RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most studies that seek to analyze the prevalence of allergic rhinitis do not include preschool children and the diagnosis in this age group is difficult. OBJECTIVE: Identify complementary tests to the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in preschool children and verify if there is scientific robustness to propose a diagnostic algorithm for this condition in this age group. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature in four databases: SCIELO, PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS and SCOPUS. Each article was initially chosen by title, abstract and by the keywords "allergic rhinitis," "diagnosis" and "preschool." Those articles selected entered the complete reading and data extraction phase. The study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under number CRD42020207053. RESULTS: Fourteen articles were suitable for analysis. In the assessment using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies - 2, all studies had at least one domain considered "high risk" or "undetermined risk." Seven reports of nasal cytology, seven of specific IgE, four of immediate hypersensitivity skin test, one of nasal nitric oxide, three of total IgE and one of urinary leukotriene E4 were found. Eight articles evaluated more than one diagnostic test. CONCLUSION: There are no defined criteria for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in preschool children. Nasal cytology, serum specific IgE and immediate hypersensitivity skin test were the most used tests. A reliable diagnostic criterion in this age group is necessary so that in the future it is possible to propose a diagnostic algorithm for allergic rhinitis in preschool children.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine is an up-to-date strategy aimed at individualizing precise pathophysiological mechanisms. Thus, precision medicine is the basis for personalized medicine, inasmuch as it seeks to define the most appropriate treatment for each patient. Nasal cytology requires only an optical microscope, stains, glasses, and nasal cytology curettes. The procedure may last very few minutes using quick staining and, therefore, it can be considered a reliable point-of-care test in the office setting. METHODS: Cross-sectional study that included 5030 outpatients with nasal disorders: 2612 males and 2418 females, with a mean age of 36.8 ± 17.1 years, who were attended to within a 5-year period. The patients were subdivided according to skin prick-test and nasal cytology results into subjects with allergic rhinitis or non-allergic rhinitis. Cellular forms were further subdivided based on their cytotype: NARNE (> 50% of neutrophils with absence of spores and bacteria); NARES (> 20% of eosinophils); NARMA (> 10% of mast cells); and NARESMA (> 20% of eosinophils and > 10% of mast cells). RESULTS: 453 subjects (9%) had negative nasal cytology, 1056 (21%) had allergic rhinitis, 538 (10.7%) had NARES, 493 (9.8%) had nasal polyposis, 251 (5%) had rhinosinusitis, 221 (4.4%) had NARESMA 201 (4%) had infectious rhinitis, 131 (2.6%) had NARMA, 89 (1.8%) had NARNE, with the remaining subjects having a miscellaneous inflammatory/infectious profile. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal cytology provides quick information about phenotype and endotype and can be repeated during follow-up to assess post-treatment changes.

Antecedentes: La medicina de precisión es una estrategia actualizada que apunta a individualizar los mecanismos fisiopatológicos precisos. Entonces, la medicina de precisión es la base de la medicina personalizada, como definir el tratamiento apropiado en cada paciente. La citología nasal solo necesita un microscopio óptico, tinturas, gafas y curetas. El procedimiento puede durar muy pocos minutos usando tinción rápida, por lo tanto, se puede considerar una prueba confiable en el punto de atención en el consultorio. Métodos: Estudio transversal que incluyó 5030 pacientes ambulatorios con trastornos nasales: 2612 hombres y 2418 mujeres, edad promedio de 36.8 ± 17.1 años, quienes fueron atendidos en un periodo de cinco años. Los pacientes se subdividieron conforme a la prueba cutánea y la citología nasal en sujetos con rinitis alérgica y con rinitis no alérgica. Las formas celulares se subdividieron en función del citotipo: rinitis no alérgica con predominio de infiltración eosinofílica (NARNE, neutrófilos > 50 % con esporas y bacterias ausentes); rinitis no alérgica con eosinófilos (NARES, eosinófilos > 20%); rinitis no alérgica con predominio de infiltrado de mastocitos (NARMA, mastocitos > 10 %) y rinitis no alérgica con eosinófilos y mastocitos (NARESMA, eosinófilos > 20 % y mastocitos > 10 %). Resultados: 453 (9 %) sujetos tuvieron citología negativa a nasal, 1056 (21 %) rinitis alérgica, 538 (10.7%) NARES, 493 (9.8%) poliposis nasal, 251 (5%) rinosinusitis, 221 (4.4%) NARESMA, 201 (4%) rinitis infecciosa; 131 (2.6%) NARMA y 89 (1.8%) NARNE; los sujetos restantes tenían un perfil inflamatorio-infeccioso misceláneo. Conclusiones: La citología nasal proporciona información rápida sobre el fenotipo y endotipo y puede repetirse en el seguimiento para evaluar los cambios posteriores al tratamiento.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rhinitis is the leading cause for consultation in the allergy department. It consists in chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa. Non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophilic syndrome is characterized by chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa (> 20% of eosinophils in nasal cytology) in the absence of demonstrable allergy (negative in vivo and in vitro tests); often it is accompanied by other sinonasal conditions (nasal polyposis, chronic rhinosinusitis), and it constitutes a risk factor for the development of obstructive sleep apnea. CASE REPORT: Seven-year old girl with rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, nasopalatine itching, and severe sneezing that limited sleep and school activities. This condition had a seasonal pattern, with important blood (800 eosinophils/µL) and nasal (30%) eosinophilia and absence of demonstrable allergy (negative skin tests, negative specific nasal challenge tests); the non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophilic syndrome diagnosis was verified. CONCLUSIONS: Non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophilic syndrome is considered to be a highly underdiagnosed disease owing to the lack of in vivo nasal tests' performance; to this underestimation, incorrect nasal etiology and lack of local in vivo tests (nasal specific IgE) are added, which warrants a high degree of diagnostic suspicion by the specialist physician.

Antecedentes: La rinitis es la primera causa de consulta en el servicio de alergia. Se trata de una inflamación crónica de la mucosa nasal. La rinitis no alérgica con síndrome eosinofílico se caracteriza por eosinofilia crónica (> 20 % de eosinófilos en citología nasal) sin que pueda comprobarse la existencia de alergia (pruebas in vivo e in vitro negativas); frecuentemente se acompaña de otras enfermedades sinonasales (poliposis nasal, rinosinusitis crónica) y constituye un factor de riesgo para desarrollar apnea obstructiva del sueño. Caso clínico: Niña de siete años de edad con rinorrea, obstrucción nasal, prurito nasopalatino y estornudos de intensidad severa que limitaban sueño y actividades escolares, de patrón estacional con importante eosinofilia sanguínea (800 eosinófilos/µL) y nasal (30 %), sin alergia demostrable (pruebas cutáneas negativas y pruebas de provocación nasal específicas negativas); se comprobó el diagnóstico de rinitis no alérgica con síndrome eosinofílico. Conclusiones: La rinitis no alérgica con síndrome eosinofílico se considera una enfermedad altamente infradiagnosticada debido a la falta de realización de pruebas nasales in vivo. A la infravaloración se suma la incorrecta etiología nasal y la inexistencia de pruebas in vitro locales (IgE nasal específica), por lo que amerita un alto grado de sospecha diagnóstica por parte del médico especialista.

Assuntos