RESUMO

This special issue aims to help fill two critical gaps in the growing literature as well as in practice. First, to bring together scholars and practitioners from around the world who develop, practice, review, and question structural competency with the aim of promoting a dialogue with related approaches, such as Latin American Social Medicine, Collective Health, and others, which have been key in diverse geographical and social settings. Second, to contribute to expanding structural competency beyond clinical medicine to include other health-related areas such as social work, global health, public health practice, epidemiological research, health policy, community organisation and beyond. This conceptual expansion is currently taking place in structural competency, and we hope that this volume will help to raise awareness and reinforce what is already happening. In sum, this collection of articles puts structural competency more rigorously and actively in conversation with different geographic, political, social, and professional contexts worldwide. We hope this conversation sparks further development in scholarly, political and community movements for social and health justice.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Este estudio tiene como objetivo describir y analizar el pluralismo médico y el tipo de relaciones de hegemonía-subalternidad entre diversas formas o saberes de atención, que se desarrollaron en el itinerario terapéutico de una padeciente de glaucoma, para mostrar el proceso articulatorio y transaccional entre distintos recursos terapéuticos, así como comprender qué elementos estructurales configuraron el itinerario y la elección terapéutica. La investigación es cualitativa, un estudio de caso en el cual se utilizó el enfoque narrativo. Para la reconstrucción de la narrativa se realizó una entrevista semiestructurada, dirigida por una guía temática previamente determinada por un conjunto de categorías apriorísticas, para posteriormente transcribir la entrevista y realizar un proceso de triangulación hermenéutica. Los resultados mostraron, en este caso, que la hegemonía en el pluralismo médico se constituyó mediante relaciones de equivalencia, así, la padeciente sustituyó el uso de medicamentos farmacológicos por terapias de medicina alternativa, no obstante, el proceso relacional de equivalencia se desarrolló en un contexto de significación biomédica, en el cual tratar o controlar la presión intraocular fue la premisa del remplazo. Asimismo, los procesos que desencadenaron la presencia de relaciones hegemónicas se constituyeron por diversos factores sociales, culturales y económicos como el desempleo, la seguridad social y el género, que desempeñaron un papel fundamental durante la búsqueda de la atención y del cuidado.

This study aims to describe and analyze the medical pluralism and the type of hegemony-subordination relation between forms of care or knowledge in the treatment of a patient with glaucoma to show the articulatory and transactional process between several therapeutic resources and understand which structural elements shaped the treatment itinerary and option. This is a qualitative research that used a narrative case study. To reconstruct the narrative, a semi-structured interview was conducted based on a thematic script previously established by a set of a priori categories to later transcribe the data and perform hermeneutic triangulation. Results showed that the hegemony in medical pluralism was based on equivalence relations, so that the patient replaced the use of pharmacological drugs with alternative medicine treatments. However, the relational process of equivalence developed itself in a context of biomedical significance, in which the treatment or control of intraocular pressure configured the substitution premise. Thus, the processes that triggered the hegemonic relations were constituted by various social, cultural, and economic factors such as unemployment, social security, and gender, which played a fundamental role during the search for care.

Este estudo visa descrever e analisar o pluralismo médico e o tipo de relação de hegemonia-subalternidade entre diversas formas de atendimento ou conhecimentos, que ocorreram no tratamento de um paciente com glaucoma, com a finalidade de mostrar o processo articulatório e transacional entre diferentes recursos terapêuticos, bem como entender quais elementos estruturais moldaram o itinerário e a opção de tratamento. Trata-se de uma pesquisa qualitativa, que utilizou um estudo de caso com abordagem narrativa. Para a reconstrução da narrativa, foi realizada uma entrevista semiestruturada, com base em um roteiro temático previamente estabelecido por um conjunto de categorias a priori, para posteriormente transcrever os dados e realizar a triangulação hermenêutica. Os resultados mostraram que a hegemonia no pluralismo médico esteve baseada em relações de equivalência, de modo que o paciente substituiu o uso de medicamentos farmacológicos por tratamentos da medicina alternativa; no entanto, o processo relacional de equivalência desenvolveu-se em um contexto de significância biomédica, na qual o tratamento ou controle da pressão intraocular foi a premissa para a substituição. Desse modo, os processos que desencadearam a presença de relações hegemônicas foram constituídos por fatores sociais, culturais e econômicos diversos como desemprego, previdência social e gênero, os quais tiveram papel fundamental durante a busca por atendimento e cuidado.

RESUMO

Este artículo de revisión presenta el libro sobre Antropología Médica de los Profesores Fernando Martínez-Pintor y Alicia Martínez Camo, sobre la situación actual de la medicina basada en la antropología, En apretadas 650 páginas resumen una perspectiva teórico-práctica de ejercicio de la medicina que viene desde la antigüedad clásica, y que termina en nuestros días. Los autores no solo hacen una revisión histórica del desarrollo del Homo Sapiens sano y enfermo, sino que postulan a un modo de acercarse a los pacientes en forma profesional y humana, Desde el capítulo 0, con ilustraciones sobre la neuroanatomía y neuroquímica cerebral, hasta los finales, el texto recorre tanto el desarrollo de la psiquiatría, de la psicología y sus diversas perspectivas (psicosomáticas, científicas y empíricas). La evolución desde los simios superiores, posibilitada por los desplazamientos de los mares en el Plioceno, llevan a la aparición del Australopithecus, y desde allí el Homo Habilis para desembocar en el Sapiens. Con la aparición de la escritura, la evolución se hace autorreflexiva, y desde el siglo XIX, prospectiva, con Teilhard de Chardin. España entra en diálogo con el resto de Europa y el mundo anglosajón, y diversos autores hacen contrapunto a los desarrollos del resto del mundo. Laín Entralgo y Rof Carballo desarrollan la psicosomática en paralelo a Alexander y Gaskill.

