RESUMO
Background/Aims: Diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is sometimes challenging because the performance of available tests is not entirely satisfactory. This study aims to directly measure the esophageal mucosal impedance during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the diagnosis of GERD. Methods: Sixty participants with typical symptoms of GERD underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry, 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and mucosal impedance measurement. Mucosal impedance measurement was performed at 2, 5, 10, and 18 cm above the esophagogastric junction during gastrointestinal endoscopy using a specific catheter developed based on devices described in the literature over the last decade. The patients were divided into groups A (acid exposure time < 4%) and B (acid exposure time ≥ 4%). Results: The mucosal impedance was significantly lower in group B at 2 cm (2264.4 Ω ± 1099.0 vs 4575.0 Ω ± 1407.6 [group A]) and 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (4221.2 Ω ± 2623.7 vs 5888.2 Ω ± 2529.4 [group A]). There was no significant difference in the mucosal impedance between the 2 groups at 10 cm and 18 cm above the esophagogastric junction. Mucosal impedance value at 2 cm > 2970 Ω resulted in a sensitivity of 96.4% and a specificity of 87.5% to exclude GERD. Conclusions: Direct measurement of mucosal impedance during endoscopy is a simple and promising method for diagnosing GERD. Individuals with an abnormal acid exposure time have lower mucosal impedance measurements than those with a normal acid exposure time.
RESUMO
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a clinical condition in which gastric reflux causes symptoms or damage to the esophageal mucosa. It is managed with proton pump inhibitors, however, up to 45% of patients with suspected GERD are refractory to treatment. It is necessary to establish a true GERD diagnosis by means of a digestive endoscopy, which does not show lesions in approximately 70% of patients. In this scenario, it is necessary to perform an esophageal pH-impedance measurement, a procedure that allows to determine whether exposure to gastric acid is pathological. Of this group, patients with pathological acid exposure are diagnosed as true non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). If, in addition to not presenting esophageal lesions, they have a physiological exposure to gastric acid, they suffer from esophageal hypersensitivity or functional heartburn, which are functional disorders. These require a different approach from that of GERD or NERD, as the symptoms are not due to pathological exposure to gastric acid. The aim was to calculate the frequency of esophageal hypersensitivity and functional heartburn in patients with suspected NERD. This was a cross-sectional study. Data was collected by reviewing pH-impedance and manometry reports, 166 patients were selected. The frequency for functional disorders was 86.15%, being 46.9% for functional heartburn and 39.2% for esophageal hypersensitivity. The frequency of functional disorders was higher than that reported in previous studies. In conclusion, age, psychological conditions, dietary, cultural, ethnic or lifestyle factors inherent to our environment might play important roles in the development of functional disorders.
La enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) es una condición clínica en la que el reflujo gástrico provoca síntomas o daños en la mucosa esofágica. Se maneja con inhibidores de la bomba de protones; sin embargo, hasta el 45% de los pacientes con sospecha de ERGE son refractarios al tratamiento. Por lo cual, es necesario establecer un verdadero diagnóstico de ERGE mediante una endoscopia digestiva, que no muestra lesiones en aproximadamente el 70% de los pacientes. En este escenario, es necesario realizar una medición de pH-impedancia esofágica, procedimiento que permite determinar si la exposición al ácido gástrico es patológica. De este grupo, los pacientes con exposición patológica al ácido son diagnosticados como verdadera enfermedad por reflujo no erosiva (ERNE). Si además de no presentar lesiones esofágicas, tienen una exposición fisiológica al ácido gástrico, padecen hipersensibilidad esofágica o pirosis funcional, que son trastornos funcionales. Estos requieren un enfoque diferente al ERGE o ERNE, ya que los síntomas no se deben a una exposición patológica al ácido gástrico. El objetivo fue calcular la frecuencia de hipersensibilidad esofágica y pirosis funcional en pacientes con sospecha de ERNE. Este fue un estudio transversal. Los datos se recopilaron mediante la revisión de informes de pH-impedancia y manometría, se seleccionaron 166 pacientes. La frecuencia de trastornos funcionales fue de 86,15%, siendo 46,9% de pirosis funcional y 39,2% de hipersensibilidad esofágica. La frecuencia de trastornos funcionales fue superior a la reportada en estudios previos. En conclusión, la edad, las condiciones psicológicas, los factores dietéticos, culturales, étnicos o de estilo de vida inherentes a nuestro entorno podrían jugar un papel importante en el desarrollo de trastornos funcionales.
RESUMO
Abstract Introduction The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is a muscular structure located at the transition from the pharynx to the esophagus, with the cricopharyngeal muscle as the most important component. During gastroesophageal reflux, the pressure in the UES elevates, which is apparently a protective mechanism to prevent esophagopharyngeal reflux and airway aspiration. In gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), there may be functional changes in the UES. Objective The objective of the present review was to determine UES functional changes in GERD. Data Synthesis In healthy individuals, gastroesophageal reflux causes an increase in the UES pressure. This response of the sphincter is at least partially impaired in patients with GERD. In the disease, the UES has a reduced length and decreased resting pressure. However, other publications found that in chronic gastroesophageal reflux the basal sphincter pressure increase, differences which may be consequent to the measurement method or to disease severity. The UES opening during swallowing has a smaller diameter, and the bolus transit time through the sphincter is longer. Conclusion The UES of patients with GERD does not open as expected and the bolus flow through the sphincter is longer. This behavior may be associated with dysphagia, a frequent complaint in patients with GERD.
