RESUMO

The aim of this work was to assess if the commercially available Fluconazole drug products (Reference, Generic and Similar) would meet the biowaiver criteria from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Brazilian Agency for Health Surveillance (ANVISA) agencies. All formulations were evaluated considering the dissolution profile carried out in Simulated Gastric Fluid (SGF) pH 1.2, Acetate Buffer (AB) pH 4.5 and Simulated Intestinal Fluid (SIF) pH 6.8. The results demonstrated that all formulations fulfilled the 85% of drug dissolved at 30 min criterion in SGF pH 1.2. However, in AB pH 4.5 and SIF pH 6.8, some formulations, including the comparator, did not achieve this dissolution percentage. The discrepant dissolution profiles also failed the ƒ2 similarity factor analysis, since none of the formulations showed values between 50 and 100 in the three dissolution media. Comparative dissolution profiles were not similar, considering that the main issues concerning the dissolution were evidenced for the comparator product. Hence, a revision in the regulatory norms in order to establish criteria to switch the comparator could result in an increased application of drugs based on biowaiver criteria

Assuntos

RESUMO

The biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) is a very important tool to replace the traditional in vivo bioequivalence studies with in vitro dissolution assays during multisource product development. This paper compares the most recent harmonized guideline for biowaivers based on the biopharmaceutics classification system and the BCS regulatory guidelines in Latin America and analyzes the current BCS regulatory requirements and the perspective of the harmonization in the region to develop safe and effective multisource products. Differences and similarities between the official and publicly available BCS guidelines of several Latin American regulatory authorities and the new ICH harmonization guideline were identified and compared. Only Chile, Brazil, Colombia, and Argentina have a more comprehensive BCS guideline, which includes solubility, permeability, and dissolution requirements. Although their regulatory documents have many similarities with the ICH guidelines, there are still major differences in their interpretation and application. This situation is an obstacle to the successful development of safe and effective multisource products in the Latin American region, not only to improve their access to patients at a reasonable cost, but also to develop BCS biowaiver studies that fulfill the quality standards of regulators in developed and emerging markets.

RESUMO

O acesso a medicamentos pode ser facilitado por programas globais de desenvolvimento farmacêutico, mas há necessidade de que as agencias regulatórias e as indústrias farmoquímicas e farmacêuticas interajam e haja um consenso quanto as exigências para o registro de medicamentos. Este artigo examinou a legislação especifica sobre bi isenção com base no Sistema de Classificação Biofarmacêutica, comparando os cenários do Brasil e do mundo. A partir dessa análise, identificou os entraves a aplicação dos critérios internacionais na realidade regulatória nacional, identificando algumas fragilidades da legislação, como no caso de pro-fármacos. Analisaram-se os critérios de cinco organismos regulatórios (Agência Europeia de Medicamentos, Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada, Conselho Internacional para Harmonização de Requisitos Técnicos para Medicamentos de Uso Humano e Organização Mundial da Saúde) frente aos requisitos da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, pontuando as diferenças e o que já se encontra pacificado no tocante a classe do Sistema de Classificação Biofarmacêutica aceita, a comparabilidade entre formulação teste e de referência, solubilidade, permeabilidade intestinal e perfil de dissolução in vitro. Concluiu--se que a Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária deve internalizar os preceitos e critérios da bioisenção com base no Sistema de Classificação Biofarmacêutica por meio de um novo marco regulatório. Além disso, para que esse marco regulatório seja bem-sucedido e produza resultados palpáveis, em especial na área de saúde publica e vigilância sanitária, a agência brasileira deve estar aberta ao diálogo com o setor regulado e as inovações e orientações da academia, sem desviar o foco de sua missão institucional.

