RESUMO
Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) has unique pathogenic and clinical features with worse prognosis than other causes of heart failure (HF), despite the fact that patients with CCC are often younger and have fewer comorbidities. Patients with CCC were not adequately represented in any of the landmark HF studies that support current treatment guidelines. PARACHUTE-HF (Prevention And Reduction of Adverse outcomes in Chagasic Heart failUre Trial Evaluation) is an active-controlled, randomized, phase IV trial designed to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily vs enalapril 10 mg twice daily added to standard of care treatment for HF. The study aims to enroll approximately 900 patients with CCC and reduced ejection fraction at around 100 sites in Latin America. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite of time from randomization to cardiovascular death, first HF hospitalization, or relative change from baseline to week 12 in NT-proBNP levels. PARACHUTE-HF will provide new data on the treatment of this high-risk population. (Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril on Morbidity, Mortality, and NT-proBNP Change in Patients With CCC [PARACHUTE-HF]; NCT04023227).
Assuntos
Aminobutiratos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Compostos de Bifenilo , Cardiomiopatia Chagásica , Combinação de Medicamentos , Enalapril , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Tetrazóis , Valsartana , Humanos , Compostos de Bifenilo/uso terapêutico , Aminobutiratos/uso terapêutico , Enalapril/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Cardiomiopatia Chagásica/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Tetrazóis/uso terapêutico , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/sangue , Doença Crônica , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico/sangue , Masculino , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
COVID-19 causes more severe and frequently fatal disease in patients with pre-existing comorbidities such as hypertension and heart disease. SARS-CoV-2 virus enters host cells through the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is fundamental in maintaining arterial pressure through the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Hypertensive patients commonly use medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), which can modulate the expression of ACE2 and, therefore, potentially impact the susceptibility and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here we assessed whether treatment of ACE2-humanized (K18-hACE2) mice with the ACEi Lisinopril affects lung ACE2 levels and the outcome of experimental COVID-19. K18-hACE2 mice were treated for 21 days with Lisinopril 10 mg/kg and were then infected with 105 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan strain). Body weight, clinical score, respiratory function, survival, lung ACE2 levels, viral load, lung histology, and cytokine (IL-6, IL-33, and TNF-α) levels were assessed. Mice treated with Lisinopril for 21 days showed increased levels of ACE2 in the lungs. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 led to massive decrease in lung ACE2 levels at 3 days post-infection (dpi) in treated and untreated animals, but Lisinopril-treated mice showed a fast recovery (5dpi) of ACE2 levels. Higher ACE2 levels in Lisinopril-treated mice led to remarkably higher lung viral loads at 3 and 6/7dpi. Lisinopril-treated mice showed decreased levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α in the serum and lungs at 6/7dpi. Marginal improvements in body weight, clinical score and survival were observed in Lisinopril-treated mice. No differences between treated and untreated infected mice were observed in respiratory function and lung histology. Lisinopril treatment showed both deleterious (higher viral loads) and beneficial (anti-inflammatory and probably anti-constrictory and anti-coagulant) effects in experimental COVID-19. These effects seem to compensate each other, resulting in marginal beneficial effects in terms of outcome for Lisinopril-treated animals.
RESUMO
Los inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina son utilizados por más de 40 millones de personas en todo el mundo para el tratamiento de enfermedades cardiovasculares. Son considerados seguros, aunque pueden producir angioedema severo en el 0,1 a 0, 5 % de los pacientes. Se presenta el caso de un paciente del sexo masculino, de 67 años de edad, con diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus e hipertensión arterial, tratado con metformina, hidroclorotiazida y enalapril desde hacía aproximadamente cuatro años, que ingresó en cuerpo de guardia con edema severo del tercio anterior de la lengua, sin compromiso respiratorio. Se indicó hidrocortisona y difenhidramina y evolucionó satisfactoriamente, por lo que fue dado de alta y se prescribió prednisona y difenhidramina por vía oral; se suspendió el enlapril y a las 48 horas se reevaluó y estaba asintomático. El mecanismo por el que estos medicamentos producen angioedema no está claro, pero probablemente sería por la acumulación tisular de bradiquinina y puede presentarse en cualquier momento del tratamiento. La correcta anamnesis, el diagnóstico precoz y el tratamiento inmediato con hidrocortisona por vía endovenosa son aspectos a considerar ante casos similares. El análisis del evento mediante la farmacovigilancia, permitió clasificarlo como severo, probablemente relacionado con el consumo de enalapril. Esto genera alertas para informar al personal de salud y tomar decisiones relacionadas con los medicamentos, que permitan la actuación inmediata con la finalidad de reducir la morbimortalidad.
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are used by more than 40 million people worldwide for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. They are considered safe, although they can cause severe angioedema in 0.1 to 0.5% of patients. The case of a 67-years-old male patient diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension, treated with metformin, hydrochlorothiazide and enalapril for approximately four years, who was admitted to the emergency room with severe edema of the third anterior of the tongue, without respiratory compromise is presented. Hydrocortisone and diphenhydramine were indicated and he evolved satisfactorily, for which he was discharged and prednisone and diphenhydramine were prescribed orally; he discontinued enlapril, 48 hours later he was reassessed and was asymptomatic. The mechanism by which these drugs produce angioedema is not clear, but it would probably be due to the tissue accumulation of bradykinin and can occur at any time during treatment. The correct history, early diagnosis and immediate treatment with intravenous hydrocortisone are aspects to consider in similar cases. Analysis of the event through pharmacovigilance allowed it to be classified as severe, probably related to the enalapril consumption. This generates alerts to inform health staff and make decisions related to medications, which allow immediate action in order to reduce morbidity and mortality.
RESUMO
Abstract Background Arterial stiffness and hypertension are strong predictors of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are first-line antihypertensive agents in reducing blood pressure and arterial stiffness. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the effects of ACEI and ARB in reducing arterial stiffness and preventing target organ damage in patients with hypertension. Methods This observational study included 654 participants who attend routine consultations at an outpatient hypertension clinic in 2 university hospitals. Patients were interviewed, and they underwent central and peripheral blood pressure measurements. Doppler echocardiography, carotid ultrasound, biochemical tests, and anthropometric parameters were carried out. Shapiro-Wilk, chi-square, and Fisher's exact test were used. A significance level of 5% was adopted. Results A total of 659 participants were evaluated in the study (398 from the ARB group and 256 from the ACEI group). Age, body mass index (BMI), central and peripheral blood pressure measurements, pulse wave velocity (PWV), left ventricular mass index, and carotid intima-media thickness did not show differences between the groups (p > 0.05). After linear regression analysis, the ACEI group had lower values of total vascular resistance (TVR) (p = 0.003) and augmentation pressure (p = 0.008), when compared to the ARB group. Conclusion This study showed that the ACEI group had a greater reduction in augmentation pressure and PWV. There were no differences between the groups regarding the improvement of outcomes related to central arterial pressure, PWV, and cardiac and vascular target organ damage.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 related mortality is about 2%, and it increases with comorbidities, like hypertension. Regarding management, there is debatable evidence about the benefits of continuation vs. discontinuation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB). AIM: We performed a systematic review to assess the effects and safety of in-hospital discontinuation compared to continuation of ACEI/ARB in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We systematically searched on PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE from inception to June 19, 2021. We included observational studies and trials that compared the effects and safety of continuing ACEI/ARB compared to discontinuing it in COVID-19 patients. Effects sizes for dichotomous variables were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals. For continuous variables, effects were expressed as mean difference (MD). We used random effect models with the inverse variance method. We assessed certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We included three open-label randomized controlled trials and five cohort studies. We found that the continuation group had lower risk of death compared with the discontinuation group only in the cohort group (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.24-0.90), but not in the RCT group (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.75-2.00). The ICU admission rate was significantly lower in the continuation group (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31-0.68) in the cohort group, but not in RCT group (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.67-1.59). We did not find significant differences between groups regarding hospitalization length, hypotension, AKI needing renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, new or worsening heart failure, myocarditis, renal replacement therapy, arrhythmias, thromboembolic events and SOFA AUC. The GRADE approach revealed that the certainty ranged from moderate to high level. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in mortality and other outcomes between continuation and discontinuation groups.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hipertensão , Humanos , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efeitos adversos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