This paper reviews a book about Medical Anthropology of professors Fernando Martínez-Pintor and Alicia Martínez Camo, about the current situation of medicine based in anthropology, In dense 650 pages they resume a theoric-practical perspective about the exercise of medicine that comes from classical authors until nowadays. The authors not only perform a historical review of the evolution of homo sapiens in health and infirmity but postulate a professional and humane approach to patients. Original is also chapter 0, with illustrations about brain neuroanatomy and neurochemistry. In the body of the book, the text centers on the development of psychiatry, of scientific psychology and their diverse perspectives (psychosomatics, scientific and empiric). The evolution from superior primates, was made possible by the displacement of oceans in the Pliocene, led to the appearance of Australopithecus first, then the Homo Habilis to arrive to the Sapiens. With the appearance of writing, evolution became self -reflective, and since the XIX century, prospective, with Teilhard de Chardin. Spain entered in dialog with the rest of Europe and the Anglo-Saxon world, and Hispanic authors paralleled the developments of the rest of the world. Lain Entralgo and Rof Carballo developed psychosomatics at the same time than Alexander and Gaskill.

RESUMO

The vast majority of studies on traditional medicine disregard the existence of biomedicine and alternative and complementary medicines in the lives of the indigenous peoples of Mexico and Latin America in general, despite the fact that these populations increasingly make use of biomedical knowledge more and more intensively. In this text I have attempted to elucidate this expansion of biomedicine and the decline of traditional medicine, through ethnographic information related to different indigenous groups. This expansion of biomedicine takes place despite the various negative consequences it generates due to different factors such as its comparative effectiveness, which is evidenced in the use of and demand for pharmaceuticals, biomedical services, and in particular the construction of hospitals in their communities. The indigenous population combines the uses of traditional medicine and biomedicine with a tendency to increasingly utilize biomedicine, even on the part of traditional healers.

La gran mayoría de los estudios de la medicina tradicional excluyen la existencia de la biomedicina y de las medicinas alternativas y complementarias en la vida de los pueblos indígenas de México y de Latinoamérica en general, pese a que estos pueblos utilizan la biomedicina en forma creciente e intensa. En este texto, he tratado de poner de manifiesto este proceso de expansión biomédica y de declive de la medicina tradicional, a través de información etnográfica referida a distintos pueblos originarios. Esta expansión biomédica se desarrolla a pesar de las varias consecuencias negativas que genera, debido a diversos factores, entre ellos, su eficacia comparativa, que se expresa a través de los usos y la demanda de fármacos, de los servicios biomédicos y, en particular, de la instalación de hospitales en sus comunidades. La población indígena articula los usos de la medicina tradicional y de la biomedicina con la tendencia a utilizar cada vez más la biomedicina, incluso por parte de los curadores tradicionales.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This article analyzes risk discourses around dengue, zika and chikungunya constructed by lay people, community leaders and disease control experts from the fields of medical anthropology, medical sociology, and public health. METHODS: A qualitative ethnographic study was conducted in a municipality in Colombia (December 2016 and January 2018) with semistructured and open-ended interviews, informal dialogues, and fieldwork journal observations. RESULTS: This study found a mismatch in risk discourse about vector-borne diseases among health officials, lay people, and community leaders. These discourses are linked to the sociocultural contexts in which people live, and offer particular ways of giving meaning and acting in the face of disease prevention. CONCLUSION: The findings show a multisituated risk that refers to the inside and outside of homes; and the prevention practices mentioned by different actors, in which a continuity of tensions between lay people, leaders and government officials can be observed.

Assuntos

RESUMO

This text is a transcription of the speech delivered by Eduardo L. Menéndez at the ceremony in which he was conferred a Doctorate Honoris Causa by the Universidad Nacional de Lanús on March 27, 2023. The speech covers aspects of his youth and academic career in Argentina, prior to his exile in Mexico in 1976, and reflects on various processes that due to a number of circumstances consciously or unconsciously oriented his field of inquiry and contextualize his theoretical contributions.