RESUMO
Introduction The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is a muscular structure located at the transition from the pharynx to the esophagus, with the cricopharyngeal muscle as the most important component. During gastroesophageal reflux, the pressure in the UES elevates, which is apparently a protective mechanism to prevent esophagopharyngeal reflux and airway aspiration. In gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), there may be functional changes in the UES. Objective The objective of the present review was to determine UES functional changes in GERD. Data Synthesis In healthy individuals, gastroesophageal reflux causes an increase in the UES pressure. This response of the sphincter is at least partially impaired in patients with GERD. In the disease, the UES has a reduced length and decreased resting pressure. However, other publications found that in chronic gastroesophageal reflux the basal sphincter pressure increase, differences which may be consequent to the measurement method or to disease severity. The UES opening during swallowing has a smaller diameter, and the bolus transit time through the sphincter is longer. Conclusion The UES of patients with GERD does not open as expected and the bolus flow through the sphincter is longer. This behavior may be associated with dysphagia, a frequent complaint in patients with GERD.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been reported to be increasing in recent years. However, there have been few reports on the prevalence of GERD during pregnancy in the Asian population. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of GERD in Vietnamese pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the antenatal clinic of the Nhan Dan Gia Dinh Hospital, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam. Four hundred females, at various stages of pregnancy, were enrolled. GERD was diagnosed if there was troublesome heartburn and/or acid regurgitation, at least once a week, during the current pregnancy. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of GERD in pregnancy was 38.5% (154/400). The prevalence of GERD in the third trimester was significantly higher than that in the second trimester (46.8% vs. 30.7%, P=0.008) and tended to be higher than its prevalence in the first trimester (46.8% vs. 35.4%, P=0.051). In the pregnant women with GERD, the frequency of regurgitation was significantly higher than that of heartburn (92.9% vs. 30.5%, P<0.001). Those typical symptoms were more prevalent in the daytime, compared with nighttime. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that GERD was prevalent during pregnancy in Vietnam. In the pregnant women with GERD, regurgitation was much more common than heartburn, and those typical reflux symptoms occurred more frequently in the daytime, compared with nighttime.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT Background: Esophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux are the same in functional heartburn, non-erosive disease, and erosive disease. Their patient-perceived intensity may be related to gastroesophageal reflux intensity. Objective To evaluate whether the symptoms in GERD patients are related to the intensity of gastroesophageal acid reflux. Methods To test this hypothesis, 68 patients with heartburn (18 with functional heartburn, 28 with non-erosive reflux disease, and 22 with erosive reflux disease) had their symptoms evaluated by the Velanovich score (which mainly focuses on heartburn) and the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) (which focuses on dysphagia). They were submitted to esophageal endoscopy and then, on another day, they answered the Velanovich and EAT-10 questionnaires and underwent manometry and 24-hour pHmetry (measured 5 cm proximal to the upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter). Results The Velanovich score was higher in patients with non-erosive and erosive diseases than in those with functional heartburn. The mean EAT-10 score did not differ between functional heartburn, erosive, and non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Considering the threshold of ≥5 to define dysphagia, 4 (22%) patients with functional heartburn, 12 (43%) with non-erosive disease, and 9 (41%) with erosive disease had dysphagia (P=0.18). There was: a) a moderate correlation between the Velanovich and DeMeester score and between Velanovich score and the percentage of acid exposure time (AET); b) a weak correlation between EAT-10 and DeMeester score and between EAT-10 and acid exposure time. Conclusion: There is a moderate positive correlation between heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux measurement. Dysphagia has a weak positive correlation with reflux measurement.
RESUMO Contexto Os sintomas esofágicos do refluxo gastroesofágico são os mesmos na pirose funcional, doença do refluxo não erosiva e doença erosiva. A intensidade percebida pelo paciente pode estar relacionada à intensidade do refluxo gastroesofágico. Objetivo Avaliar se os sintomas em pacientes com doença do refluxo gastroesofágico estão relacionados à intensidade do refluxo. Métodos: Sessenta e oito pacientes com pirose (18 com pirose funcional, 28 com doença do refluxo não erosiva e 22 com doença erosiva) tiveram seus sintomas avaliados pelo escore de Velanovich (que avalia principalmente pirose) e o Instrumento de Autoavaliação da Alimentação (EAT-10) (que avalia disfagia). Os pacientes foram submetidos à endoscopia esofágica e, em outro dia, responderam aos questionários Velanovich e EAT-10 e realizaram manometria e pHmetria de 24 horas (medida 5 cm proximal à borda superior do esfíncter esofágico inferior). Resultados O escore de Velanovich foi maior em pacientes com doença não erosiva e doença erosiva do que naqueles com pirose funcional. A pontuação média da EAT-10 não diferiu entre pirose funcional, doença do refluxo gastroesofágico erosiva e não erosiva. Considerando o limiar ≥5 para definir disfagia, 4 (22%) pacientes com pirose funcional, 12 (43%) com doença não erosiva e 9 (41%) com doença erosiva apresentavam disfagia (P=0,18). Houve: a) correlação moderada entre os escores de Velanovich e DeMeester e entre os escores de Velanovich e o percentual de tempo de exposição ao ácido (AET); b) uma correlação fraca entre o EAT-10 e o escore DeMeester e entre o EAT-10 e o tempo de exposição ao ácido. Conclusão Existe uma correlação positiva moderada entre a pirose e a medida do refluxo gastroesofágico. Disfagia tem correlação fraca com a medição do refluxo.
RESUMO
Obesity is a risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Studies addressing the brain-esophagus axis in obese are lacking. In obese with and without heartburn, we assessed: (i) the brain responses to esophageal acid perfusion during functional brain imaging; (ii) esophageal impedance baseline before and after acid perfusion; and (iii) abdominal fat distribution. In this exploratory study, 26 obese underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain combined with esophageal acid perfusion. Esophageal impedance baseline was determined before and after fMRI, followed by tomographic quantification of the abdominal fat. Among 26 obese (54% men, 39.7 years old, 33.5 kg/m2), there were 17 with heartburn and 9 without heartburn. Before fMRI, the esophageal impedance baseline was lower in obese with heartburn than without heartburn (median 1187 vs. 1890 Ω; P = 0.025). After acid perfusion, impedance baseline decreased in obese with heartburn (from 1187 to 899 Ω; P = 0.011) and was lower in this group than in obese without heartburn (899 vs. 1614 Ω; P = 0.001). fMRI task-residual analysis showed that obese with heartburn presented higher functional connectivity in several brain regions than obese without heartburn. Abdominal fat area did not differ between obese with and without heartburn either for total (72.8 ± 4.4% vs. 70.3 ± 6.0%; P = 0.280), subcutaneous (42.2 ± 9.0% vs. 37.4 ± 9.0%; P = 0.226), or visceral (30.6 ± 7.9% vs. 33.0 ± 7.8%; P = 0.484). In subjects with obesity, the brain-esophagus axis is disrupted centrally with higher functional brain connectivity and peripherally with decreased esophageal mucosa integrity in the presence of heartburn.