La enfermedad renal diabética (ERD) es una comorbilidad con alta prevalencia a nivel mundial, siendo una de las complicaciones más frecuentes de la diabetes mellitus (DM). La ERD se relaciona con complicaciones cardiovasculares y progresión de la enfermedad renal crónica (ERC), por ello la identificación de factores modificables, como el control de la presión arterial, es uno de los pilares más importantes en el manejo integral. En esta revisión hacemos un recorrido sobre el papel de la hipertensión y el bloqueo del eje renina angiotensina aldosterona (RAAS) en el curso de la ERD y las estrategias terapéuticas orientadas a la reducción de la presión arterial (PA), el bloqueo RAAS y el impacto en resultados renales y cardiovasculares. El objetivo de este artículo es hacer una revisión de las intervenciones más importantes que actúan bloqueando el eje renina angiotensina aldosterona (RAAS) y determinar si estas medidas en los pacientes con ERD, solo tienen impacto en el control de la presión arterial o si también son estrategias de nefro y cardio-protección. Conclusión: La ERD es una de las complicaciones más frecuentes de la diabetes mellitus (DM). El control de la PA sigue siendo un pilar fundamental para lograr estos objetivos. Los bloqueadores del RAAS (iECAS y BRAs) son los antihipertensivos de elección con efecto terapéutico por el bloqueo RAAS y esto les permite tener además del control de la PA, efectos nefroprotectores y cardioprotectores importantes en pacientes con ERD, sobre todo cuando hay la presencia de albuminuria. Evaluamos que además de los inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina (iECAs) y los bloqueadores del receptor de angiotensina (BRAs), vienen tomando importancia los antagonistas selectivos del receptor mineralocorticoide (ARM) como Finerenona.
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a comorbidity with a high worldwide prevalence, and one of the most frequent complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). CKD is related to cardiovascular complications and the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), therefore the identification of modifiable factors, such as blood pressure control, is one of the most important pillars in comprehensive management. In this review, we will analyze the role of hypertension and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and its suppression in the course of CKD, and therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing blood pressure (BP), RAAS blockade, and the impact on renal and cardiovascular outcomes. The objective of this article is to review the most important interventions that act by blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and to determine if these measures in patients with CKD only have an impact on blood pressure control or if they are also nephron and cardio-protective strategies. Conclusion: DKD is one of the most frequent complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). BP control continues to be a fundamental pillar to achieve these objectives. RAAS blockers (iECAS and ARBs) are the first-line antihypertensive with a therapeutic effect due to RAAS blockade and this allows them to have, in addition to BP control, important nephroprotective and cardioprotective effects in patients with CKD, especially when there is albuminuria. We evaluated that in addition to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) such as Finerenone are gaining importance.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Hipertensão , Angiotensinas , Receptores de Angiotensina , Renina , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , NefropatiasRESUMO
Background: The nutraceutical properties of food hydrolysates rely on multiple biochemical interactions involving the modulation of enzymes and cellular receptors. Numerous bioactive peptides released from troponin and tropomyosin digestion have been identified. Their characterization has mostly been performed by hydrolysis catalyzed by proteases unrelated to the human digestive system. Objective: This study aimed to determine the bioactive profile of beef, pork, and chicken meat by analyzing the frequency and pharmacokinetics of biopeptides released from troponin and tropomyosin. Methods:In silico digestion and biopeptide release frequency were studied by three parameters; bioactive fragments release frequency (AE), frequency percentage (W), and mean occurrence (AS), all stated on the BIOPEP-UWM platform. Further on, hydrolysis end-products were screened based on gastrointestinal-absorption probability and pharmacokinetic profiling performed on SwissADME, SwissTargetPrediction, and ADME/Tlab bioinformatics web tools. Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way ANOVA test. Results: Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibiting biopeptides exhibited the highest release frequency. Moreover, W and ASparameters showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between the myofibrillar isoforms assessed. Seven biopeptides were classified as highly absorbable and reported optimal drug-likeness compliance. Although biopeptides hold good pharmacokinetic properties, the therapeutic potency of biopeptides showed to be lower than those of DPP-IV and ACE-inhibiting drugs. Conclusions: Troponin and tropomyosin are rich dietary sources of bioactive peptides, mainly DPP-IV and ACE inhibitors. Digestion end-products are mainly dipeptides with optimal pharmacokinetic and drug-like properties, suggesting a potential therapeutic application in hypertensive and hyperglycemic disorders
Antecedentes: Las propiedades nutracéuticas de los hidrolizados de alimentos dependen de múltiples interacciones bioquímicos que involucran la modulación de enzimas y receptores celulares. Se han identificado numerosos péptidos bioactivos liberados de la digestión de troponina y tropomiosina, pero su caracterización se ha llevado a cabo principalmente por hidrólisis catalizada por proteasas ajenas al sistema digestivo humano. Objetivo: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar el perfil bioactivo de la carne de res, cerdo y pollo mediante el análisis de la frecuencia y farmacocinética de los biopéptidos liberados de la troponina y la tropomiosina. Métodos: Se estudió la digestión in silico y la frecuencia de liberación de biopéptidos mediante dos parámetros; frecuencia de liberación de fragmentos bioactivos (AE), frecuencia porcentual (W) y ocurrencia media (AS), ambos indicados en la plataforma BIOPEP-UWM. Más adelante, los productos finales de la hidrólisis se examinaron en función de la probabilidad de absorción gastrointestinal y el perfil farmacocinético realizado en las herramientas bioinformáticas SwissADME, SwissTargetPrediction y ADME/Tlab. El análisis estadístico se llevó a cabo mediante una prueba ANOVA de una vía. Resultados: Los biopéptidos inhibidores de la dipeptidil peptidasa IV (DPP-IV) y la enzima convertidora de angiotensina (ECA) exhibieron la mayor frecuencia de liberación. Además, los parámetros W y ASno mostraron diferencias significativas (p> 0.05) entre las isoformas miofibrilares evaluadas. Siete biopéptidos se clasificaron como altamente absorbibles e informaron un cumplimiento óptimo de similitud con el fármaco. Aunque los biopéptidos tienen propiedades farmacocinéticas adecuadas, su potencia terapéutica demostró ser menor que la de los fármacos inhibidores de la DPP-IV y la ACE. Conclusiones: La troponina y la tropomiosina son una fuente dietética rica en péptidos bioactivos, principalmente DPP-IV e inhibidores de la ACE. Los productos finales de la digestión son principalmente dipéptidos con propiedades farmacocinéticas óptimas y similares a la de los fármacos, lo que sugiere una aplicación terapéutica factible en trastornos hipertensivos e hiperglicémicos
Assuntos
Humanos , Peptídeos , Tropomiosina , Troponina , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IVRESUMO
Resumo Fundamento As evidências que embasam o uso de inibidores do sistema-renina-angiotensina aldosterona (SRAA) e betabloqueadores para prevenção de cardiomiopatia induzida por antraciclinas são controversas. Objetivo Realizamos uma metanálise para avaliar a eficácia desses medicamentos na prevenção da cardiotoxicidade. Métodos A metanálise incluiu estudos prospectivos e randomizados com adultos submetidos à quimioterapia com antraciclina e comparou o uso de terapias SRAA ou betabloqueadores versus placebo com seguimento de 6 a 18 meses. O desfecho primário foi alteração da fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) durante a quimioterapia. Os desfechos secundários foram: a incidência de insuficiência cardíaca, mortalidade por todas as causas e alterações na medida do diâmetro diastólico final. A avaliação da heterogeneidade foi realizada por estratificação e meta-regressão. O nível de significância adotado foi p < 0,05. Resultados A busca resultou em 17 estudos, totalizando 1.530 pacientes. A variação (delta) da FEVE foi avaliada em 14 estudos. A terapia neuro-hormonal foi associada a um menor delta na FEVE pré-terapia versus pós-terapia (diferença média ponderada 4,42 [intervalo de confiança de 95% 2,3 a 6,6]) e maior FEVE final (p < 0,001). O tratamento resultou em menor incidência de insuficiência cardíaca (risk ratio 0,45 [intervalo de confiança de 95% 0,3 a 0,7]). Não houve efeito na mortalidade (p = 0,3). Para a análise da FEVE, foi documentada heterogeneidade substancial, não explicada pelas variáveis exploradas no estudo. Conclusão O uso de inibidores do SRAA e betabloqueadores para prevenção da cardiotoxicidade induzida por antraciclinas foi associado a redução menos pronunciada da FEVE, maior FEVE final e menor incidência de insuficiência cardíaca. Não foram observadas alterações na mortalidade. (CRD PROSPERO 42019133615)
