RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous evidence underscores the need to assess potential clinical outcomes resulting from pharmaceutical care interventions and to monitor patient's progress to evaluate their clinical evolution, which is crucial for bolstering the relevance of implementing pharmaceutical care in healthcare services. AIMS: To conduct an in-depth analysis of pharmaceutical care practices in a geriatric ward and monitor the clinical outcomes of older people served. METHODS: This interventionist study was conducted in the geriatrics ward of a Brazilian university hospital. The research intervention occurred between January and May 2022, with a follow-up conducted for up to 90 days after patients' hospital discharge. Older patients in the geriatrics ward received pharmaceutical care, including medication reconciliation, medication review, and pharmacotherapeutic follow-up, aimed at identifying and resolving drug-related problems (DRPs). The clinical relevance of DRPs and pharmaceutical recommendations was evaluated. Additionally, analyses were conducted on mortality and rehospitalization outcomes in older patients at 30, 60, and 90 days following initial hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of the patients evaluated, a significant 88.3% exhibited at least one DRP (with an average of 2.6 ± 1.9 DRPs per patient), with the majority classified as need/indication problems (38.9%). The acceptance rate of pharmaceutical recommendations was 80.9%, with the majority categorized as very significant relevance (60.4%). DRPs were predominantly of serious clinical relevance (50.9%). In patients whose clinical indicators could be monitored, 95.5% showed some clinical response (in vital signs, laboratory tests and/or clinical status evolution) potentially related to resolved DRPs. Association analysis revealed that a higher number of medications in use before hospitalization correlated with a greater identification of DRPs during hospitalization (p = 0.03). At hospital discharge, 23.6% of patients were no longer using polypharmacy. In total, 16 patients (26.7%) died during the study period. Among patients who did not die during hospitalization (n = 54), 20 patients (37%) experienced rehospitalizations within 90 days following discharge. CONCLUSION: This study facilitated the consolidation of pharmaceutical care implementation in a geriatric ward. We conducted identification, evaluation, and proposed evidence-based solutions, as well as monitored cases for outcome analysis. It is anticipated that this methodology will inspire future research and the implementation of pharmaceutical care-related services.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a clinical pharmacist's inclusion in emergency department (ED) care in terms of the effect on on 30-day revisits after discharge from the ED and patient satisfaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized, controlled parallel-group pragmatic trial in a university hospital ED. Recruited patients were randomly assigned to a control group for standard care only or an intervention group to receive standard care plus the attention of a clinical pharmacist integrated into the care team to optimize the selection and evaluation of medications and provide pharmacotherapeutic education on the patient's discharge. The primary outcome was unplanned revisits within 30 days after discharge because of the same complaint that led to the initial ED visit. Between-group differences were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. The association between the intervention and time to the outcome event was explored with multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1001 patients were enrolled (intervention, 500; control, 501). Patients in both groups were similar. A majority were women (61.5%), and the median age (interquartile range) was 51 years (33-65 years). The pharmacist's intervention significantly reduced the number of 30-day revisits to any ED: 25 (6.3%) revisited vs 66 (16.7%) in the control group. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.17-0.50). Fifteen patients (3.0%) from the intervention group revisited the same ED vs 32 (6.5%) from the control group (aHR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.87]). More patients expressed satisfaction in the intervention group (87.2%) than in the control group ( 83.2%) (P .05). CONCLUSION: Including a clinical pharmacist in ED care substantially reduces the number of 30-day revisits and increases patient satisfaction.

OBJETIVO: Determinar el efecto de la inclusión del farmacéutico clínico en el servicio de urgencias (SU) en las reconsultas durante 30 días posalta y la satisfacción de los pacientes. METODO: Ensayo clínico controlado, aleatorizado, paralelo y pragmático, realizado en el SU de un hospital universitario. Los pacientes reclutados fueron asignados aleatoriamente al grupo control (GC) que recibió la atención habitual o al grupo intervenido (GI) que recibió además la atención de un farmacéutico clínico, el cual se integró al equipo clínico para optimizar la selección, evaluación y educación farmacoterapéutica en el SU y al alta. El desenlace primario fue reconsultas no programadas 30 días posaltarelacionadas con la atención inicial al SU. Las diferencias entre grupos se analizaron por curvas de supervivencia de Kaplan-Meier y prueba de log-rank. La asociación entre intervención y tiempo al evento fue analizada mediante regresión multivariada de riesgos proporcionales de Cox y se expresó como hazard ratio ajustada (HRa). RESULTADOS: Un total de 1.001 pacientes ingresaron al estudio (GI = 500 y GC = 501). Ambos grupos eran similares, predominaron las mujeres (61,5%), edad 51 años (RIC: 33-65). La intervención redujo significativamente las reconsultas a cualquier centro durante 30 días posalta comparado con GC [25 (6,3%) vs 66 (16,7%); HRa: 0,29 (IC 95%: 0,17-0,50)] y para el mismo centro [15 (3,0%) vs 32 (6,5%); HRa: 0,46 (IC 95%: 0,24-0,87)]. La satisfacción del usuario fue mayor en el GI que GC (87,2% vs 83,2%; p 0,05). CONCLUSIONES: La inclusión del farmacéutico clínico en un SU reduce sustancialmente las reconsultas durante 30 días posalta y mejora la satisfacción de los usuarios.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract To assess the therapy relative to indication, effectiveness, safety and adherence in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). An interventional, prospective, non-randomized study was conducted in a single secondary care center in Brazil. The pharmacist-led medication therapy management (MTM) was conducted to detect drug-related problems (DRPs) at baseline and after six months of intervention. The health status outcomes (i.e. cognitive screening tests; levels of glucose; total cholesterol; triglycerides; thyroid stimulating hormone; serum free thyroxine and blood pressure) were measured. 66 patients with AD were included, of whom 55 patients completed the follow-up of six months. 36 patients (36/55) were non-adherent to AD drug therapy. Out of detected 166 DRPs, 116 were solved. Four patients were withdrawn from the AD protocol due to resolution of prodromal symptoms. On the conclusion of the study, the MTM improved and controlled blood pressure, glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides levels (p<0.05). The pharmacist-led MTM was effective in solving 69.8% of DRPs, improving and controlling the clinical parameters evaluated

Assuntos

RESUMO

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Literature have showed inconclusive or contradictory results regarding medication review services effectiveness in optimizing process indicators. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the process indicators of a medication review service between pharmacists and physicians. METHOD: This quasi-experimental study was conducted between March 2013 and February 2014 with patients who were receiving care in a medication review service in a teaching hospital in northeastern Brazil. The main process indicators were number of pharmaceutical consultations; identification and resolution of drug-related problems (DRP) and pharmaceutical interventions that were classified according to type and degree of acceptance. Descriptive statistics were used to report data. The statistical significance of the association between variables was evaluated using the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test. The 95% confidence interval was considered, and differences were deemed statistically significant if P ≤ .05. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients attended the medication review service. The number of consultations per patient ranged from one to five (2.1 ± 1.1). The service identified 366 DRP, most of which were indication (67.5%). Patients who had four to five pharmaceutical consultations were 1.14 times more likely to have their DRP identified (χ2 = 33.83, P < .0001). Of the DRP identified, 183 (42.33%) were resolved. Patients who had between one and two pharmaceutical consultations were 1.22 times more likely not to have their DRP resolved compared with the group with more than three consultations (χ2 = 3.44, P < .05). Of the 173 pharmaceutical interventions made to the medical students and physicians, the majority (98.7%) was accepted. CONCLUSION: The collaborative medication review service optimized the process indicators. Drug-related problems identification and resolution required more than three pharmaceutical consultations. Most of the pharmaceutical interventions were accepted by prescribers. Thus, collaborative medication review services may be fundamental to the construction of more effective and safe health systems.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Targeted therapy drugs, mainly those within the signal transduction inhibitors, are used more chronically than cytotoxic drugs and are metabolised by cytochrome P450 isozymes so patients are at high risk of having drug-drug interactions (DDI). Not only this, as the majority of them are given orally, new drug-drug interactions concerning gastrointestinal absorption can occur (e.g., with proton pump inhibitors). DDI can lead to changed systemic exposure, resulting in variations in drug response of the co-administered. In addition, concomitant ingestion of dietary supplements could also alter systemic exposure of drugs, thus leading to adverse drug reactions or loss of efficacy. In this review, we give an overview of the current existing data of known or suspected DDI between targeted therapy and other medicines. A review of package inserts was performed to identify drug-drug interactions for all targeted antineoplastic agents. Tertiary databases such as Lexicomp®, Drugs, Martindale, Facts and Comparisons®, and AHFS Drug Information were also referenced. This study covered 40 targeted antineoplastic agents (28 signal transduction inhibitors, 9 monoclonal antibodies and 3 other drugs, 2 monoclonal antibody conjugates and 1 fusion protein). Most of targeted therapy drugs are major CYP3A4 substrates with P-gp playing an important role in disposition too. Thus, there is a very common thread here that these agents will likely be sensitive victims to strong CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitors and inducers. It is essential that health care providers monitor patients for potential DDI to avoid a loss in efficacy or risk of greater toxicity from targeted therapy.

Assuntos