RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare outpatient behavioral health scheduling for children in Spanish-speaking families in Pennsylvania with that for children in families who speak English. STUDY DESIGN: We made paired English and Spanish telephone calls to outpatient behavioral health facilities using a standardized script, describing a simulated, stable, Medicaid-insured child. Facilities were identified using the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services Online Provider Directory for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, which had 288 outpatient facilities with nonduplicate telephone numbers. An English-language caller following a script made up to 2 call attempts per facility from December 2019 through February 2020. The 126 facilities that did not answer the phone, accept Medicaid, or see children were removed. A Spanish-language caller then made up to 2 scripted call attempts to the 162 remaining facilities. The primary outcome was whether the facility tried to schedule an appointment for the simulated adolescent. RESULTS: A total of 125 facilities answered both English- and Spanish-language calls. For the English-language caller, 71% of facilities attempted to schedule an appointment and 100% communicated in the caller's preferred language. For the Spanish-language caller, 24% attempted to schedule an appointment (P < .001) and 25% communicated in the caller's preferred language (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Among outpatient behavioral health facilities for Medicaid-insured children in Pennsylvania, there were inequities in access to appointments for families who speak Spanish compared with English. This is a modifiable barrier to care. Community-based behavioral health care for children should strengthen language access training, contracting, and oversight.
RESUMO
General pediatricians and those specialized in developmental-behavioral and neurodevelopmental disabilities support children with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We identified substantial geographic disparities in pediatrician availability (eg, urban > rural areas), as well as regions with low pediatrician access but high ASD/ADHD prevalence estimates (eg, the US Southeast).
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To analyze spatiotemporal trends in hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) sensitive to primary health care (PHC) among individuals aged 50-69 years in Paraná State, Brazil, from 2014 to 2019 and investigate correlations between PHC services and the Social Development Index. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional ecological study using publicly available secondary data to analyze the municipal incidence of hospitalizations for CVD sensitive to PHC and to estimate the risk of hospitalization for this group of diseases and associated factors using hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal modeling with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: There was a 5% decrease in the average rate of hospitalizations for PHC-sensitive CVD from 2014 to 2019. Regarding standardized hospitalization rate (SHR) according to population size, we found that no large municipality had an SHR >2. Likewise, a minority of these municipalities had SHR values of 1-2 (33%). However, many small and medium-sized municipalities had SHR values >2 (47% and 48%, respectively). A greater Social Development Index value served as a protective factor against hospitalizations, with a relative risk of 0.957 (95% credible interval, 0.929-0.984). CONCLUSIONS: The annual risk of hospitalization decreased over time; however, small municipalities had the greatest rates of hospitalization, indicating an increase in health inequity. The inverse association between social development and hospitalizations for CVD sensitive to PHC raises questions about intersectionality in health care.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Humanos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Brasil/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Teorema de Bayes , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to analyse inequalities in oral health services utilisation (OHSU) in older Peruvian adults through comparative analysis of the years 2019 and 2021. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the 2019 and 2021 Demographic and Health Survey (ENDES). The outcome variable was OHSU by older Peruvian adults in the past year. We used Poisson generalised linear models adjusted for age and sex to assess changes in OHSU by sociodemographic characteristics. The Erreygers concentration index was used to describe the socioeconomic inequalities in OHSU. The contribution of each variable to inequalities was estimated by a decomposition analysis. RESULTS: In 2021, OHSU probability amongst older Peruvian adults decreased by 37% compared to 2019. The decline was greatest in those aged 80 or older (51%), the lowest wealth quintile (47%), those with functional limitations (53%), and those whose native language is Quechua or other indigenous languages (47%). Surprisingly, we observed a reduction in OHSU inequalities (difference: -0.1074; P = .003) during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly amongst rural residents (difference: -0.0771; P = .030), the lowest wealth quintile (difference: -0.0764; P = .020), and those with functional limitations (difference: -0.3665; P < .001). Poverty accounted for 73% of the inequality in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of OHSU has significantly decreased likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Paradoxically, we observed a reduction in OHSU inequalities during the pandemic, despite the known socioeconomic impact. However, further research is required to gain deeper understanding of this phenomenon.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Serviços de Saúde Bucal , Humanos , Peru , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviços de Saúde Bucal/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Black adults are disproportionately affected by asthma and are often considered a homogeneous group in research studies despite cultural and ancestral differences. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if asthma morbidity differs across adults in Black ethnic subgroups. METHODS: Adults with moderate-severe asthma were recruited across the continental United States and Puerto Rico for the PREPARE (PeRson EmPowered Asthma RElief) trial. Using self-identifications, we categorized multiethnic Black (ME/B) participants (n = 226) as Black Latinx participants (n = 146) or Caribbean, continental African, or other Black participants (n = 80). African American (AA/B) participants (n = 518) were categorized as Black participants who identified their ethnicity as being American. Baseline characteristics and retrospective asthma morbidity measures (self-reported exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids [SCs], emergency department/urgent care [ED/UC] visits, hospitalizations) were compared across subgroups using multivariable regression. RESULTS: Compared with AA/B participants, ME/B participants were more likely to be younger, residing in the US Northeast, and Spanish speaking and to have lower body mass index, health literacy, and <1 comorbidity, but higher blood eosinophil counts. In a multivariable analysis, ME/B participants were significantly more likely to have ED/UC visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.04-1.72) and SC use (IRR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.00-1.62) for asthma than AA/B participants. Of the ME/B subgroups, Puerto Rican Black Latinx participants (n = 120) were significantly more likely to have ED/UC visits (IRR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.22-2.21) and SC use for asthma (IRR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.06-1.92) than AA/B participants. There were no significant differences in hospitalizations for asthma among subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: ME/B adults, specifically Puerto Rican Black Latinx adults, have higher risk of ED/UC visits and SC use for asthma than other Black subgroups.
Assuntos
Asma , População Negra , Adulto , Humanos , Asma/complicações , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/etnologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Morbidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Porto Rico/etnologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/etnologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , População do Caribe/estatística & dados numéricos , África/etnologia , População Negra/etnologia , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Although several Latin American countries have 70% antenatal care coverage, the proportion of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing of Peruvian pregnant women and the socioeconomic inequalities of this preventive measure are unknown. This study aimed to determine socioeconomic inequalities and quantify the contribution of contextual and compositional factors on HIV testing during prenatal care in Peru. A cross-sectional study of the 2021 Demographic and Family Health Survey data was conducted. The outcome variable was HIV testing of pregnant women during prenatal care. An analysis of inequalities was performed including the determination of concentration curves and a decomposition analysis of concentration indices. Of a total of 17521 women aged 15 to 49 years, 91.4% had been tested for HIV during prenatal care. The concentration curves showed that prenatal HIV testing was concentrated among richer women, while the decomposition analysis determined that the main contributors to inequality were having a higher education, residing in an urban area, and in the highlands, belonging to the wealthy quintile, and being exposed to television and newspapers. Strategies focused on improving access, promotion and restructuring of prevention of mother-to-child transmission measures should be prioritized.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Peru , Estudos Transversais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , HIV , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Abstract To plan and evaluate public health policies, it is important to understand the influence of social factors on the quality and access to dental care. This study aimed to verify the potential association between the indicators of pregnant women receiving dental care and the social and health care indicators of cities in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais. A cross-sectional ecological study was performed with secondary data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics and the Health Care Department of the Ministry of Health regarding the cities of Minas Gerais. The study analyzed three health care indicators (such as more than six prenatal, the proportion of syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus tests, and oral health coverage) and four social indicators (average monthly wage, illiteracy rate, proportion of employed population, and rate of adequate sanitary sewerage). Bivariate analysis (Mann-Whitney test) and logistic regression were performed using Jamovi software. All of the indicators analyzed were associated with the access of pregnant women to dental care. However, in the regression models, only health care indicators remained statistically significant. Thus, although social indicators are associated with the access of pregnant women to dental appointments, access to primary health care and the teamwork of primary health care teams may overcome social inequality in the access of pregnant women to dental care.