Abstract Background The evidence supporting the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors and beta-blockers for the prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy is controversial. Objective We performed a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of these drugs in preventing cardiotoxicity. Methods The meta-analysis included prospective, randomized studies in adults receiving anthracycline chemotherapy and compared the use of RAAS inhibitors or beta-blockers versus placebo with a follow-up of 6 to 18 months. The primary outcome was change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of heart failure, all-cause mortality, and changes in end-diastolic measurement. Heterogeneity was assessed by stratification and meta-regression. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted. Results The search resulted in 17 studies, totaling 1,530 patients. The variation (delta) in LVEF was evaluated in 14 studies. Neurohormonal therapy was associated with a lower delta in pre- versus post-therapy LVEF (weighted mean difference 4.42 [95% confidence interval 2.3 to 6.6]) and higher final LVEF (p < 0.001). Treatment resulted in a lower incidence of heart failure (risk ratio 0.45 [95% confidence interval 0.3 to 0.7]). There was no effect on mortality (p = 0.3). For analysis of LVEF, substantial heterogeneity was documented, which was not explained by the variables explored in the study. Conclusion The use of RAAS inhibitors and beta-blockers to prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity was associated with less pronounced reduction in LVEF, higher final LVEF, and lower incidence of heart failure. No changes in mortality were observed. (CRD PROSPERO 42019133615)
RESUMO
Resumo Fundamento Os bloqueadores dos receptores da angiotensina (BRA) e os inibidores da enzima conversora da angiotensina (IECA) aumentam a expressão de ACE2, que é um receptor para entrada de SARS-CoV-2 nas células. Embora as evidências sugiram que os IECA/BRA são seguros entre a população geral com COVID-19, sua segurança em pacientes com hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade merece uma avaliação mais aprofundada. Objetivo Avaliamos a associação entre o uso de IECA/BRA e a gravidade da COVID-19 em pacientes com hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade. Métodos O presente estudo incluiu 439 pacientes adultos com sobrepeso/obesidade (índice de massa corporal ≥ 25 kg/m2) e hipertensão, diagnosticados com COVID-19 e internados no University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic entre 1º de março e 7 de dezembro de 2020. Foram avaliadas a mortalidade e a gravidade da COVID-19 com base no tempo de internação hospitalar, internação em unidade de terapia intensiva, uso de oxigênio suplementar, ventilação mecânica e uso de vasopressores. A regressão logística multivariável foi usada para examinar as associações do uso de IECA/BRA com a mortalidade e outros marcadores de gravidade de COVID-19, com um alfa bilateral definido em 0,05. Resultados A exposição aos BRA (n = 91) e IECA (n = 149) antes da hospitalização foi significativamente associada a menor mortalidade ( odds ratio [OR] = 0,362, intervalo de confiança [IC] de 95% 0,149 a 0,880, p = 0,025) e menor tempo de internação hospitalar (IC 95% −0,217 a −0,025, p = 0,015). Adicionalmente, os pacientes em uso de IECA/BRA apresentaram uma tendência não significativa de menor internação em unidade de terapia intensiva (OR = 0,727, IC 95% 0,485 a 1,090, p = 0,123), uso de oxigênio suplementar (OR = 0,929, IC 95% 0,608 a 1,421,p = 0,734), ventilação mecânica (OR = 0,728, IC 95% 0,457 a 1,161, p = 0,182) e vasopressores (OR = 0,677, IC 95% 0,430 a 1,067, p = 0,093). Conclusão Os resultados sugerem que pacientes internados com COVID-19 e hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade que receberam IECA/BRA antes da internação apresentam menor mortalidade e COVID-19 menos grave do que aqueles que não estavam tomando IECA/BRA. Os resultados também sugerem que a exposição aos IECA/BRA pode proteger pacientes com hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade de COVID-19 grave e morte.