Este texto reproduce el discurso pronunciado por Eduardo L. Menéndez, en el marco de la entrega del título de doctor honoris causa, otorgado por la Universidad Nacional de Lanús, el 27 de marzo de 2023. En su discurso recupera su infancia y su trayectoria académica en Argentina, previa a su exilio en México en 1976, y recorre varios procesos que, por diferentes circunstancias, en forma consciente e inconsciente, orientaron su campo de estudio y contextualizan sus explicaciones teóricas.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Structural competency proposals have been developed as part of an effort to infuse clinical training with a structural focus. Framed in the context of medical education, the discussion on structural competency naturally emphasises the development of such competency in healthcare workers. In this article, we shift the focus to reflect on how the work of migrant community leaders may involve the development of structural competencies and what can be learned from this complementary perspective. We analysed the development of structural competency in an immigrant rights organisation in northern Chile. We conducted focus groups with migrant leaders and volunteers and used the tools proposed by the Structural Competency Working Group to facilitate dialogue. This allowed us to verify the development of structural competency and other collective competencies, including the capacity to create a protected space for circulating experiences and knowledge; coordinate a heterogeneous group of agents; have a socio-legal impact; and maintain autonomy concerning ideological production. This article introduces the concept of collective structural competency and reflects on the importance of expanding beyond the common medical-centred approach when considering structural competency.

Assuntos

RESUMO

This study examines the personal beliefs held by parents of autistic children in Puerto Rico regarding the cause of their child's autism and how these beliefs may influence parental vaccination decision-making. This study seeks to contribute towards diversifying the autism literature by focusing on an autism community living in a relatively lower income, resource-deficit context. These findings expand our understandings of how parents of autistic children may perceive vaccines and how these perceptions are informed by various sources of knowledge. This ethnographic research study was conducted between May 2017 and August 2019. Methods included 350+ hours of participant-observation and semi-structured interviewing of 35 Puerto Rican parents of autistic children. 32 of these 35 parents interviewed believed autism to be the result of genetic risks that are 'triggered' by an unknown environmental factor. Suggested 'triggers' included various environmental contaminants and vaccinations. The subject of vaccination came up in every interview; 18 interviewed parents did not believe vaccines 'triggered' autism, 3 parents attributed their child's autism entirely to vaccines, while 14 considered vaccines to be one of several possible 'triggers'. It is important to note that no parents interviewed perceived vaccinations to be inherently or universally harmful. Rather, they perceived vaccinations to be one of many possible 'triggers' for a child predisposed to develop autism. In some cases, this perception prompted parents to oppose mandatory vaccination policies on the island. Parents shared nuanced, complex understandings of autism causation that may carry implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake within the Puerto Rican autistic community.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Based on the incorporation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as an HIV prevention strategy and considering the need to comprehend the use of medication among young people, this article analyzes narratives of gay men and transgender women from Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, participating in the PrEP1519 study. This is a qualitative research, based on the interpretative anthropology, developed by 10 in-depth interviews with PrEP users followed-up for at least three months between October and November 2019. The results showed that the drug was seen as the main motivation for participating in the study and as a strategy combined with the use of condoms, whether as additional prevention, or assuming the leading role. The medication revealed signs built by the gender performances and their relation to other medications, especially the experience of trans girls in hormonal therapy. Regarding the socialization of the use of PrEP, the narratives showed that there was no secret between the couples, which did not meant that stigmas on the association with HIV did not exist, mainly in the virtual context. In the family environment, they reported questions about the preventive function of the medication and the voluntary nature of the participation in the study. The youth's narratives revealed plural meanings of the medication and its social use, composing both the boys' and girls' performances. The signs attributed to the medication indicated that in addition to maintenance of health, the medication improves life and sexual freedom.

Com base na incorporação da profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) como estratégia para a prevenção do HIV, e considerando a necessidade de compreender o uso da medicação entre jovens, o artigo analisa as narrativas de homens gays e mulheres transgênero da cidade de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, participantes no estudo PrEP1519. A pesquisa qualitativa, baseada na antropologia interpretativa, foi desenvolvida através de 10 entrevistas em profundidade com usuários de PrEP acompanhados durante pelo menos três meses entre outubro e novembro de 2019. Os resultados mostraram que o medicamento era visto como a principal motivação para participar no estudo e como estratégia combinada com o uso de preservativos, seja como prevenção adicional ou assumindo o papel principal. A medicação revelou sinais elaborados pelas performances de gênero e sua relação com outros medicamentos, principalmente a experiência de meninas trans em uso de hormonioterapia. Quanto à socialização do uso da PrEP, as narrativas mostraram que não havia segredo entre os casais, o que não significava a inexistência de estigma em relação à associação com HIV, principalmente no contexto virtual. No ambiente familiar, os participantes relatavam questões sobre a função preventiva da medicação e a natureza voluntária da participação no estudo. As narrativas dos jovens revelaram sentidos plurais atribuídos à medicação e ao seu uso social, compondo as performances tanto dos meninos quanto das meninas. Os sinais atribuídos à medicação indicaram que além da manutenção da saúde, a medicação melhora a vida e a liberdade sexual dos usuários.

