RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The financial impact of breast cancer has been discussed due to its high incidence and the increased costs of systemic therapy and is even more relevant in countries with low and medium socioeconomic development. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the financial viability of using the MammaPrint™ (MP) genetic signature in a public and private system in a country with a medium socioeconomic development index. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A pharmacoeconomic trial with a cost-benefit analysis evaluating the reduction in costs of chemotherapy, support drugs, and materials used during chemotherapy infusion in high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients submitted to analysis using the MammaPrint™ genetic signature. RESULTS: The value of using MammaPrint™ in the Unified Health System (SUS) would bring an additional cost of US$ 1,334.56 per patient in the over-50 age group. In private medicine, the use of MammaPrint™ in the same population would result in cost savings ranging from US$ 2,422.53 to US$ 9,989.95 per patient. CONCLUSION: The use of MP in RH + breast cancer patients with high clinical risk and low genomic risk in Brazil leads to significant savings in resources when applied to supplementary healthcare. In the SUS, reducing the costs of MP for large-scale use could make its application viable. These values need to be re-evaluated in each institution, using the methodology applied in the trial, adjusting according to costs, to obtain a result that reflects its reality.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer pain is one of the main causes of human suffering, which can generate disabilities and compromise quality of life, giving rise to several psychosocial and economic consequences. AIMS: This quantitative study sought to perform a cost-effectiveness pharmacoeconomic analysis to assess the impact of implanting epidural morphine associated with ropivacaine treatment in gastrointestinal cancer patients with pain that is difficult clinical control, compared with conventional oral treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 24 patients with gastrointestinal neoplasia who underwent treatment for cancer pain that was difficult to clinically control. 12 patients each were recruited into the control and intervention groups, respectively. While patients in the control group were administered drug treatment orally, patients in the intervention group underwent a surgical procedure for subcutaneous implantation of a catheter that allowed epidural administration of morphine and ropivacaine. For pain assessment, the Visual Analogue Scale was applied. Data analysis had a descriptive character of costs, taking into account the costs for the year 2021. The study perspective was the Brazilian public healthcare provider, referred to as the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de-SUS in Portuguese). Costs were computed over the time horizon corresponding to the duration of treatment, from the first medical consultation (when the treatment was defined) to the end (end of treatment, disease progression, or death). Treatment duration was divided into three phases (first 60 days, support with palliative care, and end-of-life care). To assess the robustness of the economic analysis, sensitivity analyses were performed, considering the effectiveness of pain reduction on the Visual Analogue Scale, and a comparison of results using the median prices of pharmaceutical components used in the study. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 59.3 years. The results from the cost-effectiveness analysis showed the epidural morphine/ropivacaine treatment to be more effective with regard to pain reduction on the pain scale, particularly for end-of-life care, when compared to the conventional oral treatment, however, at a significantly higher cost. DISCUSSION: From the accomplishment of this research, it was observed that the application of the pain assessment scale is a way to better interpret and understand the patient's pain, facilitating care planning and decision-making by health professionals, as well as monitoring the effectiveness of the proposed new treatment. CONCLUSION: To present a better cost-effectiveness ratio, a reduction in the cost of the new epidural technology or an increase in the value of the existing oral intervention would be required. However, the latter is not feasible and unlikely to occur. A value judgement to decide whether the incremental benefit associated with the use of the new intervention is worth the extra cost will have to be made by the healthcare provider. Interventions that can relieve cancer pain symptoms should be investigated continuously, in search of evidence to support clinical practice and promote better quality of life for patients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Personalized medicine has allowed for knowledge at an individual level for several diseases and this has led to improvements in prevention and treatment of various types of neoplasms. Despite the greater availability of tests, the costs of genomic testing and targeted therapies are still high for most patients, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Although value frameworks and health technology assessment are fundamental to allow decision-making by policymakers, there are several concerns in terms of personalized medicine pharmacoeconomics. A global effort may improve these tools in order to allow access to personalized medicine for an increasing number of patients with cancer.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The clinical activities developed by pharmacists in a hospital environment can improve health outcomes and generate savings for hospitals. However, to determine whether pharmaceutical interventions are cost effective, it is essential to define a method according to which cost-effectiveness is intended to be measured. In addition, the quality of economic assessments and the amount of information present in systematic reviews in the literature make it difficult to analyze the effects of this intervention. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to provide an overview of systematic reviews on the pharmacoeconomic impact of the performance of pharmaceutical care in hospitals. METHODS: A systematic search of the Cochrane Library databases, PubMed or MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Open Thesis will be performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. The search will involve the use of keywords determined using the Medical Subject Headings database to define the search terms and include the following terms: "pharmacoeconomics," "pharmaceutical care," and "hospital." The study designs to be included will be systematic reviews of good quality. Studies will be included that address pharmacoeconomics; studies that evaluated pharmaceutical care in hospitals; and studies published in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. The primary outcome sought in the systematic reviews will be the cost ratio in monetary units and the outcomes in monetary or natural units. The secondary economic outcomes considered will be determined based on factors associated with the drugs and translated into benefit, efficacy, or utility. RESULTS: It is intended to start this overview in January 2023. Thus far, only previous searches have been carried out to contextualize the theme and build the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: This overview will determine the pharmacoeconomic impact of pharmaceutical care interventions in the hospital environment. In addition, this study will point out which clinical outcomes in natural units are impacted by the performance of pharmaceutical care and the strengths and limitations of each approach. It will also identify gaps in the literature and areas for future work. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019140665; https://tinyurl.com/bddwnz43.