Abstract Background Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) increase the expression of ACE2, which is a receptor for entry of SARS-CoV-2 into cells. Though evidence suggests that ARB/ACEI are safe among the general population with COVID-19, their safety in patients with overweight/obesity-related hypertension deserves further evaluation. Objective We assessed the association between ARB/ACEI use and COVID-19 severity in patients with overweight/obesity-related hypertension. Methods This study included 439 adult patients with overweight/obesity (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2) and hypertension, diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic from March 1 to December 7, 2020. Mortality and severity of COVID-19 were evaluated based on length of stay in hospital, intensive care unit admission, use of supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the associations of ARB/ACEI use with mortality and other markers of COVID-19 severity, with a two-sided alpha set at 0.05. Results Exposure to ARB (n = 91) and ACEI (n = 149) before hospitalization was significantly associated with lower mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.362, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.149 to 0.880, p = 0.025) and a shorter length of stay (95% CI −0.217 to −0.025, p = 0.015). Additionally, patients using ARB/ACEI showed a non-significant trend toward lower intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.727, 95% CI 0.485 to 1.090, p = 0.123), use of supplemental oxygen (OR = 0.929, 95% CI 0.608 to 1.421, p = 0.734), mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.728, 95% CI 0.457 to 1.161, p = 0.182), and vasopressors (OR = 0.677, 95% CI 0.430 to 1.067, p = 0.093). Conclusion Results suggest that hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and overweight/obesity-related hypertension who were prescribed ARB/ACEI before admission to the hospital exhibit lower mortality and less severe COVID-19 than those who were not taking ARB/ACEI. The results also suggest that exposure to ARB/ACEI may protect patients with overweight/obesity-related hypertension from severe COVID-19 and death.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Besides its counterbalancing role of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2 is the receptor for the type 2 coronavirus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome, the etiological agent of COVID-19. COVID-19 is associated with increased plasmatic ACE2 levels, although conflicting results have been reported regarding angiotensin (Ang) II and Ang-(1-7) levels. We investigated plasmatic ACE2 protein levels and enzymatic activity and Ang II and Ang-(1-7) levels in normotensive and hypertensive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 compared to healthy subjects. METHODS: Ang II and Ang-(1-7), and ACE2 activity and protein levels were measured in 93 adults (58 % (n = 54) normotensive and 42 % (n = 39) hypertensive) hospitalized with COVID-19. Healthy, normotensive (n = 33) and hypertensive (n = 7) outpatient adults comprised the control group. RESULTS: COVID-19 patients displayed higher ACE2 enzymatic activity and protein levels than healthy subjects. Within the COVID-19 group, ACE2 activity and protein levels were not different between normotensive and hypertensive-treated patients, not even between COVID-19 hypertensive patients under RAS blockade treatment and those treated with other antihypertensive medications. Ang II and Ang-(1-7) levels significantly decreased in COVID-19 patients. When COVID-19 patients under RAS blockade treatment were excluded from the analysis, ACE2 activity and protein levels remained higher and Ang II and Ang-(1-7) levels lower in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy people. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the involvement of RAS in COVID-19, even when patients under RAS blockade treatment were excluded. The increased circulating ACE2 suggest higher ACE2 expression and shedding.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hipertensão , Adulto , Angiotensina II/metabolismo , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2 , Humanos , Peptidil Dipeptidase A/metabolismo , Sistema Renina-AngiotensinaRESUMO
Introduction: Concerns have been raised about Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in patients with COVID-19. Although recent trials have proved its security, evidence regarding intrinsic differences between RASi is lacking, especially in patients with arterial hypertension. Our objective was to analyse the prognosis of hypertense patients who received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin-2 receptor blockers (ARBs) and were hospitalized due to COVID-19. Materials and methods: 392 consecutive patients with hypertension and COVID-19 were analyse. Incidence of the combined event (death or mechanical ventilation need) was the primary endpoint. Secondary, incidence of each event and time to event were analysed. Results: 155 received ACEi and 237 ARBs. During the hospitalization, the combined event was observed in the 31,6 % of patients. No differences were observed between those previously treated with ACEi and ARBs (33.5 vs. 30.9%; p = 0.51). In the survival analysis, no differences were observed regarding time to combined event (p = 0.91). In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (32.3 vs. 29.1%; p = 0.51), as well as the need of mechanical ventilation (3.2 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.23). Conclusions: The type of RASi was not associated with in-hospital major events in patients with arterial hypertension hospitalized due to COVID-19.
Introducción: Han surgido dudas sobre la seguridad de los fármacos inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina (SRA) en pacientes con enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Aunque estudios recientes han demostrado la seguridad de este grupo de fármacos, la evidencia sobre la comparativa de los diferentes fármacos inhibidores del SRA es escasa, sobre todo en pacientes hipertensos. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar el pronóstico de los pacientes hipertensos tratados con inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina (IECA) o antagonistas del receptor de angiotensina II (ARA II) que presentaron COVID-19. Materiales y métodos: Se analizaron 582 pacientes hipertensos con COVID-19. Se registró la incidencia del evento combinado de muerte o necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI) durante la hospitalización. De forma secundaria, se analizó la incidencia de eventos de manera independiente y se realizó un análisis de supervivencia para analizar el tiempo hasta los eventos. Resultados: 155 pacientes recibían tratamiento previo con IECA y 237 con ARA II. Durante la hospitalización por COVID-19, se observó una incidencia del evento combinado del 31.6%. No se detectaron diferencias entre los pacientes que recibían tratamiento con IECA y los tratados con ARA II (33.5 vs. 30.9%; p = 0.51). En el análisis de supervivencia, no se hallaron diferencias en el tiempo hasta el evento combinado (p = 0.91). La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue similar en ambos grupos (32.3 vs. 29.1%; p = 0.51), así como la necesidad de VMI (3.2 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.23). Conclusiones: El tipo de inhibidor del SRA no se asoció a diferencias pronósticas significativas entre los pacientes hipertensos ingresados con COVID-19.