RESUMO
Central America and the Caribbean is a highly heterogeneous region comprising more than 30 countries and territories with more than 200 million inhabitants. Although recent advances in the region have improved access to cancer care, there are still many disparities and barriers for obtaining high-quality cancer treatments, particularly for those from disadvantaged populations, immigrants, and rural areas. In this article, we provide an overview of cancer care in Central America and the Caribbean, with selected examples of issues related to disparities in access to care and suggest solutions and strategies to move forward.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias , Humanos , Região do Caribe/epidemiologia , América Central/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMO
The objective of this study was to determine the socioeconomic inequalities and factors associated with the use of modern contraceptive methods (MCM) in the population of sexually active women of childbearing age in Ecuador. This was an analytical observational study, based on a secondary data analysis of the 2018 National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT). Information on 19,106 sexually active, married, or cohabiting women between the ages of 15 and 49 were included. Concentration curves (CC) and Erreygers concentration indices (ECI) were calculated, taking into account the use of MCM as the dependent variable and the wealth index as the independent variable. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using generalized linear models of the Poisson family. We found that 92.8% of the women surveyed used some type of MCM in the last month. A higher educational level presented a significant pro-rich concentration in the use of MCM (EIC: 0.05; p = 0.004). On the other hand, women belonging to the age group of 20 to 29 years (ECI: -0.027; p = 0.027), women with no job (ECI: -0.025; p = 0.004), and non-indigenous women (EIC: -0.031; p < 0.001), presented a pro-poor concentration. Factors significantly associated with MCM use were age, marital status, occupation, parity, ethnicity, area of residence, and living on the coast. In Ecuador, there are socioeconomic inequalities at different levels of population subgroups in women of childbearing age. Measures to promote the use of MCM are required, focusing on groups that present inequality, taking into account the factors associated with their use.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between race and ethnicity and length of stay (LOS) for US children with acute osteomyelitis. STUDY DESIGN: Using the Kids' Inpatient Database, we conducted a cross-sectional study of children <21 years old hospitalized in 2016 or 2019 with acute osteomyelitis. Using survey-weighted negative binomial regression, we modeled LOS by race and ethnicity, adjusting for clinical and hospital characteristics and socioeconomic status. Secondary outcomes included prolonged LOS, defined as LOS of >7 days (equivalent to LOS in the highest quartile). RESULTS: We identified 2388 children discharged with acute osteomyelitis. The median LOS was 5 days (IQR, 3-7). Compared with White children, children of Black race (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27), Hispanic ethnicity (aIRR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.21), and other race and ethnicity (aIRR 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.23) had a significantly longer LOS. The odds of Black children experiencing prolonged LOS was 46% higher compared with White children (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.01-2.11). CONCLUSIONS: Children of Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and other race and ethnicity with acute osteomyelitis experienced longer LOS than White children. Elucidating the mechanisms underlying these race- and ethnicity-based differences, including social drivers such as access to care, structural racism, and bias in provision of inpatient care, may improve management and outcomes for children with acute osteomyelitis.
Assuntos
Hospitalização , Tempo de Internação , Osteomielite , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Doença Aguda , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Estudos Transversais , Etnicidade , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Osteomielite/epidemiologia , Osteomielite/etnologia , Osteomielite/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Brancos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential effect modification by health insurance coverage on racial and ethnic disparities in cancer survival among US children and adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: Data from 54â558 individuals diagnosed with cancer at ≤ 19 years between 2004 and 2010 were obtained from the National Cancer Database. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for analyses. An interaction term between race/ethnicity and health insurance type was included to examine racial/ethnic disparities in survival by each insurance status category. RESULTS: Racial/ethnic minorities experienced a 14%-42% higher hazard of death compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) with magnitudes varying by health insurance type (Pinteraction < .001). Specifically, among those reported as privately insured, the hazard of death was higher for non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.36-1.62), non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Natives (HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.36-2.90), non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.13-1.50), and Hispanics (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.17-1.40) vs NHWs. Racial/ethnic disparities in survival among those reported as covered by Medicaid were present for NHBs (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.19-1.43) but no other racial/ethnic minorities (HR ranges: 0.98â¼1.00) vs NHWs. In the uninsured group, the hazard of death for NHBs (HR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.26-2.23) and Hispanics (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.01-1.61) was higher vs NHWs. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in survival exist across insurance types, particularly for NHB childhood and adolescent cancer patients vs NHWs with private insurance. These findings provide insights for research and policy, and point to the need for more efforts on promoting health equity while improving health insurance coverage.
Assuntos
Etnicidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Hispânico ou Latino , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Brancos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Indígena Americano ou Nativo do AlascaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in the availability of mental health crisis services in Puerto Rico relative to US states before and after Hurricanes Maria and Irma. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: National Mental Health Services Surveys conducted in 2016 and 2020. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional design. The independent variable was mental health facility location in Puerto Rico or a US state. Dependent variables were the availability of three mental health crisis services (psychiatric emergency walk-in services, suicide prevention services, and crisis intervention team services). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The proportion and per 100,000 population rate of facilities offering crisis services were calculated. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The availability of crisis services at mental health facilities in Puerto Rico remained stable between 2016 and 2020. These services were offered less at indigent care facilities in Puerto Rico than US states (e.g., 38.2% vs. 49.5% for suicide prevention, p = 0.06) and the magnitude of difference increased following Hurricane Maria. CONCLUSIONS: There are disparities between Puerto Rico and US states in the availability of mental health crisis services for indigent patients.
Assuntos
Tempestades Ciclônicas , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Humanos , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , Saúde Mental , Estudos TransversaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hispanic/Latinx (HL) ethnicity encompasses racially and culturally diverse subgroups. Studies suggest that Puerto Ricans (PR) may bear greater asthma-related morbidity than Mexicans, but these were conducted in children or had limited clinical characterization. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether disparities in asthma morbidity exist among HL adult subgroups. METHODS: Adults with moderate-severe asthma were recruited from US clinics, including from Puerto Rico, for the Person Empowered Asthma Relief (PREPARE) trial. Considering the shared heritage between PR and other Caribbean HL (Cubans and Dominicans [C&D]), the investigators compared baseline self-reported clinical characteristics between Caribbean HL (CHL) (PR and C&D: n = 457) and other HLs (OHL) (Mexicans, Spaniards, Central/South Americans; n = 141), and between CHL subgroups (C&D [n = 56] and PR [n = 401]). This study compared asthma morbidity measures (self-reported exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids, emergency department/urgent care (ED/UC) visits, hospitalizations, health care utilization) through negative binomial regression. RESULTS: CHL compared to OHL were similar in age, body mass index, poverty status, blood eosinophils, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide but were prescribed more asthma controller therapies. Relative to OHL, CHL had significantly increased odds of asthma exacerbations (odds ratio [OR]: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.4-2.4), ED/UC visits (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.4-2.5), hospitalization (OR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.06-3.7), and health care utilization (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.44-2.53). Of the CHL subgroups, PR had significantly increased odds of asthma exacerbations, ED/UC visits, hospitalizations, and health care utilization compared to OHL, whereas C&D only had increased odds of exacerbations compared to OHL. PR compared to C&D had greater odds of ED/UC and health care utilization. CONCLUSIONS: CHL adults, compared with OHL, adults reported nearly twice the asthma morbidity; these differences are primarily driven by PR. Novel interventions are needed to reduce morbidity in this highly impacted population.
Assuntos
Asma , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/mortalidade , Etnicidade , Morbidade , Porto Rico/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Brazil has been disproportionately affected by COVID-19, placing a high burden on ICUs. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are perceptions of ICU resource availability associated with end-of-life decisions and burnout among health care providers (HCPs) during COVID-19 surges in Brazil? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We electronically administered a survey to multidisciplinary ICU HCPs during two 2-week periods (in June 2020 and March 2021) coinciding with COVID-19 surges. We examined responses across geographical regions and performed multivariate regressions to explore factors associated with reports of: (1) families being allowed less input in decisions about maintaining life-sustaining treatments for patients with COVID-19 and (2) emotional distress and burnout. RESULTS: We included 1,985 respondents (57% physicians, 14% nurses, 12% respiratory therapists, 16% other HCPs). More respondents reported shortages during the second surge compared with the first (P < .05 for all comparisons), including lower availability of intensivists (66% vs 42%), ICU nurses (53% vs 36%), ICU beds (68% vs 22%), and ventilators for patients with COVID-19 (80% vs 70%); shortages were highest in the North. One-quarter of HCPs reported that families were allowed less input in decisions about maintaining life-sustaining treatments for patients with COVID-19, which was associated with lack of intensivists (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.05-1.80) and ICU beds (aRR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.16-2.62) during the first surge and lack of N95 masks (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.10-1.85), noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (aRR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.18-2.07), and oxygen concentrators (aRR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13-2.00) during the second surge. Burnout was higher during the second surge (60% vs 71%; P < .001), associated with witnessing colleagues at one's hospital contract COVID-19 during both surges (aRR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.25-1.93] and 1.31 [95% CI, 1.11-1.55], respectively), as well as worries about finances (aRR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.61) and lack of ICU nurses (aRR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02-1.53) during the first surge. INTERPRETATION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, ICU HCPs in Brazil experienced substantial resource shortages, health care disparities between regions, changes in end-of-life care associated with resource shortages, and high proportions of burnout.