RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop a scale of anticholinergic activity drugs used in Brazil, to be applied in health care and pharmacoepidemiology research. METHODS: We performed a literature review on PubMed/MEDLINE® to identify previously published scales of anticholinergic drugs. This scale started with anticholinergic drugs, and those with known anticholinergic activity as per the 4th level, chemical-therapeutic subgroup, of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification. We also included drugs with high anticholinergic activity, as described in a list of potentially inappropriate medications for use in older adults, according to the 2015 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. Drugs listed in at least two anticholinergic scales were added. Then we verified which drugs in the previous steps were marketed in Brazil. We assigned a score of 1, 2 and 3, based on their anticholinergic action. RESULTS: A total of 273 anticholinergic drugs were identified, of which 125 were included in the scale. We identified 45 (36.0%) drugs with a score of 3, 13 (10.4%) with a score of 2, and 67 (53.6%) with a score of 1. Drugs for the nervous and respiratory systems were the most frequent in the scale. Eight drugs were not present in previous scales. CONCLUSION: The methodology used for development of the Brazilian anticholinergic activity scale is simple, systematized, reproducible and easy to update. The scale allows evaluating the impact of anticholinergic burden on health outcomes, and can potentially contribute to pharmacoepidemiology research, leading to more accurate measurements of anticholinergic activity.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Colinérgicos/farmacologia , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/normas , Idoso , Brasil , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/classificação , Humanos , Farmacoepidemiologia , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective To develop a scale of anticholinergic activity drugs used in Brazil, to be applied in health care and pharmacoepidemiology research. Methods We performed a literature review on PubMed/MEDLINE® to identify previously published scales of anticholinergic drugs. This scale started with anticholinergic drugs, and those with known anticholinergic activity as per the 4th level, chemical-therapeutic subgroup, of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification. We also included drugs with high anticholinergic activity, as described in a list of potentially inappropriate medications for use in older adults, according to the 2015 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. Drugs listed in at least two anticholinergic scales were added. Then we verified which drugs in the previous steps were marketed in Brazil. We assigned a score of 1, 2 and 3, based on their anticholinergic action. Results A total of 273 anticholinergic drugs were identified, of which 125 were included in the scale. We identified 45 (36.0%) drugs with a score of 3, 13 (10.4%) with a score of 2, and 67 (53.6%) with a score of 1. Drugs for the nervous and respiratory systems were the most frequent in the scale. Eight drugs were not present in previous scales. Conclusion The methodology used for development of the Brazilian anticholinergic activity scale is simple, systematized, reproducible and easy to update. The scale allows evaluating the impact of anticholinergic burden on health outcomes, and can potentially contribute to pharmacoepidemiology research, leading to more accurate measurements of anticholinergic activity.
RESUMO Objetivo Desenvolver uma escala de atividade anticolinérgica abrangendo os medicamentos utilizados no Brasil, para aplicação no cuidado em saúde e em pesquisas farmacoepidemiológicas. Métodos Realizou-se revisão da literatura no PubMed/MEDLINE®para identificação das escalas de mensuração da atividade anticolinérgica. Iniciou-se a escala com os fármacos anticolinérgicos e aqueles com atividade anticolinérgica conhecida, relacionados segundo o nível 4, subgrupo químico, na classificação da Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical . Incluíram-se os fármacos com atividade anticolinérgica alta, descritos na lista de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados para idosos, segundo o 2015 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria . Adicionaram-se os medicamentos que constavam em, no mínimo, duas escalas anticolinérgicas. Em seguida, verificaram-se os medicamentos constantes nas etapas anteriores comercializados no Brasil. A magnitude da atividade anticolinérgica foi estabelecida em escores com os valores de 1, 2 e 3. Resultados Foram identificados 273 medicamentos com atividade anticolinérgica, sendo 125 incluídos na escala. Destes, 45 (36,0%) receberam pontuação 3, 13 (10,4%) tiveram pontuação 2, e 67 (53,6%) pontuação 1. A maioria dos medicamentos da escala atuava nos sistemas nervoso e respiratório. Oito fármacos não constavam em escalas prévias. Conclusão A metodologia de desenvolvimento da escala brasileira de atividade anticolinérgica é simples, sistematizada, reprodutível e de fácil atualização. A escala permite avaliar o impacto da carga anticolinérgica nos resultados em saúde e pode contribuir com as pesquisas farmacoepidemiológicas, propiciando mensurações mais exatas da atividade anticolinérgica.
Assuntos
Humanos , Idoso , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/normas , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/farmacologia , Padrões de Referência , Brasil , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Farmacoepidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/classificaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anticholinergic drugs are often involved in explicit criteria for inappropriate prescribing in older adults. Several scales were developed for screening of anticholinergic drugs and estimation of the anticholinergic burden. However, variation exists in scale development, in the selection of anticholinergic drugs, and the evaluation of their anticholinergic load. This study aims to systematically review existing anticholinergic risk scales, and to develop a uniform list of anticholinergic drugs differentiating for anticholinergic potency. METHODS: We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE. Studies were included if provided (1) a finite list of anticholinergic drugs; (2) a grading score of anticholinergic potency and, (3) a validation in a clinical or experimental setting. We listed anticholinergic drugs for which there was agreement in the different scales. In case of discrepancies between scores we used a reputed reference source (Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference®) to take a final decision about the anticholinergic activity of the drug. RESULTS: We included seven risk scales, and evaluated 225 different drugs. Hundred drugs were listed as having clinically relevant anticholinergic properties (47 high potency and 53 low potency), to be included in screening software for anticholinergic burden. CONCLUSION: Considerable variation exists among anticholinergic risk scales, in terms of selection of specific drugs, as well as of grading of anticholinergic potency. Our selection of 100 drugs with clinically relevant anticholinergic properties needs to be supplemented with validated information on dosing and route of administration for a full estimation of the anticholinergic burden in poly-medicated older adults.