RESUMO
The study aimed to develop lipid nanoparticles using excipients compatible with carvedilol (CARV) for enhanced transdermal drug delivery. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) were successfully obtained and fully characterised. Franz diffusion cells were used for release and in vitro permeation studies in the porcine epidermis (EP) and full-thickness rat skin. NLC4 and NLC5 (0.5 mg/mL of CARV) presented small size (80.58 ± 1.70 and 116.80 ± 12.23 nm, respectively) and entrapment efficiency of 98.14 ± 0.79 and 98.27 ± 0.99%, respectively. CARV-loaded NLC4 and NLC5 controlled drug release. NLC4 allowed CAR permeation through porcine EP in greater amounts than NLC5, i.e. 11.83 ± 4.71 µg/cm2 compared to 3.06 ± 0.79 µg/cm2. NLC4 increased CARV permeation by 2.5-fold compared to the unloaded drug in rat skin studies (13.73 ± 4.12 versus 5.31 ± 1.56 µg/cm2). NLC4 seems to be a promising carrier for the transdermal delivery of CARV.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Carvedilol/administração & dosagem , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Lipídeos/química , Administração Cutânea , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacocinética , Animais , Carvedilol/farmacocinética , Nanopartículas/química , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Pele/metabolismo , Absorção Cutânea , SuínosRESUMO
This study evaluates the carvedilol-lercanidipine drug interaction, and the influence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on both drugs. Patients with high blood pressure (8 with normal renal function [control] and 8 with CKD with estimated glomerular filtration rate categories of G3b to G5 [12-38 mL/min/1.73 m2 ]) were included and prescribed 3 different treatment regimens, a single oral dose of racemic carvedilol 25 mg (CAR), a single oral dose of racemic lercanidipine 20 mg (LER), and single oral doses of CAR plus LER. Blood samples were collected and variations in heart rate were assessed (using isometric exercise with handgrip) for up to 32 hours. Lercanidipine pharmacokinetics were not enantioselective, and were not affected by carvedilol and CKD. Carvedilol pharmacokinetics (data presented as median) were enantioselective with higher plasma exposure of (R)-(+)-carvedilol in both control (103.5 vs 46.0 ng â h/mL) and CKD (190.6 vs 98.9 ng â h/mL) groups. Lercanidipine increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of only (R)-(+)-carvedilol in the CKD group (190.6 vs 242.2 ng â h/mL) but not in the control group (103.5 vs 98.7 ng â h/mL). CKD increased plasma exposure (46.0 vs 98.9 ng â h/mL) and effect-compartment exposure (5.5 vs 20.9 ng â h/mL) to (S)-(-)-carvedilol, resulting in higher ß-adrenergic inhibition (10.0 vs 6.1 bpm). Therefore, carvedilol dose titration in CKD patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate categories of G3b to G5 should be initiated, with no more than half the dose used for patients with normal renal function.