RESUMO

O omeprazol é inibidor de bomba de prótons mais prescrito no Brasil e é indicado para o tratamento de doenças por refluxos gastroesofágicos, úlcera péptica, esofagite erosiva, erradicação de Helicobacter pylori, síndrome de Zollinger-Ellison, gastrinomas, gastrite e distúrbios hipersecretores e prevenção de úlcera péptica. O uso indiscriminado e desnecessário, principalmente por idosos, é uma importante questão de saúde pública a ser tratada. Apesar de ser conhecida a existência do uso indiscriminado do omeprazol, identifica-se a necessidade de se verificar como ocorre a prescrição desse medicamento no contexto do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) do Brasil. Além disso, acredita-se que estudos que analisam de modo famacoeconômico a prescrição do omeprazol podem contribuir para a revisão ou implementação de diretrizes e protocolos que envolvam o uso desse medicamento. O objetivo foi caracterizar e realizar análise farmacoeconômica do uso do omeprazol em Unidade de Atenção Primária a Saúde (UAPS) em Minas Gerais, Brasil. Trata-se de estudo descritivo com análise das prescrições de 41 pacientes idosos atendidos no período de abril/maio de 2018 e foram identificadas as seguintes variáveis: idade, sexo, dose, indicação, realização de endoscopia, demais medicamentos em uso e custo do tratamento. Na análise farmacoeconômica realizou-se o cálculo do custo médio da quantidade de omeprazol prescrita por paciente e considerou-se a realização ou não de endoscopia. Na população estudada, 29 (70,3%) do sexo feminino com mediana de idade: 69 anos. Apenas em 4 prontuários (9,8%) havia indicação para uso e em 18 (43,9%) pacientes, a utilização era feita há mais de dois anos e em 7 (17,1%) a mais de cinco anos. Apenas 3 (7,3%) realizaram endoscopia e foram utilizados 371 meses totalizando um valor financeiro de R$35.657,23. Os achados sugerem prescrições em longo prazo e sem registro da indicação em prontuário. O custo referente às prescrições poderia ser otimizado com a realização de endoscopia e suspensão do uso, quando constatada ausência de indicação.

Omeprazole is the most prescribed proton pump inhibitor in Brazil and is indicated for the treatment of diseases caused by gastroesophageal reflux, peptic ulcer, erosive esophagitis, eradication of Helicobacter pylori, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, gastrinomas, gastritis, and hypersecretory disorders, as well as peptic ulcer prevention. The indiscriminate and unnecessary use, mainly by the elderly, is an important public health issue to be addressed. Despite the existence of indiscriminate use of omeprazole being known, there is a need to verify how this medication is prescribed in the context of the Unified Health System (UHS) in Brazil. In addition, it is believed that studies that aim to analyze the prescription of omeprazole in a pharmacoeconomic way can contribute to the review or implementation of guidelines and protocols involving the use of this drug. The objective of this study was to characterize and perform a pharmacoeconomic analysis of the use of omeprazole in a Primary Healthcare Centers (PHC) in Minas Gerais, Brazil. This is a descriptive study analyzing the prescriptions of 41 elderly patients treated in the period of April/May 2018 and the following variables were identified: age, sex, dose, indication, endoscopy, other medications in use, and cost of treatment. In the pharmacoeconomic analysis, the average cost of the amount of omeprazole prescribed per patient was calculated and whether or not endoscopy was performed was considered. In the studied population, 29 (70.3%) were female with a median age: 69 years. Only in 4 medical records (9.8%) was there indication for use, and 18 (43.9%) patients had been using omeprazole for more than two years and 7 (17.1%) for more than five years. Only 3 (7.3%) patients underwent endoscopy, and 371 months-worth of omeprazole were used, totaling a financial value of R$35,657.23. The findings suggest long-term prescriptions and no record of their indication on medical records. The cost related to prescriptions could be optimized by performing endoscopy and discontinuing its use when no indication is found.

RESUMO

Objetivo: Esclarecer o impacto farmacoterapêutico e farmacoeconômico das intervenções farmacêuticas em serviços de urgência e emergência. Métodos: Estudo de intervenção conduzido em uma Unidade de Pronto Atendimento. Os pacientes admitidos na pesquisa receberam acompanhamento farmacoterapêutico por meio de avaliação e intervenção na farmacoterapia. Resultados: Participaram do estudo 197 pacientes majoritariamente feminino, comórbidos, com média de idade de 43 anos ± 13. Foram realizadas intervenções em 130 destes, com aceitação de 83% por parte da equipe de assistência. As intervenções também repercutiram na farmacoeconomia, proporcionando uma redução de custos de 35% em comparação ao semestre anterior. Conclusão: Nossos resultados expressaram que a presença do farmacêutico clínico é essencial para farmacoterapias otimizadas e redução de custos hospitalares.

Objective: To clarify pharmaceutical interventions' pharmacotherapeutic and pharmacoeconomic impact on urgent and emergency services. Methods: Intervention study conducted in an Emergency Care Unit. Patients enrolled in the research received pharmacotherapeutic follow-up through evaluation and intervention in pharmacotherapy. Results: One hundred and ninety seven patients, mostly female, with comorbid conditions, with a mean age of 43 years ± 13, participated in the study. Interventions were performed in 130 of them, with an acceptance of 83% by the care team. The interventions also impacted pharmacoeconomics, providing a cost reduction of 35% compared to the previous semester. Conclusion: Our results expressed that the presence of the clinical pharmacist is essential for optimized pharmacotherapies and hospital cost reduction.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Comparar custos da terapia endovenosa exclusiva com linezolida com os custos da terapia iniciada por via endovenosa com transição para via oral após 72 horas, como estratégia de intervenção em programas de gestão de antimicrobianos. Métodos: Avaliação econômica de custo-minimização comparando custos diretos da terapia endovenosa exclusiva com linezolida com a terapia endovenosa seguida de transição para via oral em cenário simulado, sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), com árvore de decisão como modelo para tomada de decisão. Resultados: A alternativa englobando a transição de via mostrou-se a mais econômica em todos os cenários analisados. Para 28 dias de tratamento com linezolida, houve redução de 22% nos custos, considerando o paciente internado. Ao considerar alta após o sexto dia de tratamento, a redução de custos variou de 26%, com financiamento pelo SUS do restante do tratamento, a 84%, com financiamento do tratamento pós-alta pelo paciente. Conclusão: Conclui-se que a transição de via de linezolida é uma importante estratégia nos programas de gerenciamento de antimicrobianos, capaz de gerar economia significativa para a instituição. As avaliações econômicas de custo-minimização, nesse contexto, são uma importante ferramenta para demonstrar o aspecto econômico com potencial para sensibilizar gestores e tomadores de decisão.

Objective: To compare the direct costs of linezolid intravenous therapy with the costs of intravenous therapy switching to oral therapy after 72 hours as an intervention strategy in antimicrobial stewardship programs. Methods: Economic evaluation cost-minimization comparing direct costs of exclusive linezolid intravenous therapy with intravenous therapy for 72 hours and after switching to oral therapy in a simulated scenario, from the perspective of the National Health Service, with a decision tree as a decision modeling. Results: The alternative encompassing the therapy transition proved to be the most economical in all analyzed scenarios. For 28 days of treatment with linezolid, there was a 22% reduction in costs, considering the hospitalized patient. When considering discharge after the sixth day of treatment, the cost reduction ranged from 26%, with funding from the National Health Service for the rest of the treatment, to 84%, with funding for the post-discharge treatment by the patient. Conclusion: It was concluded that the linezolid therapy transition is an important strategy in antimicrobial management programs, capable of generating significant savings for the institution. In this context, economic cost-minimization assessments are an important tool to demonstrate the economic aspect with the potential to raise awareness among managers and decision-makers.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumo Os estudos em vigilancia farmacológica e ecofarmacológicas possibilitam o monitoramento, identificagao e minimi-zagao de efeitos nocivos advindos do uso de medicamentos. Diante disso, o presente estudo teve como objetivo descrever o cenário atual da farmacoepidemiologia e ecofarmacovigilancia no Brasil, no que se refere a produgao, registro, comerciali-zagao e uso de medicamentos. Foi realizado um levantamento sistemático, através dos bancos de dados PubMed/Medline, Lilacs e SciELO, cuja temática envolveu pesquisas em farmacoeconomia, farmacovigilancia, ecofarmacovigilancia e estudo da utilizagao de medicamentos no Brasil de 2001 a 2019. As publicagóes distribuíram-se de forma desigual entre as regióes brasileiras. Pacientes hipertensos, oncológicos e as gestantes foram os grupos de risco mais citados e os antimicrobianos, psicotrópicos e antineoplásicos os grupos farmacológicos mais discutidos. Custo de cuidados em saúde foi a temática mais abordada no contexto da farmacoeconomia e grande parte dos trabalhos destinou-se a análise e obtengao de dados referentes ao uso de medicamentos e suas reagóes adversas. Em relagao a ecofarmacovigilancia nao foram encontradas publicagóes no Brasil que contemplem essa área. Apesar dos avangos da legislagao farmacoepidemiológica e melhorias nos processos de fiscalizagao, no que tange a vigilancia da produgao, registro, comercializagao e uso de medicamentos, ainda permanecem carencias, quanto ao aporte de uma visao científica direcionada, sobretudo ao gerenciamento e diferentes usos dos recursos terapéuticos, e económicos do sistema de saúde brasileiro, bem como uma visao ambiental referente ao uso de medicamentos.

Abstract Studies in pharmacological and ecopharmacological surveillance make it possible to monitor, identify and minimize harmful effects arising from the use of drugs. Therefore, the present study aimed to describe the current scenario of pharmacoepidemiology and ecopharmacovigilance in Brazil, about the production, registration, marketing, and use of medicines. A systematic survey was carried out through the PubMed/Medline, Lilacs, and SciELO databases, whose theme involved research in pharmacoeconomics, pharmacovigilance, ecopharmacovigilance, and the study of drug use in Brazil from 2001 to 2019. Publications were unevenly distributed between Brazilian regions. Hypertensive patients, cancer patients, and pregnant women were the most cited risk groups, and antimicrobials, psychotropics, and antineoplastics were the most discussed pharmacological groups. Cost of health care was the most discussed topic in the context of pharmacoeconomics and most of the work was aimed at analyzing and obtaining data regarding the use of drugs and their adverse reactions. Regarding ecopharmacovigilance, no publications were found in Brazil covering this area. Despite advances in pharmacoepidemiological legislation and improvements in inspection processes, regarding the surveillance of the production, registration, commercialization, and use of medicines, there are still gaps regarding the contribution of a directed scientific vision, especially to the management and different uses of resources. therapeutic and economic aspects of the Brazilian health system, as well as an environmental vision regarding the use of medicines.