Assuntos
Monitoramento do pH Esofágico , Azia , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Feminino , Esôfago/patologia , Impedância Elétrica , Ácidos , Obesidade/complicações , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/patologiaRESUMO
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Heartburn and acid regurgitation are typical symptoms usually associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GERD is one of the gastrointestinal diagnosis with higher prevalence worldwide, significantly impairing patients' quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of GERD-related symptoms in the Brazilian urban population. METHODS: National telephone survey with community-dwelling Brazilian individuals. Self-reported prevalence and frequency of symptoms (heartburn / regurgitation) were assessed. Individuals rated the impact of symptoms in their general well-being using a numeric scale from 1 to 10 (1 = no impact; 10 = very intense, preventing the person to eat and perform daily routine activities). Descriptive and bivariate statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: The final sample was comprised of 1,773 subjects, 935 (52.7%) females, an average of 40 years old. The prevalence of heartburn and regurgitation in the past 6 months was 26.2% (n=466) and 11.0% (n=196), respectively. Women presented higher prevalence (heartburn n=266, 28.5% and regurgitation n=119, 12.7%) than men (n=200, 23.1% and n=78, 8.9%, respectively) (P<0.05). Heartburn in the past week was reported by 175 individuals (9.8%), while regurgitation episodes by 67 (3.8%). Absence of impact of the symptom in the overall well-being was observed for 82 subjects (17.6%) with heartburn and 18 individuals (9.2%) with regurgitation. Very intense impact was reported by 46 subjects (9.8%) with heartburn and 41 (20.9%) with regurgitation. Women's well-being was more affected than men's (mean score 5.45 vs 4.71, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Heartburn and regurgitation were frequent symptoms, women with higher prevalence. These symptoms led to a substantial impact on individuals' well-being, women being more affected.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: Pirose e regurgitação ácida são sintomas típicos usualmente relacionados à doença do refluxo gastroesofágico (DRGE). A DRGE é um dos diagnósticos gastrointestinais com maior prevalência mundial, afetando significativamente a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. OBJETIVO: Analisar o impacto de sintomas relacionados à DRGE em uma amostra da população brasileira urbana. MÉTODOS: Inquérito nacional via telefone com indivíduos brasileiros em contexto comunitário. O inquérito foi conduzido entre 6 de agosto e 12 de setembro de 2018. A prevalência autorrelatada e a frequência dos sintomas foram avaliadas. Os respondentes classificaram o impacto dos sintomas no seu bem-estar geral utilizando uma escala numérica de 1 a 10 (1 = ausência de impacto; 10 = impacto muito grave, impedindo a pessoa de comer ou realizar atividades da vida diária). Análises estatísticas descritivas e bivariadas foram conduzidas. RESULTADOS: A amostra final foi constituída por 1.773 indivíduos, 935 (52,7%) mulheres, com idade média de 40 anos. A prevalência de pirose e regurgitação nos últimos 6 meses foi de 26,2% (n=466) e 11,0% (n=196), respectivamente. Sexo feminino (pirose n=266, 28,5% e regurgitação n=119, 12,7%) apresentou prevalência mais alta do que o masculino (n=200, 23,1% e n=78, 8,9%, respectivamente) (P<0,05). Pirose na última semana foi relatada por 175 indivíduos (9,8%), enquanto episódios de regurgitação por 67 (3,8%). Ausência de impacto dos sintomas no bem-estar geral dos indivíduos foi observada para 82 respondentes (17,6%) com pirose e 18 (9,2%) daqueles com regurgitação. Impacto muito grave foi reportado por 46 (9,8%) indivíduos com pirose e 41 (20,9%) com regurgitação. Sexo feminino foi mais afetado pelos sintomas do que o masculino. CONCLUSÃO: Pirose e regurgitação foram bastante frequentes sendo o sexo feminino mais afetado. Tais sintomas levaram a impacto no bem-estar dos indivíduos, com maior prejuízo para mulheres.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Azia/etiologia , Azia/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Brasil/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with slower transit of the bolus through the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter. Functional heartburn has similar symptoms to gastroesophageal reflux disease, however, the symptoms are not caused by reflux. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate oral and pharyngeal transit in patients with functional heartburn, with the hypothesis that, similar to patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, they have changes in pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter transit time. METHODS: Oral and pharyngeal transit was evaluated by videofluoroscopy in eight women with functional heartburn, five with mild dysphagia for solid foods, and 12 female controls. Controls and patients swallowed in duplicate 5 mL and 10 mL of liquid and paste boluses. RESULTS: No difference in the oral or pharyngeal transit time was found between patients and controls. No aspiration of bolus into the airways was detected in any individual. Pharyngeal residues were detected in the same proportion of swallows, in patients (12.5%) and controls (15.0%), after swallows of 10 mL paste bolus. CONCLUSION: Oral, pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter transit time are similar in patients with functional heartburn to healthy controls.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: A doença do refluxo gastroesofágico está associada ao trânsito mais lento do bolo deglutido pela faringe e esfíncter superior do esôfago. Pirose funcional tem sintomas similares aos de doença do refluxo gastroesofágico, entretanto eles não são consequência de refluxo. OBJETIVO: Como na pirose funcional os sintomas são semelhantes aos da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico, o objetivo desta investigação foi avaliar a duração do trânsito do bolo deglutido pela boca, faringe e esfíncter superior do esôfago em pacientes com pirose funcional, com a hipótese de que esses pacientes também apresentem alteração no trânsito. MÉTODOS: Pelo método videofluoroscópico foi avaliado o trânsito oral e faríngeo de oito pacientes do sexo feminino com pirose funcional, cinco com disfagia leve para alimentos sólidos, e 12 indivíduos controles do sexo feminino. Controles e pacientes deglutiram em duplicata 5 mL e 10 mL de bolos com a consistências líquida e pastosa. RESULTADOS: Com bolo líquido e pastoso não houve diferença na duração do trânsito oral, faríngeo e pelo esfíncter superior do esôfago entre controles e pacientes. Não houve aspiração do bolo para as vias aéreas em nenhum indivíduo. Os resíduos faríngeos foram observados na mesma proporção das deglutições em pacientes (12,5%) e controles (15%), com a deglutição de 10 mL de bolo pastoso. CONCLUSÃO: A duração do trânsito oral, faríngeo e pelo esfíncter superior do esôfago foi semelhante nos pacientes com pirose funcional e controles.