RESUMO
Introduction: Functional neurological disorders (FND) are conditions that cause to alterations in nervous system functions. They are disabling and impair the quality of life of patients but that are potentially reversible provided they have specific management. Functional seizures (FS) and functional movement disorder (FMD) are among the most common subtypes. Studies suggest a strong overlap between FS and FMD; however, there are still no cross-sectional studies that compare the management between these two conditions. Thus, our focus was to carry out a research that compares how these two subtypes of FND are being managed, in addition to assessing rates of understanding and acceptance of a diagnosis of FND. Methods: It is a cross-sectional study with data collected from medical records and interviews with two patients' groups (FS and FMD) treated from a FND clinic of the public health system of Brazil. Results: From 105 medical records of patients with FND analyzed, 60 participants were eligible and agreed to participate in this research, being FS (n = 31) and FMD (n = 29). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in the use of antiseizure (FS > FMD), opioids (FMD > FS), multi-professional follow-up (FMD > FS) and rates of understanding and acceptance of an FND diagnosis (FMD > FS). Similarities were found in sociodemographic profiles, medical follow-up, psychiatric comorbidities and use of antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics and mood stabilizers between two conditions. Conclusion: More similarities than differences in management were found between FS and FMD. Similarities may be related to overlaps in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. Differences may be related to specific issues of each patient and condition. Regardless of the group, patients who perform psychotherapeutic follow-up have higher rates of understanding and acceptance of an FND diagnosis.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore how neurology specialists with interest in epilepsy depict psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and their experience of diagnosing and treating the disorder. METHODS: An art project was organized as part of the curriculum of the 14th Latin American Summer School on Epilepsy (LASSE) in São Paulo (Brazil) from February 27th to March 6th, 2020. Willing neurologists were invited to draw or paint PNES and present their professional perspective of this disorder. Grouped by common themes, the artworks were analyzed in the context of the existing literature on PNES. RESULTS: The participants created 31 paintings and drawings, 13 of which were selected to represent the recurring themes. Throughout the artworks, neurologists often portrayed PNES as masking the underlying psychological issues, but there was little emphasis on the genesis of PNES itself. The manifestation of PNES was more attributed to just emotional suppression rather than to the influence of different situational factors on a pre-established seizure scaffold. Considering the management of PNES, neurology specialists used the symbol of a labyrinth to represent the difficulties of effectively providing diagnosis and multidisciplinary care for the patients. The general outlook on PNES was associated with darkness, possibly due to limited understanding of the disorder's nature and the unavailability of effective treatment options. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that art projects can be useful to better grasp neurology specialists' opinions about a certain disorder. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of PNES and help establish multidisciplinary care.