Basado en la incorporación de la profilaxis previa a la exposición (PrEP) como una estrategia de prevención contra el VIH, y considerando la necesidad de entender el uso de medicación entre gente joven, este artículo analiza narrativas de hombres gais y mujeres transgénero de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, que participan en el estudio PrEP1519. Esta es una investigación cualitativa, basada en la antropología interpretativa, desarrollada por 10 entrevistas en profundidad con usuarios de PrEP, a quienes se les realizó un seguimiento durante al menos tres meses entre octubre y noviembre de 2019. Los resultados mostraron que la medicación fue considerada como la principal motivación de participar en el estudio y como una estrategia combinada con el uso de condones, ya sea como prevención adicional, o asumiendo el papel principal. La medicación reveló signos de estar construida por el desempeño del género y su relación con otros medicamentos, especialmente la experiencia de las chicas trans en la terapia hormonal. Respecto a la socialización del uso del PrEP, las narrativas mostraron que no había secretos entre las parejas, lo cual no significó que no existieran estigmas en la asociación con el VIH, principalmente en contexto virtual. En el ambiente familiar, se informó de cuestiones sobre la función preventiva de la medicación y la naturaleza voluntaria de participar en el estudio. Las narrativas de ellos jóvenes revelaron significados plurales de la medicación y su uso social, formando parte del desempeño tanto de los chicos como de las chicas. Los signos atribuidos a la medicación indicaron que además de mantener la salud, la medicación mejora la vida y la libertad sexual.

RESUMO

Based on the incorporation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as an HIV prevention strategy and considering the need to comprehend the use of medication among young people, this article analyzes narratives of gay men and transgender women from Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, participating in the PrEP1519 study. This is a qualitative research, based on the interpretative anthropology, developed by 10 in-depth interviews with PrEP users followed-up for at least three months between October and November 2019. The results showed that the drug was seen as the main motivation for participating in the study and as a strategy combined with the use of condoms, whether as additional prevention, or assuming the leading role. The medication revealed signs built by the gender performances and their relation to other medications, especially the experience of trans girls in hormonal therapy. Regarding the socialization of the use of PrEP, the narratives showed that there was no secret between the couples, which did not meant that stigmas on the association with HIV did not exist, mainly in the virtual context. In the family environment, they reported questions about the preventive function of the medication and the voluntary nature of the participation in the study. The youth's narratives revealed plural meanings of the medication and its social use, composing both the boys' and girls' performances. The signs attributed to the medication indicated that in addition to maintenance of health, the medication improves life and sexual freedom.

Com base na incorporação da profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) como estratégia para a prevenção do HIV, e considerando a necessidade de compreender o uso da medicação entre jovens, o artigo analisa as narrativas de homens gays e mulheres transgênero da cidade de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, participantes no estudo PrEP1519. A pesquisa qualitativa, baseada na antropologia interpretativa, foi desenvolvida através de 10 entrevistas em profundidade com usuários de PrEP acompanhados durante pelo menos três meses entre outubro e novembro de 2019. Os resultados mostraram que o medicamento era visto como a principal motivação para participar no estudo e como estratégia combinada com o uso de preservativos, seja como prevenção adicional ou assumindo o papel principal. A medicação revelou sinais elaborados pelas performances de gênero e sua relação com outros medicamentos, principalmente a experiência de meninas trans em uso de hormonioterapia. Quanto à socialização do uso da PrEP, as narrativas mostraram que não havia segredo entre os casais, o que não significava a inexistência de estigma em relação à associação com HIV, principalmente no contexto virtual. No ambiente familiar, os participantes relatavam questões sobre a função preventiva da medicação e a natureza voluntária da participação no estudo. As narrativas dos jovens revelaram sentidos plurais atribuídos à medicação e ao seu uso social, compondo as performances tanto dos meninos quanto das meninas. Os sinais atribuídos à medicação indicaram que além da manutenção da saúde, a medicação melhora a vida e a liberdade sexual dos usuários.

Basado en la incorporación de la profilaxis previa a la exposición (PrEP) como una estrategia de prevención contra el VIH, y considerando la necesidad de entender el uso de medicación entre gente joven, este artículo analiza narrativas de hombres gais y mujeres transgénero de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, que participan en el estudio PrEP1519. Esta es una investigación cualitativa, basada en la antropología interpretativa, desarrollada por 10 entrevistas en profundidad con usuarios de PrEP, a quienes se les realizó un seguimiento durante al menos tres meses entre octubre y noviembre de 2019. Los resultados mostraron que la medicación fue considerada como la principal motivación de participar en el estudio y como una estrategia combinada con el uso de condones, ya sea como prevención adicional, o asumiendo el papel principal. La medicación reveló signos de estar construida por el desempeño del género y su relación con otros medicamentos, especialmente la experiencia de las chicas trans en la terapia hormonal. Respecto a la socialización del uso del PrEP, las narrativas mostraron que no había secretos entre las parejas, lo cual no significó que no existieran estigmas en la asociación con el VIH, principalmente en contexto virtual. En el ambiente familiar, se informó de cuestiones sobre la función preventiva de la medicación y la naturaleza voluntaria de participar en el estudio. Las narrativas de ellos jóvenes revelaron significados plurales de la medicación y su uso social, formando parte del desempeño tanto de los chicos como de las chicas. Los signos atribuidos a la medicación indicaron que además de mantener la salud, la medicación mejora la vida y la libertad sexual.

RESUMO

RESUMEN La gran mayoría de los estudios de la medicina tradicional excluyen la existencia de la biomedicina y de las medicinas alternativas y complementarias en la vida de los pueblos indígenas de México y de Latinoamérica en general, pese a que estos pueblos utilizan la biomedicina en forma creciente e intensa. En este texto, he tratado de poner de manifiesto este proceso de expansión biomédica y de declive de la medicina tradicional, a través de información etnográfica referida a distintos pueblos originarios. Esta expansión biomédica se desarrolla a pesar de las varias consecuencias negativas que genera, debido a diversos factores, entre ellos, su eficacia comparativa, que se expresa a través de los usos y la demanda de fármacos, de los servicios biomédicos y, en particular, de la instalación de hospitales en sus comunidades. La población indígena articula los usos de la medicina tradicional y de la biomedicina con la tendencia a utilizar cada vez más la biomedicina, incluso por parte de los curadores tradicionales.

ABSTRACT The vast majority of studies on traditional medicine disregard the existence of biomedicine and alternative and complementary medicines in the lives of the indigenous peoples of Mexico and Latin America in general, despite the fact that these populations increasingly make use of biomedical knowledge more and more intensively. In this text I have attempted to elucidate this expansion of biomedicine and the decline of traditional medicine, through ethnographic information related to different indigenous groups. This expansion of biomedicine takes place despite the various negative consequences it generates due to different factors such as its comparative effectiveness, which is evidenced in the use of and demand for pharmaceuticals, biomedical services, and in particular the construction of hospitals in their communities. The indigenous population combines the uses of traditional medicine and biomedicine with a tendency to increasingly utilize biomedicine, even on the part of traditional healers.

RESUMO

This article analyzes two general lines of research on traditional medicine used by Mexican indigenous peoples since the 15th century up to the present day. The first - pioneered by anthropologists and physicians with anthropological training - addresses traditional medicine so as to promote biomedicine among indigenous groups, with the purpose of improving their health conditions. This line of research developed between the 1930s and 1960s, reemerged in the mid-1970s with the Alma Ata Conference, and has maintained momentum into the present day, seeking to expand coverage of the health sector in marginalized areas, but while subordinating traditional medicine to biomedical programs in all aspects. The second line of research has been fostered by anthropologists, in particular from the 1960s onward, and seeks to comprehend indigenous cultures through traditional medicine, with a particular focus on healers, who express the cosmovision, identity, sense of belonging, and cultural autonomy of indigenous peoples. However, these enquiries attempt to comprehend and validate the ways in which traditional medicine encapsulates cultural identity, and in some cases to justify political, economic, and above all ideological objectives. These perspectives do not take into consideration information regarding morbility, mortality, and life expectancy, despite the fact that indigenous peoples are the social group with the highest mortality rates and lowest life expectancy.

Este trabajo analiza dos líneas básicas de estudios que se centran en la medicina tradicional utilizada por los pueblos originarios mexicanos desde el siglo XV hasta la actualidad. La primera, impulsada por antropólogos y médicos con formación antropológica, aborda la medicina tradicional para impulsar la biomedicina en los pueblos indígenas, procurando mejorar sus condiciones de salud. Esta línea se desarrolló entre las décadas de 1930 y 1960, para reaparecer a mediados de 1970 a partir de la Conferencia de Alma Ata, y se mantuvo hasta la actualidad buscando expandir la cobertura de atención del sector salud en áreas marginadas, pero supeditando la medicina tradicional, en todos los aspectos, a los programas biomédicos. La segunda línea, ha sido impulsada por antropólogos, sobre todo desde la década de 1960, buscando comprender las culturas originarias a través de la medicina tradicional y de lxs curadorxs, que expresan la cosmovisión, identidad, pertenencia y autonomía cultural de los pueblos originarios. Pero esta búsqueda la realizan tratando de comprender y revalidar el papel de identificador cultural de la medicina tradicional y, en algunas orientaciones, justificar objetivos económico-políticos y, especialmente, ideológicos. Esto lo hacen excluyendo la información sobre morbilidad, mortalidad y esperanza de vida, pese a que los pueblos originarios constituyen el sector social con mayores tasas de mortalidad y menor esperanza de vida.

Assuntos

RESUMO

With an eye to health equity and community engagement in the context of the initial COVID-19 vaccine roll-out, the COVID-19-related concerns of the Latinx (Hispanic/Latino) community in southern San Diego (California, USA) were examined using 42 rapid, ethnographically-informed interviews and two focus groups conducted in early-mid 2021. An anthropologically oriented qualitative analysis delimited the cultural standpoint summarized as aguantarismo, which celebrates human durability in the face of socioeconomic hardship and the capacity to abide daily life's challenges without complaint. After characterizing aguantarismo, its role in both undermining and supporting vaccine uptake is explored. To avoid diverting attention from the structural factors underlying health inequities, the analysis deploys the theoretical framework of critical medical anthropology, highlighting inequities that gain expression in aguantarismo, and the indifference toward vaccination that it can support. In placing critical medical anthropology into conversation with the cultural values approach to public health, the analysis sheds new light on the diversity of human strategies for coping with infectious disease and uncovers new possibilities for effective vaccination promotion. Findings will be useful to public health experts seeking to convert non-vaccinators and optimize booster and pediatric COVID-19 vaccine communications. They will also contribute to the literature on cultural values in relation to Hispanic/Latino or border health more broadly, both by confirming the vital flexibility of cultural standpoints like aguantarismo and by documenting in situ what is to the social science and health literature, albeit not to cultural participants, a novel constellation.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Mexican immigrants in the U.S. show high incidence of type 2 diabetes, and increased risk is associated with longer duration of residency. This study considers the impact of culture over time for Mexican immigrant women in a southern U.S. city. Using cultural consensus analysis to empirically derive the substance and structure of a cultural model for la buena vida (the good life) among Mexican immigrant women in Birmingham, Alabama, we assess the extent to which respondents are aligned with the model in their everyday lives. This measure of 'cultural consonance' is explored as a moderating variable between length of time living in the U.S. and level of Hemoglobin A1c. Results demonstrate that for those with more time in the U.S., those with lower consonance are more likely to have diabetes, while those who are more aligned with la buena vida are at lower risk.