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Faringe , Azia , Transtornos de Deglutição , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Deglutição , ManometriaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Heartburn and regurgitation are the most common gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and dysphagia could be a possible symptom. This investigation aimed to evaluate the prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation. METHODS: A total of 147 patients (age, 20-70 years; women, 72%) complaining of heartburn and regurgitation, without esophageal stricture, previous esophageal surgery, or other diseases, were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients had esophagitis. The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was employed to screen for dysphagia; EAT-10 is composed of 10 items, and the patients rate each item from 0 to 4 (0, no problems; 4, most severe symptom). Results of the 147 patients were compared with those of 417 healthy volunteers (women, 62%; control group) aged 20-68 years. RESULTS: In the control group, only two (0.5%) had an EAT-10 score ≥5, which was chosen as the threshold to define dysphagia. EAT-10 scores ≥5 were found in 71 (48.3%) patients and in 55% of the patients with esophagitis and 47% of the patients without esophagitis. This finding indicates a relatively higher prevalence of perceived dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation and in patients with esophagitis. We also found a positive correlation between EAT-10 scores and the severity of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms based on the Velanovich scale. CONCLUSION: In patients with heartburn and regurgitation symptoms, the prevalence of dysphagia was at least 48%, and has a positive correlation with the overall symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Transtornos de Deglutição/epidemiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Azia/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The best method to measure the frequency and duration of gastroesophageal reflux is 24-h pH or 24-h pH/impedance monitoring. However, the detection of reflux can vary when measured on different days. Our aim was to evaluate the possibility that the severity of gastroesophageal reflux is different even under similar conditions on two consecutive days. METHODS: We performed a 48-h pH monitoring in 12 subjects, aged 25 - 63 years, who complaint of heartburn and regurgitation, ten with esophagitis and two with non-erosive disease. The pH measurement was conducted at 5 cm from the lower esophageal sphincter. The patients stayed at the Clinical Investigation Ward of the hospital for 48 h. On each day, they consumed a 2,000 calorie diet. The results obtained on the first day were compared with those on the second day. RESULTS: Mean reflux index in the upright position was different between the two days. Results of the pH-monitoring within the 2 h after the meal revealed differences in the number of acidic reflux and reflux index episodes. Three patients had abnormal DeMeester score on one day and normal score on the other day. Considering the upper limit of 6.0% of the test duration with esophageal pH < 4 as indicative of gastroesophageal reflux disease, two patients showed abnormal results on one day and normal results on the other day. CONCLUSIONS: The 24-h pH monitoring, performed on two consecutive days under similar conditions, can lead to different diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in symptomatic patients.
RESUMO
Resumen Introducción y objetivos: el análisis de la impedancia basal nocturna media (IBNM) se ha propuesto para incrementar la precisión diagnóstica de enfermedad por reflujo erosiva (ERGE). Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar el rendimiento diagnóstico de esta prueba en un grupo de pacientes con ERGE conocida. Materiales y métodos: incluimos 123 individuos (58 con ERGE y 65 controles sanos) a quienes se les realizó pH-impedanciometría (pH-IMM) consecutiva entre enero de 2015 y junio de 2017. Todos los pacientes tenían endoscopia tomada en los 6 meses previos. El tiempo de exposición ácida (TEA) anormal (>4,2%) y la presencia de pirosis y/o regurgitación en los 6 meses previos fueron los criterios para el diagnóstico de ERGE. Se encontraron 58 pacientes con ERGE, 24 con enfermedad por reflujo erosiva (ERE) y 34 con enfermedad por reflujo no erosiva (ERNE). Los 65 restantes fueron controles sanos (CS) asintomáticos con EGD y pH-IMM normales. Todos los trazos de pH-IMM se reanalizaron para medir la IBNM por un segundo observador que desconocía los datos previos. El análisis estadístico incluyó pruebas múltiples de Bonferroni para comparar los grupos; regresión lineal para variables continuas; y análisis de curva ROC para buscar valor IBNM con mayor rendimiento. Para los diferentes parámetros de precisión diagnóstica se utilizó el punto de corte de la IBNM. Se usó significancia estadística con valor de p <0,01 e intervalos de confianza de 95% (IC 95%) para todos los cálculos. Resultados: los pacientes con ERE y ERNE presentaron valores de IBNM significativamente más bajos que el grupo control (p <0,01). Se observó una correlación negativa entre los valores de la IBNM y TEA (r = 0,59; p = <0,001), y también entre la IBNM y número de eventos de reflujo (r = 0,37; p = <0,001). En el análisis de curva ROC, el área bajo la curva de la IBNM fue de 0,941 (IC 95%: 0,894-0,987) y el punto de corte con mayor eficiencia 1102 ohms (sensibilidad 98,5%; especificidad 84,5%). Usando este valor (<1,102), la IBNM tuvo una sensibilidad para detectar ERGE de 91% (ERNE 86% y ERE 100%) y una especificidad de 98%. Conclusión: la IBNM tiene alta sensibilidad y especificidad para el diagnóstico de la ERGE. Adicionar esta prueba al análisis convencional de la pH-impedancia y a los métodos actuales de estudio de la ERGE puede mejorar significativamente nuestra capacidad para diagnosticar la enfermedad.
