RESUMO
Assessment of ischaemia severity includes a variety of measures, such as pedal pulse palpation, the ankle/brachial index (ABI), and the toe/brachial index (TBI), but there is a lack of consensus regarding which ischaemia scale is the most effective for determining outcome prognosis. The purpose of this study is to validate the application of the ischaemia severity scale (ISS) in the effective prediction of wound healing, amputations, and mortality for diabetic foot wounds (DFW). This prospective study included 235 consecutive patients graded according to the Saint Elian Wound Score System (SEWSS). The ISS is part of this system, with patients being scored as non-ischaemic (0) or having mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) ischaemia. Age, diabetes duration in years, and ulcer size were found to be associated with a longer mean ischaemia of increasing severity. A trend of reduction in the pulse palpation rates (70.4%, 50%, 8.5% to 0%; p < 0.01), ABI (1.1 ± 0.1, 0.86 ± 0.3, 0.68 ± 0.2, 0.47 ± 0.2, p < 0.01), TBI average values (0.90 ± 0.35, 0.62 ± 0.52, 0.50 ± 0.33, 0.10 ± 0.42, p < 0.01), wound healing success (88.7%, 57.7%, 40.7%, 12.9%; p < 0.01), and delay in weeks (Kaplan−Meier: log-rank 44.2, p < 0.01) was observed with increasing values of the ISS (0, 1, 2, and 3). The odds ratio for adverse outcomes increased for each additional level of ischaemia severity. Thus, we demonstrate that the ISS is useful in effectively predicting adverse outcomes for DFW.
RESUMO
The objective of this study was to evaluate a measure of the responsiveness and reliability of the pulse volume recording upstroke ratio (PVRr). A database of 389 subjects undergoing lower extremity revascularization was analyzed. Subjects were included in the analysis if they had undergone pedal radiographs, had PVRs performed pre- and postlower extremity revascularization, and had regular pulsatile digital waveforms with a pressure recording on both PVRs. The responsiveness of the PVRr was assessed by means of the postoperative percent change in comparison to the digital pressures. A statistically significant negative correlation was observed (Pearson -0.421; p = .007) indicating that as digital pressures increased, the PVRr decreased. Further, measurement of the reliability of the PVRr was performed on a selection of 10 recordings by 2 residents and 3 board-certified surgeons. The observed intraclass correlation coefficient of measurements was 0.960. Results of this investigation provide evidence in support of the responsiveness and inter-rater reliability in the calculation of the pulse volume recording upstroke ratio.