Access to medicines can be facilitated by global pharmaceutical development programs, but there is a need for regulatory agencies and the pharmochemical and pharmaceutical industries to interact and to have a consensus on the requirements for drug registration. This article examined the specific legislation concerning to biowaiver based on the Biopharmaceutical Classification System, comparing the scenario in Brazil and worldwide. Based on this analysis, it identified the obstacles to the application of international criteria in the national regulatory reality, identifying some weaknesses of the legislation, as in the case of prodrugs. The criteria of five regulatory bodies (European Medicines Agency, Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada, International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use and World Health Organization) were analyzed in relation to the requirements of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa), pointing out the differences and what has already been settled regarding the accepted class of the Biopharmaceutical Classification System, the comparability between test and reference formulations, solubility, intestinal permeability and in vitro dissolution profile. It was concluded that Anvisa should internalize the percepts and criteria of the biowaiver based on Biopharmaceutical Classification System, through a new regulatory framework. Moreover, for this regulatory framework to be successful and produce tangible results, especially in the area of public health and health surveillance, Anvisa must be open to dialogue with the regulated sector and to innovations and guidance from academia, without losing focus of its institutional mission.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The replacement of traditional in vivo bioequivalence studies by in vitro dissolution assays, based on the biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS), has emerged as an important tool for demonstrating the interchangeability of multisource products. This paper summarizes the current implementation of the BCS-based biowaiver for the development of multisource products in Latin America, and identifies several challenges and opportunities for greater convergence and application of BCS regulatory requirements. METHODS: Differences and similarities between the current BCS-based biowaivers' guidelines proposed by two relevant regulatory agencies for the Latin American region (FDA and WHO) and the new ICH harmonization guideline were identified and compared. An update of the BCS-based biowaiver guideline for Latin American countries was also considered, based on the respective regulatory information on bioequivalence studies, which is publicly available. RESULTS: About 50% of the Latin American countries analyzed have no information on the implementation of any bioequivalence standards, while in the countries where bioequivalence studies are considered, the acceptance and application of BCS-based biowaiver requirements is quite heterogeneous. This situation contrasts with the international trend of global harmonization for BCS-based biowaiver guidance, suggesting the need in Latin America to identify opportunities and overcome challenges to improve the development of BCS-based biowaivers to avoid costly and time-consuming in vivo bioequivalence studies. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the region is in a position to improve access to safe and effective medicines at a reasonable cost by applying BCS-based biowaiver guidance.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Solubility, intestinal permeability and dissolution are the main factors that govern the rate and extent of drugs absorption and are directly related to bioavailability. Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) is an important tool which uses in vitro results for comparison with bioavailability in vivo (biowaiver). Valsartan is widely used in the treatment of hypertension and shows different BCS classification in the literature (BCS class II or III). OBJECTIVE: This work proposes the study of valsartan biopharmaceutics properties and its BCS classification. METHODS: High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method was developed and validated to quantify the drug in buffers pH 1.2, 4.5 and 6.8 respectively. Valsartan solubility was determined in these three different media using shake flask method and intrinsic dissolution rate. Evaluation of dissolution profile from coated tablets was conducted. RESULTS: The low solubility (pH 1.2 and 4.5) and high solubility (pH 6.8) were observed for both solubility methods. Permeability data reported from the literature showed that valsartan is a low permeability drug. Valsartan presented the rapid release profile only in pH 6.8. CONCLUSION: We defined that valsartan is a class IV drug, in disagreement with what has been published so far. It is important to emphasize that the conditions considered here are indicated to define the biopharmaceutics classification by regulatory agencies.

Assuntos

RESUMO

A biowaiver is accepted by the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) for immediate-release solid oral products containing Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class I drugs showing rapid drug dissolution. This study aimed to simulate plasma concentrations of fluconazole capsules with different dissolution profiles and run population simulation to evaluate their bioequivalence. The dissolution profiles of two batches of the reference product Zoltec® 150 mg capsules, A1 and A2, and two batches of other products (B1 and B2; C1 and C2), as well as plasma concentration-time data of the reference product from the literature, were used for the simulations. Although products C1 and C2 had drug dissolutions < 85% in 30 min at 0.1 M HCl, simulation results demonstrated that these products would show the same in vivo performance as products A1, A2, B1, and B2. Population simulation results of the ln-transformed 90% confidence interval for the ratio of Cmax and AUC0-t values for all products were within the 80-125% interval, showing to be bioequivalent. Thus, even though the in vitro dissolution behavior of products C1 and C2 was not equivalent to a rapid dissolution profile, the computer simulations proved to be an important tool to show the possibility of bioequivalence for these products.