Resumen Los estudios de vigilancia farmacológica y ecofarmacológica permiten controlar, identificar y minimizar los efectos nocivos derivados del uso de los medicamentos. Ante esto, el presente estudio tuvo como objetivo describir el escenario actual de la farmacoepidemiología y la ecofarmacovigilancia en Brasil, en relación con la producción, el registro, la comercialización y el uso de los medicamentos. Se realizó una encuesta sistemática, a través de las bases de datos PubMed/Medline, Lilacs y SciELO, cuya temática involucró investigaciones sobre farmacoepidemiología, farmacovigilancia, ecofarmacovigilancia y estudio del uso de medicamentos en Brasil desde 2001 hasta 2019. Las publicaciones se distribuyeron de forma desigual entre las regiones brasileñas. Los pacientes hipertensos, los pacientes oncológicos y las mujeres embarazadas fueron los grupos de riesgo más citados y los antimicrobianos, los psicotrópicos y los antineoplásicos fueron los grupos farmacológicos más discutidos. El coste de la asistencia sanitaria fue el tema más abordado en el contexto de la farmacoeconomía y la mayoría de los trabajos estaban dirigidos a analizar y obtener datos sobre el uso de los medicamentos y sus reacciones adversas. En cuanto a la ecofarmacovigilancia, no se encontraron publicaciones en Brasil que aborden esta área. A pesar de los avances en la legislación farmacoepidemiológica y de las mejoras en los procesos de inspección, en lo que respecta a la vigilancia de la producción, registro, comercialización y uso de los medicamentos, todavía falta una visión científica dirigida, sobre todo, a la gestión y a los diferentes usos de los recursos terapéuticos y económicos del sistema de salud brasileño, así como una visión ambiental en cuanto al uso de los medicamentos.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: Cuba es un país con desarrollo en el área biotecnológica y de medicamentos, donde los estudios farmacoeconómicos aportan evidencia significativa para la toma de decisiones, principalmente en la actualidad que el país se encuentra inmerso en la Tarea ordenamiento y a la vez es afectado por la pandemia del nuevo coronavirus. Objetivo: Caracterizar los estudios farmacoeconómicos en Cuba en los últimos 20 años. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación bibliométrica para la que se recuperó la producción científica cubana sobre farmacoeconomía en la base de datos Scopus del periodo 2001-2020. Se utilizaron indicadores bibliométricos para obtener número de documentos, años de publicación, fuentes, colaboración, tipo y patrones de colaboración institucional y de países, así como coocurrencia de palabras clave. Resultados: Se recuperaron 648 documentos. El año más productivo fue 2010. Los documentos se publicaron en 273 revistas, 17 (6,2 por ciento) cubanas y 256 (93,8 por ciento) extranjeras. Hubo 449 (69,3 por ciento) documentos en colaboración institucional y 199 (30,7 por ciento) sin colaboración. Las instituciones más productivas fueron Centro de Ingeniería Genética y Biotecnología 82 (12,7 por ciento) y Centro de Inmunología Molecular, 77 (11,9 por ciento). La red de colaboración entre países mostró tres áreas definidas, Latinoamérica, Norteamérica-Europa-India y España. Los temas más publicados fueron efectividad y seguridad de medicamentos, las vacunas y los relacionados con el cáncer. Conclusiones: Las publicaciones se caracterizaron por ser en colaboración, con ligero predominio de las nacionales sobre las internacionales. Es necesario ampliar la realización de evaluaciones económicas completas(AU)

Introduction: Cuba is a country with development in the biotechnology and medicines field, where pharmacoeconomic studies provide significant evidence for decision-making; mainly at present when the country is immersed in the Task of Ordering and at the same time is affected by the pandemic of the new coronavirus. Objective: Characterize pharmacoeconomic studies in Cuba in the last 20 years. Methods: A bibliometric research was carried out for which the Cuban scientific production on pharmacoeconomics was recovered in the Scopus database for the period 2001-2020. Bibliometric indicators were used to obtain the number of documents, years of publication, sources, collaboration, type and patterns of institutional and country collaboration, as well as co-occurrence of keywords. Results: 648 documents were retrieved. The most productive year was 2010. The documents were published in 273 journals, 17 (6.2percent) Cuban ones and 256 (93.8percent) foreign. There were 449 documents (69.3percent) in institutional collaboration and 199 (30.7percent) without collaboration. The most productive institutions were the Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology with 82 (12.7percent) and the Center of Molecular Immunology, with 77 (11.9percent). The collaboration network between countries showed three defined areas: Latin America, North America-Europe-India and Spain. The most published topics were effectiveness and safety of drugs, vaccines, and those related to cancer. Conclusions: The publications were characterized by being collaborative, with a slight predominance of national over international ones. Comprehensive economic assessments need to be expanded(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medication errors are avoidable occurrences that can assume clinically significant dimensions and impose relevant costs to the health system, especially in the context of antineoplastic therapy. OBJECTIVE: Assess the clinical significance and economic impacts of a clinical pharmaceutical service. This retrospective study consists of an analysis of pharmacy interventions and drug-related problems found in a review of electronic prescriptions referring to antineoplastic therapy of a public teaching tertiary hospital in Brazil. METHOD: Retrospective descriptive study obtained from electronic records of drug-related problems and pharmaceutical interventions related to antineoplastic therapy for oncological and hematological diseases, obtained through the pharmacotherapy review service. The accepted interventions were analyzed for the financial impact generated, evaluating your direct costs. The perception of clinical significance of a random sample of interventions was ascertained by the experts' opinion, using the Delphi method. RESULTS: The most frequent problem was a "lack of information to professionals" (25.06%), "problems as to the frequency and interval of doses" (22.90%), and "medication underdosing" (16.20%). Dose adjustment (31.50%) and clarifications (30.90%) were the most frequent pharmaceutical interventions. In the second round of Delphi, experts rated 77.77% of interventions as extremely significant and very significant. The main drugs reported in the interventions were cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, methotrexate, folinic acid, and monoclonal antibodies. The savings amounted to US$1,193,970.18 and involved mainly bortezomib, dactinomycin, and monoclonal antibodies. CONCLUSION: Clinical pharmacy services contributed to the rational use of medicines presenting clinical significance and avoiding waste of financial resources.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introdução: A pandemia de COVID-19 fez aumentar a demanda de medicamentos utilizados em hospitais, como a Ceftazidima + Avibactam. Nesse contexto, a Central de Misturas Intravenosas (CMIV) de um hospital público universitário passou a unitarizar as doses prescritas. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o impacto da unitarização no consumo deste antibacteriano de alto custo em um hospital público universitário. Métodos: Trata-se de uma análise farmacoeconômica de custos diretos, sobre a utilização de frascos-ampola de Ceftazidima + Avibactam no período de 01/07/2020 a 31/05/2021. Foram unitarizadas todas as doses que correspondiam a uma fração da dose total do frasco-ampola, em Cabine de Segurança Biológica classe II B2. Os frascos-ampola foram utilizados à exaustão, através do compartilhamento e organização dos horários de manipulação. Resultados: O número total de preparos realizados pela CMIV do referido hospital no período foi de 837. O consumo projetado sem a centralização dos preparos seria de 837 (um frasco por dose). Entretanto, o consumo real foi de 437 frascos. A eficiência de unitarização foi de 101%, com economia real de 400 frascos (R$ 244.832,00) para a instituição. Conclusão: A pandemia de COVID-19 sobrecarregou os sistemas de saúde do mundo todo, sendo que a atuação farmacêutica foi fundamental para garantir o acesso aos medicamentos essenciais. A CMIV assumiu a unitarização da Ceftazidima + Avibactam, antibiótico em risco de desabastecimento, gerando um consumo 47,8% menor, contribuindo para o acesso deste medicamento de forma ininterrupta durante os 11 meses avaliados na referida instituição.

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic has increased the demand for drugs used in hospitals, such as Ceftazidime + Avibactam. In this context, the Central of Intravenous Admixtures (CMIV) of a public university hospital started to unitarize the prescribed doses. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of unitarization on the consumption of this high-cost antibacterial in a public university hospital. Methods: This is a pharmacoeconomic analysis of direct costs, on the Ceftazidime + Avibactam vials use, in the period from 07/01/2020 to 05/31/2021. All doses that corresponded to a fraction of the entire vial were unitarized in a Class II B2 Biological Safety Cabin. The vials were used to exhaustion, by sharing them, and organizing the manipulation schedules. Results: The total number of preparations made by the CMIV of that hospital in the period was 837 doses. The projected consumption would be 837 vials (one vial per dose). However, the actual consumption was 437 vials. The unitarization efficiency was of 101%, with real savings of 400 vials (R$ 244,832.00) for the institution. Conclusion: COVID-19 pandemic has overburdened health systems around the world, and pharmaceutical actions have been fundamental to guaranteeing access to essential medicines. CMIV took over the unitarization of Ceftazidime + Avibactam, an antibiotic at risk of shortages, leading to a 47.8% lower consumption, contributing to uninterrupted access to this drug during the 11 months evaluated at that institution.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: La economía de los medicamentos se puede considerar como el estudio y cálculo económico detallados del medicamento, que ayuda a satisfacer las necesidades del paciente según costo, beneficio y eficacia de dicho medicamento. Objetivo: El objetivo de la investigación fue evaluar si la valoración económica de la tableta de acetaminofén 500 mg. permitirá conocer el beneficio en el costo del fármaco en los establecimientos farmacéuticos de Lima. Métodos: La investigación presenta un diseño no experimental, transversal, descriptivo y analítico. Población: 25 trabajadores de la DIGEMID con conocimientos de farmacoeconomía; muestra: 100 por ciento de la población. Para la evaluación se utilizó un cuestionario de escala Likert, basado en las dos variables cuantitativas: Valoración económica y Coste-beneficio. El tratamiento estadístico se realizó con el programa SPSS v.25. Traducción realizada con la versión gratuita del traductor www.DeepL.com/Translator Resultados: De un total de 44 presentaciones de tabletas de acetaminofén vendidas en 41 distritos de Lima, se obtuvieron siete presentaciones que ofrecen el producto a un precio elevado, siendo estas no beneficiosas en el 15,9 por ciento y se encontraron 37 establecimientos que ofrecen el medicamento a un precio medio beneficioso (84,1 por ciento). Conclusiones: La farmacoeconomía aplicada al medicamento acetaminofén presentación tableta 500 mg permitió conocer que dicho producto tiene un costo de bajo a moderado, por lo que es asequible a la población de bajos recursos. Asimismo, la evaluación económica efectuada permitirá la toma de decisiones del consumidor al momento de la compra(AU)

Introduction: The economics of medicines can be considered as the detailed economic study and calculation of the treatment, which helps to satisfy the needs of the patient according to the cost, benefit, and efficacy of said medicine. Objective: The objective of the research was to evaluate if the economic valuation of the acetaminophen 500 mg. tablet will allow to know the benefit in the cost of the drug in pharmaceutical establishments in Lima. Methods: The research presents a non-experimental, cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical design. Population: 25 DIGEMID workers with knowledge of pharmacoeconomics; sample: 100 percent of the population. A Likert scale questionnaire was used for the evaluation, based on the two quantitative variables: Economic valuation and Cost-benefit. Statistical processing was carried out using the SPSS v.25 program. Results: From a total of 44 presentations of acetaminophen tablets sold in 41 districts of Lima, seven presentations have been obtained that offer the product at a high price, these being not beneficial and reaching 15.9 percent, 37 establishments were found They offer the drug at a helpful average price reaching 84.1 percent. Conclusions: The pharmacoeconomics applied to the drug acetaminophen 500 mg tablet presentation allowed us to know that this product has a low to moderate cost, making it affordable to the low-income population. Likewise, the economic evaluation carried out will allow decision-making at the time of purchase, which will enable the people to identify the price(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Avaliar a custo-efetividade da trifluridina/cloridrato de tipiracila (FTD/TPI) em comparação ao melhor cuidado de suporte (sigla em inglês BSC, best supportive care) e ao regorafenibe para o tratamento em pacientes com câncer colorretal metastático (CCRm) politratados (terceira linha ou linhas posteriores) sob a perspectiva de pagadores privados no Brasil. Métodos: Foi construído um modelo de sobrevida particionado considerando três estados de saúde. A efetividade foi medida em anos-vida ganhos e Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY). Os custos foram obtidos a partir da perspectiva do sistema de saúde privado brasileiro considerando um horizonte temporal de cinco anos. Também foram realizadas análises de sensibilidade univariada e probabilística para avaliar a robustez do modelo. Resultados: A utilização de FTD/TPI pode gerar melhores desfechos clínicos versus BSC e economia de recursos versus regorafenibe. FTD/TPI proporcionou mais 0,098 anos de vida por paciente e uma qualidade de vida incremental de 0,072, comparada ao BSC. Já em relação ao regorafenibe, a FTD/TPI apresentou redução de R$ 2.088,49 nos custos por paciente e benefícios clínicos com incremento marginal. Conclusão: FTD/TPI representa uma opção de tratamento de CCRm custo-efetiva, comparada ao regorafenibe, na perspectiva de pagadores privados no Brasil

Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil chloridrate (FTD/TPI) compared to best supportative care (BSC) and regorafenib for the treatment of polytreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) (3rd line or later lines) in the private payer perspective in Brazil. Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed based on three health states. Effectiveness was measured in life-years gained and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Costs were obtained from the perspective of the supplementary healthcare system in Brazil considering a time horizon of five years. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the model. Results: The use of FTD/TPI may generate better clinical outcomes versus BSC and resource savings versus regorafenib. FTD/TPI provided more 0,098 years of life per patient and an incremental quality of life of 0,072 compared to BSC. Regarding regorafenib, FTD/TPI provided a cost reduction of R$ 2.088,49 per patient and similar clinical benefits. Conclusion: FTD/TPI represents a cost-effective treatment option for mCRC compared to regorafenib from the perspective of the supplementary healthcare system in Brazil

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi realizar o levantamento de custo dos medicamentos antifibróticos para o tratamento da fibrose pulmonar idiopática no estado do Pará. Métodos: Trata-se de uma pesquisa documental do tipo descritiva, retrospectiva e quantitativa, referente às tecnologias pirfenidona e nintedanibe, demandadas entre os meses de junho de 2016 a junho de 2019. Para a obtenção dos dados, acessaram-se os relatórios de dispensação por paciente, notas fiscais relacionadas à aquisição dos medicamentos, além de planilha Excel de cadastro e acompanhamento de processos dos anos correspondentes, disponibilizados pela Secretaria de Estado de Saúde. Resultados: Foram atendidos 81 processos destinados à aquisição dos medicamentos (2 em 2016, 13 em 2017, 31 em 2018 e 35 em 2019); dos quais 29 solicitando nintedanibe e 52, pirfenidona. Quanto aos gastos, identificou-se que, em 2016, se pagou R$ 38.673,32 para a aquisição nintedanibe. Em 2017, foi R$ 158.881,27 para a aquisição de pirfenidona e R$ 322.277,67 para o atendimento de nintedanibe. Para 2018, percebeu-se o aumento impactante de pirfenidona (R$ 627.959,33), se comparada aos anos anteriores, enquanto o nintedanibe totalizou R$ 670.337,55. Já para o primeiro semestre de 2019 foram investidos R$ 620.393,55 para a pirfenidona e R$ 464.079,84 para nintedanibe. Conclusões: Identificou-se que a demanda de tecnologias em saúde destinadas aos portadores de fibrose pulmonar idiopática no Pará segue em constante crescente, por ser uma tecnologia inovadora que ainda não está incorporada no Sistema Único de Saúde, fazendo-se necessários critérios que regulamentem a sustentabilidade do acesso ao tratamento dessa doença rara

