RESUMO
Placement of pedicle screw in the subaxial cervical spine is a challenging and complex technique but provides significant biomechanical advantages. Despite its potential complications, the role and use of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) are growing. A literature review of the significant articles on applying pedicle screws in the subaxial cervical spine was done (articles between 1994 and 2020). Furthermore, our center´s experience of 15 years related to CPS is also discussed in this study. Transpedicular instrumentation in the subaxial cervical spine requires profound anatomical knowledge and meticulous surgical technique. This technique provides superior biomechanical stability compared to the other cervical fixation techniques. Pull-out strength of CPS is twice as compared to the lateral mass screws. There have been numerous variations in the technique of CPS, varying from open techniques to minimally invasive and the use of biomodels and templates during this procedure. Clinically, CPS can be used in different cervical trauma situations, such as fracture-dislocations, floating lateral mass, and fractures associated with ankylosing spondylitis. Despite the possibility of neurovascular injury due to the proximity of the vertebral artery, spinal cord, and spinal nerves to the cervical pedicles, scientific literature, and our center × s experience show low risk, and this technique can be performed safely. CPS placement is a safe procedure, and it has great potential in the management of cervical spine trauma.
RESUMO
Resumen: Introducción: El manejo correcto de la vía aérea en los pacientes politraumatizados es crucial, ya que es necesario tener una vía aérea segura y proveer adecuada ventilación sin emperorar una probable lesión medular. Objetivo: Determinar el efecto de la maniobra de fijación en línea (MILS del inglés Manual In-Line Stabilisation) en la clasificación de Cormack-Lehane (CL), así como la correlación con el índice de masa corporal (IMC). Material y métodos: En un estudio descriptivo en el Centro Hospitalario del Estado Mayor Presidencial en la Ciudad de México se incluyeron 56 pacientes con estado físico ASA I a IV. El anestesiólogo realizó la laringoscopía directa bajo MILS y valoró el grado de CL. Inmediatamente después se reposicionó al paciente en posición de olfateo, se efectuó nueva laringoscopía directa y se revaloró de nuevo el grado de CL. Resultados: Los grados del CL fueron significativamente diferentes entre la posición MILS versus olfateo. Los grados de CL fueron en su mayoría altos cuando se posicionó al paciente en MILS (75% de los pacientes clasificados entre III y IV) y disminuyeron significativamente al ser cambiados a posición de olfateo. Conclusión: Se observa mejoría del CL cuando se cambia de posición MILS a olfateo.
Abstract: Introduction: Correct airway management of polytraumatized patients is crucial because of the necessity of securing the airway and providing adequate ventilation without worsening a probable spinal cord injury. Objective: Determine the effect of manual inline stabilization (MILS) on Cormack-Lehane classification and if there is any correlation with body mass index (BMI). Material and methods: In a descriptive study at the Centro Hospitalario del Estado Mayor Presidencial in Mexico City, we included 56 patients with ASA physical status I to IV. The anesthesiologist performed direct laryngoscopy while MILS was performed and observed the CL grade. Immediately after, the patient was repositioned into the sniffing position, direct laryngoscopy was performed, and the CL grade was observed again. Results: The CL grades observed were significantly different between MILS vs. Sniffing position. CL grades were mainly high when positioned in MILS (75% classified as grades III and IV) and diminished significantly when changed to the sniffing position. Conclusion: Improvement of CL grade was observed when changing from MILS to sniffing position.
RESUMO
Introdução As fraturas cervicais correspondem a um grande espectro de lesões. Em alguns trabalhos a coluna cervical é o segmento mais acometido nas fraturas vertebrais, representando cerca de 45-60% de todos os casos. Apresentamos o perfil epidemiológico de 48 pacientes com fratura traumática da coluna cervical tratados cirurgicamente no serviço de neurocirurgia do Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal. Métodos Trata-se de um trabalho retrospectivo, baseado na revisão de prontuários médicos, de pacientes com fratura da coluna cervical operados no período de julho de 2007 a julho de 2012. Resultados Predomínio do sexo masculino (89,5%); a faixa etária mais comum é de 20-40 anos (50%); idade média do sexo masculino é de 36,6 anos e do feminino, 19,8 anos (teste t: p » 0,04); vértebra mais fraturada: C5 (53,3%); 54,1% dos indivíduos apresentam algum déficit neurológico; fratura do tipo B é mais comum na coluna cervical (62,2%); mecanismos do trauma: acidente automobilístico (41,6%), queda de altura (20,8%), acidente motociclístico (12,5%), outros (25,1%); déficit neurológico da cervical alta (zero) e subaxial de 57,7% (p » 0,052); déficit neurológico masculino de 53,4% e feminino de 60% (p > 0,05); déficit neurológico do tipo A de 71,4%, do tipo B de 55,5%, e do tipo C de 54,5% (p > 0,05). Conclusão A maioria dos pacientes era do sexo masculino e da faixa etária entre 20 e 40 anos de idade, sendo as mulheres mais jovens que os homens. Cerca de 54,1% dos pacientes apresentavam déficit neurológico à admissão hospitalar e tinham C5 como principal vértebra fraturada. A fratura tipo distração (tipo B da AO) foi a mais encontrada. O principal mecanismo do trauma foram os acidentes de trânsito seguido pelas quedas de altura.
