RESUMO
Introduction: Periodontal inflammation causes dysbiosis and change in the microbiota. Nonsurgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) helps in removal of plaque and restoring periodontal health. Various adjunctive therapy like use of mouthwash helps in maintenance of periodontal health and reducing inflammatory load. Materials and Methods: A total of 108 subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and periodontitis were divided into three groups: Group 1 received NSPT and rinsing with 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash for 3 months, Group 2 received NSPT and rinsing with 1.5% hydrogen peroxide mouthwash for 3 months, Group 3- received NSPT only (control group). The clinical parameters measured included Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Bleeding on probing (BOP) and probing (PD) at baseline, 1, 2, 3 months follow up. Salivary interleukin 1ßlevels were measured at baseline and 3 months interval. Results: Group 1, 2 and 3 showed significant reduction in PI, GI, BOP and PD at 1 and 3 months follow up (p<0.05). However, Intergroup comparison of clinical parameters showed significant reduction in group 1 and 2 when compared with group 3 (p<0.05). Salivary interleukin 1-ß levels showed significant reduction from baseline to 3 months in all the three groups and intergroup comparison didn't show any significant changes, (p>0.05). Conclusions: Hydrogen peroxide mouthwash as an adjunct to NSPT can be considered as a safe and effective measure to reduce periodontal inflammation in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with chronic periodontitis.
Introducción: La inflamación periodontal causa disbiosis y cambios en la microbiota. La terapia periodontal no quirúrgica (NSPT) ayuda a eliminar la placa y restaurar la salud periodontal. Diversas terapias complementarias, como el uso de enjuague bucal, ayudan a mantener la salud periodontal y reducir la carga inflamatoria. Materiales y Métodos: Un total de 108 sujetos diagnosticados con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y periodontitis se dividieron en tres grupos: el grupo 1 recibió NSPT y enjuague con enjuague bucal de clorhexidina al 0,2% durante 3 meses, el grupo 2 recibió NSPT y enjuague con enjuague bucal de peróxido de hidrógeno al 1,5% durante 3 meses, y el Grupo 3 recibió NSPT únicamente (grupo de control). Los parámetros clínicos medidos fueron el índice de placa (PI), el índice gingival (GI), el sangrado al sondaje (BOP) y al sondaje (PD) al inicio del estudio, 1, 2, y 3 meses de seguimiento. Los niveles de interleucina 1ß en saliva se midieron al inicio y a los 3 meses. Resultado: Los grupos 1, 2 y 3 mostraron una reducción significativa en IP, GI, BOP y PD al mes y 3 meses de seguimiento (p<0,05). Sin embargo, la comparación intergrupal de los parámetros clínicos mostró una reducción significativa en los grupos 1 y 2 en comparación con grupo 3 (p<0,05). Los niveles de interleucina 1-ß salival mostraron una reducción significativa desde el inicio hasta los 3 meses en los tres grupos y la comparación entre grupos no mostró ningún cambio significativo (p>0,05). Conclusión: El enjuague bucal con peróxido de hidrógeno como complemento de la NSPT puede considerarse una medida segura y eficaz para reducir la inflamación periodontal en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y periodontitis crónica.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Periodontite Crônica/terapia , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/uso terapêutico , Antissépticos Bucais/uso terapêutico , Saúde BucalRESUMO
Introduction: Mouthwashes play an important role in the dental clinic, but their role on viruses requires investigation. Objective:to review in vitro studies to identify the effect of different mouthwashes on the main viruses associated with routine dental care. Methodology:The following databases were searched in September 2023: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases; the Cochrane Library and the Virtual Health Library (VHL); and grey literature. In vitro studies that used mouthwashes to reduce the viral load were selected. The PICOS strategy was considered to define eligibility criteria: the Population (viruses involved in the etiology of oral infection), the Intervention (oral antiseptics), the appropriate comparator (positive and negative controls), the Outcomes of interest (reduction of viral load) and the Study design (in vitro studies). Results:Considering the eligibility criteria, 19 articles were included in this review. The efficacy of povidone-iodine (PVP-I), chlorhexidine, Listerine®, essential oils, and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) rinses were investigated. PVP-I (0.23%) had its effects mainly associated with coronaviruses SARS(Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome),demonstrating a significant reduction in viral load after 15 seconds of exposure. Chlorhexidine (0.05%; 0.1% and 0.5%) was ineffective against adenovirus, poliovirus, and rhinovirus respiratory viruses. Listerine® demonstrated superior efficacy against HSV-1 and 2 viruses and influenza A, and cetylpyridine chloride also demonstrated virucidal activity against influenza A. Conclusions:The type, concentration, and time of exposure to antiseptics varied between studies. PVP-I and chlorhexidine digluconate were the most studied substances, butin general, PVP-I was more effective in reducing viral titers, especially concerning coronaviruses. Other antiseptics such as CPC, H2O2 and Listerine® have also shown significant reduction in viral load, but this is a limited number of studies (AU).
Introdução: Os enxaguantes bucais desempenham um papel importante na clínica odontológico, porém seu papel sobre os vírus requer investigações. Objetivo: revisar estudos in vitro para identificar o efeito de diferentes colutórios sobre os principais vírus associados ao atendimento odontológico de rotina. Metodologia: As seguintes bases foram pesquisadas até setembro de 2023: PubMed, Embase, Scopus e Web of Science; a Biblioteca Cochrane e a Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS); e literatura cinzenta. Foram selecionados estudos in vitro que utilizaram bochechos com o objetivo de reduzir a carga viral. A estratégia PICOS foi considerada para a definição dos critérios de elegibilidade: População (vírus envolvidos na etiologia da infecção oral), Intervenção (antissépticos orais), Comparador (controles positivos e negativos), os Desfechos de interesse (redução da carga viral) e o desenho do estudo (estudos in vitro). Resultados: Considerando os critérios de elegibilidade, 19 artigos foram incluídos para esta revisão. A eficácia da povidona-iodo (PVP-I), clorexidina, Listerine®, óleos essenciais e lavagens com cloreto de cetilpiridínio foram investigadas. O PVP-I(0.23%)teve seus efeitos principalmente associados ao coronavírusSARS (Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Severa),demonstrando uma redução significativa da carga viral após 15 segundos de exposição. A clorexidina mostrou-se ineficaz contra vírus respiratórios de adenovírus, poliovírus e rinovírus. Listerine® demonstrou eficácia superior contra vírus HSV-1 e 2 e vírus influenza A, e cloreto de cetilpiridinio também demonstrou atividade virucida contra influenza A.Conclusões:O tipo, concentração e tempo de exposição aos antissépticos variaram entre os estudos. O PVP-I e o digluconato de clorexidina foram as substâncias mais estudadas, mas no geral, o PVP-I foi mais eficaz na redução dos títulos virais, principalmente no que diz respeito aos coronavírus. Outros antissépticos como CPC, H2O2 e Listerine® também mostraram redução significativa da carga viral, mas trata-se de um número limitado de estudos (AU).