RESUMO

This study aimed at evaluating the shake-flask use as a universal method to evaluate drug solubility in a biowaiver context as proposed by FDA, EMA and ANVISA. The solubility of losartan was determined in three buffers using the shake-flask method, intrinsic dissolution (ID) and Quantum Chemistry. Moreover, the evaluation of a losartan dissolution profile from coated tablets was conducted. The losartan low solubility in pH 1.2 and high solubility in pH 6.8 were observed using the shake-flask method. However, the solubility results using ID demonstrated its high solubility in pH 1.2 and 6.8. It was not possible to find conclusive results regarding the solubility of the drug in pH 4.5. The studies conducted by Quantum Chemistry provide molecular and electronic data that helped understand the losartan solvation in different pH values. Our experimental results defined that losartan can be classified as a low-solubility drug. In addition, this work shows that shake-flask cannot be a universal method of solubility studies in biowaiver context. Individual analysis will be necessary. The intrinsic dissolution should be considered as a complementary method.

Assuntos

RESUMO

El desarrollo de los medicamentos químicos de los últimos 50 años ha permitido la obtención de notables mejoras en la salud humana. La calidad, seguridad y eficacia así como las Buenas Prácticas de Manufactura (BPM), y las Buenas Prácticas de Laboratorio (BPL), son exigencias implantadas en la industria farmacéutica en la mayoría de los países. La aparición y desarrollo de las especialidades farmacéuticas genéricas en los últimos 35 años ha acompañado al desarrollo de los estudios de Biodisponibilidad y Bioequivalencia in vivo e in vitro (Bioexención). Se revisa los avances en estudios de Bioequivalencia en el Perú y los requisitos de la Ley de medicamentos aprobada en 2009. Los estudios de Bioequivalencia principalmente farmacocinéticos constituyen el estándar para que los organismos regulatorios en materia farmacéutica asuman la equivalencia terapéutica. Esta a su vez es un criterio aceptado para asumir intercambiabilidad del medicamento. En este artículo se revisan las definiciones, los diferentes tipos de diseños empleados en los estudios de Bioequivalencia, sus requisitos principales así como los criterios de aceptabilidad y rechazo de los resultados de los estudios de Bioequivalencia. Se hace especial mención a la posición de la OMS, la FDA y EMEA en los últimos años. Se describe la Clasificación Biofarmacéutica (SCB), que considera cuatro grupos y su aplicación para la bioexencin, bajo los criterios de la FDA y de la OMS.

In the last 50 years the development of the chemical medicines has allowed to achieve remarkable improvements in human health care. In many countries the pharmaceutical industry regulations on quality, safety and effectiveness as well as Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) are mandatory requirements. Generic pharmaceutical products have been developed in the last 35 years, along with studies of bioavailability, bioequivalence in vivo and in vitro (Biowaiver). In this article the progress in Bioequivalence studies in Peru will be reviewed as well as the requirements of the Medicines Act adopted in 2009. The pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence is the standard for pharmaceutical regulatory agencies; in this way they are able to establish pharmaceutical therapeutic equivalence and this is an accepted criteria for the medication interchangeability. The most important requirements of acceptability and rejection of the results of the studies of Bioequivalence are reviewed in this article, as well as the criteria and the definitions related to them and the different programs designed for these studies. In this article we review definition, different study designs used bioequivalence, their requirements and the criteria of acceptability and rejection of the results bioequivalence studies. The position of the WHO, the FDA and EMEA in the last few years has a special reference in the article. The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), that consider four groups and their application to biowaiver, under the criteria of FDA and WHO is reviewed.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Pharmacological therapy is essential in many diseases treatment and it is important that the medicine policy is intended to offering safe and effective treatment with affordable price to the population. One way to achieve this is through biowaiver, defined as the replacement of in vivo bioequivalence studies by in vitro studies. For biowaiver of new immediate release solid oral dosage forms, data such as intestinal permeability and solubility of the drug are required, as well as the product dissolution. The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) is a scientific scheme that divides drugs according to their solubility and permeability and has been used by various guides as a criterion for biowaiver. This paper evaluates biowaiver application, addressing the general concepts and parameters used by BCS, making a historical account of its use, the requirements pertaining to the current legislation, the benefits and risks associated with this decision. The results revealed that the use of BCS as a biowaiver criterion greatly expands the therapeutics options, contributing to greater therapy access of the general population with drug efficacy and safety guaranteed associated to low cost.

