Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Biol Trop ; 36(2B): 511-7, 1988 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3078800

RESUMO

A monovalent antivenom was produced by immunizing two horses with venom of the pit viper Bothrops asper (Ophidia: Viperidae). Although development of the immune response against four toxic and enzymatic activities of the venom was similar in both horses during the first two thirds of the immunization schedule, antibody response in one of the horses reached much higher levels in the last part of the immunization. Immunoelectrophoretic analysis indicates that there were precipitating antibodies in the sera of these horses during all the stages of immunization. However, immunoprecipitation did not correlate with the ability of sera to neutralize toxic activities of B. asper venom. Monovalent antivenom was more effective than the commercially available polyvalent antivenom in the neutralization of Bothrops asper venom. On the other hand, despite the fact that it neutralizes lethal and hemorrhagic activities of the venoms of Lachesia muta and Crotalus durissus durissus, it was less effective than polyvalent antivenom in these neutralizations. Moreover, it does not neutralize defibrinating activity induced by these two venoms, whereas it neutralizes this effect in the case of B. asper venom. It is proposed that monovalent antivenom may be highly effective in the case of envenomations induced by Bothrops asper venom; its use in treating accidents by L. muta and C. durissus would be indicated only if polyvalent antivenom is not available. Results also demonstrate that it is important to monitor antibody response individually in horses being immunized for antivenom production, due to the conspicuous variability in the response of different animals.


Assuntos
Antivenenos/isolamento & purificação , Venenos de Crotalídeos/imunologia , Cavalos/imunologia , Imunização , Animais , Formação de Anticorpos , Antivenenos/biossíntese , Antivenenos/provisão & distribuição , Antivenenos/uso terapêutico , Imunoeletroforese
2.
Rev. biol. trop ; Rev. biol. trop;36(2B): 511-7, nov. 1988. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-103745

RESUMO

A monovalent antivenom was produced by immunozing two horses with venom of the pit viper Bothrops asper (Ophidia: Viperidae). Although development of the immune response against four toxic and enzymatic activitiesof the venom was similar in both horses during the first two thirds of the immunization schedule, antibody response in one of the horses reached much higher levels in the last part of the immunization. Immunoelectrophoretic analysis indicates that there were precipitating antibodies in the sera of these horses during all the stages of immunization. However, immunoprecipitation did not correlated with the ability of sera to neutralize toxic activities of B. asper venom. Monovalent antivenom was more effective than the commercialy available polyvalent antivenom in the neutralization of Bothrops asper venom. On the other hand, despite the fact that it neutralizes lethal and hemorrhagic activities of the venoms of Lachesia muta and Crotalus durissus, it was less effective than polyvalent antivenom in these neutralizations. Moreover, it does not neutalize defibrinating activity induced by these two venoms, whereas it neutralizes this effect in the case of B. asper venom. It is proposed that monovalent antivenom my be highly effective in the case of envenomations induced by Bothrops asper venom; its use in treating accidentsby L. muta and C. durissus would be indicated only of polyvalent antivenom is not available. Results also demonstrate that it is important to monitor antibody response individually in horses being immunized for antivenom production, due to the conspicuous variability in the response of different animals.


Assuntos
Animais , Antivenenos/isolamento & purificação , Venenos de Crotalídeos/imunologia , Cavalos/imunologia , Imunização , Formação de Anticorpos , Antivenenos/biossíntese , Antivenenos/provisão & distribuição , Antivenenos/uso terapêutico , Imunoeletroforese
4.
Bull Pan Am Health Organ ; 12(1): 23-7, 1978.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-667406

RESUMO

A multivalent coral snake antivenin was prepared in horses immunized with a mixture of venoms from the species Micrurus nigrocinctus, M. mipartitus, and M. frontalis, following immunization procedures previously reported (2). Plasma from the horses was fractionated with ammonium sulfate. The antivenin produced was then tested against venoms from ten species. The neutralization titers obtained indicate it would be useful in treating bites received from most of the important coral snake species in North and South America, namely: M. fulvius, M. alleni, M. carinicaudus dumerilii, M. corallinus, M. frontalis, M. lemniscatus, M. mipartitus, M. nigrocinctus, and M. spixii. The authors note that appropriate cooperation by scientists in various countries would make production of this antivenin an easy matter, and that the product could conveniently be distributed via PAHO or other international agencies. They also note that the antivenin showed no significant neutralizing effect against M. surinamensis venom. This situation would appear to justify preparing a monovalent antivenin against M. surinamensis, or else including M. surinamensis venom in an immunization formula for a multivalent antidote.


Assuntos
Antivenenos/farmacologia , Venenos Elapídicos , Serpentes , Animais , Antivenenos/isolamento & purificação , Antivenenos/provisão & distribuição , Dose Letal Mediana , Camundongos , Testes de Neutralização , América do Norte , América do Sul
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA