RESUMO
Los IBP han demostrado ser fármacos relativamente seguros después de muchos años de una amplia utilización. Las reacciones adversas con las que más frecuentemente se han asociado son leves y con escasa repercusión clínica. Inducen hipergastrinemia pero esta no se ha relacionado con una capacidad para inducir lesiones malignas Parece que pueden facilitar determinadas infecciones bacterianas a nivel digestivo y del aparato respiratorio, aunque este hecho no limita su prescripción dada la facilidad de su tratamiento. Desde el punto de vista farmacocinético se han descrito la posibilidad de interacciones con otros fármacos a nivel del citocromo P450, pero ello no parece tener mayor trascendencia clínica y terapéutica en general. Sin embargo, recientemente se está incidiendo por las agencias reguladoras en la hipotética interacción de los IBP (sobre todo omeprazol) con el clopidogrel generando una reducción en su efecto antiagregante. Aunque se debe seguir esta recomendación, necesitaria ser evaluado de forma específica para poder determinar su realidad clínica y las posibles alternativas existentes en los pacientes con riesgo de sangrado gastrointestinal. En último lugar se revisa su administración en situaciones especiales, objeto de discusión, como en la mujer embarazada o durante la lactancia materna...
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Bombas de Próton/administração & dosagem , Bombas de Próton/efeitos adversos , Bombas de Próton , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Constipação Intestinal , Diarreia , Gastroenterologia , Farmacologia ClínicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A number of recent case reports and case series suggest that proton pump inhibitors may cause acute interstitial nephritis. AIM: To establish the nature of the relationship (cause or association) between proton pump inhibitor use and development of interstitial nephritis. DATA COLLECTION: Two researchers independently searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, GOOGLE, LILACS, COCHRANE) for articles from 1970 to 2006, including all study designs, populations and languages. Two independent reviewers assessed study quality and collected the data. SELECTION CRITERIA: absence of baseline renal failure, development of interstitial nephritis after proton pump inhibitor exposure, nephritis confirmed by creatinine plus either renal biopsy or recurrence upon reinitiating proton pump inhibitor. RESULTS: Sixty four cases (60% females, mean age 78 years) of proton pump inhibitor-associated interstitial nephritis were found, 60 included in this review (59 confirmed by renal biopsy, one by recurrence upon reinitiating proton pump inhibitor). The most common symptoms were non-specific. The mean proton pump inhibitor treatment duration before diagnosing nephritis was 13 weeks, average recovery time was 35.5 weeks, one patient required permanent dialysis, there were no deaths. CONCLUSION: Proton pump inhibitor-related interstitial nephritis is rare, idiosyncratic and difficult to predict. It requires a high level of clinical suspicion. While there is not sufficient evidence to establish a causal relationship with certainty, there does appear to be a low-prevalence association.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Nefrite Intersticial/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Injúria Renal Aguda/patologia , Idoso , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Nefrite Intersticial/patologia , Bombas de Próton/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To characterize those pediatric patients who receive long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and to determine the safety of long-term use of PPIs in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Patient databases were screened for long-term PPI use, defined as more than 9 months of continuous prescription, between 1989 and 2004. RESULTS: The median duration of PPI use in the 166 patients in the study group was 3 years (range, 0.75 to 11.25 years). A total of 80 patients used PPIs for 3 to 11 years duration; 35 of these for more than 5 years, and 15 for more than 8 years. Mean age at initial prescription was 7.8 years. At least 1 gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-predisposing disorder was present in 79% of the patients; the major disorders were neuromotor (in 66%) and esophageal atresia (in 14.5%). No GERD-predisposing disorder was present in 35 patients (21%). Endoscopic findings included hiatal hernia in 39% and histologically proven Barrett's esophagus in 4.8%. Omeprazole was used in 90% of the patients; lansoprazole, in 7%. Six adverse reactions seen in 4 patients were potentially related to PPI (nausea and diarrhea, skin rash, agitation, and irritability). CONCLUSIONS: Children with underlying GERD-predisposing disorders compose the majority of long-term PPI users. Few adverse reactions to these drugs occur, and discontinuation of the drug is seldom indicated. These preliminary data suggest that PPIs may be efficacious and safe for continuous use for up to 11 years' duration in children.