RESUMO
In this study we investigated the ability of zebrafish to discriminate visual signs and associate them with a reward in an associative-learning protocol including distractors. Moreover, we studied the effects of caffeine on animal performance in the task. After being trained to associate a specific image pattern with a reward (food) in the presence of other, distractor images, the fish were challenged to locate the exact cue associated with the reward. The distractors were same-colored pattern images similar to the target. Both the target and distractors were continually moved around the tank. Fish were exposed to three caffeine concentrations for 14 days: 0 mg/L (control, n = 12), 10 mg/L (n = 14), and 50 mg/L (n = 14). Zebrafish spent most of the time close to the target (where the reward was offered) under the effects of 0 and 10 mg/L caffeine, and the shortest latency to reach the target was observed for the 10-mg/L caffeine group. Both caffeine treatments (10 and 50 mg/L) increased the average speed and distance traveled when compared to the control group. This study confirms previous results showing that zebrafish demonstrate conditioned learning ability; however, low-dose caffeine exposure seems to favor visual cue discrimination and to increase zebrafish performance in a multicue discrimination task, in which primarily focus and attention are required in order to obtain the reward.
Assuntos
Aprendizagem por Associação/efeitos dos fármacos , Atenção/efeitos dos fármacos , Cafeína/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Receptores Purinérgicos P1/administração & dosagem , Peixe-Zebra , Animais , Comportamento Animal/efeitos dos fármacos , Cafeína/farmacologia , Café , Condicionamento Psicológico/efeitos dos fármacos , Discriminação Psicológica/efeitos dos fármacos , Antagonistas de Receptores Purinérgicos P1/farmacologia , Recompensa , Percepção Visual/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
Human endothelial progenitor cells (hEPC) are recruited to sites of neovascularization where they differentiate into endothelial cells. The signals/factors responsible for hEPC migration and adhesion to sites of injury are not well understood. Elevated levels of adenosine are known to increase mature endothelial cell migration in response to tissue injury. However, the understanding of the role of adenosine in the physiology of hEPC is very limited. Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analyses, we detected the expression of the adenosine receptors A2A, A2B, and A3 in hEPC. Stimulation of adenosine receptors using adenosine or the nonselective agonist adenosine-5'-N-ethylcarboxamide (NECA) increased hEPC migration in 1.4-fold and 2.1-fold (P < 0.01), respectively. Stimulation of hEPC using the A2A-specific agonist CGS-21680 resembled the effect observed in migration when using adenosine or NECA. Consequently, NECA and CGS-21680-stimulated migration of hEPC were reverted using the A2A receptor antagonist ZM-241385. NECA-stimulated migration was inhibited in dose-dependent manner using MRS-1523 (Ki of 147 ± 0.016 nM), MRS-1754 (Ki of 1900 ± 0.02 nM), or ZM-241385 (Ki of 0.2 ± 0.01 nM). In conclusion, adenosine stimulates hEPC migration by activating A2A and A3 but not A2B receptors and provides evidence to support a role of adenosine in modulating angiogenic capacity of hEPC.