RESUMO

Resumo Como política pública, práticas integrativas e complementares estão disponíveis no sistema público de saúde no Brasil desde 2006. Este texto, de caráter qualitativo e baseado em dados secundários da literatura e de documentos oficiais, tem o objetivo de compreender a Política Nacional de Práticas Integrativas e Complementares, a partir da sua presença por variados espaços da sociedade. Contornando a comparação entre o documento e a prática da política, propõe-se um caminho teórico e metodológico que possibilite novas percepções sobre a política em situações concretas. Aplicando a teoria ator-rede e a abordagem do agenciamento, as análises permitem perceber a política como um emaranhado de ações que faz surgir múltiplas realidades e versões contextuais da política, dependendo dos atores com os quais se associa. Desse modo, os resultados apontam para complexidade escondida por trás da aparente singularidade, revelando a pluralidade de atores que constituem essas realidades e demonstrando a dependência da política com relação à ação de outros atores para que ela se torne realidade. Seguindo esse caminho, é possível gerar novos elementos que contribuam para a análise da política na prática, somando-se aos estudos que enfatizam a comparação entre o documento e a prática.

Abstract Integrative and complementary therapies have been available in the public health system in Brazil as a public policy since 2006. This text of a qualitative nature based on secondary data from the literature and official documents has the aim of understanding the National Policy of Integrative and Complementary Practices from its presence in varied spaces in society. Bypassing the comparison between the theory and practice of the policy, a theoretical and methodological path is proposed to enable new perceptions about policy in practice. By applying the actor-network theory and the negotiation approach, the analysis enables us to perceive the policy as a combination of actions that gives rise to multiple realities and contextual versions of policy, depending on the actors involved. Thus, the results point to complexity hidden behind apparent singularity, revealing the plurality of actors that constitute these realities and demonstrating that the policy is dependent on the actions of other actors for it to become a reality. Following this analytical path, it is possible to generate new elements that contribute to the analysis of the policy in practice, adding to the studies that emphasize the comparison between theory and practice.

RESUMO

Introduction: The objective of this article was to explore, from an anthropological perspective, the social representations that doctors who treat covid-19 in specialized hospitals in Mexico City have, regarding the relationship between their professional performance and the deterioration of their mental health; as well as their social representations of the existing institutional resources to provide them mental health attention and their care-seeking and self-care strategies. Materials and Methods: For this, a quali-tative investigation was carried out with semi-structured interviews with 35 doctors who treat covid-19. Results: From the points of view of the doctors, various sociocultural and structural causes of mental illness related to their professional performance are documented and analyzed, as well as their repre-sentations about the inadequacy and/or ineffectiveness of the institution, group, or individual resources to provide them mental health attention; and some allopathic and non-biomedical forms of care-seeking and self-care. Conclusions: Recommendations are made to address the etiologies of the disease analyzed in a culturally and structurally appropriate way to the context of the pandemic.

Introducción: el objetivo de este artículo es explorar, desde una perspectiva antropológica, las representaciones sociales de los médicos que atienden covid-19 en hospitales especializados de la Ciudad de México, respecto a la relación entre su desempeño profesional y el deterioro de su salud mental, así como de los recursos institucionales existentes para atenderla y sus estrategias de búsqueda de atención y de autoatención. Materiales y métodos: para ello, se realizó una investigación cualitativa con entrevistas semiestructuradas a 35 médicos que atienden covid-19. Resultados: a partir de sus puntos de vista se documentan y analizan diversas causas socioculturales y estructurales del padecimiento mental relacionado con su desempeño profesional, así como sus representaciones sobre la inadecuación o ineficacia de los recursos institucionales, grupales o individuales, para atenderlo y algunas modalidades de búsqueda de atención y autoatención alopáticas y no biomédicas. Conclusiones: se realizan recomendaciones para abordar institucionalmente las etiologías del padecimiento reportadas por los entrevistados de una forma cultural y estructuralmente adecuada al contexto de la pandemia.