Introducción: Los enjuagues bucales son importantesen la clínica dental, sin embargo, su efecto sobre los virus requiere investigaciones. Objetivo: Revisar estudios in vitro para identificar el efecto de enjuagues bucales sobre los principales virus asociados con larutinaodontológica. Metodología: Las siguientes bases de datos fueron investigadas hasta septiembrede 2023: PubMed, Embase, Scopus y Web of Science; Biblioteca Cochrane y Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (BVS); yliteratura gris. Se seleccionaron estudios in vitro que utilizaron enjuagues bucales con el objetivo de reducir la carga viral. Se consideró la estrategia PICOS para definir los criterios de elegibilidad: Población (virus implicados en la etiología de la infección oral), Intervención (antisépticos bucales), Comparador (controles positivos y negativos), Resultados de interés (reducción de la carga viral) y diseño del estudio (in vitro). Resultados: Considerando los criterios de elegibilidad, se incluyeron 19 artículos.Se investigó la eficacia de povidona yodada (PVP-I), clorhexidina, Listerine®,aceites esenciales y enjuagues de cloruro de cetilpiridinio (CPC). PVP-I(0.23%)mostró sus efectos principalmente asociados al coronavirus SARS(Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo), demostrando una reducción significativa de la carga viral después de 15 segundos. Se ha demostrado que la clorhexidina es ineficaz contra losvirus respiratorios adenovirus, poliovirus y rinovirus. Listerine® demostró una eficacia superior contra los virus HSV-1 y 2 y el virus de la influenza A, y el CPCtambién mostró actividad virucida contra la influenza A.Conclusiones: El tipo, la concentración y el tiempo de exposiciónvariaron entre los estudios. PVP-I y digluconato de clorhexidina fueron las sustancias más estudiadas, pero,PVP-I fue más efectiva en la reducción de los títulos virales, especialmente en lo que respecta a los coronavirus. Otros antisépticos como CPC, H2O2 y Listerine® también mostraron una reducción significativa de la carga viral, pero se trata de un número limitado de estudios (AU).
Assuntos
Humanos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina , Controle de Infecções , Antissépticos Bucais/uso terapêutico , Vírus , Técnicas In Vitro/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The decline in dental caries has been attributed to the widespread use of fluoride (F). Two forms of presentation are fluoridated toothpaste (FT) and mouthwash (MW), widely used by the population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate in vitro the effects of combining FT and MW, whether supplemented with sodium trimetaphosphate (TMP) or not, on dental enamel demineralization. Bovine enamel blocks (n = 60) were selected based on initial surface hardness (SHi) and divided into 5 experimental groups (n = 12 each): I) Placebo Toothpaste (without F/TMP); II) 1100 ppm F Toothpaste (FT); III) 1100F associated with a MW at 100 ppm F (FT + MW 100F); IV) 1100F associated with a MW at 225 ppm F (FT + MW 250F); and V) 1100F associated with a MW at 100 ppm F supplemented with 0.4 % TMP (FT + MW 100F-TMP). The blocks were treated twice a day, undergoing 5 pH cycles over 7 days. Thus, the percentage change in surface hardness (%SH), integrated subsurface hardness loss (ΔKHN), and the concentration of F, phosphorus (P), and calcium (Ca) in the enamel were determined. The data were submitted to ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test (p < 0.001). RESULTS: The 1100F group was statistically inferior to the groups associated with MW for %SH, ΔKHN, and the concentration of P and Ca in the enamel (p < 0.001). Blocks treated with FT + MW 225F and FT + MW 100F-TMP showed significantly lower %SH compared to the other groups (p < 0.001). The FT + MW 100F - TMP group exhibited the lowest depth mineral loss (ΔKHN), and higher concentration de P in enamel (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The adjunct use of MW with FT produces a greater protective effect in inhibiting enamel demineralization, and the supplementation of TMP to the MW with 100F provides a superior effect compared to MW with 225F. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This combination of treatments could be regarded as one of several alternative fluoride supplements for subjects at elevated risk of caries.
Assuntos
Cariostáticos , Esmalte Dentário , Fluoretos , Dureza , Antissépticos Bucais , Polifosfatos , Desmineralização do Dente , Cremes Dentais , Animais , Bovinos , Polifosfatos/uso terapêutico , Polifosfatos/farmacologia , Desmineralização do Dente/prevenção & controle , Esmalte Dentário/efeitos dos fármacos , Cariostáticos/uso terapêutico , Cremes Dentais/uso terapêutico , Cremes Dentais/química , Antissépticos Bucais/uso terapêutico , Fluoretos/uso terapêutico , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Cálcio/análise , Teste de MateriaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the anti-demineralizing effect of a mouthwash comprising pomegranate peel extract (PPE 3%), sodium trimetaphosphate (TMP 0.3%), and fluoride (F 225 ppm) in an in situ study, and to assess its irritation potential in an ex vivo study. METHODS: This double-blind crossover study was conducted in four phases with 7 days each. Twelve volunteers used palatal appliances containing enamel blocks, which were subjected to cariogenic challenges. The ETF formulation (PPE + TMP + F, pH 7.0), TF formulation (TMP + F, pH 7.0), deionized water (W, pH 7.0), and essential oil commercial mouthwash (CM, 220 ppm F, pH 4.3) were dropped onto the enamel twice daily. The percentage of surface hardness loss, integrated loss of subsurface hardness, calcium, phosphorus, and fluoride in enamel and biofilms were determined. In addition, alkali-soluble extracellular polysaccharide concentrations were analyzed in the biofilms. The irritation potential was evaluated using the hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test through the vascular effect produced during 300-s of exposure. RESULTS: ETF was the most efficacious in preventing demineralization. It also showed the highest concentrations of calcium and phosphorus in the enamel and in the biofilm, as well as the lowest amount of extracellular polysaccharides in the biofilm. In the eggs, ETF produced light reddening, whereas CM led to hyperemia and hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of PPE to formulations containing TMP and F increased its anti-demineralizing property, and this formulation presented a lower irritation potential than the CM. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ETF can be a promising alternative alcohol-free mouthwash in patients at high risk of caries.
Assuntos
Antissépticos Bucais , Extratos Vegetais , Punica granatum , Desmineralização do Dente , Humanos , Cálcio/análise , Estudos Cross-Over , Esmalte Dentário , Fluoretos , Dureza , Antissépticos Bucais/química , Antissépticos Bucais/farmacologia , Fósforo , Polifosfatos , Desmineralização do Dente/prevenção & controle , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The comprehension of the interests of Internet users regarding their health-related searches may reveal the community's demands about oral health. The study aimed to characterize the interests of Google users related to mouthwash in Australia, Brazil, Chile, Japan, Mexico, Russia, the United Kingdom, the United States, Saudi Arabia and South Africa applying the Google Trends. METHODS: This longitudinal retrospective study analysed the mouthwash-related interest of Google users from January 2004 to December 2020. The monthly variation of relative search volume (RSV) and the main queries related were determined using Google Trends. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) forecasting models were built to establish the predictive RSV values for mouthwash for additional 12 months. Auto-correlation plots and a general additive model (GAM) were used to diagnose trends and seasonality in RSV curves. In addition, the influence of social isolation related to the outbreak of COVID-19 were analysed. RESULTS: The RSVs curves showed a considerable increase in searches related to mouthwash to AUS, BRA, JAP, MEX, GBR and USA (RSV > 25), while the growth was slight to CHI, KSA, RSA and RUS (RSV < 25) over the years, without influence of monthly seasonality. All countries showed a significant increase in mouthwash interest after the outbreak of COVID-19, except for KSA and RUS. The mouthwash-related searches were associated to specific brands or chemical compositions, treatments, whitening agents, homemade mouthwash and indications for the 'best mouthwash'. CONCLUSIONS: In general, there was an increasing interest of Google users in mouthwash-related topics between 2004 and 2020. In addition, in most countries, there was an expansion in searches during the social isolation of the COVID-19 pandemics.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Antissépticos Bucais , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Antissépticos Bucais/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Brasil , Saúde BucalRESUMO
Introduction: Periodontitis is a pandemic, with about 14 percent of people worldwide already suffering from severe periodontitis. Early intervention in the disease could probably reduce its progression and eliminate the need for the extraction of affected teeth. Quercetin is a probable candidate as it has exemplary anti-inflammatory properties. The presence of phenolic hydroxyl groups in them greatly contributes to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Objectives: The study introduces the formulation of Quercetin mouthwash and assesses its anti-inflammatory properties in comparison to Diclofenac sodium. Methods: Quercetin mouthwash was prepared using a commercially procured bioactive agent. One standard nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, Diclofenac was used as a reference drug. The percentage inhibition of protein denaturation was calculated and its anti-inflammatory properties were evaluated through Bovine Serum Albumin Assay and Egg Albumin Assay. Results: Quercetin mouthwash showed parallel anti-inflammatory properties and showed a proportionate increase in anti-inflammatory properties with the increase in the concentration of the mouthwash. Comparable inhibition of protein denaturation at 10µl and 50µl concentrations with a proportionate variation of 1 percent (p>0.05) to the control in Egg Albumin Assay and 47 percent and 83 percent denaturation at 10µl and 50µl of Bovine Serum Albumin Assay were observed. Conclusion: Quercetin mouthwash has shown significant anti-inflammatory activity and hence is considered a potent anti-inflammatory agent comparable to Diclofenac sodium. It is found to be a suitable agent as an oral formulation for reducing the progression of inflammatory conditions(AU)
Introducción: La periodontitis es una pandemia, ya que alrededor del 14 por ciento de las personas en todo el mundo padecen periodontitis grave. Una intervención precoz en la enfermedad podría, probablemente, reducir su progresión y eliminar la necesidad de extraer los dientes afectados. La quercetina es un candidato probable, ya que tiene propiedades antiinflamatorias ejemplares. Su presencia de grupos hidroxilos fenólicos contribuye en gran medida a sus actividades antioxidantes y antiinflamatorias. Objetivos: El estudio presenta la formulación del colutorio de quercetina y evalúa sus propiedades antiinflamatorias en comparación con el diclofenaco sódico. Métodos: Se preparó un colutorio de quercetina, utilizando un agente bioactivo obtenido comercialmente. Se utilizó como fármaco de referencia un antiinflamatorio no esteroideo estándar, el diclofenaco. Se calculó el porcentaje de inhibición de la desnaturalización de proteínas y se evaluaron sus propiedades antiinflamatorias mediante ensayo con albúmina de suero bovino y con albúmina de huevo. Resultados: El colutorio de quercetina mostró propiedades antiinflamatorias paralelas y mostró un aumento proporcional de las propiedades antiinflamatorias con el aumento de la concentración del colutorio. Se observó una inhibición comparable de la desnaturalización de proteínas a concentraciones de 10µl y 50µl con una variación proporcional del 1 por ciento (p > 0,05), respecto al control en el ensayo de albúmina de huevo y una desnaturalización del 47 por ciento y 83 por ciento a 10µl y 50µl del ensayo de albúmina de suero bovino. Conclusiones: El enjuague bucal de quercetina ha mostrado una actividad antiinflamatoria significativa, por lo que se considera un potente agente antiinflamatorio comparable al diclofenaco sódico. Se considera un agente adecuado como formulación oral para reducir la progresión de las afecciones inflamatorias(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Periodontite/epidemiologia , Quercetina/uso terapêutico , Saúde Bucal , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Antissépticos Bucais/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oral care regimens can be explored to improve oral health in patients with gingivitis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent oral care regimen with a dual zinc plus arginine (DZA) toothpaste and cetylpyridinium chloride with zinc lactate (CPC + Zn) mouthwash in reducing gingival bleeding in patients with gingivitis. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial included 94 participants with gingivitis who were randomized into two groups: the DZA/CPC + Zn group, which used a 1450-ppm fluoride toothpaste containing 0.96% zinc plus 1.5% arginine and a fluoride-containing mouthwash with 0.075% CPC and 0.28% zinc lactate, and the control group, which used a 1450-ppm fluoride toothpaste and a placebo mouthwash for 6 months. All participants were examined by a blinded examiner who measured the gingival index, plaque index, and gingival severity index. Data were analyzed using paired t test, independent t test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). RESULTS: Both groups presented statistically significant reductions in all clinical parameters compared to baseline. The DZA/CPC + Zn group exhibited significantly greater reductions in gingival index, gingival severity index, proximal gingival index, plaque index and proximal plaque index compared to the control group at 1, 3, and 6 months. Furthermore, DZA/CPC + Zn significantly decreased the percentage of patients with generalized gingivitis over a 6-month follow-up period. However, differences between the DZA/CPC + Zn and the control groups were not maintained after both groups established similar regimens with fluoride toothpaste. CONCLUSION: The multicomponent oral care regimen consisting of DZA toothpaste and CPC + Zn mouthwash is effective in reducing gingival inflammation and supragingival biofilm in patients with gingivitis.
RESUMO
Background: In individuals with coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load (VL) plays an important role in infectivity. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the reduction in the VL and infectivity induced by phthalocyanine mouthwash and nasal spray in patients with COVID-19. Methods: Patients with mild COVID-19 were recruited to participate in a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial. Participants were assigned to one of three groups: Group 1, non-active mouthwash and saline nasal spray (SNS); Group 2, phthalocyanine mouthwash and SNS; and Group 3 phthalocyanine mouthwash and phthalocyanine nasal spray. VL was assessed in nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs collected at the time of clinical diagnosis at baseline as well as 24 and 72 hours after starting the rinsing protocols. Findings: Forty-six participants were included in the analysis: 15, 16, and 15 in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. After 72 hours, the reduction in VL was significantly higher in Group 3 (mean cycle threshold (Ct) decrease: 11.21) than in Group 1 (mean Ct decrease: 5.53). Additionally, only the mean VL in Group 3 was reduced to a non-contagious level after 72 hours. Main conclusions: Use of phthalocyanine mouthwash and nasal spray is effective at reducing SARS-CoV-2 infectivity.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais , COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Antissépticos Bucais/uso terapêutico , Sprays NasaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to assess the impact of mouthwashes on the composition of the human oral microbiome. METHOD: An electronic search algorithm was adapted to MEDLINE-PubMed, Scopus, Embase and ISI Web of Science, and reference lists of relevant sources were manually searched. Inclusion criteria were controlled clinical trials published in English whose population were adult individuals who rinse with antimicrobial mouthwashes and that analysed changes in the oral microbiome by metataxonomy, metagenomics or phylogenetic microarray. Identified studies were screened and assessed following the PRISMA guidelines, and results were compiled into qualitative synthesis of the evidence. RESULTS: Five controlled clinical studies were included. These studies found associations between the daily use of mouthwashes and changes in the oral microbiome, but the nature of the effect varied according to the mouthwash. Chlorhexidine (CHX) rinses lowered microbial diversity. While 7-day use of CHX led to increases in the abundance of Neisseria, Streptococcus and Granulicatella and a decrease in the abundance of Actinomyces, its prolonged use led to widespread reductions in several genera and species. Cetylpyridinium chloride-containing mouthwashes specifically lowered the abundance of gingivitis-associated genera. In contrast, N-acetyl cysteine-based mouthwashes did not promote changes in the oral microbiome. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial heterogeneity, we found evidence to support the hypothesis that CHX and CPC mouthwashes promote changes in oral microbial structure and/or reductions in community diversity that favour the resolution of dysbiosis. However, future large population-based studies of adequate duration are needed to fully understand the extent to which antimicrobial mouthwashes modulate the microbiome.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais , Anti-Infecciosos , Placa Dentária , Microbiota , Adulto , Humanos , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Placa Dentária/tratamento farmacológico , Antissépticos Bucais/uso terapêutico , Filogenia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como AssuntoRESUMO