RESUMO
La esclerosis sistémica (ES) es una enfermedad inmunomediada, caracterizada por la presencia de fibrosis e inflamación tisular, que conlleva a cambios degenerativos vasculares de la piel y órganos internos tales como pulmón, corazón, tracto gastrointestinal y riñón. Tiene formas de presentación localizadas y sistémicas. La crisis renal esclerodérmica (CRE) es la manifestación grave en el riñón que se caracteriza por: a) hipertensión maligna, de inicio súbito asociado a aumento de actividad de renina plasmática. Hay una variante clínica que cursa con normotensión, la cual es de peor pronóstico; b) insuficiencia renal aguda (IRA); c) microangiopatía trombótica. A continuación, se relata la presentación de un caso de CRE en un paciente de sexo femenino de 60 años, que ingresó a la Institución con un cuadro caracterizado por crisis hipertensiva tipo emergencia, caída de filtrado glomerular severa, microhematuria y proteinuria; la cual recibió tratamiento médico, pero por persistencia de signos y síntomas, se decidió realizar una punción biopsia renal, la cual confirmo el diagnóstico.
Systemic sclerosis (SS) is characterized by the presence of thickening and hardening of the skin (from the Greek "sclero"), it has forms of limited and diffuse manifestation. It is chronic in pattern and manifests with vascular dysfunction and severe systemic connective fibrosis. Sclerodermic renal crisis (CRE) is the severe manifestation in the kidney, and is characterized by: a) Malignant hypertension, of sudden onset associated with increased plasma renin activity. There is a clinical variant, which presents with normotension, which has a worse prognosis. (UTAH); b) Acute Renal Failure (ARF); c) Proteinuria in the non-nephrotic range. Microscopic hematuria and casts are uncommon. Next, we are going to report the presentation of a case of sclerodermic renal crisis (CRE), in a 60-year-old female patient, who was admitted to our institution with a condition characterized by severe arterial hypertension, severe glomerular filtration drop, microhematuria and proteinuria; which received medical treatment, but due to the persistence of signs and symptoms, it was decided to perform a renal biopsy puncture, which confirmed the diagnosis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Along with other canonical systems, the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has shown important roles in stress. This system is a complex regulatory proteolytic cascade composed of various enzymes, peptides, and receptors. Besides the classical (ACE/Ang II/AT1 receptor) and the counter-regulatory (ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/Mas receptor) RAS axes, evidence indicates that nonclassical components, including Ang III, Ang IV, AT2 and AT4, can also be involved in stress. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: This comprehensive review summarizes the current knowledge on the participation of RAS components in different adverse environmental stimuli stressors, including air jet stress, cage switch stress, restraint stress, chronic unpredictable stress, neonatal isolation stress, and post-traumatic stress disorder. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In general, activation of the classical RAS axis potentiates stress-related cardiovascular, endocrine, and behavioral responses, while the stimulation of the counter-regulatory axis attenuates these effects. Pharmacological modulation in both axes is optimistic, offering promising perspectives for stress-related disorders treatment. In this regard, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are potential candidates already available since they block the classical axis, activate the counter-regulatory axis, and are safe and efficient drugs.
