Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transplantation ; 103(9): 1746-1751, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31283672

RESUMO

Early results of hand and face transplants and other grafts such as those of uterus, penis, trachea, larynx, or abdominal wall have confirmed the potential for vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) to restore appearance, anatomy, function, independence, and social integration in patients suffering from devastating tissue deficits untreatable by conventional treatment options. Despite such promise, these novel and complex procedures face challenges and controversies that remain open to discussion and debate. Indeed, many barriers to clinical advancement and negative stakeholder perceptions still exist. The bioethical challenges surrounding VCA include but are not limited to justice and vulnerability of subjects, and their experiences with risks, benefits and outcomes, provider economy of fame, public awareness and attitudes toward transplantation, and policy and regulatory issues shaping progress of the field. The First International Workshop on Bioethical Challenges in Reconstructive Transplantation was organized by the Brocher Foundation in Hermance, Switzerland. VCA professionals representing teams from across the world examined bioethical issues in VCA related to standards for safety, efficacy, feasibility, privacy, confidentiality, and equitability. Key discussion topics from the workshop were included in a survey questionnaire implemented across VCA professionals attending the 13th Congress of International Society of VCA held in Salzburg, Austria. The insights from the Brocher workshop and International Society of VCA survey as presented here could help inform the future development of clinical practice and policy strategies in VCA to ensure value, accessibility, and acceptance of these procedures by potential donors, potential or actual recipients and their families, and providers and payers.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica/ética , Aloenxertos Compostos , Confidencialidade/ética , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Segurança do Paciente , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/ética , Alotransplante de Tecidos Compostos Vascularizados/ética , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Alotransplante de Tecidos Compostos Vascularizados/efeitos adversos
2.
Transplantation ; 101(1): e1-e11, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27893612

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cellular therapies for immunomodulation in vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) have gained importance due to their potential for minimization of immunosuppression. Adipose-derived (AD) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) especially have shown encouraging potential. We investigated the influence of timing and frequency of AD-MSC treatment on immunologic and graft survival as well as graft vasculopathy outcomes after VCA. METHODS: Lewis rats received full-mismatched Brown Norway rat hindlimb transplants. Recipient animals were assigned to groups receiving donor-derived AD-MSCs (10 cells/animal) either on postoperative day (POD) 1, POD 4, or repeatedly on POD 4, 8, and 15, and compared to untreated controls. RESULTS: Although AD-MSC administration on POD 1 or POD 4, 8, and 15 resulted in 50% long-term graft acceptance, recipients treated on POD 4, and controls rejected before POD 50. All treated animals revealed peripheral blood chimerism (4 weeks), most pronounced after repetitive cell administration (12.92% vs 5.03% [POD 1] vs 6.31% [POD 4]; P < 0.05; all P < 0.01 vs control 1.45%). Chimerism was associated with the generation of regulatory T cells (CD4CD25FoxP3). In vitro mixed lymphocyte reactions revealed modulation of the recipient immune response after AD-MSC treatment. Graft arteries at end point revealed significant differences of arterial intimal thickness between rejecting and AD-MSC-treated animals (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results point to the potential for repetitive AD-MSC administration in improving outcomes after VCA. Future studies are warranted into optimization of the dosing and frequency of AD-MSC therapy, either alone or used in, combination with other cell therapies (such as hematopoietic stem cells or bone marrow-derived MSC or dendritic cells) for optimization of appropriate conditioning or maintenance regimens.


Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/citologia , Aloenxertos Compostos/irrigação sanguínea , Aloenxertos Compostos/transplante , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Membro Posterior/irrigação sanguínea , Membro Posterior/transplante , Imunoterapia/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/métodos , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/imunologia , Alotransplante de Tecidos Compostos Vascularizados/métodos , Animais , Proliferação de Células , Células Cultivadas , Aloenxertos Compostos/imunologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Membro Posterior/imunologia , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Ativação Linfocitária , Masculino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/efeitos adversos , Modelos Animais , Ratos Endogâmicos BN , Ratos Endogâmicos Lew , Linfócitos T Reguladores/imunologia , Fatores de Tempo , Quimeras de Transplante , Tolerância ao Transplante , Doenças Vasculares/imunologia , Doenças Vasculares/prevenção & controle , Alotransplante de Tecidos Compostos Vascularizados/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA