RESUMO
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic posed a worldwide challenge, leading to radical changes in surgical services. The primary objective of the study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on elective and emergency surgeries in a Brazilian metropolitan area. The secondary objective was to compare the postoperative hospital mortality before and during the pandemic. Patients and Methods: Time-series cohort study including data of all patients admitted for elective or emergency surgery at the hospitals in the Public Health System of Federal District, Brazil, between March 2018 and February 2022, using data extracted from the Hospital Information System of Brazilian Ministry of Health (SIH/DATASUS) on September 30, 2022. A causal impact analysis was used to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on elective and emergency surgeries and hospital mortality. Results: There were 174,473 surgeries during the study period. There was a reduction in overall (absolute effect per week: -227.5; 95% CI: -307.0 to -149.0), elective (absolute effect per week: -170.9; 95% CI: -232.8 to -112.0), and emergency (absolute effect per week: -57.7; 95% CI: -87.5 to -27.7) surgeries during the COVID-19 period. Comparing the surgeries performed before and after the COVID-19 onset, there was an increase in emergency surgeries (53.0% vs 68.8%, P < 0.001) and no significant hospital length of stay (P = 0.112). The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on postoperative hospital mortality was not statistically significant (absolute effect per week: 2.1, 95% CI: -0.01 to 4.2). Conclusion: Our study showed a reduction in elective and emergency surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly due to disruptions in surgical services. These findings highlight that it is crucial to implement effective strategies to prevent the accumulation of surgical waiting lists in times of crisis and improve outcomes for surgical patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery decreased during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To study the evolution of acute care surgery and its relationship with the pandemic severity. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study which compared patients who underwent acute care surgery during the pandemic to a control group. RESULTS: A total of 660 patients were included (253 in the control group, 67 in the first-wave, 193 in the valley, and 147 in the second wave). The median daily number of acute care surgery procedures was 2 during the control period. This activity decreased during the first wave (1/day), increased during the valley (2/day), and didn't change in the second wave (2/day). Serious complications were more common during the first wave (22.4%). A negative linear correlation was found between the daily number of acute care surgery procedures, number of patients being admitted to the hospital each day and daily number of patients dying because of COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Acute care surgery was reduced during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, increased during the valley, and returned to the pre-pandemic level during the second wave. Thus, acute care surgery was related to pandemic severity, with fewer surgeries being performed when the pandemic was more severe.
ANTECEDENTES: La cirugía urgente disminuyó durante la primera ola de la pandemia de COVID-19. OBJETIVO: Estudiar la evolución de la cirugía urgente y su relación con la gravedad de la pandemia. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo que compara los pacientes intervenidos de forma urgente durante la pandemia con un grupo control. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 660 pacientes (253 en el grupo control, 67 en primera ola de la pandemia, 193 en el periodo valle y 147 en la segunda ola). La mediana del número de cirugías urgentes fue de 2 (intervalo intercuartílico: 1-3) durante el periodo control, disminuyó durante la primera ola (1/día), aumentó durante el valle (2/día) y no se modificó en la segunda ola (2/día). Las complicaciones mayores fueron más comunes durante la primera ola (22.4%). Se encontró una correlación lineal negativa entre el número de procedimientos quirúrgicos urgentes diarios y el número de ingresos hospitalarios y fallecimientos diarios por COVID-19. CONCLUSIONES: La cirugía urgente se redujo durante la primera ola, aumentó durante el periodo valle y volvió a niveles prepandémicos durante la segunda ola. Además, la cirugía urgente se relaciona con la gravedad de la pandemia, ya que se realizaron menos cirugías urgentes durante el periodo de mayor gravedad de la pandemia.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Joint replacement surgery is in increasing demand and is the most common inpatient surgery for Medicare beneficiaries. The venue for post-operative rehabilitation, including early outpatient therapy after surgery, influences recovery and quality of life. As part of a comprehensive total joint program at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, we developed and validated a predictive model to anticipate and plan the disposition for rehabilitation of our patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We analyzed data for TKA patients who completed a pre-operative Total Knee Risk Assessment in 2017 (the model development cohort) or during the first 6 months of 2018 (the model validation cohort). The Total Knee Risk Assessment, which is used to guide disposition for rehabilitation, included questions in mobility, social, and environment domains. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict discharge to post-acute care facilities (PACFs) (ie, skilled nursing facilities or acute rehabilitation centers). RESULTS: Data for a total of 1481 and 631 patients who underwent TKA were analyzed in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Ninety-three patients (6.3%) in the development cohort and 22 patients (3.5%) in the validation cohort were discharged to PACFs. Eight risk factors for discharge to PACFs were included in the final multivariable model. Patients with a diagnosis of neurological disorder and with a mobility/balance issue had the greatest chance of discharge to PACFs. CONCLUSION: This validated predictive model for discharge disposition following TKA may be used as a tool in shared decision-making and discharge planning for patients undergoing TKA.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Idoso , Humanos , Medicare , Alta do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergency medicine (EM) in Brazil has achieved critical steps toward its development in the last decades including its official recognition as a specialty in 2016. In this article, we worked in collaboration with the Brazilian Association of Emergency Medicine (ABRAMEDE) to describe three main aspects of EM in Brazil: (1) brief historical perspective; (2) current status; and (3) future challenges. MAIN TEXT: In Brazil, the first EM residency program was created in 1996. Only 20 years later, the specialty was officially recognized by national regulatory bodies. Prior to recognition, there were only 2 residency programs. Since then, 52 new programs were initiated. Brazil has now 54 residency programs in 16 of the 27 federative units. As of December 2020, 192 physicians have been board certified as emergency physicians in Brazil. The shortage of formal EM-trained physicians is still significant and at this point it is not feasible to have all Brazilian emergency care units and EDs staffed only with formally trained emergency physicians. Three future challenges were identified including the recognition of EM specialists in the house of Medicine, the need of creating a reliable training curriculum despite highly heterogeneous emergency care practice across the country, and the importance of fostering the development of academic EM as a way to build a strong research agenda and therefore increase the knowledge about the epidemiology and organization of emergency care. CONCLUSION: Although EM in Brazil has accomplished key steps toward its development, there are several obstacles before it becomes a solid medical specialty. Its continuous development will depend on special attention to key challenges involving recognition, reliability, and research.