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , COVID-19 , Brasil/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Profissional/terapia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pandemias , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Cesarean rates are particularly high among Hispanic women in some regions of the United States, placing a disproportionate health burden on women and their newborns. This integrative review synthesized the literature on mode of birth (vaginal vs cesarean) and related childbirth complications (hemorrhage, surgical site infection, perineal trauma) among Mexican American women living in the United States. METHODS: Four electronic databases, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and SCOPUS, were searched to identify studies meeting the inclusion criteria, research studies that included Mexican American women who were pregnant or postpartum. Results were limited to English language and publications that were peer-reviewed and published before May 2020. Covidence was used in article identification, screening, and assessment. Critical appraisal of the research was performed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs. RESULTS: Ten articles met inclusion criteria. In some studies, Mexican American women born in the United States were more likely to have cesareans than women born in Mexico; in other studies, these findings were reversed. Mexican American women often had lower unadjusted cesarean rates compared with non-Hispanic white women, but adjusting for birth facility (some facilities perform more cesareans than others), sociodemographic, and risk factors often revealed Mexican American women have a higher adjusted risk for cesarean birth. Women with higher socioeconomic status had higher cesarean rates compared with women with lower socioeconomic status. In studies of birth outcome by level of acculturation, women who were US-oriented had higher rates of cesarean and more frequent perinatal complications. By ethnic subgroup, rates of cesarean and complications varied among Hispanic women. DISCUSSION: Birth facility was associated with perinatal outcomes for Mexican American women; those who gave birth at higher-performing facilities had better outcomes when compared with women who gave birth at lower-performing facilities. After adjusting for pregnancy complications, Mexican American women had a greater risk for cesarean birth compared with non-Hispanic white women, a finding that may have clinical practice implications. Level of acculturation affected birth outcomes, but more research using precise instruments is needed.
Assuntos
Aculturação , Americanos Mexicanos , Cesárea , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Parto , Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize differences in operative management and surgical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting associated with the socioeconomic context in which a patient lives. METHODS: We used a validated index of 17 variables derived from the US Census Bureau to assign socioeconomic status at the block group level to patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution over a 16-year period. Operative mortality, stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, sternal wound infection, reoperation, composite morbidity or mortality, long-term survival, and use of arterial conduits were the outcomes assessed. RESULTS: This study was composed of 6751 patients. Lower socioeconomic status was significantly associated with increased rates of stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and composite morbidity or mortality in a multivariable analysis. Low socioeconomic status was significantly associated with poorer long-term adjusted survival (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.55). Finally, lower socioeconomic status was significantly associated with decreased use of more than 1 arterial conduits in a multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The socioeconomic context in which a patient lives is significantly associated with short- and long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. There may also be variation in operative management, demonstrated by decreased use of arterial conduits. Lower rates of arterial revascularization among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients who undergo coronary artery revascularization may provide a target for intervention.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Insuficiência Renal , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Humanos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Classe Social , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a global concern about the high rates of cesarean birth (CB). This study aimed to investigate the geographic and socioeconomic inequalities in CB rates in the Peruvian population. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study using the Peruvian Demographic and Family Health Surveys (ENDES, the Spanish acronym for Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar) between 2009 and 2018. ENDES reported data from births registered in the five years preceding survey execution. For the years 2009 (n = 10 289) and 2018 (n = 23 077), we calculated the weighted rates of CB among variables such as natural geographic domain (Coast, Andean, or Amazon), area of residence (rural or urban), wealth index quintile (quintile 1 is poorest, and quintile 5 is richest), and educational level. To assess inequalities, we calculated the concentration index (CIs), the slope index of inequality (SII), and the relative index of inequality (RII). RESULTS: The CB rates by year were 21.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.0-22.9) in 2009 and 34.5% (95% CI: 33.4-35.5) in 2018. Women living in urban and coastal regions and with a higher education level had the highest CB rates. All the CIs were positive, reflecting a prowealthy inequality in CB rates, and both SII and RII were positive, indicating a gap between the use of cesarean in women in the higher wealth quintile compared with those in the lower quintile. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean birth rates have increased by 60% during the last decade in Peru. The richest wealth quintiles had the highest CB rates during the study years, which were well above global recommendations.
