Chronic inflammation has been found to mediate a wide variety of diseases including neoplasms. Among the gene products involved in the induction of the inflammatory process, Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) has been shown to have a close relationship with tumorigenesis, however COX-2 expression has never been evaluated in CGCL. The aim of the study was to investigate the expression of COX-2 in CGCL. Immunohistochemical assessment for COX-2 expression was performed in 18 patients previously diagnosed with CGCL. Multinucleated giant cells (MGC) and mononucleated stromal cells (MSC) were used in the slide analysis. Among the patients studied, 10 were male and 8 were female, with a median age of 15.4 years. Lesions in the mandible were observed in 11 cases and 7 were found in the maxilla. There were 9 aggressive and 9 non-aggressive CGCLs. COX-2 immunopositivity was present in only 3 cases stained in both MGC and MSC. All 3 cases presented with ulcerations in the mucosa lesion, suggesting that the COX-2 expression is due to the presence of inflammation. This study does not support the involvement of COX-2 in the etiophatogenesis of CGCL.
Assuntos
Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/metabolismo , Células Gigantes/enzimologia , Doenças Maxilomandibulares/enzimologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Células Gigantes/patologia , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Doenças Maxilomandibulares/patologia , Masculino , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the immunohistochemical expression of MMP-1 and MMP-9 with the clinical behavior of central giant cell lesions (CGCLs) of the jaws. STUDY DESIGN: Paraffin-embedded tissue from 30 aggressive and 12 nonaggressive CGCLs was assessed for the expression of MMP-1 and MMP-9 using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Although cellular immunolocalization patterns of MMP-1 and MMP-9 were similar, mean values of expression estimation/SID scores of each protease were significantly higher in aggressive CGCLs in comparison with nonaggressive lesions. Moreover, linear regression analysis showed that there was a reasonably good correlation not only between the expression estimation but also among SID scores of the 2 proteolytic enzymes. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest a role for MMP-1 and MMP-9 in the resorptive activity of different cellular groups in CGCLs and indicate that differences in immunoreactivity of these 2 proteolytic enzymes may underlie the distinct clinical behavior.