The Silver nanoparticle (AgNPs) have received attention for their antiviral potential against SARS-CoV-2. The objective is to conduct a scope review and map the scientific evidence on the use of AgNPs in mouthwashes as an adjunct in decreasing the viral load in the oral cavity of patients with SARS-CoV-2. A search was performed in the PubMed, Medline, Scielo databases, and a manual search in the reference lists, following the standards of the Joanna Briggs Institute for Scoping Review without restriction of year, language or sample size. Thus, 14 articles were included, where they researched the use of AgNPs with antiviral effect against SARS-CoV-2, mouthwashes for SARS-CoV-2 and AgNPs as mouthwashes. We can suggest that AgNPs are likely antiviral therapies for SARS-CoV-2 and its use in mouthwashes associated with other therapies are promising strands for decreasing viral load and infection by the vírus (AU)
As nanopartículas de prata (AgNPs) têm recebido atenção por seu potencial antiviral no SARS-CoV-2. O objetivo deste trabalho é realizar uma revisão de escopo e mapear as evidências científicas sobre o uso de AgNPs em bochechos como adjuvante na diminuição da carga viral na cavidade oral de pacientes com SARS-CoV-2. Foi realizada busca nas bases de dados PubMed, Medline, Scielo e busca manual nas listas de referências, seguindo os padrões do Joanna Briggs Institute for Scoping Review sem restrição de ano, idioma ou tamanho da amostra. Assim, foram incluídos 14 artigos, onde pesquisaram o uso de AgNPs com efeito antiviral contra SARS-CoV-2, enxaguatórios bucais para SARS-CoV-2 e AgNPs como enxaguatórios bucais, vertentes promissoras para diminuição da carga viral e infecção pelo vírus.(AU)
Assuntos
Prata , Nanopartículas , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Antissépticos BucaisRESUMO
Abstract Accumulated evidence has shown that the oral cavity may be an important reservoir for SARS-CoV-2. Some authors have suggested that the use of mouthrinses could reduce SARS-CoV-2 viral load in the saliva. Thus, the aim of this review was to synthesize evidence about the efficacy of mouthrinses in reducing the salivary viral load of SARS-CoV-2. 2. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the efficacy of different mouthrinses in reducing salivary SARS-CoV-2 loads. Various active ingredients have been tested in these trials: 0.5%,1% and 2% povidone-iodine, 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX), 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), 0.075% CPC with Zinc lactate, 1% and 1.5% hydrogen peroxide (HP), 1.5% HP + 0.12% CHX and ß-cyclodextrin and citrox. The studies reported an intra-group reduction in the salivary levels of the virus, when compared with the baseline. However, the majority of these trials failed to demonstrate a significant inter-group difference between active groups and the control group relative to the decrease in salivary SARS-CoV-2 loads. Although promising, these results should be confirmed by larger trials.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the effect of mouthwash use on the development of oral cancer. METHODS Observational studies with adult/older adult populations that have examined the association between mouthwash use and oral cancer were included. Electronic search was performed in July 2022, with no time or language restrictions. PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases were used, and the search was extended to theses and dissertations libraries, Google Scholar, reference lists, and other sources. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and quantitative data synthesis was performed by random effects meta-analysis, with different subgroup analyses and meta-regression. This revision was registered in Prospero (CRD42020143307). RESULTS Of the 4,094 studies identified in the search, 15 case-control studies were included in the review, totaling 6,515 cases and 17,037 controls. The meta-analysis included 17 measures of effect from 15 case-control studies. The pooled OR was 1.00 (95%CI: 0.79-1.26, n = 17 studies), but it was 2.58 (95%CI: 1.38-4.82, n = 2 studies) among those who had used mouthwashes three times or more times a day, and 1.30 (95%CI: 1.10-1.54, n = 4 studies) among those who had used mouthwashes for more than 40 years. CONCLUSIONS We found evidence that a high frequency of mouthwash use may be associated with an increased risk of oral cancer. However, despite the biological plausibility for this association, we suggest caution upon interpretation of our findings due to the few number of studies that have investigated the mouthwash use frequency, which should be considered. Therefore, we recommend that future studies assess, in detail, the frequency, duration, and content of mouthwashes to increase the strength of evidence for a possible dose-response effect of mouthwashes on oral cancer risk.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Bucais , Fatores de Risco , Metanálise , Antissépticos Bucais , Revisão SistemáticaRESUMO
Introdução: os enxaguantes bucais clareadores tem sido muito utilizados, porém sua eficiência e efeitos colaterais trazem questionamentos. Objetivo: este ensaio clínico teve como objetivo avaliar se o enxaguante bucal clareador, contendo peróxido de hidrogênio a 1,5%, apresenta ação clareadora e se há algum efeito secundário na cavidade bucal. Metodologia: foram selecionados 10 voluntários com idade média de 21,5 anos, submetidos a avaliação da cor dos dentes com auxílio do espectrômetro em 3 momentos: inicial; com 15 e com 30 dias de uso do enxaguante. A avaliação dos efeitos colaterais foi realizada a partir da coleta de saliva estimulada em 4 momentos: antes e depois ao primeiro uso do produto, com 15 e com 30 dias, e realizadas as análises laboratoriais: fluxo salivar; pH; quantidade de Streptococcus mutans e de Lactobacillus. A normalidade dos dados foi verificada pelo teste de Shapiro-Wilk, comparação de cor pelo teste t dependente, comparação dos microrganismos pelos testes ANOVA de medidas repetida e Tukey. Resultados: as análises de cor dos dentes não evidenciaram nenhuma alteração significativa em nenhum dos tempos investigados. No fluxo salivar, pH e Lactobacillus não houveram alterações significativas. Na quantidade de Streptococcus mutans notou-se um aumento significativo quando comparado os valores após o primeiro uso e com 30 dias. Conclusão: a solução de enxague bucal contendo peróxido de hidrogênio a 1,5% não apresentou alteração significativa na coloração dos dentes e nenhum efeito colateral significativo na atividade cariogênica de acordo com os testes e períodos avaliados.
