RESUMO
Background: The recent inclusion of polypills-fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive medicines and a statin with or without aspirin-in the World Health Organization's Essential Medicines List (EML) reiterates the potential of this approach to improve global treatment coverage for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Although there exists extensive evidence on the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of polypills, there has been no research to date assessing the real-world availability and affordability of polypills globally. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey, based on the WHO/Health Action International methodology, in 13 countries around the world. In the surveyed countries, we first ascertained whether any polypill was authorised for marketing and/or included in EMLs and clinical guidelines. In each country, we collected retail and price data for polypills from at least one public-sector facility and three private pharmacies using convenience sampling. Polypills were considered unaffordable if the lowest-paid worker spent more than a day's wage to purchase a monthly supply. Results: Polypills were approved for marketing in four of the 13 surveyed countries: Spain, India, Mauritius and Argentina. None of these countries included polypills in national guidelines, formularies, or EMLs. In the four countries, no surveyed public pharmacies stocked polypills. In the private sector, we identified seven unique polypill combinations, marketed by eight different companies. Private sector availability was 100% in Argentina and Spain. Most combinations (n = 5) identified were in India. Combinations found in India and Spain were affordable in the local context. A lowest-paid government worker would spend between 0.2 (India) and 2.8 (Mauritius) days' wages to pay the price for one month's supply of the polypills. Polypills were likely to be affordable if they were manufactured in the same country. Conclusion: Low availability and affordability of polypills in the public sector suggest that implementation remains poor globally. Context-specific multi-disciplinary health system research is required to understand factors affecting polypill implementation and to design and evaluate appropriate implementation strategies.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Índia/epidemiologia , Anti-Hipertensivos/economia , Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Espanha/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/economia , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/economia , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Saúde Global , Argentina/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Objective: To analyse the incidence and risk of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), level of risk factor control, treatment persistence and cost of the CNIC polypill version containing acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg (A20), and ramipril 2.5, 5.0 or 10 mg in secondary cardiovascular prevention patients. Method: Subanalysis of the observational, retrospective, multicentre, NEPTUNO study in patients treated for two years with the CNIC polypill A20, the same monocomponents as single drugs, equipotent drugs, and other therapies. Results: 922 patients were included in each group. The risk of recurrent MACE was lower among CNIC A20 polypill users than all others (21%, 23% and 26% increased risk among the monocomponents, equipotent or other therapy cohorts, respectively; p < 0.05). The magnitude of the mean change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure, as well as the increase in the proportion of patients achieving target goals, was also greater among patients treated with the CNIC A20 polypill than in any of the other cohorts (all p < 0.001). Treatment persistence was significantly higher in patients treated with the CNIC A20 polypill (p < 0.001) and was a less costly strategy than any other therapeutic option. Conclusions: In patients in secondary cardiovascular prevention, the CNIC A20 polypill (ASA 100 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, and ramipril 2.5, 5.0 or 10 mg) constitutes a valid therapeutic option with similar benefits and outcomes to the version of the polypill with atorvastatin 40 mg.
Objetivo: Analizar la incidencia y el riesgo de eventos adversos cardiovasculares mayores (MACE) recurrentes, el nivel de control de factores de riesgo, la persistencia al tratamiento y el coste de la versión de la polipíldora CNIC que contiene 100 mg de ácido acetilsalicílico (AAS), 20 mg de atorvastatina (A20) y 2.5/5.0 ó 10 mg de ramipril en pacientes en prevención cardiovascular secundaria. Método: Subanálisis del estudio observacional, retrospectivo y multicéntrico NEPTUNO en pacientes tratados durante 2 años con la polipíldora CNIC A20, los mismos monocomponentes por separado, medicamentos equipotentes uotras terapias. Resultados: Se incluyeron 922 pacientes en cada grupo. El riesgo de sufrir un MACE recurrente en el grupode polipíldora CNIC A20 fue menor que en todas las demás cohortes (21%, 23% y 26% de aumento del riesgo en las cohortesde monocomponentes, equipotentes u otras terapias, respectivamente; p < 0.05). La magnitud del cambio en el colesterol unidoa lipoproteínas de baja densidad y la presión arterial, así como el incremento en la proporción de pacientes que alcanzaron losobjetivos establecidos, fueron mayores en los pacientes tratados con la polipíldora CNIC A20 que en cualquiera de las otrascohortes (p < 0.001). La persistencia al tratamiento fue mayor en los pacientes tratados con la polipíldora CNIC A20 (p < 0.001)y esta estrategia resultó ser menos costosa que cualquier otra opción terapéutica. Conclusiones: En pacientes en prevencióncardiovascular secundaria, la polipíldora CNIC A20 (AAS 100 mg; atorvastatina 20 mg; ramipril 2.5/5.0 ó 10 mg) constituye unaopción terapéutica válida con beneficios y resultados similares a la versión de la polipíldora con 40 mg de atorvastatina.
RESUMO
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of death and disability worldwide. Although age-standardized CVD mortality rates decreased globally by 14.5% between 2006 and 2016, the burden of CVD remains disproportionately higher in low- and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries. Even though proven, effective approaches based on multiple-drug intake aimed at the prevention and treatment of CVD are currently available, poor adherence, early discontinuation of treatment, and suboptimal daily execution of the prescribed therapeutic regimes give rise to shortfalls in drug exposure, leading to high variability in the responses to the prescribed medications. Wald and Law, in their landmark paper published in BMJ 2003, hypothesized that the use of a fixed-dose combination of statins, ß-blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and aspirin (classic Polypill composition) may increase adherence and decrease CVD by up to 80% when prescribed as primary prevention or in substitution of traditional protocols. Since then, many clinical trials have tested this hypothesis, with comparable results. This review aims to describe the available clinical trials performed to assess the impact of fixed-dose combinations on adherence, cost-effectiveness, and the risk factors critical to the onset of CVD.
RESUMO
Background: Higher medication adherence reduces the risk of new cardiovascular events. However, there are individual and health system barriers that lead to lower adherence. The polypill has demonstrated benefits in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality mainly driven by an increase in adherence. We aim to evaluate the impact of the polypill on adherence to cardiovascular medication, its efficacy and safety in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Databases were searched from January 2003 to December 2022. We included randomized, pragmatic, or real-world clinical trials and observational studies. The primary outcome was medication adherence, secondary outcomes were efficacy in cardiovascular disease in primary and secondary prevention and safety. Results: From the 490 publications screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into a comparative table Of those included, 70% were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 53.8% focused on secondary prevention. Most of the studies received a high and moderate quality rating. Self-report, pill counting and, the Morisky scale were the most frequent methods to evaluate adherence (84.6%). Compared with standard medication, the polypill improved overall medication adherence by 13%, with percentages ranging from 7.6% to 34.9%. Moreover, a potential benefit was also observed in reducing Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), particularly in secondary prevention studies, with hazard ratios ranged between 0.43 to 0.76. Compared to standard care, the profile of side effects was similar. Conclusion: The polypill is an effective, safe, and practical strategy to improve adherence in people at risk of CVD. Although there is a demonstrated benefit in reducing MACE, predominantly in secondary prevention, there are still gaps in its efficacy in primary prevention and reducing total mortality. Therefore, the importance of obtaining long-term results of the polypill effect and how this strategy can be implemented in real practice.
Assuntos
Fármacos Cardiovasculares , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Humanos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Secundária , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Adesão à MedicaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review considers the framework of high-risk vs. population approaches as proposed in the Rose's axiom within the context of cardiovascular diseases, including its benefits and limitations. We also contextualize the use of precision medicine in primary prevention therapy and contrast that with population approach. RECENT FINDINGS: Although the high-risk strategy aims at individualized care, the complexity of pharmacologic regimens and other limitations reduces its real-life impact. On the other hand, broad population strategies include treatment of a substantial number of low-risk individuals who are unlikely to benefit from treatment. The use of additional strategies to identify those low-risk individuals, instead of targeting at identifying the high-risk population, is and alternative strategy to be considered. Evidence of the potential use of coronary artery calcium score and polypills for this strategy is discussed. A more targeted population approach to primary prevention in cardiovascular diseases with the use of polypills and coronary artery calcium score might be considered in a structured mass-strategy approach to risk reduction.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Medicina de Precisão , Prevenção Primária , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In many patients, the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events persists despite statin treatment and attaining target LDL-c levels. This residual risk is in part attributed to atherogenic dyslipidemia (AD). We studied the clinical effectiveness of the CNIC-polypill in improving the lipid profile, and lipid ratios and indices indicative of AD that are more accurate in predicting lipid-related CV risk. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, observational, non-comparative, prospective registry in 533 patients in Mexico. We evaluated blood lipids at baseline (usual care) and after 12 months of treatment with the CNIC-polypill (Sincronium®), including total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), cholesterol low-density lipoproteins (LDL-c), cholesterol high-density lipoproteins (HDL-c), and cholesterol non-high-density lipoproteins (non-HDL-c). We also calculated and compared AD-related lipid ratios and indices, including remnant cholesterol (RC), Castelli's risk index-I (CRI-I), atherogenic index (AI), atherogenic coefficient (AC), a surrogate of insulin resistance (IRS), atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), and lipoprotein combined index (LCI). RESULTS: At 1 year of treatment, there was a significant reduction in the levels of TC (-22.6%), TG (-29.2%), LDL-c (-13.8%), and non-HDL-c (-29.2%) (all p < 0.001). The likelihood that patients attained their corresponding target LDL-c and TG levels was almost three-fold and seven-fold higher, respectively (p < 0.001). The values of the AD-related ratios RC, CRI-I, AI, AC, AIP, and LCI were all significantly lower (p < 0.001) after one year of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with or at high risk of CVD, one-year treatment with the CNIC-polypill significantly lowered lipid ratios indicative of AD compared to baseline.