RESUMO
Recent studies have shown that the pharmacodynamic (PD) index driving the efficacy of ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations such as ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam is the percentage of time the free inhibitor concentration is above a threshold (fT>threshold). However, data with piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) are scarce. Here we aimed to assess the relationship between fT>threshold and TZP antibacterial efficacy by a population pharmacokinetic study in mice and dose-effect experiments in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model with two isogenic strains of Escherichia coli differentially expressing TEM-1 ß-lactamase. We also explored the dynamics of resistance selection with the innovator and a non-equivalent generic, extrapolated the results to the clinic by Monte Carlo simulation of standard TZP doses, and estimated the economic impact of generic-selected resistance. The fT>threshold index described well the efficacy of TZP versus E. coli, with threshold values from 0.5 mg/L to 2 mg/L and mean exposures of 42% for stasis and 56% for 1 log10 kill. The non-equivalent generic required a longer exposure (fT>threshold 33%) to suppress resistance compared with the innovator (fT>threshold 22%), leading to a higher frequency of resistance selection in the clinical simulation (16% of patients with the generic vs. 1% with the innovator). Finally, we estimated that use of TZP generics in a scenario of 25% therapeutic non-equivalence would result in extra expenses approaching US$1 billion per year in the USA owing to selection of resistant micro-organisms, greatly offsetting the savings gained from generic substitution and further emphasising the need for demonstrated and not assumed therapeutic equivalence.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Medicamentos Genéricos/farmacocinética , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Penicilânico/análogos & derivados , Seleção Genética , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/farmacocinética , Animais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Medicamentos Genéricos/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos Genéricos/farmacologia , Feminino , Camundongos , Ácido Penicilânico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Penicilânico/farmacocinética , Ácido Penicilânico/farmacologia , Piperacilina/administração & dosagem , Piperacilina/farmacocinética , Piperacilina/farmacologia , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/farmacologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) exhibit changes in extracellular fluid that may alter the plasma concentrations of beta-lactams and result in therapeutic failure or toxicity. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with hematological malignancies and FN after receiving chemotherapy at a primary public cancer center. METHODS: This was an open, nonrandomized, observational, descriptive, and prospective study. Samples from 15 patients with hematological malignancies and FN were evaluated after the administration of chemotherapy. Five blood samples were taken from each patient when the antibiotic level was at steady-state 10, 60, 120, 180, and 350 min after each dose. Antibiotic concentrations were measured using gel diffusion with Bacillus subtilis. All study participants provided written informed consent. RESULTS: We investigated the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in 14 patients between the ages of 18 years and 59 years and with a mean absolute neutrophil count of 208 cells per mm³ (standard deviation (SD) ± 603.2). The following pharmacokinetic measurements were obtained: maximum concentration, 94.1-1133 mg/L; minimum concentration, 0.47-37.65 mg/L; volume of distribution, 0.08-0.65 L/kg (mean, 0.34 L/kg); drug clearance (CL), 4.42-27.25 L/h (mean, 9.93 L/h); half-life (t(1/2)), 0.55-2.65 h (mean, 1.38 h); and area under the curve, 115.12-827.16 mg · h/L. CONCLUSION: Patients with FN after receiving chemotherapy exhibited significant variations in the pharmacokinetic parameters of piperacillin compared with healthy individuals; specifically, FN patients demonstrated an increase in t1(/2) and decreased CL.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Neutropenia Febril Induzida por Quimioterapia/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Penicilânico/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/sangue , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Neutropenia Febril Induzida por Quimioterapia/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril Induzida por Quimioterapia/etiologia , Feminino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/metabolismo , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutrófilos/citologia , Ácido Penicilânico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Penicilânico/sangue , Ácido Penicilânico/farmacocinética , Ácido Penicilânico/uso terapêutico , Piperacilina/administração & dosagem , Piperacilina/sangue , Piperacilina/farmacocinética , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Antibiotic restriction can be useful in maintaining bacterial susceptibility. The objective of this study was verify if restriction of cefepime, the most frequently used cephalosporin in our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), would ameliorate broad-spectrum susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates. Nine hundred and ninety-five premature and term newborns were divided into 3 cohorts, according to the prevalence of cefepime use in the unit: Group 1 (n=396) comprised patients admitted from January 2002 to December 2003, period in which cefepime was the most used broad-spectrum antibiotic. Patients in Group 2 (n=349) were admitted when piperacillin/tazobactam replaced cefepime (January to December 2004) and in Group 3 (n=250) when cefepime was reintroduced (January to September 2005). Meropenem was the alternative third-line antibiotic for all groups. Multiresistance was defined as resistance to 2 or more unrelated antibiotics, including necessarily a third or fourth generation cephalosporin, piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem. Statistics involved Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and logrank tests, Kaplan-Meier analysis. Groups were comparable in length of stay, time of mechanical ventilation, gestational age and birth weight. Ninety-eight Gram-negative isolates were analyzed. Patients were more likely to remain free of multiresistant isolates by Kaplan-Meier analysis in Group 2 when compared to Group 1 (p=0.017) and Group 3 (p=0.003). There was also a significant difference in meropenem resistance rates. Cefepime has a greater propensity to select multiresistant Gram-negative pathogens than piperacillin/tazobactam and should not be used extensively in neonatal intensive care.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Cefalosporinas/administração & dosagem , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Cefepima , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Meropeném , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Ácido Penicilânico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Penicilânico/análogos & derivados , Piperacilina/administração & dosagem , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam , Estudos Prospectivos , Tienamicinas/administração & dosagem , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Antibiotic restriction can be useful in maintaining bacterial susceptibility. The objective of this study was verify if restriction of cefepime, the most frequently used cephalosporin in our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), would ameliorate broad-spectrum susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates. Nine hundred and ninety-five premature and term newborns were divided into 3 cohorts, according to the prevalence of cefepime use in the unit: Group 1 (n=396) comprised patients admitted from January 2002 to December 2003, period in which cefepime was the most used broad-spectrum antibiotic. Patients in Group 2 (n=349) were admitted when piperacillin/tazobactam replaced cefepime (January to December 2004) and in Group 3 (n=250) when cefepime was reintroduced (January to September 2005). Meropenem was the alternative third-line antibiotic for all groups. Multiresistance was defined as resistance to 2 or more unrelated antibiotics, including necessarily a third or fourth generation cephalosporin, piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem. Statistics involved Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and logrank tests, Kaplan-Meier analysis. Groups were comparable in length of stay, time of mechanical ventilation, gestational age and birth weight. Ninety-eight Gram-negative isolates were analyzed. Patients were more likely to remain free of multiresistant isolates by Kaplan-Meier analysis in Group 2 when compared to Group 1 (p=0.017) and Group 3 (p=0.003). There was also a significant difference in meropenem resistance rates. Cefepime has a greater propensity to select multiresistant Gram-negative pathogens than piperacillin/tazobactam and should not be used extensively in neonatal intensive care.