Introduction: whitening mouthwashes have been widely used, but their efficiency and side effects raise questions. Objective: this clinical trial aimed to assess whether the bleaching mouthwash, containing 1.5% hydrogen peroxide, has a bleaching action and whether there are any side effects in the oral cavity. Methods: 10 volunteers were selected, with a mean age of 21.5 years, who underwent tooth color evaluation with the aid of a spectrometer in 3 moments: initial; with 15 and 30 days of using the washes. The evaluation of side effects was performed from the collection of stimulated saliva in 4 moments: before and after the first use of the product, at 15 and 30 days, and laboratory analyzes were carried out: salivary flow; pH; the number of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus. Normal distribution was verified with Shapiro-Wilk test, comparisons of color were performed with t-test, comparisons of the microorganisms were performed with repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results: the analysis did not show any significant changes in any of the investigated times. There were no significant changes in the salivary flow, pH and Lactobacillus. The number of Streptococcus mutans, was noted a significant increase when comparing the values after the first use and with 30 days. Conclusion: the mouthwash containing 1.5% hydrogen peroxide was not shown any significant alterations in the color teeth. There were not significant collateral effects on the cariogenic activity according to the tests and periods evaluated.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Testes de Atividade de Cárie Dentária , Clareadores Dentários , Peróxido de Hidrogênio , Antissépticos Bucais , Streptococcus mutans , LactobacillusRESUMO
Introducción: El propósito del presente es sistematizar y analizar artículos científicos, acerca de la efectividad de ciertos enjuagues bucales para reducir la carga viral contra SARS-COV-2. Metodología: Las búsquedas se realizaron en las bases de datos científicas como PubMed y SciELO, entre otros, utilizando algoritmos de búsqueda, términos MeSH y booleanos. También se aplicaron criterios de inclusión/exclusión, seleccionando artículos provenientes de estudios primarios, publicados entre los meses de enero a septiembre de 2020, en idiomas inglés y español. Se utilizó un diseño metodológico mixto mediante el uso de los criterios de calidad PRISMA y de la Teoría Fundamentada (codificación abierta y central). Resultados: Se encontraron 144 artículos que coincidían con los algoritmos de búsqueda y criterios de calidad, de los cuales sólo ocho fueron analizados en la etapa de elegibilidad. Conclusiones: Se pudo determinar que los enjuagues más frecuentemente investigados en el último tiempo, para la desinfección oral inicial preoperatoria y/o de uso rutinario como enjuague oral contra SARS-COV-2 fueron la povidona yodada 0.2%; clorhexidina 0.12% y 0.2%, aceites esenciales con etanol al 21.6% y peróxido de hidrógeno 1.5% y 3.0%. La clorhexidina 0.2% temperada a 47°C demostró mayor efectividad que clorhexidina 0.12% a temperatura normal y que povidona yodada.
Introduction: The purpose of this research was systematize and analyze scientific articles, about the effectiveness of certain mouthwashes to reduce the viral load against SARS-COV-2. Methodology: The searches were performed in the PubMed and SciElo scientific databases, among others, using search algorithms, MeSH and Boolean terms. Certain criteria of inclusion/exclusion were also applied, selecting articles from primary studies, published between the months of January and September of 2020, in both English and Spanish. A mixed methodological design was used through the employment of quality criteria such as PRISMA and the Grounded Theory (open and central coding). Software based on texts and numbers were used for the data analysis plan. Results: 144 articles matching the search algorithms and quality criteria were found, of which only eight were analyzed in the eligibility stage. Conclusions: It was determined that the most frequently investigated mouthwashes in recent times, for preoperative initial oral disinfection and/or for a daily basis use as an oral rinse were the povidone iodine 0.2%; chlorhexidine 0.12% and 0.2%; essential oils with ethanol 21.6% and hydrogen peroxide 1.5% and 3.0%. The chlorhexidine 0.2% tempered at 47°C proved to be more effective than the chlorhexidine 0.12% at normal temperature and the povidone iodine.
Assuntos
Humanos , Carga Viral/efeitos dos fármacos , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos dos fármacos , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Antissépticos Bucais/administração & dosagem , Saliva/virologiaRESUMO
Abstract Chlorhexidine was introduced almost seven decades ago and has a myriad of applications in dentistry. Few studies have evaluated the antimicrobial and antifungal capacity of different concentrations of chlorhexidine mouthwashes. Therefore, the aim of this study, was to evaluate in vitro, the antibacterial and antifungal capacity of three commercially available mouthwashes in Costa Rica, with different concentrations of chlorhexidine, 0.12%, 0.06%, and 0.03%. The experimental method selected was the Kirby-Bauer method to evaluate the antibacterial and antifungal effect of each compound by measuring the inhibitory effect on Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans strains, exposed to the antiseptic solutions. All samples showed some degree of antibacterial and antifungal effect. Even though we provide in vitro results, our findings are of relevance since all the species used in our experiment are microorganisms that may be present in dental plaque. Our results further support evidence that oral hygiene regimens may include mouthwashes with low doses of chlorhexidine and maintain reasonable antibacterial and antifungal efficacy.
Resumen La clorhexidina se introdujo hace casi siete décadas y tiene una gran variedad de aplicaciones en odontología. Pocos estudios han evaluado la capacidad antimicrobiana y antifúngica de diferentes concentraciones de enjuagues bucales con clorhexidina. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar in vitro, la capacidad antibacteriana y antifúngica de tres enjuagues bucales disponibles comercialmente en Costa Rica, con diferentes concentraciones de clorhexidina, 0.12%, 0.06% y 0.03%. El método experimental seleccionado fue el método Kirby-Bauer para evaluar el efecto antibacteriano y antifúngico de cada compuesto midiendo el efecto inhibidor sobre Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli y Candida albicans, expuestos a la solución antiséptica. Todas las muestras mostraron algún grado de efecto antibacteriano y antifúngico. Aunque proporcionamos resultados in vitro, nuestros hallazgos son de relevancia, ya que todas las especies utilizadas en nuestro experimento son microorganismos que pueden estar presentes en la placa dental. Nuestros resultados respaldan aún más la evidencia de que los regímenes de higiene bucal pueden incluir enjuagues bucales con dosis bajas de clorhexidina y mantener una eficacia antibacteriana y antifúngica razonable.