Objective: The objective of this study was to perform the cost survey of antifibrotic drugs for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the state of Pará. Methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective and quantitative documentary research on Pirfenidone and Nintedanibe technologies, demanded from June 2016 to June 2019. To obtain the data were accessed dispensing reports per patient, Invoices related to the purchase of medicines, in addition to Excel spreadsheet for registration and monitoring of processes of the corresponding years, available from the Secretary of State for Health. Results: 81 cases were received for the purchase of medicines (2 in 2016, 13 in 2017, 31 in 2018 and 35 in 2019); of which 29 requesting nintedanibe and 52, pirfenidone. Regarding expenses, it was identified that in 2016, R$ 38,673.32 was paid for the acquisition of nintedanibe. In 2017, it was R$ 158,881.27 for the acquisition of pirfenidone and R$ 322,277.67 for the service of nintedanibe. For 2018, there was a significant increase in pirfenidone (R$ 627,959.33) compared to the previous year, while nintedanibe totaled R $ 670,337.55. For the first half of 2019, R$ 620,393.55 was invested for pirfenidone and R$ 464,079.84 for nintedanibe. Conclusions: It was identified that the demand for health technologies for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Pará continues to grow, as it is an innovative technology that is not yet incorporated into the Unified Health System. sustainability of access to treatment for this rare disease

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs associated with evaluation of ß-lactam allergy in children labeled as allergic. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective year-long real life observational study designed to evaluate all pediatric patients with suspected ß-lactam allergy who consulted for allergy evaluation. Direct and indirect costs were systematically recorded. Direct healthcare costs were calculated by taking into account the number of visits and all complementary and diagnostic tests performed. Direct nonhealthcare costs were calculated by considering the number of visits and the kilometers from their homes to the clinic. Finally, indirect costs were evaluated by considering the absenteeism of parents or other companions who took the children to the clinic. RESULTS: A total of 40 children with suspected allergy to ß-lactams were evaluated in our outpatient clinic from June 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018. Total direct healthcare costs were $5038.03, with an average cost per patient of $125.95. Direct nonhealthcare costs reached $901.87 ($22.55 per patient) and indirect nonhealthcare costs reached $6384.35 ($159.61 per patient). The total cost was $12 324.25, a cost of $308.11 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Elective evaluation of ß-lactam allergy and delabeling children who are not allergic is not expensive. In addition, it could save future expenses because of an unnecessary lifelong use of alternative antibiotics that are usually more expensive, less effective, and more frequently associated with antimicrobial resistance and different side effects.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The only recommended pharmacological treatments for specific dementias are donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine (recommended drugs, RD). However, other drugs without recommendations (not recommended drugs, NRD) are often used to treat patients with cognitive impairment (CI) in Argentina. The INSSJyP is the largest health insurance in Argentina. The objective of this study is to analyze the prescription pattern, cost, and implications of NRD used for the treatment of CI in the INSSJyP. MATERIALS: This is a retrospective, population-based study of the INSSJyP outpatients' prescriptions database for drugs usually prescribed for CI during 2015. These data were compared with the same database in 2009. The number of "prescriptions" always refers to dispensed packages. RESULTS: A total of 3 255 438 packages of drugs usually indicated for CI were prescribed during 2015: 1 912 476 packages of RD (59%) and 1 342 962 packages of NRD (41%).Comparing the results with those obtained in 2009, there is a 148% gross increase in the prescription of both RD and NRD for CI, although the rates/1000 affiliates/year show a lesser rise for NRD (70.1%) compared to RD (103.9 %).The expenditure on CI drugs prescribed during 2015 was 77 million USD. NRD cost represented approximately 20 million USD. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate drug use increases health costs in developing countries. We found a high number of patients with a probable diagnosis of CI treated with NRD. It is extremely relevant that all the healthcare professionals can update their knowledge and modify behavioral insights about appropriate prescription for specific dementias.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: The economic feasibility of pharmacotherapeutic empowerment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) is still not well established. Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an individual pharmacotherapeutic empowerment strategy (IPES) for patients with DM2. Methods: This is a cost-effectiveness study nested in a non-randomized clinical trial with patients ≥18 years of age, of both genders, with low and moderate cardiovascular risks. This study was carried out from the perspective of the municipal health system of Divinópolis in Minas Gerais state, and compared patients submitted to an IPES and patients who received only traditional care, 1 year before the beginning of the intervention (baseline) and 1 year after its completion (follow-up). The costs of the services offered by the municipality were computed, and in the intervention group IPES costs were included. Glycated hemoglobin (A1c) was the effectiveness parameter adopted. Cost-effectiveness ratio analyses, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and sensitivity analysis were performed. Results: In the analysis of cost-effectiveness, it is observed that a reduction of 0.359 in A1c costs US$708.47 in the intervention group and a reduction of 0.170 costs US$1927.13 in the control group. Thus, the ICER is US$387.66 per patient/year. In the sensitivity analysis, it was observed that the IPES was dominant in 19.8% of the simulated scenarios and cost-effective in 80.2%. Conclusions: The IPES is an alternative that presents economic feasibility for the municipal public health system scenario. The absence of randomization in patient selection is a limitation of this study.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Analisar os gastos com insulinas análogas de ação rápida e longa, no município de Belém/PA, no ano de 2016. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo descritivo, quantitativo de farmacoeconomia, relacionado aos custos de insulinas análogas. A pesquisa foi realizada na Secretária Municipal de Saúde de um município do estado do Pará, por meio da análise das notas de empenho referentes à aquisição de insulinas análogas no ano de 2016. Os dados foram tabulados no Microsoft® Excel 2010, no qual também foram geradas tabelas e gráficos para melhor interpretação das informações coletadas. A presente pesquisa não envolveu a participação de seres humanos e nem a utilização de dados secundários, por isso não houve a necessidade de submissão ao Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa (CEP). Resultados: Durante o ano de 2016, foram disponibilizadas 15 variedades de apresentação de análogos de insulinas. Neste ano, foram realizadas 10 compras de insulinas comprovadas por meio de empenho, resultando num total de 30.450 frascos de insulina, que gerou uma despesa extra de R$ 1.857.778,00 ao município. Em relação à quantidade comprada e ao custo de cada insulina análoga, a insulina Glargina liderou o ranking em ambas as variáveis, obtendo 12.650 frascos comprados e custo total de R$ 967.970,00. Conclusão: Mesmo com a recente inclusão nas listas-padrão de algumas insulinas análogas que devem ser disponibilizadas pelo Sistema único de Saúde (SUS), essa ação ainda não ocorre de maneira efetiva no território brasileiro, evidenciado pelos gastos significativos com a compra de insulinas análogas por meio de judicialização.