Introduction The cervical fractures represent a wide spectrum of injuries. In some works, the cervical spine is the segment most affected vertebral fractures, representing 4560% of all cases.We present the epidemiological profile of forty-eight patients with traumatic cervical spine fracture surgically treated in the neurosurgery service at the Hospital of the Federal District. Methods This was a retrospective study, based on a review of medical records of patients with cervical spine fracture surgery from July 2007 to July 2012. Results Predominance of males (89.5%), the most common age group is 2040 years (50%), mean age: males (36.6 years) and females (19.8 years) (t-test p » 0.04); fractured vertebra: C5 (53.3%), 54.1% of subjects have a neurological deficit, fracture type B is more common in the cervical spine (62.2%), mechanism of injury: motor vehicle accidents (41.6%), fall (20.8%), motorcycle (12.5%), other (25.1%), neurological deficit: high cervical 0 cases, subaxial 57.7% (p » 0.052); neurological deficit: male 53.4%, female 60% (p> 0.05); neurological deficit: 71.4% Type A, Type B 55.5% 54.5% Type C (p> 0.05). Conclusion Most patients were male and the age group between 2040 years of age, with younger women than men. Approximately 54.1% of the patients had neurologic deficit on admission and had as main fractured vertebra C5. The distraction fractures (AO Type B) was found most frequently. The main mechanism of injury were traffic accidents followed by falls from height.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgiaRESUMO
Study Design Literature review. Objective To discuss the evaluation and management of subaxial cervical spine trauma (C3-7). Methods A literature review of the main imaging modalities, classification systems, and nonsurgical and surgical treatment performed. Results Computed tomography and reconstructions allow for accurate radiologic identification of subaxial cervical spine trauma in most cases. Magnetic resonance imaging can be utilized to evaluate the stabilizing discoligamentous complex, the nerves, and the spinal cord. The Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) is a new system that aids in injury classification and helps guide the decision-making process of conservative versus surgical treatment. Though promising, the SLIC system requires further validation. When the decision for surgical treatment is made, early decompression (less than 24 hours) has been associated with better neurologic recovery. Surgical treatment should be individualized based on the injury characteristics and surgeon's preferences. Conclusions The current state of subaxial cervical spine trauma is one of great progress. However, many questions remain unanswered. We need to continue to account for the individual patient, surgeon, and hospital circumstances that effect decision making and care.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the complications due to severe acrescentar sigla após o nome (CST). METHODS: Between 1997 and 2006, 217 patients (191 men and 26 women) were prospectively evaluated. The mean age was 36.75±1.06 years. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of the patients had medical complications. The most important risk factor was alcoholic beverage use. The most important associated injury was head trauma (HT). Patients with American Spine Injury Association (ASIA) A or B had a 2.3-fold greater relative risk of developing complications. Thirty-three patients (15.2%) died. Patients with neurological deficit had a 16.9-fold higher risk of death. There was no influence of age and time between trauma and surgery on the presence of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Of the patients, 45% had clinical complications and 7.5% had associated injuries; pneumonia was the most important complication; patient age and time between trauma and surgery did not influence the development of medical complications; neurological status was the most important factor in determining morbidity and mortality.
OBJETIVO: Identificar complicações decorrentes do trauma raquimedular cervical grave. MÉTODOS: Avaliação prospectiva de 217 pacientes (191 homens e 26 mulheres) entre 1997 e 2006, com média de idade de 36,75±1,06 anos. RESULTADOS: Houve complicações em 45% dos pacientes. O fator de risco mais importante foi ingestão de bebida alcoólica. Trauma craniano foi a associação mais frequente. Pacientes com classificação A ou B da American Spine Injury Association (ASIA) tiveram 2,3 vezes maior chance de complicações. Faleceram 33 pacientes (15,2%), sendo a chance de óbito 16,9 vezes maior naqueles com déficit neurológico. Não houve influência da idade ou do tempo decorrido entre o trauma e a cirurgia. CONCLUSÕES: Dos pacientes, 45% apresentaram complicações e 7,5% apresentaram traumas associados; pneumonia foi a principal complicação clínica; a idade dos pacientes e o tempo entre o trauma e a cirurgia não influenciaram na frequência de complicações; o status neurológico após o trauma foi o fator de risco mais importante na determinação de morbidade e mortalidade.
Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índices de Gravidade do TraumaRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study of patients treated for subaxial cervical spine trauma (SCST) at a tertiary medical center. PURPOSE: Evaluate the validity of the Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC) system in surgical versus non-surgical decision making for SCST. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Age >12 years, presence of SCST with complete clinical and radiological (CT and MRI) data. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with incomplete radiographic or clinical data, pathological fractures, isolated upper cervical trauma (occiput to C2), isolated transverse process or spinous process fractures, chronic or age indeterminate fractures, isolate MRI findings, and severe systemic trauma with death prior to either surgical or non-surgical treatment. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were treated non-surgically (C), whereas 24 were treated surgically (S). In the C group, the SLIC score ranged from 0 to 5 points (standard deviation [SD] = 1.20 points; mean 1.07; median 1). Just 1 patient had an SLIC score greater than 2 (7.1% of the patients). In the S group, the SLIC score ranged from 1 to 10 points (standard deviation [SD] = 2.03 points; mean 5.6; median 6). Just 2 patients had an SLIC score smaller than 4 (both with 1 point each, 8.3% of the total group). All the other 22 (accounting for 91.6%) patients had an SLIC of 4 or more points. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the SLIC classification looks to be a promising system to aid spinal surgeons in the decision-making process of subaxial cervical trauma, but a large prospective cohort study is required.