Assuntos
Clorexidina/análise , Antissépticos Bucais/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The worldwide efforts that healthcare professionals are making in the COVID-19 pandemic is well known, and the high risk of illness and death that front-line staff experience on a daily basis is a reality, despite well-defined protocols for the use of personal protective equipment. In addition, it is well known that vaccination is still faraway to be achieved worldwide and that new variants are emerging, thus additional protective measures must be explored. A prospective open-label randomized controlled clinical trial was performed on front-line medical staff from the Dr. Enrique Cabrera General Hospital in México City to evaluate the effectiveness of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal rinses with a neutral electrolyzed water, known as SES, to reduce the risk of COVID-19 disease among front-line, not vaccinated medical staff. A total of 170 volunteers were enrolled and equally divided in a control group and SES group. All members of the trial wore the adequate personal protection equipment at all times while performing their duties, as required by standard COVID-19 safety protocols. Additionally, the SES group participants followed a prophylactic protocol with SES (oral and nasal rinses, three times a day for 4 weeks). All participants were monitored for COVID-19 symptoms and disease in a time-frame of 4 weeks and the incidence of illness per group was registered. The relative risk of disease, associated with each treatment was calculated. The presence of COVID-19-positive cases, in the group that received the nasal and oral rinses with SES was 1.2%, while in the group that did not do the SES rinses (control group), it was 12.7% (P=0.0039 and RR=0.09405; 95% CI of 0.01231-0.7183). The prophylactic protocol was demonstrated as a protective factor, in more than 90%, for developing the disease, and without adverse effects. Nasal and oral rinses with SES may be an efficient alternative to reinforce the protective measures against COVID-19 disease and should be further investigated. The present clinical trial was retrospectively registered in the Cuban public registry of clinical trials (RPCEC) database (March 16, 2021; PREVECOVID-19: RPCEC00000357).
RESUMO
This study aimed to systematically review the literature about the virucidal efficacy of CHX in comparison to other substances used in the oral cavity. Electronic searches were performed in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science). Only studies that presented the following characteristics were included: (1) verified virucidal efficacy of CHX against Herpes Simplex Type-1 (HSV-1), any Influenza, or any human coronavirus (HcoV); and (2) compared the virucidal efficacy of CHX with essential oils (Listerine®), quaternary ammonium compounds, povidone-iodine, hydrogen peroxide, negative control substance, and absence of therapy. Two researchers independently selected the studies, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias. A narrative data synthesis was used. Twenty-five studies were included, of which 21 were in vitro and four were randomized clinical trials (RCT). Studies assessed the virucidal efficacy of CHX against Herpes Simplex Type-1 (HSV-1) (10 studies), Influenza A (InfluA) (4 studies), human coronavirus (HCoV) (4 studies) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) (11 studies). Most studies demonstrated that CHX has a positive virucidal efficacy against HSV-1 and InfluA strains. However, lower efficacy was shown to InfluA strain in comparison to povidone-iodine. Lower to none virucidal efficacy of CHX is expected for HCoV and SARS-CoV-2 strains for in vitro studies. Three RCT demonstrated that CHX was able to significantly reduce the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 for a short period. CHX may present an interesting virucidal efficacy against HSV-1 and InfluA viruses. CHX also presents transient efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 when used as a mouthwash.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Clorexidina , Clorexidina/farmacologia , Humanos , Antissépticos Bucais/farmacologia , Povidona-Iodo , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the knowledge of orthodontic professionals regarding the prescription of dentifrices and antiseptics during orthodontic treatment. Methods: An observational and descriptive exploratory study of national scope was conducted with 440 Brazilian orthodontists, based on previous sample calculations, to evaluate the clinical practice of orthodontists in prescribing dentifrices and antiseptics. Self-managed electronic questionnaires were sent to orthodontic professionals. The data were analyzed by means of absolute and relative frequency distribution tables. Results: It was verified that the most indicated mouthwash (39.8%) was Colgate Periogard® and 421 of the participants (95.7%) know its active ingredient (chlorhexidine digluconate). Besides Colgate Periogard® antiseptic, the participants were also questioned about which active ingredient present on the following antiseptics, whose assertive answers were in the following order of %, Cepacol® (Sanofi-Aventis®) with 60.7%, Colgate Plax® (Colgate®) with 54.5% and Listerine® (Jhonson&Jhonson®) with 51.6%. As for the chlorhexidine therapeutic regime, 63.9% have stated assertively its use, being this one of 2 times a day during 7 to 10 days. The most indicated tooth was Colgate Total 12®, and 60.18% of these individuals correctly indicated its active compound. Conclusion: According to the methodology employed, it could be concluded that orthodontic professionals know and prescribe methods of chemical control to patients during orthodontic treatment and most identify the active chemical compounds present in antiseptic and tooth formulas.
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o conhecimento dos profissionais da ortodontia quanto à prescrição de dentifrícios e antissépticos durante o tratamento ortodôntico. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo observacional e descritivo exploratório de abrangência nacional com 440 ortodontistas brasileiros, baseado em cálculo amostral prévio, para avaliação da prática clínica dos ortodontistas na prescrição de dentifrícios e antissépticos. Questionários eletrônicos auto administrados foram enviados aos profissionais da Ortodontia. Os dados foram analisados por meio de tabelas de distribuição de frequência absolutas e relativas. Resultados: Verificou-se que o antisséptico bucal mais indicado (39,8%) foi o Colgate Periogard® (Colgate®) e 421 dos participantes (95,7%) conhecem o seu ingrediente ativo (digluconato de clorexidina). Além do antisséptico Colgate Periogard®, os participantes também foram questionados sobre qual o ingrediente ativo presente nos seguintes antissépticos, cujas respostas assertivas estavam na seguinte ordem %, Cepacol® (Sanofi-Aventis®) com 60,7%, Colgate Plax® (Colgate®) com 54,5% e Listerine® (Jhonson&Jhonson®) com 51,6%. Quanto ao regime terapêutico da clorexidina 63,9% indicaram assertivamente sua utilização sendo a mesma de 2 vezes ao dia durante 7 a 10 dias. O dentifrício mais indicado foi o Colgate Total 12®, sendo que 60,18% desses indivíduos indicaram corretamente seu composto ativo. Conclusão: De acordo com a metodologia empregada, pôde-se concluir que os profissionais da ortodontia conhecem e prescrevem métodos de controle químico aos pacientes durante o tratamento ortodôntico e a maioria identifica os compostos químicos ativos presentes nas fórmulas de antissépticos e dentifrícios.