Objective: To analyze the costs of fast and long-acting analogues of insulin in Belém/PA, from 2016. Methods: This is a descriptive and quantitative study of pharmacoeconomics, related to the analogues of insulins cost. The research was realized at the Municipal Health Secretary from a county in the state of Pará, through analysis of the commitment notes regarding the acquisition of analogous of insulins from the year of 2016. The data were charted in Microsoft® Excel 2010, which also generated another's tables and graphs for the information collected better interpretation. The present research did not involve the human beings participation or even use of secondary data, so there was no need to submit to the Research Ethics Committee (REC/CEP). Results: During the year 2016, 15 presentation varieties of analogous of insulin were made available. This same year, 10 purchases of proven insulin were performed through a commitment, resulting in a total of 30.450 bottles of insulin, which generated an extra expense of R$ 1,857.778.00 to the county. Regarding the quantity purchased and the cost of each analogous insulin, Glargina insulin led the ranking in both variables, obtaining 12.650 bottles purchased and R$ 967,970.00 of total cost. Conclusion: Despite the recent inclusion at the standard lists of some analogues of insulins that should be made available by the Single Health System (SHS/SUS), this action still does not occur effectively in Brazil, evidenced by the significant expenses with the purchase of analogues of insulins through a judicial process (public civil action).

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over the past 5 years, 55 new anticancer drugs have been launched worldwide. Considering the increasing costs of innovative treatments, both the number and the relevance of cost-effectiveness analyses have increased, meaningfully supporting decision making by stakeholders and policy makers. Notably, cost-effective treatments remain unavailable to patients because they are still unaffordable for a multitude of payers. OBJECTIVES: To discuss the differences between cost-effectiveness and affordability. METHODS: We reviewed the most relevant data on the divergences between cost-effectiveness and affordability. In addition, we included our recommendations to improve patients' access to innovative cancer therapies. RESULTS: The increasing costs of recently launched antineoplastic drugs, as high as $150 000 per year, represent a major barrier to patients' access to treatments globally. In Brazil, for example, patients' access to innovative treatments depends greatly on whether the individual has private health insurance. In the public health sector, patients' access to cost-effective innovative treatments varies according to the financial capacity of the facility, leading to inequalities within the same healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that because of the socioeconomic inequality mostly seen in lower and middle-income countries, it is difficult to define a cost-effectiveness threshold by region or a willingness-to-pay threshold affordable to the entire population. We consider that benchmark interventions might help to find an affordable willingness-to-pay threshold, and league table interventions might help policy makers, physicians, and the society to share the decision making.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background The emergence and rapid spread of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria related to nosocomial infections is a growing worldwide problem, and polymyxins have become important due to the lack of new antibiotics. Objectives To evaluate the outcomes and pharmacoeconomic impact of using colistin and polymyxin B to treat nosocomial infections. Setting Neurosurgical, cardiovascular, or transplantation intensive care unit (ICU) at the Clinical Hospital of the University of Campinas (São Paulo, Brazil). Method A retrospective cohort study was conduct in patients in the ICU. The renal function was determined daily during treatment by measuring the serum creatinine. A cost minimization analysis was performed to compare the relative costs of treatment with colistin and polymyxin B. Main outcomes measure The outcomes were 30-day mortality and frequency and onset of nephrotoxicity after beginning treatment. Results Fifty-one patients treated with colistin and 51 with polymyxin B were included. 30-day mortality was observed in 25.49% and 33.33% of patients treated with colistin and polymyxin B, respectively; Nephrotoxicity was observed in 43.14% and 54.90% of patients in colistin and polymyxin B groups, respectively; and onset time of nephrotoxicity was 9.86 ± 13.22 days for colistin and 10.68 ± 9.93 days for polymyxin B group. Colistin treatment had a lower cost per patient compared to the cost for polymyxin B treatment (USD $13,389.37 vs. USD $13,639.16, respectively). Conclusion We found no difference between 30-day mortality and nephrotoxicity between groups; however, colistin proved to be the best option from a pharmacoeconomic point of view.

Assuntos