O tratamento farmacológico é essencial frente a várias patologias e é fundamental que a política de medicamentos tenha por objetivo oferecer à população tratamento seguro, eficaz e de preço acessível. Uma forma de alcançar esse objetivo é por meio da bioisenção, definida como a substituição de estudos de bioequivalência in vivo por estudos in vitro. Para bioisentar novos medicamentos sob a forma farmacêutica sólida oral de liberação imediata são utilizados dados de permeabilidade intestinal e solubilidade do fármaco, bem como sua dissolução a partir da forma farmacêutica. O Sistema de Classificação Biofarmacêutica (SCB) é um esquema científico que divide os fármacos em classes de acordo com a solubilidade e permeabilidade e vem sendo utilizado como critério para bioisenção em diversas legislações. O presente artigo faz uma avaliação da aplicação da bioisenção, abordando os conceitos gerais e parâmetros utilizados pelo SCB, fazendo um relato histórico da aplicação da bioisenção, das exigências pertinentes às legislações vigentes, dos benefícios e riscos inerentes a uma tomada de decisão sobre bioisenção baseada neste critério. Os resultados revelaram que a utilização do SCB como critério amplia enormemente as possibilidades de bioisenção, contribuindo para o maior acesso da população em geral a medicamentos com garantida eficácia, segurança e menor custo.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Literature data on the properties of zidovudine relevant to waiver of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) testing requirements for the approval of immediate-release (IR) solid oral dosage forms containing zidovudine alone or in combination with other active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are reviewed. Solubility, dissolution, and permeability data for zidovudine, along with its dosing schedule, therapeutic index and pharmacokinetic properties, and reports related to BE/bioavailability were all taken into consideration. Data for solubility and permeability suggest that zidovudine belongs to Class I according to the Biopharmaceutics Classification System. Also, zidovudine is not a narrow therapeutic index drug. Although five out of 13 formulations tested in vivo (mostly of unreported composition) failed to show BE, it appears that in vitro studies performed according to biowaiver methods could predict in vivo behavior. Nevertheless, it is highly recommended that if a biowaiver is to be applied, excipient choices be limited to those found in IR drug products approved in International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) or associated countries in the same dosage form (Table 2 of this monograph), in their usual amounts. These conclusions apply to products containing zidovudine as the only API and also to fixed combination products containing zidovudine with respect to the zidovudine component of the formulation.

Assuntos

RESUMO

El presente estudio se realizó con el objetivo de establecer mediante pruebas de disolución in vitro, si dos formas farmacéuticas multifuente de liberación inmediata, de administración peroral con metformina como principio activo, son equivalentes en relación con su producto de referencia. Los datos de porcentaje de disolución obtenidos en tres niveles de pH (1,2; 4,5 y 6,8) y en dos equipos de disolución diferentes, se analizaron mediante el método de modelo independiente para comparar los perfiles de disolución de los productos a través del cálculo de los factores de diferencia (f1) y de similitud (f2), según las recomendaciones de la Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Para evaluar la cinética de liberación del fármaco, se aplicaron tres modelos matemáticos (ecuación de orden cero, de primer orden e Higuchi); además, para la comparación de los productos se aplicó un método basado en análisis multivariado para un diseño de medidas repetidas. Los resultados mostraron que existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los productos, razón por la cual en este estudio no se demostró la equivalencia de los productos B y C con relación al producto A, con base en pruebas de disolución in vitro.

The objective of the study was to determine the equivalence of two multisource drug products of metformin tablets using in vitro testing. The in vitro dissolution profiles were done in phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), acetate buffer (pH 4.5), hydrochloric acid (pH 1.2) and two dissolution apparatus were used. Multivariate analysis for repeated measures design was employed to compare the percentage dissolved of the drug products. According to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for dissolution data equivalence, model independent approach was applied. This involves the use of difference factor (f1) and similarity factor (f2). The drug release from drug products was analyzed by various mathematical models such as zero order, firs order and Higuchi. The results showed that there were significant differences between the drug products, and for this reason it was not possible to demonstrate equivalence based in vitro assays.