Assuntos
Peptidil Dipeptidase A , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina , Angiotensina II/metabolismo , Angiotensina II/farmacologia , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/metabolismo , Peptidil Dipeptidase A/metabolismo , Peptidil Dipeptidase A/farmacologia , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/fisiologia , Transdução de SinaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is one of the most prevalent primary glomerulopathies in children. There are various studies investigating the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) in adults with IgAN. However, only few studies evaluated the efficacy of these medications in pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ACEI/ARB in children with IgAN. DATA SOURCES: Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched between the 1st of April and 20th of July of 2021 using the keywords "IgA Nephropathy," "Berger's Disease," "Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors," "Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists," "Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers," and similar entry terms collected from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies (case series, case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional) and clinical trials with descriptions of pediatric patients (under 19 years old) with histopathological diagnosis of IgA nephropathy and who received ACEI and/or ARB. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Pediatric patients (under 19 years old) with histopathological diagnosis of IgA nephropathy and who received ACEI and/or ARB. STUDY APPRAISAL: For quality assessment, the Risk of Bias 2 tool (RoB 2), the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool (ROBINS-I), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used. RESULTS: After recovering 1,471 studies, only eight, published between 2003 and 2019, met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. Of the 737 included children in the studies, 202 (25.8%) used ACEI/ARB and were compared with placebo and other therapy regimens. Of the seven studies that evaluated proteinuria, six reported an efficacy of ACEI/ARB in reducing this marker. ACEI/ARB also showed a possible effect in reducing hematuria and oxidative stress. The most common side effect was dizziness. LIMITATIONS: The number of studies about the treatment with ACEI/ARB in children with IgAN is scarce. In addition, the studies are very heterogeneous. There are few studies that compared ACEI/ARB with placebo. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: The use of ACEI and/or ARB appears to be safe and to reduce proteinuria in pediatric patients with IgAN. Nonetheless, further randomized controlled trials, with greater methodological rigor and longer follow-up time, are required to establish the efficacy and safety of this therapy in this population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: The protocol of this systematic literature review was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42021245375, and in the OSF registries ( https://osf.io/qft4z/ ) with the registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VADYR . A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Glomerulonefrite por IGA , Adulto , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/efeitos adversos , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Glomerulonefrite por IGA/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Proteinúria/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Resumen La esclerosis sistémica (ES) es una enfermedad inmuno-mediada, caracterizada por la presencia de fibrosis e inflamación tisular que conlleva cambios degenerativos vasculares de la piel y órganos internos tales como pulmones, corazón, tracto gastrointestinal y riñones. La crisis renal esclerodérmica (CRE), manifestación grave en el riñón, se caracteriza por: hipertensión maligna de inicio súbito, asociada al aumento de la actividad de renina plasmática. Hay una variante clínica que cursa con normotensión, la cual es de peor pronóstico; Insuficiencia Renal Aguda (IRA); y microangiopatía trombótica. A continuación, vamos a relatar la presentación de un caso de CRE en un paciente de 60 años, sexo femenino, quien ingresó al Sanatorio de los Arcos en Buenos Aires, Capital Federal (Argentina) con un cuadro caracterizado por una crisis hipertensiva tipo emergencia, caída de filtrado glomerular severa, micro hematuria y proteinuria. Recibió tratamiento médico, pero por persistencia de signos y síntomas, se decidió realizar una punción biopsia renal, la cual confirmó el diagnóstico. La hematuria microscópica y los cilindros son infrecuentes.
Abstract Systemic sclerosis (SS) is characterized by the thickening and hardening of the skin (from the Greek "sclero"); it has forms of limited and diffuse manifestation. It is chronic in pattern and manifests as vascular dysfunction and severe systemic connective fibrosis. Scleroderma renal crisis (CRE) is a severe manifestation in the kidney characterized by malignant hypertension of sudden onset associated with increased plasma renin activity. There is a clinical variant with normotension which has a worse prognosis called Acute Renal Failure (ARF), and thrombotic microangiopathy. Microscopic hematuria and casts are uncommon. We report a case of scleroderma renal crisis (CRE) in a 60-year-old female patient who entered the Sanatorio de los Arcos in Buenos Aires, Capital Federal (Argentina) with severe arterial hypertension, severe glomerular filtration drop, microhematuria and proteinuria. She received medical treatment; nevertheless, it was decided to perform a renal biopsy puncture due to the persistence of signs and symptoms, which confirmed the diagnosis.
RESUMO
COVID-19 is a pandemic disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is potentially fatal for vulnerable individuals. Disease management represents a challenge for many countries, given the shortage of medicines and hospital resources. The objective of this work was to review the medicinal plants, foods and natural products showing scientific evidence for host protection against various types of coronaviruses, with a focus on SARS-CoV-2. Natural products that mitigate the symptoms caused by various coronaviruses are also presented. Particular attention was placed on natural products that stabilize the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS), which has been associated with the entry of the SARS-CoV-2 into human cells.