RESUMO

Introducción: Las fracturas del metatarso son las lesiones traumáticas más comunes del pie, y las del primer metatarsiano son las cuartas en frecuencia. El tratamiento funcional de las fracturas metatarsianas consiste en el apoyo efectivo y precoz, sin inmovilización del miembro. Objetivo: Comparar la efectividad del tratamiento funcional en las fracturas del primer metatarsiano con los tratamientos convencionales Métodos: Se realizó un estudio analítico, observacional, retrospectivo, de casos y controles, en 102 fracturas del primer metatarsiano durante un período de ocho años. La muestra incluyó a pacientes de ambos sexos, entre 16 y 65 años de edad. Se comparó el tratamiento funcional con los tratamientos ortopédico y quirúrgico. Las fracturas fueron clasificadas según su localización, recomendación terapéutica y tratamiento efectuado. Los resultados fueron evaluados en función de la duración de la incapacidad temporal y las complicaciones. Resultados: 48 fracturas fueron tratadas con el método funcional y 41 mediante descarga e inmovilización. Los 13 pacientes con criterio de indicación quirúrgica fueron intervenidos mediante reducción y osteosíntesis. Se obtuvo una menor duración de la incapacidad y menos complicaciones con el tratamiento funcional que con los tratamientos convencionales. Conclusiones: En los últimos años ha aumentado la tendencia a tratar las fracturas metatarsianas de manera conservadora y muchos autores recomiendan el método funcional como tratamiento de elección. Este proporciona una curación más temprana y ocasiona menos complicaciones que los tratamientos convencionales(AU)

Introduction: Metatarsal fractures are the most common traumatic injuries of the foot, and those of the first metatarsal are the fourth in frequency. The functional treatment of metatarsal fractures consists of effective and early support, without limb immobilization. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of functional treatment in fractures of the first metatarsal with conventional treatments. Methods: An analytical, observational, retrospective, case-control study was conducted on 102 first metatarsal fractures over a period of eight years. The sample included patients of both sexes, between 16 and 65 years of age. Functional treatment was compared with orthopedic and surgical treatments. The fractures were classified according to location, therapeutic recommendation and treatment. The results were evaluated according to the duration of the temporary incapacity and the complications. Results: Forty eight fractures were treated with the functional method and 41 by offloading and immobilization. The thirteen patients with surgical indication criteria were operated by reduction and osteosynthesis. A shorter duration of disability and fewer complications were achieved with functional treatment than with conventional treatments. Conclusions: In recent years, the tendency to treat metatarsal fractures conservatively has increased and many authors recommend the functional method as the treatment of choice. This provides earlier healing and causes fewer complications than conventional treatments(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Reportar los resultados clínicos y radiológicos del tratamiento funcional de fracturas desplazadas de olécranon en pacientes >70 años. Materiales y Métodos: Se evaluaron 28 pacientes >70 años con fracturas desplazadas de olécranon. El tratamiento consistió en la inmovilización inicial con una valva de yeso (promedio 5 días) y, luego, movilización activa según tolerancia. No se indicó rehabilitación kinesiológica. Ningún paciente fue perdido en el seguimiento. El grupo estaba formado por 27 mujeres y un hombre. La edad promedio era de 82 años. Según la clasificación de la Clínica Mayo, 18 fracturas eran de tipo IIA y 10, de tipo IIB. El seguimiento promedio fue de 14 meses. Resultados: La flexo-extensión fue de 142°-15°. La fuerza muscular fue de M5 en 17 pacientes y de M4 en 9. La fuerza de puño fue un 93% del lado contralateral. El dolor según la escala visual analógica fue de 1. La satisfacción con el tratamiento según esta escala fue de 9. Según el puntaje de la Clínica Mayo, 22 pacientes tuvieron resultados excelentes y 6, buenos. El puntaje DASH promedio fue de 15. Veinticuatro pacientes evolucionaron hacia la seudoartrosis. El gap articular final fue, en promedio, de 16 mm. El gap a nivel de la cortical posterior final fue, en promedio de 22 mm. Conclusión: El tratamiento no quirúrgico de las fracturas desplazadas de olécranon en pacientes mayores ofrece un número elevado de buenos resultados funcionales con alto grado de satisfacción. Nivel de evidencia: IV.