Introdução: O objetivo deste artigo é explorar, a partir de uma perspectiva antropológica, as represen-tações sociais que os médicos que tratam a covid-19 em hospitais especializados na Cidade do México, têm sobre a relação entre seu desempenho profissional e a deterioração de sua saúde mental; bem como os recursos institucionais existentes para cuidar da saúde mental e as estratégias de busca de cuidado e autocuidado. Materiais e métodos: Para isso, foi realizada uma pesquisa qualitativa com entrevistas semiestruturadas com 35 médicos que tratam da covid-19. Resultados: Do ponto de vista dos médicos, são documentadas e analisadas diversas causas socioculturais e estruturais do adoecimento mental relacio-nadas à sua atuação profissional, bem como suas representações sobre a inadequação e/ou ineficiência dos recursos institucionais, grupais ou individuais, disponíveis para atendê-los e algumas modalidades de busca de cuidado e autocuidado alopáticos e não biomédicos. Conclusões: São feitas recomendações para abordar institucionalmente as etiologias da doença relatadas pelos entrevistados de forma cultural e estruturalmente adequada no contexto da pandemia.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumo Este estudo foi desenvolvido na interseção entre as ciências da saúde e a antropologia, com finalidade de compreender a importância da medicina tradicional afro-brasileira retratada nas casas de candomblé, explorando interações de seus membros com o sistema biomédico de saúde. A antropologia da saúde objetiva compreender o fenômeno da saúde como uma elaboração sociocultural, e partir disso desenvolve a noção de sistema cultural de saúde, operador teórico deste estudo. Esta proposta pode contribuir para superar os desafios enfrentados no campo da saúde coletiva, ao possibilitar diálogo entre sistemas culturais de saúde, favorecendo a criação de políticas mais eficazes. Este artigo, de inspiração etnográfica, foi desenvolvido a partir do levantamento bibliográfico específico, seguido de observações participantes e entrevistas com membros da comunidade Ilé Alákétu Asè Ifá Omo Oyá, localizada em São Paulo. A prática em saúde no candomblé consegue alcançar lacunas deixadas pela biomedicina, associando de forma não autoritária, colonialista ou excludente saberes de saúde distintos, considerando os processos simbólicos, culturais, subjetivos e espirituais envolvidos nos processos de adoecimento.

Abstract This study was developed at the intersection of health sciences and anthropology in order to understand the value of traditional Afro-Brazilian Medicine portrayed in houses of Candomblé exploring its member's interactions with the biomedical system of health. The anthropology of health aims to understand the phenomenon of health as a socio-cultural elaboration and from this, develops the notion of cultural health system, the theoretical operator of this study. This proposal can contribute to the challenges faced in the field of collective health by enabling dialogue between cultural health systems, supporting the creation of more effective policies. This ethnographic-inspired article was developed from a specific bibliographic survey, followed by participant observations and interviews with members of the community Ilé Alákétu Asè Ifá Omo Oyá, located in São Paulo. The health practice in candomblé manages to reach gaps left by biomedicine by associating itself in a non-authoritarian, colonialist or exclusive way taking into account the symbolic, cultural, subjective and spiritual processes involved in the processes of illness. This practice brings other possible ways of interpretation, treatment and cure for health problems.

Assuntos

RESUMO

With the rising demand for short-term experiences in global health (STEGH) is an ever-increasing volume of literature that focuses attention on ethics and ethical concerns, such as the effects of STEGH on host populations. Such concerns have driven the development of ethical principles and guidelines, with discussions and debates largely centred around normative questions of positive/negative and benefit/harm for us/them. Using a critical medical humanities lens, this paper blurs these dichotomous framings and offers a more complex understanding of the effects and effectiveness of STEGH on hosts. I explore STEGH that send volunteers from North American universities to the Dominican Republic to participate in service-learning activities aimed at improving the lives of impoverished Haitian migrants living in bateyes I address the following questions: What perspectives about the impacts of interventions on host communities manifest through STEGH? What tensions emerge through interactions among diverse stakeholders related to those perspectives, and with what effects? Drawing together critical theory and ethnography, I examined the perspectives of three stakeholder groups: student and faculty volunteers, host organisation staff, and hosts in batey communities. Data collected from observations and interviews were counterposed; I analysed interactions and interplay between stakeholders. My findings revealed conflicts around an emergent theme: counting efforts, or volunteers' proclivity for numerical evidence of impactful STEGH for hosts. With attention on power relations, I argue that a preoccupation with quantifiable evidence eclipsed and erased the lived realities of hosts, thereby blocking a fully ethical engagement. These sociopolitical effects, often overlooked in conventional ethics assessments, are no less harmful and may reinforce rather than reduce inequalities that the global health movement seeks to eliminate. My study offers a compelling case for how the critical medical humanities lend critical insights in the name of improving global health.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO Desde principios de la década del 2000, se ha desarrollado una expansión de cultivo de soja transgénica en el Conosur que ha implicado un incremento exponencial de los volúmenes de plaguicidas utilizados en la región. Desde las ciencias sociales, se ha enfatizado el análisis de los conflictos socio- -ambientales para resistir ante los diversos proble-mas que conlleva este modelo productivo. Uruguay, aunque menos visible en los debates internacionales, no estuvo ajeno a dicho proceso. Este artículo tiene como objetivo introducir el caso uruguayo en el debate regional sobre los problemas ocasionados por la expansión de plaguicidas asociada al avance de la sojización y discutir las posibilidades de la participación social en salud ambiental como forma de resistencia. La metodología combina un estudio etnográfico en el núcleo agrícola del país con análisis documental. Se discuten los resultados a la luz de la antropología médica crítica, evidenciando que si bien las denuncias son mecanismos que permiten visibilizar públicamente los problemas ocasionados por el uso de plaguicidas, en el marco de las relaciones de hegemonía- -subalternidad que estructuran las relaciones sociales en una economía agraria, los alcances y límites de la participación social en salud ambiental las trascienden.

