RESUMO

An increase in total drug (small molecules and biologics) approvals by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was seen in 2023 compared with the previous year. Cancer remained the disease most targeted by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), followed by autoimmune conditions. Our data reveal the prevalence of approvals for biologics even during years when the total number of authorizations was low, such as in 2022. Over half the drugs that received the green light in 2023 benefited from expedited programs, as the incidence of many diseases increased. In addition, over half of the biologics approved received Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA. This narrative review delves into details of the most significant approvals in 2023, including mAbs, enzymes, and proteins, explaining their mechanisms of action, differences from previous drugs, placebo, and standards of care, and outcomes in clinical trials. Given the varying number of drugs authorized annually by the U.S. health authority, this review also examines the limits of external influences over the FDA's decisions and independence regarding drug approvals and withdrawals.

RESUMO

Las enfermedades raras son aquellas que tienen baja prevalencia y que, por lo tanto, el desarrollo de medicamentos para tratarlas no es rentable para las empresas farmacéuticas debido a la baja demanda. A pesar de que ya se cuenta con diferentes políticas públicas alrededor del mundo para incentivar a las industrias farmacéuticas a investigar estos medicamentos, conocidos como medicamentos huérfanos, su desarrollo conlleva muchas dificultades en las evaluaciones clínicas y el precio final para el público es muy elevado. Si bien en años recientes se ha planteado el uso de tecnología de impresión en 3D para producir estos medicamentos o incluso recurrir a otros medicamentos previamente aprobados para tratar enfermedades raras, existe un historial de mal uso de las legislaciones por parte de las empresas con el fin de generar beneficios comerciales, por lo que estas políticas deben reforzarse para que cumplan su propósito; ayudar a una población muy vulnerable. El objetivo del presente texto es exponer los resultados de una revisión documental sobre el panorama científico y sociopolítico en el que se encuentra el problema de las enfermedades raras y los medicamentos huérfanos, así como las posibles soluciones que se están desplegando para abordarlo. Deriva de un estudio que se desarrolla en el momento actual en la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, de Ciudad de México.

The strange illnesses are those that have low prevalence and that, therefore, the development of medications to treat them is not profitable for the pharmaceutical companies due to the drop demands. Although it is already counted with different political public around the world to motivate to the pharmaceutical industries to investigate these medications, well-known as orphan medications, their development bears many difficulties in the clinical evaluations and the final price for the public it is very high. Although in recent years he/she has thought about the use of impression technology in 3D to produce these medications or even to appeal to other medications previously approved to treat strange illnesses, a record of wrong use of the legislations exists on the part of the companies with the purpose of generating commercial benefits, for what these politicians should be reinforced so that they complete its purpose; to help a very vulnerable population. The objective of the present text is to expose the results of a documental revision on the scientific and sociopolitical panorama in which is the problem of the strange illnesses and the orphan medications, as well as the possible solutions that they are spreading to approach it. It derives of a study that is developed in the current moment in the Metropolitan Autonomous University, of Mexico City.

RESUMO

The year 2022 witnessed the control of the COVID-19 pandemic in most countries through social and hygiene measures and also vaccination campaigns. It also saw a decrease in total approvals by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nevertheless, there was no fall in the Biologics class, which was boosted through the authorization of 15 novel molecules, thus maintaining the figures achieved in previous years. Indeed, the decrease in approvals was only for the category of small molecules. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) continued to be the drug class with the most approvals, and cancer remained the most targeted disease, followed by autoimmune conditions, as in previous years. Interestingly, the FDA gave the green light to a remarkable number of bispecific Biologics (four), the highest number in recent years. Indeed, 2022 was another year without the approval of an antimicrobial Biologic, although important advancements were made in targeting new diseases, which are discussed herein. In this work, we only analyze the Biologics authorized in 2022. Furthermore, we also consider the orphan drugs authorized. We not only apply a quantitative analysis to this year's harvest, but also compare the efficacy of the Biologics with those authorized in previous years. On the basis of their chemical structure, the Biologics addressed fall into the following classes: monoclonal antibodies; antibody-drug conjugates; and proteins/enzymes.

RESUMO

Molecular docking is a useful and powerful computational method for the identification of potential interactions between small molecules and pharmacological targets. In reverse docking, the ability of one or a few compounds to bind a large dataset of proteins is evaluated in silico. This strategy is useful for identifying molecular targets of orphan bioactive compounds, proposing new molecular mechanisms, finding alternative indications of drugs, or predicting drug toxicity. Herein, we describe a detailed reverse docking protocol for the identification of potential targets for 4-hydroxycoumarin (4-HC). Our results showed that RAC1 is a target of 4-HC, which partially explains the biological activities of 4-HC on cancer cells. The strategy reported here can be easily applied to other compounds and protein datasets.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO A Resistência a Antimicrobianos (AMR) tem se revelado como um dos maiores problemas para a saúde pública no nível global. O objetivo deste artigo foi analisar a formulação da resposta à AMR negociada no âmbito da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) por seus Estados-Membros. Foram analisados os relatórios e resoluções produzidos na Assembleia Mundial da Saúde no período de 1998 a 2019. Os achados indicam que, a partir de 2014, foram estabelecidas condições de possibilidade para a aprovação do Plano de Ação Global em AMR de forma mais robusta, abrangendo o conceito de Saúde Única e envolvendo outras instâncias internacionais (FAO, OIE, OMC e PNUMA). A análise dos conteúdos e o uso de diferentes referenciais analíticos, considerando dois setores econômicos - agropecuária e indústria farmacêutica -, mostraram-se relevantes para ilustrar a complexidade da temática, reforçando sua relevância global, reconhecendo a dimensão do uso de antibióticos em animais e as lacunas em inovação tecnológica. Como a OMS, além de ser um importante agente mobilizador para a resposta à AMR no nível global, tem garantido orçamento para ações nessa área mesmo em um contexto de desfinanciamento, conclui-se que a perspectiva da saúde pública deve prevalecer na resposta à AMR.

ABSTRACT Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) has proved to be a major public health problem at the global level. This paper examined the formulation of the response to AMR negotiated through the World Health Organization (WHO) by its Member States. Related WHO reports and resolutions from 1998 to 2019 were analysed. The findings indicate that, from 2014 on, more robust conditions were established for approval of a Global Action Plan on AMR, encompassing the concept of One Health and involving other international entities (FAO, OIE, WTO and Unep). Content analysis and various analytical frameworks, considering two economic sectors (the livestock and pharmaceutical industries), proved relevant to illustrating the complexity of the issue, reinforcing its global importance and acknowledging the extent of antibiotic use in animals and the gaps in technological innovation. As the WHO is not only an important agent for mobilizing the response to AMR at the global level, but - despite a context of de-funding - has guaranteed a budget for action in this area, it is concluded that the public health perspective should prevail in the response to AMR.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES This study examined the purchases of eculizumab, a high-cost monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of rare diseases by Brazilian federal agencies, in terms of purchased quantities, expenditures, and prices. METHODS Eculizumab purchases made between March 2007 and December 2018 were analyzed, using secondary data extracted from the Federal Government Purchasing System (SIASG in Portuguese). The following aspects were assessed: number of purchases, purchased quantities, number of daily doses defined per 1,000 inhabitants per year, annual expenditures, and prices. The prices were adjusted by the National Broad Consumer Price Index for December 2018. Linear regression was used for trend analysis. RESULTS All acquisitions by federal agencies were made by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. The purchases began in 2009 with tender waiver to comply with legal demand. There was an increasing trend in the number of purchases and quantities acquired over time. Two hundred and eighty-three purchases were made, totaling 116,792 units purchased, 28.2% of them in 2018. The adjusted total expenses summed more than R$ 2.44 billion. After market approval by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, the weighted average price fell approximately 35%, to values under the Medicines Market Chamber of Regulation established prices. CONCLUSION Eculizumab represented extremely significant expenditures for the Brazilian Ministry of Health during the period. All purchases were made to meet demands from lawsuits, outside the competitive environment. The market approval of eculizumab promoted an important price reduction. This study indicates the relevance of licensing and the need for permanent monitoring and auditing of drug purchases to meet legal demands.

RESUMO OBJETIVOS O estudo examinou as aquisições de eculizumabe, um anticorpo monoclonal de alto custo utilizado no tratamento de doenças raras, pelos órgãos federais brasileiros, em termos das quantidades compradas, gastos e preços. MÉTODOS Foram analisadas compras de eculizumabe realizadas entre março de 2007 e dezembro de 2018, por meio de dados secundários extraídos do sistema de compras do governo federal (Siasg). Foram examinados o número de compras, quantidades adquiridas, número de doses diárias definidas por 1.000 habitantes por ano, gastos anuais e preços praticados. Os preços foram corrigidos pelo índice nacional de preços ao consumidor amplo para dezembro de 2018. Regressão linear foi utilizada para análises de tendência. RESULTADOS Todas as aquisições por órgãos federais foram realizadas pelo Ministério da Saúde. As compras se iniciaram em 2009, sendo efetuadas por dispensa de licitação e para atendimento de demanda judicial. Houve tendência crescente no número de compras e quantidades adquiridas ao longo do tempo. Foram realizadas 283 compras, totalizando 116.792 unidades adquiridas, 28,2% compradas em 2018. Os gastos totais contratados corrigidos somaram mais de R$ 2,44 bilhões. Após a aprovação do registro pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, o preço médio ponderado caiu aproximadamente 35%, para valores abaixo dos preços estabelecidos pela Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos. CONCLUSÃO O eculizumabe representou gastos extremamente significativos para o Ministério da Saúde no período. Todas as compras foram feitas para atendimento de demandas judiciais, fora do ambiente competitivo. Seu registro promoveu queda importante nos preços praticados. O estudo aponta a relevância do registro sanitário e da necessidade de monitoramento e auditoria permanentes das compras de medicamentos para atendimento de demandas judiciais.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumo: Em abril de 2019, foi assinada a portaria de incorporação do medicamento nusinersena no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). É o medicamento mais caro já incorporado ao SUS, para uso no tratamento de atrofia muscular espinhal 5q tipo I. A incorporação é referida como um marco na tomada de decisão sobre novas tecnologias no SUS, a ser viabilizada por meio de acordo de partilha de risco. O trabalho discute o processo de incorporação do nusinersena, destacando aspectos contextuais, temporais e técnicos, além de possíveis consequências para a institucionalização da avaliação de tecnologias em saúde (ATS) no SUS. Seguiu método exploratório, com revisão de informações públicas produzidas pela Comissão de Incorporação de Tecnologias no SUS (CONITEC) e busca em bancos de dados governamentais de preços e compras. Foi produzida linha temporal descrevendo os pontos-chave do processo de incorporação. Houve dois pedidos de incorporação do medicamento. O primeiro, submetido pela Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos (SCTIE) do Ministério da Saúde, negado por unanimidade, em novembro de 2018. Seguiu-se o pedido do Secretário da SCTIE à Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU), para que pudesse decidir de forma contrária à recomendação do plenário da CONITEC. A AGU recomendou uma nova submissão, feita pela empresa produtora e aprovada por unanimidade, em março de 2019. Não houve acréscimo de novas evidências ou redução de preço que justificassem a mudança de decisão. Não foram identificados os elementos constituintes do acordo de partilha de risco. São sinalizados problemas de transparência e accountability, bem como riscos ao processo de institucionalização da ATS que vinha em curso no SUS.

Abstract: In April 2019, a ruling was signed for the incorporation of the drug nusinersen by the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS). Nusinersen is the most expensive drug ever incorporated by the SUS and is used to treat type I 5q spinal muscular atrophy. The incorporation has been described as a milestone in decision-making on new technologies in the SUS, enabled through a risk-sharing agreement. The article discusses the process involved in the incorporation of nusinersen, highlighting the context, timing, and technical issues, in addition to possible consequences for the institutionalization of health technology assessment (HTA) in the SUS. The study used an exploratory method, reviewing public information produced by the Commission for Incorporation of Technologies in the SUS (CONITEC) and searches in government databanks on prices and purchases. A timeline was produced, describing the key points in the process of incorporation. There were two formal requests for the drug's incorporation. The first was submitted by the Division of Science, Technology, and Strategic Inputs (SCTIE) of the Brazilian Ministry of Health and was turned down unanimously in November 2018. This was followed by a petition by the head of the SCTIE to the Attorney General's Office (AGU) to overrule the recommendation by the CONITEC plenary. The AGU recommended a new submission, made by the drug's manufacturing company, which was approved unanimously in March 2019. The was no addition of new evidence or a price reduction to justify the change of decision. No elements were identified in the risk-sharing agreement. This suggests problems of transparency and accountability, as well as risks in the process of institutionalization of HTA that had been underway in the SUS.

Resumen: En abril de 2019, se firmó el decreto de incorporación del medicamento nusinersén en el Sistema Único de Salud brasileño (SUS). Es el medicamento más caro que se ha incorporado al SUS para su uso en el tratamiento de la atrofia muscular espinal 5q tipo I. La incorporación del mismo está considerada como un marco de referencia en la toma de decisiones sobre nuevas tecnologías en el SUS, que puede ser viable mediante el acuerdo de distribución de riesgo. El trabajo discute el proceso de incorporación del nusinersén, destacando aspectos contextuales, temporales y técnicos, además de posibles consecuencias para la institucionalización de la evaluación de tecnologías en salud (ETS) en el SUS. El trabajo siguió el método exploratorio, con una revisión de la información pública, generada por la Comisión de Incorporación de Tecnologías en el SUS (CONITEC) y la búsqueda en bancos de datos gubernamentales de precios y compras. Se creó una línea temporal, describiendo los puntos-clave del proceso de incorporación. Hubo dos peticiones de incorporación del medicamento. La primera, sometida a la Secretaría de Ciencia, Tecnología e Insumos Estratégicos (SCTIE) del Ministerio de Salud, rechazada por unanimidad, en noviembre de 2018. A lo que le siguió la petición del Secretario de la SCTIE a la Abogacía-General de la Unión (AGU), para que pudiese decidir en otro sentido respecto a la recomendación del pleno de la CONITEC. La AGU recomendó una nueva remisión, realizada por la empresa productora y aprobada por unanimidad, en marzo de 2019. No se produjo un incremento de nuevas evidencias o una reducción del precio que justificasen el cambio de decisión. No se identificaron los elementos constituyentes del acuerdo de distribución de riesgo. Se señalaron los problemas de transparencia y rendición de cuentas, así como riesgos para el proceso de institucionalización de la ETS que estaba en curso en el SUS.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the actual diagnoses of 76 patients (2005-2015) whose clinical presentations so closely resembled infant botulism that the patients were treated with Human Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous (BIG-IV; BabyBIG), but whose illnesses subsequently were not laboratory confirmed as infant botulism ("clinical mimics" of infant botulism). STUDY DESIGN: The California Department of Public Health produces BIG-IV and distributes it nationwide as a public service (ie, not-for-profit) orphan drug to treat patients hospitalized with suspected infant botulism. During the study period, admission records and discharge summaries for all patients treated with BIG-IV but who lacked a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of infant botulism were collected and abstracted. The patients' discharge diagnoses were identified, categorized, and compared with previously reported clinical mimics categories for 32 patients (1992-2005). RESULTS: From 2005 to 2015, 76 clinical mimic illnesses were identified. These illnesses were distributed into the 5 categories previously reported of (1) probable infant botulism lacking confirmatory testing (26.3%); (2) spinal muscular atrophy (19.7%); (3) miscellaneous (15.8%); (4) metabolic disorders (11.8%); and (5) other infectious diseases (10.6%). Of the 76 clinical mimic illnesses, 15.8% had no alternate diagnosis established and were therefore categorized as undetermined. CONCLUSIONS: Over the 23 years 1992-2015, patients presenting with illnesses so clinically similar to infant botulism that they were treated with BIG-IV had actual diagnoses that were distributed into 5 main categories. These categories and their individual components constitute a working bedside differential diagnosis of infant botulism.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To report the efficacy of Human Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous (BIG-IV) in the first 12 years following its licensure in 2003 and to characterize its use nationwide in treating patients with infant botulism. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records and billing information were collected for US patients treated with BIG-IV from 2003 to 2015. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and hospital charge information for treated patients were compared with the BIG-IV Pivotal Clinical Trial Placebo Group to quantify decreases in LOS and hospital charges. RESULTS: The use of BIG-IV reduced mean LOS from 5.7 to 2.2 weeks. This shortened hospital stay resulted in a mean decrease in hospital charges of $88 900 per patient. For all US patients 2003-2015, total decreases in LOS and hospital charges were 66.9 years and $86.2 million, respectively. The decrease in mean LOS was time dependent: BIG-IV treatment on hospital days 0-3 reduced mean LOS by 3.7 weeks (P <.001 vs the BIG-IV Pivotal Clinical Trial Placebo Group), on hospital days 4-7 by 2.6 weeks (P <.001 vs the BIG-IV Pivotal Clinical Trial Placebo Group) and on hospital days 8-10 by just 1 week (P = NS). Since licensure, 1192 patients in 48 states and Washington, DC, have been treated with BIG-IV. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BIG-IV since its licensure in 2003 treated approximately 93% of US patients with laboratory-confirmed infant botulism, and prevented >65 years in hospital stay and >$85 million in hospital charges from occurring. The greatest LOS reduction was achieved when BIG-IV was administered soon after hospital admission. Effective and appropriate use of BIG-IV in the US has continued in the postlicensure period.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT In the US, where registration of lobbyists is mandatory, the pharmaceutical industry and private health-care providers spend huge amounts of money seeking to influence health policies and government decisions. In Brazil, where lobbying lacks transparency, there is virtually no data on drug industry expenditure to persuade legislators and government officials of their viewpoints and to influence decision-making according to commercial interests. Since 1990, however, the Associação da Indústria Farmacêutica de Pesquisa (Interfarma - Pharmaceutical Research Industry Association), Brazilian counterpart of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), main lobbying organization of the US pharmaceutical industry, has played a major role in the advocacy of interests of major drug companies. The main goals of Interfarma lobbying activities are: shortening the average time taken by the Brazilian regulatory agency (ANVISA) to approve marketing authorization for a new drug; making the criteria for incorporation of new drugs into SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System) more flexible and speeding up technology incorporation; changing the Country's ethical clearance system and the ethical requirements for clinical trials to meet the need of the innovative drug industry, and establishing a National Policy for Rare Diseases that allows a prompt incorporation of orphan drugs into SUS. Although lobbying affects community health and well-being, this topic is not in the public health research agenda. The impacts of pharmaceutical lobbying on health policies and health-care costs are of great importance for SUS and deserve to be investigated.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Partindo da definição e compreensão dos conceitos relacionados ao medicamento, às doenças raras e à ética, bem como à interface entre esses conceitos no bojo da reflexão do direito sanitário, são detalhadas e discutidas as excepcionalidades das drogas, destinadas a tratar doenças raras, definidas por padrões epidemiológicos nacionais e internacionais, como aquelas que afetam poucos indivíduos, proporcionalmente. Em seguida, examina-se o debate internacional acerca do fornecimento de medicamento pós-estudo, para concluir com a evocação do necessário compromisso ético.