Abstract Introduction and Objectives: Analysis of nocturnal basal impedance (IBNM) has been proposed as a way to increase accuracy of GERD diagnosis. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of this test in a group of patients known to have GERD. Materials and methods: We included 123 individuals: 58 with GERD and 65 healthy controls. They underwent consecutive pH-impedance monitoring between January 2015 and June 2017. All had undergone endoscopy in the 6 months prior to testing. Criteria used for diagnosis of GERD were abnormal acid exposure time (AET > 4.2%), pyrosis and/or regurgitation in the previous 6 months. We found 58 patients with GERD of whom 24 had erosive reflux disease (ERE) and 34 had non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). The remaining 65 were asymptomatic healthy controls with normal endoscopic results and pH impedance monitoring. A second observer who did not know the previous data measurements analyzed all pH impedance monitoring traces for IBMN. Statistical analysis included multiple Bonferroni tests for comparison between groups, linear regression for continuous variables, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to find high performance IBNM values. The IBNM cutoff point was used for diagnostic precision parameters. Statistical significance was set at p <0.01, and 95% confidence intervals were used for all calculations. Results: IBNM measures were significantly lower for patients with ERE and NERD than for the control group (p <0.01). A negative correlation was observed between IBNM and acid exposure time values (r = 0.59, p = <0.001) and also between IBNM and number of reflux events (r = 0.37, p = <0.001). ROC curve analysis found that the area under the curve for IBNM was 0.941 (95% CI: 0.894-0.987), and the cutoff point with the highest efficiency was 1,102 ohms (sensitivity 98.5%, specificity 84.5%). Using this value (<1.102), the IBNM had a sensitivity for detecting GERD of 91% (NERD 86% and ERE 100%) and a specificity of 98%. Conclusion: IBNM has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of GERD. Addition of this test to conventional pH-impedance analysis and current methods for studying GERD can significantly improve our ability to diagnose this disease.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Doença , Impedância Elétrica , Monitoramento Ambiental , Azia , Métodos , Pacientes , Endoscopia , Padrões de ReferênciaRESUMO
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Medical literature has shown dyspepsia and heartburn-related symptoms occur among 15% to 40% of the population. These symptoms can occur at any age and are more prevalent in women. OBJECTIVE Investigate the prevalence of dyspeptic symptoms and heartburn among individuals over 18. METHODS Individuals over 18 were randomly selected in public venues in Belo Horizonte/MG to participate. A standardized questionnaire that included questions related to social-demographic characteristics, eating habits, digestive symptoms, medical appointments, medications, exams, previous surgeries and comorbidities was applied. A questionnaire about functional dyspepsia diagnosis (Rome III) was also applied. RESULTS A total of 548 individuals were interviewed. Among these, 58.4% were women, 59.3% were white, 55.9% were single and the average age was 36 years. Within this group, 376 individuals (68.6%) declared to have some symptom and/or use medication to relieve dyspepsia symptoms, and for these patients were applied the Rome III questionnaire. Based on the diagnostic criteria for the questionnaire proposed by the Rome III consensus, the symptom of postprandial fullness was reported by 6.7% of the individuals, early satiety (3.5%) and epigastric pain (10.6%). The overlap of these symptoms was very frequent. The prevalence of functional dyspepsia was 10.6% (postprandial discomfort syndrome (8.2%) and epigastric pain syndrome (2.4%). Among all participants, 52.5% reported heartburn, and 11.1% presented this symptom at least once a week. The most used drug was omeprazole. CONCLUSION The prevalence of dyspeptic symptoms and heartburn among a Brazilian adult urban population is similar to those described in other countries.
RESUMO CONTEXTO Tem sido relatado que cerca de 15% a 40% da população geral apresenta alguma queixa dispéptica e/ou pirose. Os sintomas dispépticos podem surgir em qualquer idade e são mais prevalentes no sexo feminino. OBJETIVO Investigar a prevalência de sintomas dispépticos e pirose em indivíduos com idade superior a 18 anos. MÉTODOS Foram selecionados aleatoriamente indivíduos com idade superior a 18 anos, entrevistados em praças públicas de Belo Horizonte/MG, por meio de um questionário que abordou características sócio-demográficas, questões relacionadas aos hábitos alimentares, sintomas digestivos, consultas médicas, medicamentos, exames, antecedentes cirúrgicos, comorbidades e questionário específico para diagnóstico de dispepsia funcional (Roma III). RESULTADOS Foram entrevistados 548 participantes. Destes, 58,4% eram mulheres, 59,3% da raça branca, 56% solteiros e a idade média foi de 36 anos. Neste grupo, 376 indivíduos (68,6%) declararam ter algum sintoma e/ou utilizar algum medicamento para aliviar sintomas dispépticos. Para esses indivíduos, foi utilizado o questionário Roma III para o diagnóstico de dispepsia sendo sintoma de plenitude pós-prandial (6,7%), saciedade precoce (3,5%) e a dor ou queimação no estômago (azia) presente em 10,6%. A sobreposição desses sintomas foi muito frequente. A prevalência de dispepsia funcional foi de 10,6% (síndrome de desconforto pós-prandial (8,2%), síndrome da dor epigástrica (2,4%)). Dentre os participantes, 52,5% relatavam pirose, sendo que desses 11,1% apresentavam este sintoma, no mínimo, uma vez por semana. O medicamento mais utilizado foi o Omeprazol. CONCLUSÃO A prevalência dos sintomas dispépticos e pirose na população urbana adulta brasileira é semelhante a descrita em outros países.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Dispepsia/epidemiologia , Azia/epidemiologia , População Urbana , Brasil/epidemiologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is currently considered the surgical treatment of choice for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its long-term effectiveness is above 90%. Adequate patient selection and the experience of the surgeon are among the predictive factors of good clinical response. However, there can be new, persistent, and recurrent symptoms after the antireflux procedure in up to 30% of the cases. There are numerous causes, but in general, they are due to one or more anatomic abnormalities and esophageal and gastric function alterations. When there are persistent symptoms after the surgical procedure, the surgery should be described as "failed". In the case of a patient that initially manifests symptom control, but the symptoms then reappear, the term "dysfunction" could be used. When symptoms worsen, or when symptoms or clinical situations appear that did not exist before the surgery, this should be considered a "complication". Postoperative dysphagia and dyspeptic symptoms are very frequent and require an integrated approach to determine the best possible treatment. This review details the pathophysiologic aspects, diagnostic approach, and treatment of the symptoms and complications after fundoplication for the management of GERD.