Assuntos
Coeficiente de Natalidade , Pobreza , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Peru/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective:to analyze the epidemiological data of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), and the access to health of black people in Brazil during the pandemic, comparing them with previous years. Method:epidemiological, descriptive, and quantitative study of SARS cases in black patients, reported in the information system on epidemiological surveillance of influenzaof the Ministry of Health, between 2017 and 2020. Results:it was observed that, in 2020, there was an increase in the prevalence of SARS cases in blacks, in addition to a significant increase in lethality when compared to the general population. Furthermore, it was found that mortality was significantly higher in individuals with SARS who required ventilatory support. Conclusion:skin color is a determinant of several social and health vulnerabilities in Brazil and worldwide, having a direct impact on theincreased morbidity and mortality of the black population during the pandemic.
RESUMEN Objetivo:analizar los datos epidemiológicos del Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo (SRAS) y el acceso a la salud de los negros en Brasil durante la pandemia, comparándolos con años anteriores. Método:estudio epidemiológico, descriptivo y cuantitativo de casos de SRAS en pacientes de raza negra, reportados en el sistema de información de vigilancia epidemiológica de Influenza del Ministerio de Salud, entre 2017 y 2020. Resultados:se observó que, en En 2020, hubo un aumento en la prevalencia de casos de SARS en negros, además de un aumento significativo en la letalidad en comparación con la población general. Además, se encontró que la mortalidad fue significativamente mayor en las personas con SARS que requirieron soporte ventilatorio. Conclusión:color de la piel es un determinante de varias vulnerabilidades sociales y de salud en Brasil y en todo el mundo, teniendo un impacto directo en el aumento de la morbilidad y mortalidad de la población negra durante la pandemia.
RESUMO Objetivo: analisar os dados epidemiológicos da síndrome respiratória aguda grave (SRAG) e o acesso à saúde de pessoas negras no Brasil durante a pandemia, comparando-os com os anos anteriores.Método: estudo epidemiológico, descritivo e quantitativo de casos de SRAG em pacientes negros, notificados no sistema de informação em vigilância epidemiológica da influenza do Ministério da Saúde, entre 2017 e 2020. Resultados: observou-se que, em 2020, houve um aumento da prevalência dos casos de SRAG em negros, além de um aumento significativo da letalidade quando comparada à população em geral. Além disso, verificou-se que a mortalidade foi significativamente maior em indivíduos com SRAG que necessitaram de suporte ventilatório. Conclusão: a cor da pele é um determinante de diversas vulnerabilidades sociais e de saúde no Brasil e no mundo, tendo impacto direto no aumento da morbimortalidade da população negra durante a pandemia.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , RacismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: UC San Diego Health System (UCSDHS) is the largest academic medical center and integrated care network in US-Mexico border area of California contiguous to the Northern Baja region of Mexico. The COVID-19 pandemic compelled several UCSDHS and local communities to create awareness around best methods to promote regional health in this economically, socially, and politically important border area. PURPOSE: To improve understanding of optimal strategies to execute critical care collaborative programs between academic and community health centers facing public health emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on the experience of UCSDHS and several community hospitals (one US, two Mexican) in the US-Mexico border region. METHODS: After taking several preparatory steps, we developed a two-phase program that included 1) in-person activities to perform needs assessments, hands-on training and education, and morale building and 2) creation of a telemedicine-based (Tele-ICU) service for direct patient management and/or educational coaching experiences.Findings.A clinical and educational program between academic and community border hospitals was feasible, effective, and well received. CONCLUSION: We offer several policy-oriented recommendations steps for academic and community healthcare programs to build educational, collaborative partnerships to address COVID-19 and other cross-cultural, international public health emergencies.
RESUMO
We described prenatal care quality for four indicators over a 12-years period among puerperae living in Southern Brazil. Five surveys including all women giving birth between 01/01 to 31/12 in 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, and 2019 were conducted in Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. A single standardized questionnaire was applied within 48 h after delivery in all the city's maternity hospitals. Outcomes included the followings proportion of pregnant women who started prenatal care in the first trimester and performed at least six medical visits, completed at least two HIV, two syphilis and two qualitative urine tests. These indicators were stratified according to quartiles of household income. Absolute and relative measures of inequalities were calculated. A total of 12,645 (98% of the total) of the 12,914 mothers eligible in the five surveys were successfully interviewed. Coverage for all indicators increased substantially, especially in the poorest quartile for six prenatal care visits starting in the first trimester, and for HIV and qualitative urine tests. The slope index (SII) and the concentration index (CIX) of inequality showed clear disadvantage among the poorest for prenatal visits starting in the first trimester and performing two or more urine tests. There was a substantial increase in coverage for all variables studied in the period. The reduced inequity, mainly for the beginning of the first trimester and for visits and urine tests, was due to the higher coverage achieved in the poorest quartile.