RESUMO
Resumen Objetivo: Evaluar la utilidad de un enjuague bucal con solución salina (EBSS) como muestra diagnóstica para la detección de SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes ambulatorios. Material y métodos: Este fue un estudio prospectivo realizado en el Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad "Dr. Juan Graham Casasús", se seleccionaron 34 muestras aleatorias pareadas EBSS/MNF (enjuague bucal con solución salina/muestra (clínica) de la nasofaringe) que se recolectaron durante la visita al centro de evaluación ambulatoria de dicho hospital. Las muestras se analizaron mediante la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa con transcripción inversa en tiempo real (RT-PCR) y se calculó la concordancia entre EBSS y MNF, la sensibilidad y especificidad del EBSS. Resultados: De las 34 muestras pareadas EBSS/MNF, 14 fueron positivas para SARS- CoV-2; 4 muestras de EBSS y 10 muestras de MNF. Los resultados concordantemente positivos en las muestras pareadas EBSS/MNF fueron 3 y las medias de CT de cada gen (RdRp, N, E) no mostraron diferencia significativa entre las muestras. Se observaron 8 discordancias entre los dos tipos de muestras (7 individuos dieron positivo por MNF y 1 por EBSS). La concordancia observada entre EBSS y MNF fue aceptable (coeficiente kappa 0.31). La sensibilidad de EBSS fue de 30% con una especificidad del 95.8%. Conclusiones: La sensibilidad de EBSS no es comparable con la sensibilidad de MNF para la detección de SARS-CoV-2, pero nuestros datos sugieren al EBSS como una herramienta no invasiva, permite la autocolección y no requiere personal de salud capacitado para su muestreo: asimismo, esta muestra podría ser alternativa ante la escasez de hisopos y medios de transporte viral. Además, el EBSS puede tener beneficio para poblaciones remotas, vulnerables o facilitar las pruebas a un gran número de individuos.
Abstract Objective: To assess the usefulness of a saline mouth rinse (SMR) as a diagnostic tool for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in outpatients. Method: This was a prospective study carried out at the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad "Dr. Juan Graham Casasús", 34 SMR/SNP (saline mouth rinse/sample (clinical) of nasopharyngeal) randomized paired samples were selected and collected in the outpatient clinic. The samples were analyzed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the concordance between SMRs and SNP samples and the sensitivity and specificity of SMR were calculated. Results: Out of the 34 SMR/SNP paired samples, 14 samples were positive for SARS- CoV-2; 4 SMR samples and 10 SNP samples. We found 3 positive concordant results in the SMRs/SNP paired samples, the mean CT for each gene (RdRp, N, E) did not show a significant difference between the samples. Eight discrepancies were observed between the two types of samples (7 individuals were positive by SNP and 1 for SMR). The concordance observed between SMR and SNP was acceptable (kappa coefficient 0.31). The sensitivity of EBSS was 30% with a specificity of 95.8%. Conclusions: The SMR sensitivity is not comparable with SNP sensitivity for SARS- CoV-2 detection, but our data suggest SMR as a non-invasive tool that allows self- collection, and it does not require health trained personnel for its collection. Also, this sample could be an alternative to the lack of swabs and/or viral transportation media. Additionally, SMR may be of benefit in remote and vulnerable populations, and/or to facilitate the screening of SARS-CoV-2 in a large number of individuals.
RESUMO
Se ha sugerido que el uso de antisépticos orales podría reducir la carga viral del virus SARS-CoV-2 en los pacientes durante la atención dental, pero sin evidencia que avale su efectividad. Dada la vulnerabilidad del virus a la oxidac ión, se ha recomendado el uso de colutorios que contengan agentes oxidantes como la povidona yodada. El objetivo de la presente revisión fue determinar la efectividad del uso de povidona yodada como antiséptico oral en la disminución de la carga viral del virus SARS-CoV-2. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual en Salud, SciELO, Web of Science y EBSCO host. Se incluyeron estudios clínicos en pacientes con COVID-19 y estudios in vitro con cepas del virus que utilizaran colutorios de povidona yodada como forma de intervención, publicados entre enero del 2019 y enero del 2021. La selección de los artículos se realizó en dos etapas por dos autores de manera independiente. Luego de eliminar los artículos duplicados, se mantuvieron 53 referencias. Finalmente se incluyeron 2 estudios in vivo y 5 estudios in vitro para la revisión cualitativa. En los estudios in vitro, todas las concentraciones de povidona yodada evidenciaron una actividad virucida eficaz en los distintos tiempos de exposición, donde la mínima concentración efectiva correspondió a 0,5 % en 15 segundos. Los estudios in vivo presentaron resultados positivos hacia el uso de povidona yodada, pero con tamaños muestrales pequeños y una gran heterogeneidad en su metodología. En conclusión el uso profiláctico de povidona yodada como colutorio contra el virus SARS-CoV-2 es respaldado por los trabajos in vitro, con tiempos de aplicación fácilmente realizables en la atención dental, pero se requiere de un mayor número de ensayos controlados aleatorizados para comprobar su efectividad en la práctica clínica.
It has been suggested that the use of oral antiseptics could reduce the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 virus in patients during dental care, but without evidence to support its effectiveness. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of povidone iodine mouthwash in reducing the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 virus. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual enSalud, SciELO, Web of Science and EBSCOhost. Clinical studies in patients with COVID-19 or in vitro studies with SARS-CoV-2 strains that used povidone-iodine mouthwash as a form of intervention, published between January 2019 and January 2021, were included. The selection of articles was carried out in two phases by two authors independently. After removing duplicate articles, 53 references were kept. Finally, 2 in vivo studies and 5 in vitro studies were included for the qualitative review. In the in vitro studies, all concentrations of povidone iodine showed effective virucidal activity at the different exposure times, where the minimum effective concentration corresponded to 0.5 % in 15 seconds. In vivo studies showed positive results towards the use of povidone iodine, but with small sample sizes and great heterogeneity in their methodology. The prophylactic use of povidone iodine mouthwash against the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is supported by in vitro studies, with application times easily achievable in dental care, but a large number of randomized controlled trials are required to verify its effectiveness in clinical practice.