Objective: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes of the functional treatment for displaced olecranon fractures in patients >70 years old. Methods: Twenty-eight patients >70 years old with displaced olecranon fractures were evaluated. The treatment included initial immobilization with a cast (average time 5 days) and then active movement as tolerated. Physiotherapy was not indicated. No patients were lost in the follow-up. The study group included 27 women and a man. Average age was 82 years old. According to the Mayo Clinic Classification, 18 fractures were type IIA and 10 were type IIB. Average followup was 14 months. Results: Flexion-extension was of 142°-15°. Muscular strength of the triceps was M5 in 17 patients and M4 in 9. Grip strength was 93% of the contralateral side. The score in the visual analogue scale for pain was 1. Satisfaction with the treatment according to this scale was 9. According to the Mayo Clinic classification, 22 patients presented excellent results, and 6 good results. Average DASH score was 15. Twenty-four patients evolved to a nonunion. Mean final joint gap was 16 mm. Mean final gap at the posterior cortical level of the olecranon was 22 mm. Conclusion: Functional treatment of displaced olecranon fractures in patients >70 years old is associated with a high degree of goods results and patient satisfaction. Level of evidence. IV.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Reportar los resultados clinicos y radiologicos del tratamiento funcional de fracturas desplazadas de olecranon en pacientes >70 anos. Materiales y Métodos: Se evaluaron 28 pacientes >70 anos con fracturas desplazadas de olecranon. El tratamiento consistio en la inmovilizacion inicial con una valva de yeso (promedio 5 dias) y, luego, movilizacion activa segun tolerancia. No se indico rehabilitacion kinesiologica. Ningun paciente fue perdido en el seguimiento. El grupo estaba formado por 27 mujeres y un hombre. La edad promedio era de 82 anos. Segun la clasificacion de la Clinica Mayo, 18 fracturas eran de tipo IIA y 10, de tipo IIB. El seguimiento promedio fue de 14 meses. Resultados: La flexo-extension fue de 142°-15°. La fuerza muscular fue de M5 en 17 pacientes y de M4 en 9. La fuerza de puno fue un 93% del lado contralateral. El dolor segun la escala visual analogica fue de 1. La satisfaccion con el tratamiento segun esta escala fue de 9. Segun el puntaje de la Clinica Mayo, 22 pacientes tuvieron resultados excelentes y 6, buenos. El puntaje DASH promedio fue de 15. Veinticuatro pacientes evolucionaron hacia la seudoartrosis. El gap articular final fue, en promedio, de 16 mm. El gap a nivel de la cortical posterior final fue, en promedio de 22 mm. Conclusión: El tratamiento no quirurgico de las fracturas desplazadas de olecranon en pacientes mayores ofrece un numero elevado de buenos resultados funcionales con alto grado de satisfaccion.(AU)

Objective: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes of the functional treatment for displaced olecranon fractures in patients >70 years old. Methods: Twenty-eight patients >70 years old with displaced olecranon fractures were evaluated. The treatment included initial immobilization with a cast (average time 5 days) and then active movement as tolerated. Physiotherapy was not indicated. No patients were lost in the follow-up. The study group included 27 women and a man. Average age was 82 years old. According to the Mayo Clinic Classification, 18 fractures were type IIA and 10 were type IIB. Average followup was 14 months. Results: Flexion-extension was of 142°-15°. Muscular strength of the triceps was M5 in 17 patients and M4 in 9. Grip strength was 93% of the contralateral side. The score in the visual analogue scale for pain was 1. Satisfaction with the treatment according to this scale was 9. According to the Mayo Clinic classification, 22 patients presented excellent results, and 6 good results. Average DASH score was 15. Twenty-four patients evolved to a nonunion. Mean final joint gap was 16 mm. Mean final gap at the posterior cortical level of the olecranon was 22 mm. Conclusion: Functional treatment of displaced olecranon fractures in patients >70 years old is associated with a high degree of goods results and patient satisfaction.(AU)

RESUMO

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of a consecutive cohort of patients aged > 70 years with a displaced fracture of the olecranon, which was treated non-operatively with early mobilisation. We identified 28 such patients (27 women) with a mean age of 82 years (71 to 91). The elbow was initially immobilised in an above elbow cast in 90° of flexion of the elbow for a mean of five days. The cast was then replaced by a sling. Active mobilisation was encouraged as tolerated. No formal rehabilitation was undertaken. At a mean follow-up of 16 months (12 to 26), the mean ranges of flexion and extension were 140° and 15° respectively. On a visual analogue scale of 1 (no pain) to 10, the mean pain score was 1 (0 to 8). Of the original 28 patients 22 developed nonunion, but no patients required surgical treatment. We conclude that non-operative functional treatment of displaced olecranon fractures in the elderly gives good results and a high rate of satisfaction.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate functional results, the amount of time that patients missed from regular working activities, and the incidence of residual mechanical ankle instability following conservative treatment of a first episode of severe lateral ankle ligament sprain (with articular instability). METHODS: This prospective and randomized study included 186 patients with severe lateral ankle ligament injuries, who were randomly assigned into 2 conservative treatment groups. In group A, participants were treated with a walking boot with weight-bearing allowed, pain management, ice, and elevation with restricted joint mobilization for 3 weeks. In group B, patients were treated with a functional brace for 3 weeks. After this period, patients from both groups were placed in a short, functional brace for an additional 3 weeks, during which they also started a rehabilitation program. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in pain intensity score between the 2 groups; however, functional evaluations based on the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot score system showed a statistically significant improvement in the group treated with the functional brace. In addition, the average recovery period necessary for patients of group B to resume their duties was shorter than that for patients in group A. No significant difference was detected in residual mechanical ankle instability between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe lateral ankle ligament lesions treated with a functional brace were shown to exhibit somewhat better results than those treated with a walking boot, and both methods presented a very low incidence of residual chronic instability. We found adequate conservative treatment was sufficient to reestablish ankle stability and that functional treatment had a marginally better clinical short-term outcome with a shorter average recovery period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prospective randomized study.

Assuntos