Assuntos
Fundoplicatura , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Recidiva , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Contexto: la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) es una patología muy prevalente en adultos que altera la calidad de vida. Se han investigado múltiples tratamientos, algunos de ellos son cambios en el estilo de vida, dado que se han descrito algunos factores de riesgo asociados. El cambio en el estilo de vida es recomendado, sin embargo la evidencia que la soporta es controvertida y escasa. Objetivo: estimar el impacto que tienen los cambios en el estilo de vida en los pacientes con ERGE. Metodología: se realizó un búsqueda sistemática de la literatura en 3 bases de datos (PubMed, ScienceDirect y Embase) y se utilizaron las palabras claves "gastroesophagueal reflux", "heartburn", "bed head elevation", "Carbonated Beverages", "mint", "cacao", "citrus", "alcohol drinking", "caffeine", "coffee", "late-evening meal", "spicy food", "fatty foods", "obesity", "weight loss", "exercise" y "Smoking Cessation". Se incluyeron ensayos clínicos controlados y estudios de cohortes prospectivos que hayan estudiado una intervención en el estilo de vida sobre y evaluado su efecto sobre la ERGE. Resultados: se encontraron 2731 artículos, de los cuales 15 fueron incluidos para ser analizados. Suspender algunos alimentos o bebidas como la menta, el chocolate, cítricos, bebidas carbonatadas, comidas grasas y picantes para mejorar la clínica de la ERGE carece de evidencia. Tomar café descafeinado podría disminuir la cantidad de reflujo. Dejar de fumar se asoció con mejoría de la sintomatología. El horario de la comida en la noche puede alterar algunos parámetros de la pH-metría pero no modificó los síntomas. Algunos ejercicios, principalmente respiratorios podrían mejorar la sintomatología. La elevación de la cabecera de la cama y disminuir de peso en pacientes en sobrepeso/obesos tienen evidencia a favor de la mejoría de los síntomas, sin embargo cuentan con evidencia en contra y limitaciones metodológicas. Conclusión: los cambios en el estilo de vida para mejorar la ERGE no cuentan con evidencia adecuada, existen principalmente ensayos clínicos no controlados o estudios observacionales. Se necesitan más ensayos clínicos y de mejor calidad para definir el impacto de estas medidas en la ERGE.
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very prevalent disease among adults that alters the quality of life. Many treatments have been investigated, some of which require changes in lifestyle related to associated risk factors. Although changes in lifestyle are recommended, the evidence that supports these recommendations is controversial and scarce. Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the impact of lifestyle changes on patients with GERD. Methodology: A systematic search of the literature in PubMed, Science Direct and Embase was conducted using the following keywords: gastroesophagueal (sic) reflux, heartburn, bed head elevation, Carbonated Beverages, mint, cocoa, citrus, Drinking Alcohol, caffeine, coffee, late-evening meal, spicy food, fatty foods, obesity, weight loss, exercise and Smoking Cessation. Controlled clinical trials and prospective cohort studies that studied lifestyle changes and their effects on GERD were included in the study. Results: Of the 2,731 articles found, fifteen were included in our analysis. There is little evidence that suspending consumption of food or drink items such as peppermint, chocolate, citrus, carbonated beverages, fatty foods and spicy foods clinically improves GERD. Decaffeinated coffee may decrease the amount of reflux, and quitting smoking is associated with improvement in symptoms. Meal times at night can change some parameters of pH monitoring but did not alter symptoms. Some exercises, mainly respiratory, may improve symptoms. There is evidence that elevating the head while in the bed and weight loss (in cases of overweight or obese patients) improve symptoms, but there is also evidence against these methods and studies of them have methodological limitations. Conclusion: Adequate evidence does not exist that changes in lifestyle improve GERD symptoms. Most studies are uncontrolled clinical trials or observational studies. Additional clinical trials with better quality are needed to define the impact of these measures on GERD.
Assuntos
Humanos , Bebidas , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , AziaRESUMO
Background Heartburn and regurgitation frequently occur in the third trimester of pregnancy, but their impact on quality of life has not been thoroughly investigated. Objective To measure health-related quality of life of third-trimester pregnant women with heartburn and regurgitation. Methods Data on obstetric history, heartburn and regurgitation frequency and intensity, history of heartburn and regurgitation and health-related quality of life were collected of 82 third-trimester pregnant women. Results Sixty-two (76%) women had heartburn, and 58 (71%), regurgitation; 20 were asymptomatic. Mean gestational age was 33.8±3.7 weeks; 35 (43%) women had a family history of heartburn and/or regurgitation, and 57 (70%) were asymptomatic before pregnancy. The following quality of life concepts were significantly reduced: physical problems and social functioning for heartburn; physical problems and emotional functioning for regurgitation. There was agreement between heartburn in present and previous pregnancies. Conclusion Heartburn and/or regurgitation affected health-related quality of life of third trimester pregnant women .
Contexto A pirose e a regurgitação ocorrem com frequência no terceiro trimestre de gestação, mas o seu impacto na qualidade de vida não foi completamente investigado. Objetivo Avaliar a qualidade da vida de gestantes do terceiro trimestre com pirose e regurgitação. Métodos Os dados sobre a história obstétrica, frequência, intensidade e história de pirose e regurgitação, bem como a qualidade de vida foram coletados de 82 mulheres do terceiro trimestre de gestação. Resultados Sessenta e duas (76%) mulheres tinham pirose e, 58 (71%), regurgitação; 20 eram assintomáticas. A idade gestacional média foi de 33,8 ± 3,7 semanas; 35 (43%) mulheres tinham história familiar de pirose e/ou regurgitação e 57 (70%) eram assintomáticos antes da gestação. Os seguintes domínios de qualidade de vida estavam significativamente reduzidos: limitação física e aspectos sociais pela pirose; limitação física e aspectos emocionais pela regurgitação. Houve concordância entre pirose nas gestações atuais e prévias. Conclusão A pirose e/ou regurgitação afetam a qualidade de vida de gestantes de terceiro trimestre. .
Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/psicologia , Azia/psicologia , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
AIM: To test efficacy and durability of a polyphenol-based prebiotic treatment for acute gastroenteritis in a 300 patient double-blinded clinical study. METHODS: A two-arm randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical study was conducted at two public health centers in Managua, Nicaragua. Potential subjects who qualified based on inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms. Two thirds of the subjects (n = 200) received a single titrated 0.5-2 ounce liquid dose of a novel polyphenol-based prebiotic (Aliva(TM)) diluted with 2 to eight ounces of oral rehydration solution (ORS). One third of the subjects (n = 100) were randomized to receive two liquid ounces of a taste and color-matched placebo diluted in eight ounces of ORS. The outcome variables measured included stool consistency, stomach discomfort, gas and bloating, and heartburn/indigestion. The study subjects ranked their stool consistency and the severity of their subjective symptoms at specified intervals from immediately prior to treatment, to five days post treatment. All subjects recorded their symptoms in a study diary. The study subjects also recorded the time and consistencies of all stools in their study diary. Stool consistency was compared to the picture and descriptions on the Bristol Stool Chart, and any stool rated greater than Type 4 was considered unformed. The clinical study team reviewed the study diaries with subjects during daily follow-up calls and close-out visits, and recorded the data in case report forms. RESULTS: After receiving a single dose, Aliva treated subjects reported shorter median time to their last unformed stool (1 h 50 min) than placebo treated subjects (67 h 50 min.), a statistically significant difference [95%CI: -3178-(-2018), P = 0.000]. Aliva treated subjects also reported shorter median their time to last unformed stool (TTLUS) (1 hrs 50 min) than placebo treated subjects (67 h 50 min), which was also a statistically significant difference (P = 0.000).The percentage of subjects recording TTLUS was greater for those who received Aliva vs placebo at 30 min (P = 0.027), 2 h (P = 0.000), 24 h (P = 0.000), 48 h (P = 0.000), 72 h (P = 0.000), and 5 d (P = 0.000) post dose. There were 146 study subjects 14 years old or older, which was the criteria set for reliable self-reporting of subjective symptoms. Of those 146 subjects, 142 reported stomach pain and discomfort during screening. From 90 minutes [95%CI: -1.8-(-0.01), P = 0.048] through 5 d [95%CI: -3.4-(-1.9), P = 0.000), the subjects treated with Aliva experienced significantly less stomach pain and discomfort than those who received placebo. Of those same 146 participants, 114 subjects reported gas and bloating during screening. Similarly, subjects who received Aliva experienced significantly less gas and bloating from 2 h [95%CI: -1.7-(-0.39), P = 0.030] through 5 d (95%CI: -2.0-0.42, P = 0.005) compared with the placebo arm. CONCLUSION: In this double-blind, randomized clinical study, subjects with acute gastroenteritis receiving Aliva prebiotic showed significant and sustained improvement of multiple symptoms vs those receiving placebo.
Assuntos
Gastroenterite/terapia , Intestinos/microbiologia , Polifenóis , Prebióticos , Dor Abdominal/microbiologia , Dor Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Dor Abdominal/terapia , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Pré-Escolar , Defecação , Método Duplo-Cego , Fezes , Feminino , Flatulência/microbiologia , Flatulência/fisiopatologia , Flatulência/terapia , Gastroenterite/diagnóstico , Gastroenterite/microbiologia , Gastroenterite/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Intestinos/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Nicarágua , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Objetivos: Avaliar a prevalência e fatores agravantes do sintoma de pirose possivelmente associado a refluxo gastroesofágico, em estudantesde medicina da Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT).Métodos: Um estudo transversal avaliou questionários aplicados a estudantes do Curso de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Tocantinsentre 23/09/2013 e 04/10/2013. As variáveis analisadas foram faixa etária, sexo, Ãndice de massa corporal, frequência de ocorrência dossintomas, percepção de fatores que agravam o sintoma de pirose, tabagismo e uso de medicamentos para aliviar sintomas de pirose. Paracalcular a prevalência, foi considerado como sintoma de refluxo gastroesofágico a ocorrência de pirose mais de uma vez por semana, mas osfatores agravantes foram pesquisados nos indivÃduos que referiam ter tido o sintoma pelo menos uma vez na vida. A análise estatÃstica incluiuas frequências absolutas e relativas das variáveis, bem como os intervalos de confiança de 95%.Resultados: Foram avaliados 186 estudantes, sendo que 160 (86,0%) referiram ter tido pirose em alguma ocasião. Naqueles que referiramtal sintoma, a faixa etária predominante foi de 21 a 25 anos (65,0%), sendo 51,3% do sexo masculino. O sintoma de pirose ocorrendo pelomenos uma vez por semana foi referido por 88 (47,3%) dos entrevistados, sendo uma vez por semana por 53 (28,5%) e mais de uma vez porsemana por 35 (18,8%). Considerando todos os 160 estudantes que referiam ter tido pirose em alguma ocasião, constatou-se piora do sintomana presença de alterações emocionais (67,5%), ingestão de alimentos gordurosos ou condimentados (63,7%) e bebidas alcoólicas (60,6%).Conclusões: Os estudantes de medicina em estudo apresentaram uma alta prevalência do sintoma pirose. O sintoma era agravado por ingestãode alimentos gordurosos ou condimentados, alterações emocionais e bebidas alcoólicas.
