RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) has shown sensitivity in the detection of macular edema. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate indices formed with FAF and retinal anatomical-functional variables in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with ziv-aflibercept (ziv-AFL). METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 15 DME patients who received ziv-AFL intravitreal injections were included in the study. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and FAF were evaluated before treatment and at one and two months. OCT variables were central subfield thickness (CST), macular volume (MV) and macular cube average thickness (MCAT). FAF/BCVA, FAF/CS, FAF/CST, FAF/MV and AF/MCAT indices baseline values were obtained. Analysis was performed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between baseline FAF/BCVA index and BCVA at second month (rs = - 0.78, p = 0.000), between baseline FAF/CS index and BCVA at second month (rs = -0.68, p = 0.0009) and between baseline FAF/CS index and MV at first month of follow-up (rs = 0.64, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In DME, composite indices with baseline FAF predict variables such as BCVA in the follow-up of patients receiving ziv-AFL.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La autofluorescencia retiniana (AF) ha mostrado sensibilidad en la detección del edema macular. OBJETIVOS: Evaluar índices formados con la AF y variables anatomofuncionales retinianas en pacientes con edema macular diabético (EMD) tratados con ziv-aflibercept (ziv-AFL). MÉTODOS: Fueron incluidos 29 ojos de 15 pacientes con EMD que recibieron inyecciones intravítreas de ziv-AFL. Se evaluó agudeza visual mejor corregida (AVMC), sensibilidad al contraste (SC), tomografía de coherencia óptica (TCO) y AF, antes del tratamiento, así como al primer y segundo mes de iniciado este. Las variables de la TCO fueron grosor foveal central (GFC), volumen macular (VM) y grosor promedio macular (GPM). Se obtuvieron los valores basales de AF/AVMC, AF/SC, AF/GFC, AF/VM y AF/GPM. Se realizó análisis con el coeficiente de correlación de rangos de Spearman y análisis de regresión lineal. RESULTADOS: Hubo una correlación significativa entre el índice AF/AVMC basal y la AVMC en el segundo mes (rs = −0.78, p = 0.000), entre el índice AF/SC basal y la AVMC en el segundo mes (rs = −0.68, p = 0.0009) y entre AF/SC basal y el VM en el primer mes de seguimiento (rs = 0.64, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONES: En el EMD, los índices compuestos con AF basales predicen variables como AVMC en el seguimiento de pacientes que reciben ziv-AFL.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatia Diabética , Edema Macular , Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico por imagem , Seguimentos , Fundo de Olho , Humanos , Edema Macular/diagnóstico por imagem , Edema Macular/etiologia , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento , Acuidade VisualRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the combination of fundus autofluorescence results with several clinical and structural variables into mathematical indexes to enhance their ability to predict visual and anatomical changes after the antivascular endothelial growth factor loading dose. METHODS: Patients with diabetic macular edema were enrolled. Each patient had a comprehensive ophthalmological examination, contrast sensitivity, optical coherence tomography, and fundus autofluorescence assessment. All patients received three monthly doses of ziv-aflibercept and were followed each month for response assessment. Autofluorescence was classified according to its level into five grades. The grades were combined with other variables (best-corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, central macular thickness, macular cube volume, and macular cube average thickness) into normalized indexes. Statistical assessment was done using a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, linear regression, and interobserver-agreement analysis. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the fundus autofluorescence/baseline best-corrected visual acuity index and the fundus autofluorescence/contrast-sensitivity index at baseline with the best-corrected visual acuity after the third dose of ziv-aflibercept (rs = -0.78, p = .000 and rs = -0.68, p = .0009 respectively). The fundus autofluorescence/baseline best-corrected visual acuity index and the fundus autofluorescence/contrast-sensitivity index, both at baseline had a mild correlation with the macular volume at 1 month of follow-up (rs = 0.56, p = .008 and (rs = 0.64, p = .002, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that it is possible to combine fundus autofluorescence results with functional and structural variables into normalized indexes that could potentially predict outcomes after antivascular endothelial growth factor loading dose in patients with diabetic macular edema.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between fundus autofluorescence and morphologic parameters as well as visual function in patients with diabetic macular oedema treated with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept. METHODS: A total of 34 eyes of 20 patients with untreated diabetic macular oedema received an intravitreal injection of ziv-aflibercept at baseline, and 1 and 2 months later. The baseline, 1-month, and two-month best corrected visual acuity determination, contrast sensitivity, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, mean central macular thickness, mean macular cube volume, mean macular cube average thickness, and fundus autofluorescence (decreased, normal, or increased; and single or multiple spots) were measured. Correlation analysis with a determination of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, regression analysis, agreement between investigators, and Friedman's test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: A direct correlation was observed between baseline fundus autofluorescence and macular cube average thickness at 1 month (r = 0.51, p = 0.020) and between fundus autofluorescence at 1 month and baseline macular cube average thickness (r = 0.50, p = 0.021). Regression analysis showed a coefficient of determination of 0.29 (p = 0.016) between baseline fundus autofluorescence and macular cube average thickness at 1 month. CONCLUSION: In patients with diabetic macular oedema, the pretreatment baseline degree of foveal fundus autofluorescence might be helpful in predicting macular cube average thickness in patients undergoing treatment with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept in the short term.