RESUMO

Although policies of waiving bioequivalence studies are part of the legal framework of various regulatory agencies, there is no harmonization with regard to extension of the biowaiver to drugs other than those with high solubility and high permeability, nor is there any consensus or official endorsement of the biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system (BDDCS). To better understand the applicability of the biowaiver, we carried out a cross-sectional survey to estimate the relative risk of obtaining nonbioequivalent (non-BE) or bioinequivalent (BIE) results for drug products containing drugs belonging to each of the biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) and BDDCS classes. Five hundred bioequivalence studies were randomly sampled from a database of the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA). The drugs were classified according to the BCS and BDDCS, to evaluate how characteristics related to drug and dosage form influence the outcome of bioequivalence studies. The relative risk of obtaining a non-BE result was approximately four times lower for drugs in classes 1 and 3 of BCS or BDDCS when compared with class 2 drugs. Thus, it seems that the final outcome of a bioequivalence study is strongly influenced by the solubility of the drug, but not by its intestinal permeability or extent of metabolism.

Assuntos

RESUMO

En el presente trabajo se hace un análisis de los conceptos, normativas y propuestas sobre la equivalencia terapéutica de medicamentos similares con respecto a los innovadores, desde una perspectiva internacional y nacional, explicando las bases científicas de los estudios de bioexención in vitro para determinar la intercambiabilidad de aquellos medicamentos similares provenientes de diferentes fuentes que se han liberado de los estudios de bioequivalencia (in vivo). Además, se presentan algunos resultados de estudios de test de disolución para dar a conocer la metodología usada en la bioexención y se detallan los requisitos para aprobar un Centro de Bioequivalencia in vitro.

In this review, the concepts, guidelines and proposals regarding the determination of therapeutic equivalence of similar drug products are analyzed from a national and international point of view. The scientific background of the in vitro biowaiver studies that may result in the interchange ability of multisource drug product that have been waived from the demonstration of in vivo bioequivalence studies is also explained. In order to explain the methods in biowaiver studies, results of dissolution kinetics are shown as well as the requirements to approve an in vitro biopharmaceutic center.

Assuntos

RESUMO

El Sistema de Clasificación Biofarmacéutica (SCB), publicado por Gordon Amidon y cols. en 1995, se basa en un sólido fundamento científico para clasificar un fármaco considerando los parámetros de solubilidad y permeabilidad, factores estrechamente relacionados con el proceso de absorción, y plantea como objetivo, la posibilidad de establecer correlaciones in vitro-in vivo que permitan sustituir los ensayos realizados en humanos por ensayos de disolución in vitro, de acuerdo con la clasificación obtenida para el fármaco. Actualmente la aplicación del SCB está enfocada a los estudios de bioequivalencia para demostrar intercambio de medicamentos, presentados en forma sólida de liberación inmediata, de administración peroral y al aseguramiento de que los cambios realizados durante el escalonamiento o en las formulaciones o procesos de éstos, una vez aprobados, no tengan incidencia en su comportamiento in vivo. La proyección de la aplicación del SCB se está dando hacia su implantación como herramienta en el desarrollo de nuevos fármacos, en el diseño y desarrollo de medicamentos y en la posibilidad de bioexenciones para los sistemas de liberación controlada.

The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), published in 1995 by Gordon Amidon and coworkers, is proposed based on recognizing the underlying process that is controlling the drug absorption rate and extent, namely, drug solubility and intestinal membrane permeability, classifying a drug according to this. Its objective is the possibility to set standards for in vitro drug dissolution testing methodology which will correlate with the in vivo process, avoiding human studies. The BCS can be used to classify drugs and set standards for scale-up and post-approval changes to show that the efficacy has not been altered, as well as standards for in vitro/in vivo correlation for bioequivalence studies, for solid oral immediate release products. About this, exists discusses for further potential applications of the BCS in the development of new drugs and drug products and in the possibility of biowaivers for controlled-release products.