Aims: To evaluate the prevalence and aggravating factors of heartburn symptom possibly associated with gastroesophageal reflux in medicalstudents of the Federal University of Tocantins.Methods: A cross-sectional study evaluated questionnaires given to students of the Medical School of the Federal University of Tocantinsbetween 09/23/2013 and 10/04/2013. The analyzed variables were age, sex, body mass index, frequency of occurrence of symptoms, perceptionof factors that aggravate the symptom of heartburn, smoking, and use of drugs to relieve symptoms of heartburn. To calculate the prevalence,occurrence of heartburn more than once a week was considered as a symptom of gastroesophageal reflux, but the aggravating factors wereinvestigated in subjects who reported having had this symptom at least once in life. Statistical analysis included absolute and relative frequenciesof the variables as well as the confidence intervals of 95%.Results: At all 186 students were evaluated, of which 160 reported heartburn at some time. In those who reported such symptom, thepredominant age group was 21-25 years (65.0%), and 51.3% were male. The symptom of heartburn occurring at least once a week was reportedfor 88 (47.3%) of respondents, being 53 (28.5%) for once a week and 35 (18.8 %) for more than once a week. Considering all the 160 studentswho reported having had heartburn at some time, there was a worsening of symptoms in the presence of emotional disorders (67.5%), eatingfatty foods (63.7%) and alcoholic beverages (60.6% ).Conclusions: Medical students in the study showed a high prevalence of heartburn. This symptom was aggravated in most interviewees byintake of fatty or spicy foods, emotional changes, and alcoholic beverages.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients generally present with heartburn as the main symptom. Antidepressants might help to relieve heartburn by acting on the esophagus-brain axis. We aimed to assess the effect of nortriptyline on behavioral and brain responses to painful esophageal acid infusion in NERD patients evaluated with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). METHODS: In a randomized double-blind crossover design, 20 NERD patients off proton pump inhibitors (36.1 ± 9.3 years, 75% women) were assigned to 21 days of nortriptyline and placebo, in counterbalanced order, with a 21 days washout period in between both treatment periods. Changes in acid-induced brain response on fMRI and heartburn perception were assessed and at the end of each treatment. KEY RESULTS: Nortriptyline significantly reduced the acid-induced brain response in prefrontal cortex (median [IQR]: -1.9 [-4.5 to -0.1] vs -0.3 [-2.5 to 2.3]; p = 0.050), caudate (-3.0 [-5.1 to -0.01] vs 0.48 [-1.9 to 3.1]; p = 0.029), insula (-2.4 [-4.8 to -0.6] vs -0.2 [-1.5 to 1.5]; p = 0.029), cingulate (-4.2 [-8.8 to -0.1] vs -0.6 [-1.8 to 3.0]; p = 0.017), and hippocampus (-2.7 [-6.0 to 0.5] vs -0.04 [-2.3 to 1.9]; p = 0.006) in comparison with placebo. However, there was no significant difference between nortriptyline and placebo in clinical outcomes and side effects. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Nortriptyline decreased the brain response to esophageal acid infusion more markedly than placebo, but without clinical significance.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos Tricíclicos/uso terapêutico , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Azia/tratamento farmacológico , Nortriptilina/uso terapêutico , Percepção da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Encéfalo/fisiologia , Mapeamento Encefálico , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Esôfago/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , Azia/etiologia , Azia/fisiopatologia , Azia/psicologia , Humanos , Ácido Clorídrico/farmacologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Percepção da Dor/fisiologiaRESUMO
Objetivos: Determinar la eficacia del Cuestionario Carlsson - Dent (CCD) y la prueba terapéutica con inhibidores de la bomba de protones para el diagnóstico de Enfermedad por Reflujo Gastroesofágico (ERGE), en el Servicio de Gastroenterología del Hospital Obrero N° 2 (enero-junio 2014). Métodos: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, basado en población, que incluyó pacientes atendidos de forma consecutiva por el Servicio de Gastroenterología en quienes se aplicó el CCD, esofagogastroduodenoscopía y prueba con inhibidores de la bomba de protones a quienes obtenían puntajes ≥ 4. Se clasificó a los pacientes en tres grupos: 1 (≤3 puntos), 2 (4-11 puntos) y 3 (12-18 puntos). Resultados: Se incluyeron 155 pacientes. Perteneciendo 30% al Grupo 39% al grupo 2 y 31% al grupo 3. La respuesta a IBP, 42% reportó respuesta positiva total y 39% parcial. La sensibilidad y especificidad del CCD (punto de corte 4 puntos) para el hallazgo de patología esofágica, fueron 92% y 39%, respectivamente. Conclusiones: El CCD tiene un considerable valor como herramienta diagnostica en la detección de ERGE sobretodo en el primer nivel de atención. Pacientes con calificación de 4 a 11 (grupo 2) del CCD, tienen mayor probabilidad de responder en forma favorable a la prueba terapéutica con IBP. Presentando aquellos con calificación mayor a 12 (grupo 3) baja respuesta a la prueba terapéutica por lo que se debe considerar realizar un abordaje más preciso en relación a complicaciones de ERGE.
Objectives: To determine the efficacy Questionnaire Carlsson-Dent (CCD) and the therapeutic test inhibitors proton pump for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), in the Department of Gastroenterology of the Hospital Obrero N°2 (July-December 2013). Methods: a prospective, population-based, which included consecutive patients seen by the Department of Gastroenterology in whom the CCD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and test inhibitor proton pump who obtained scores ≥ 4 was applied was performed. We classified the patients into three groups: 1 (≤ 3 points), 2 (4-11 points) and 3 (12-18 points). Results: 155 patients were included. Belonging 30% in Group 39% in group 2 and 31 % to group 3. Response to IBP, 42% reported overall positive response and 39% partial. The sensitivity and specificity of the CCD (cutoff 4 points) for the finding of esophageal disease were 92% and 39%, respectively. Conclusions: the CCD has considerable value as a diagnostic tool in the detection of GERD especially in the first level attention. Patients rated from 4 to 11 (group 2) of the CCD, are more likely to respond favorably to the therapeutic test PPI. Presenting those with higher rating to 12 (group 3) low response to therapeutic trial so you should consider a more precise approach in relation to complications of GERD.