ABSTRACT Since the early 2000s, there has been an expansion of transgenic soybean cultivation in the Conosur, which has involved an exponential increase in the volumes of pesticides used in the region. Social sciences have emphasized the analysis of socio-environmental conflicts to resist the various problems that this productive model entails. Uruguay, although less visible in international debates, was not exempt from this process. This article aims to introduce the Uruguayan case in the regional debate on the problems caused by the spread of pesticides associated with the advance of soybean production and to discuss the possibilities of social participation in environmental health as a form of resistance. The methodology combines an ethnographic study in the agricultural core of the country with documentary analysis. The results are discussed in the light of critical medical anthropology, evidencing that although public complaints are mechanisms that allow public visibility of the problems caused by the use of pesticides, within the framework of hegemonysubalternity relations that structure social relations in an agrarian economy, the scope and limits of social participation in environmental health transcend them.

RESUMO

Resumen: El trabajo de campo etnográfico, que implica el encuentro con la otredad, es utilizado por la antropología médica para acercarse a la comprensión de problemáticas sociales relacionadas con la salud, la enfermedad, la atención y la muerte. El objetivo del trabajo fue realizar una reflexión ética de diversas situaciones conflictivas experimentadas por tres antropólogas durante sus investigaciones en México, a través del análisis de sus diarios de campo. Con este fin, se realizó un análisis grupal e interdisciplinario desde una perspectiva ética. Los conflictos encontrados se clasificaron en: 1. Dilemas éticos (como la sinceridad vs. ocultamiento de información); 2. Disonancias éticas (como la justicia en el acceso de los informantes a los servicios médicos, el acceso y la identidad del antropólogo en campo, los límites de la intervención, la reciprocidad y las emociones del investigador); y 3. Otros (conflictos éticos tales como la observación del paternalismo médico y las diferencias disciplinares entre el quehacer antropológico y el médico). Este análisis permitió comprender a través de una alerta ético-metodológica los posicionamientos epistemológicos, metodológicos y, principalmente, éticos de las investigadoras que, de manera subrepticia, guían la construcción del quehacer antropológico. Asimismo, la investigación permitió vislumbrar la responsabilidad de las acciones o inacciones del investigador frente a las personas observadas dentro de un contexto de atención en salud.

Abstract: Ethnographic fieldwork, which implies the encounter with otherness, is used by medical anthropology to approach the understanding of social problems related to health, illness, care and death. The objective of the work was to carry out an ethical reflection on various conflictive situations experienced by three anthropologists during their research in Mexico, by means of the analysis of their field diaries. To this end, a group and interdisciplinar y analysis was carried out from an ethical perspective. The conflicts found were classified as: 1. Ethical dilemmas (such as sincerity vs. concealment of information); 2. Ethical dissonances (such as fairness in informants' access to medical services, access and identity of the anthropologist in the field, limits of the intervention, reciprocity, and the emotions of the researcher); and 3. Others (ethical conflicts such as the observation of medical paternalism and the disciplinary differences between anthropological and medical work). This analysis allowed us to understand, through an ethical-methodological alert, the epistemological, methodological and, mainly, the ethical positions of the researchers who, surreptitiously, guide the construction of the anthropological task. Likewise, the investigation allowed us to glimpse the responsibility of the actions or inactions of the researcher vis a vis of the people observed within a context of health care.

Resumo: O trabalho de campo etnográfico, que implica o encontro com a alteridade, é utilizado pela antropologia médica para abordar a compreensão dos problemas sociais relacionados à saúde, doença, cuidado e morte. O objetivo do trabalho foi realizar uma reflexão ética sobre diversas situações conflituosas vivenciadas por três antropólogos durante suas pesquisas no México, por meio da análise de seus diários de campo. Para tanto, realizou-se uma análise grupal e interdisciplinar a partir de uma perspectiva ética. Os conflitos encontrados foram classificados em: 1. Dilemas éticos (como sinceridade x ocultação de informações); 2. Dissonâncias éticas (como equidade no acesso dos informantes aos serviços médicos, acesso e identidade do antropólogo em campo, limites de intervenção, reciprocidade e emoções do pesquisador); e 3. Outros (conflitos éticos como a observação do paternalismo médico e as diferenças disciplinares entre o trabalho antropológico e o médico). Essa análise permitiu compreender, por meio de um alerta ético-metodológico, as posições epistemológicas, metodológicas e, principalmente, éticas dos pesquisadores que, sub-repticiamente, orientam a construção da tarefa antropológica. Da mesma forma, a investigação permitiu vislumbrar a responsabilidade das ações ou omissões do pesquisador diante das pessoas observadas em um contexto de atenção à saúde.