Taking off from a definition and comprehension of concepts related to medication, rare diseases and ethics, as well as the interface of these concepts in the core of reflection on sanitary law, the details and exceptionalities of the orphan drugs, designed to treat rare diseases, defined by domestic and international epidemiological standards as those that proportionally affect few individuals. Below, we examine the international debate concerning the supply of medication post-study, to conclude by evoking the required ethical commitment.

Partiendo de la definición y la comprensión de los conceptos relacionados al medicamento, a las enfermedades raras y a la ética, así como a la interfaz entre estos conceptos en el nudo de la reflexión del Derecho Sanitario, son detalladas y discutidas las excepcionalidades de las drogas, destinadas a tratar enfermedades raras, definidas por patrones epidemiológicos nacionales e internacionales como aquellas que afectan a pocos individuos, proporcionalmente. Posteriormente, se examina el debate internacional a propósito de la provisión de medicamentos post-estudio, para concluir con la evocación del requerido compromiso ético.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: DNA methylation (DNMTi) and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are in development for cancer therapy. So far, four epigenetic drugs are approved for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The combination of hydralazine-valproate (TRANSKRIP(™)) is being repositioned as an oral DNMT and HDAC inhibitor. AREAS COVERED: Brief discussion on the current status of epigenetic drugs and studies published on the preclinical and clinical development of the hydralazine-valproate combination. EXPERT OPINION: Drug repositioning is a strategy for prompt and cost-efficient drug discovery. There is evidence that combining DNMTi with HDACi would be more efficacious than administering each agent on its own. Hydralazine-valproate is safe when used alone or in combination with chemotherapy or chemoradiation. The fact that both drugs are orally administered is another advantage over current epigenetic drugs. This combination is promising but larger studies are needed. Among these, the randomized Phase III trials in advanced and in locally advanced cervical cancer combined with chemotherapy and cisplatin-radiation respectively, would eventually confirm its efficacy. Studies on MDS and CTCL would also eventually prove the efficacy of hydralazine valproate so that in the coming years hydralazine-valproate could have a role in cancer epigenetic therapy.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUÇÃO: A partir de 2007, quatro novas drogas anti-epilépticas foram aprovadas, o acetato de eslicarbazepina, lacosamida, rufinamida e estiripentol. Destas drogas, duas aparecem como drogas órfãs, ou seja, drogas desenvolvidas especificamente para o tratamento de uma síndrome-específica, sendo essas, o estiripentol, indicada na Síndrome de Dravet e a rufinamida, na Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut. OBJETIVO: Revisar a eficácia, tolerabilidade e efeitos adversos das novas drogas, em especial das drogas órfãs. MÉTODO: Estudos foram selecionados de banco de dados eletrônicos. A análise destes estudos averiguou a eficácia, efetividade, efeitos adversos mais comuns, raros e de longo prazo assim como a comparação com os fármacos existentes. CONCLUSÕES: O desenvolvimento de drogas específicas no tratamento das síndromes epilépticas constitui-se na pedra angular do tratamento da epilepsia, minimizando o tempo até o alcance do controle de crises, com consequente menor tempo de exposição aos efeitos deletérios da epilepsia.

INTRODUCTION: Four new antiepileptic drugs have been approved since 2007, eslicarbazepine acetate, lacosamide, rufinamide and stiripentol. Out of these, two drugs are orphan drugs, that is, drugs specifically designed for the treatment of a specific epileptic syndrome, such as stiripentol for Dravet Syndrome and rufinamide for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome. OBJECTIVE: to review the efficacy, tolerability and adverse effects of the newly released drugs, especially of both orphan drugs. METHODOLOGY: Studies were selected from electronic data base. Analyses of these studies ascertained the most common, rare and long-term adverse effects, efficacy, and effectiveness, as well as comparison with existing drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The development of specific drugs in the treatment of epileptic syndromes constitutes the cornerstone in the treatment of epilepsy, minimizing the time needed to achieve seizure control, with consequent reduced exposure to the deleterious effects of epilepsy.

Assuntos