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adherence to treatment after a myocardial infarction (MI) is poor, even in the early postinfarction period. Combining evidence-based drugs into a multicap could improve adherence in this population. No previous randomized trial assessing fixed-dose combination therapy has included patients early after a MI. We aimed to assess if a multicap containing four secondary prevention drugs increases adherence to treatment at 6 months after MI hospitalization. The study was designed as a randomized, parallel, open-label, controlled trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized within 7 days of a MI to either multicap or control group. The multicap group received a capsule containing aspirin, atenolol, ramipril, and simvastatin. The control group received each drug in separate pills. The primary outcome was adherence at 6 months. We also measured blood pressure, heart rate, serum cholesterol levels, C-reactive protein, and platelet aggregation. RESULTS: The study was stopped prematurely when 100 patients were included for futility. At 6 months, 92 (95.8%) patients were adherent to medical treatment: 98.0% in the multicap group and 93.5% in the control group [relative risk (RR) 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.14; p = 0.347]. There were no differences between groups in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.662), diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.784), heart rate (p = 0.533), total cholesterol (p = 0.760), LDL-c (p = 0.979), C-reactive protein (p = 0.399), or in the proportion of patients with adequate platelet aggregation inhibition (p = 0.600). CONCLUSIONS: The study did not find any improvement in the adherence at 6 months after a MI with a multicap-based strategy (Multicap for Increase Adherence After Acute Myocardial Infarction; [ ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02271178]).
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Atenolol/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Adesão à Medicação , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Ramipril/administração & dosagem , Sinvastatina/administração & dosagem , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/sangue , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/fisiopatologia , Administração Oral , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/efeitos adversos , Argentina , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Atenolol/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Ramipril/efeitos adversos , Prevenção Secundária , Sinvastatina/efeitos adversos , Comprimidos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Aim: To determine the effectiveness of Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC)-polypill (acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg, ramipril 5/10 mg, simvastatin 40 mg) in achieving blood pressure (BP) goals. Patients & methods: A multicenter, observational, one cohort, prospective study. BP targets were analyzed in patients with cardiovascular disease after 12-months treatment with the CNIC polypill. Results: A total of 572 patients (59.4 ± 13.9 years, 57.3% men) were analyzed. At baseline, BP was 147.1 ± 18.1/88.3 ± 10.6 mmHg, 97.1% of patients were taken renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 5.4% calcium antagonists, 1.9% diuretics and 13.1% ß-blockers. The proportion of patients who achieved BP targets increased from 20.1 to 55.4% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In routine practice, switching from usual care to the CNIC-polypill in patients with cardiovascular disease could facilitate achieving BP goals.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Diuréticos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade/tendências , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular disease pandemic has promoted the cardiovascular polypill as one of the most scalable public health strategies to improve cardiovascular risk by increasing accessibility and adherence to treatments. Data from randomized clinical trials has shown that the polypill strategy significantly improves adherence as well as risk factor control (cholesterol and blood pressure), however, to date, no information from phase IV registries has been available. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, observational and prospective registry of a polypill-based treatment strategy. A total of 1193 patients in Mexico were included. Patient demographics, clinical history, blood pressure, analysis of blood lipids and the Framingham risk score were measured at baseline and after 12 months of treatment with the CNIC-Ferrer polypill. RESULTS: At one year with the polypill, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels changed from mean 146.9 mmHg to 128 mmHg (p <0.001), and from 89.1 mmHg to 80.4 mmHg (p <0.001) respectively. LDLc levels were significantly reduced 132.5-107.6 mg/dL (p <0.001). The 10 year Framingham cardiovascular disease risk was also reduced in the high-risk group (33.7 + 22.0 vs. 21.2 + 14.8; p <0.001) and in the intermediate risk group (23.7 + 14.8 vs. 12.7 + 11.4; p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the results of the current study constitute the first real life data on the impact of a polypill therapy on cardiovascular risk factor control. The results show major improvements on the primary outcome, above and beyond those presented previously in the setting of randomized clinical trials.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Colesterol/sangue , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The simplification of fixed dose medications by using a single 'polypill' is an attractive strategy to improve adherence to medications which has shown benefit to cardiovascular risk factor control and cardiovascular disease prevention or delay in the progression of these diseases. We review the evidence obtained from a series of clinical trials demonstrating an improvement in adherence to the polypill compared to the use of each compound separately, and found similar or better control of the classical cardiovascular risk factors and a similar safety profile. These results suggest that the use of the polypill could have a beneficial impact in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the polypill has the potential to improve cost effectiveness and is simple to use. However, before recommending the implementation of the polypill in programs aimed at primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention, we are awaiting the results of several current clinical trials aimed at measuring the impact on the frequency of major cardiovascular outcomes, particularly in low-medium-income countries.