RESUMO
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE The aim was to evaluate the prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) and its association with body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and functionality among institutionalized older adults. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted. The swallowing function and diagnosis of OD were evaluated with a volume-viscosity swallow test. Activities of daily living were evaluated by the Barthel Index. Body composition was evaluated by BIA, and phase angle (PhA) was determined. RESULTS Eighty institutionalized older adults were evaluated. The mean age of the study population was 82±9.5 years, and 65% were females. The OD prevalence was 30%, dependence was 30%, and sarcopenia was 16%. In the multivariate analysis, a low PhA (<3.5°) was independently associated with the presence of OD adjusted by sex and age (OR: 2.60, 95%CI 2.41-2.90, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS A higher prevalence of OD was found. Significant and independent associations were found between low PhA, dependence, and sarcopenia with the presence of OD among institutionalized older persons.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos de Deglutição/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Deglutição/epidemiologia , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico , Sarcopenia/epidemiologia , Composição Corporal , Atividades Cotidianas , Estudos Transversais , Impedância ElétricaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It remains unknown if a patient's prior episode-of-care (EOC) costs for total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty procedure can be used to predict subsequent costs for future procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether there is a correlation between the EOC costs for a patient's index and subsequent THA or TKA. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 11,599 THA and TKA Medicare patients from 2015 to 2019 and identified all patients who underwent a subsequent THA and TKA during the study period. We collected demographics, comorbidities, short-term outcomes, and 90-day EOC claims costs. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify whether prior high-EOC costs were predictive of high costs for the subsequent procedure. RESULTS: Of the 774 patients (6.7%) who underwent a subsequent THA or TKA, there was no difference in readmissions (4% vs 5%, P = .70), rate of discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) (15% vs 15%, P = .89), and mean costs ($18,534 vs $18,532, P = .99) between EOCs. High-cost patients for the initial TKA or THA were more likely to be high cost for subsequent procedure (odds ratio 14.33, P < .01). Repeat high-cost patients were more likely to discharge to an SNF for their first and second EOC compared to normative-cost patients (P < .01). CONCLUSION: High-cost patients for their initial THA or TKA are likely to be high cost for a subsequent procedure, secondary to a high rate of SNF utilization. Efforts to reduce costs in repeat high-cost patients should focus on addressing post-operative needs pre-operatively to facilitate safe discharge home.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Idoso , Cuidado Periódico , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Medicare , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate and detail the management of a difficult, long-term, open abdomen in a resource constraint setting with the use of Hydrocolloid dressing. METHOD: An observational retrospective study was conducted at a single level-1 trauma center. Over a 5-year period, all the open abdomen patients were evaluated and the cohorts who were treated with Hydrocolloid dressings were described in detail from their admission to their discharge. RESULTS: During this period, there were 147 open abdomens. 7.5% (11) patients required long-term open abdomen management, in which Hydrocolloid dressing was utilized. Of this group, there were no entero/colonic-atmospheric fistulas, and there was either de-novo complete skin coverage, successful skin graft placement, or definitive abdominal wall repair in all the patients. De-novo complete skin coverage took an average of 7.4 months. All the patients were discharged home after an average of 107 days hospitalized. CONCLUSION: Despite not being an optimal management of an open abdomen, there are always a small group of these patients who lose abdominal domain, are critically ill or injured, and have prolonged hospitalization with an open abdomen. In this cohort, and especially in resource constraint settings, Hydrocolloid dressing is a cost-efficient, simple, and effective method to treat the 'long-term' open abdomens.
Assuntos
Curativos Hidrocoloides , Fístula Intestinal , Abdome/cirurgia , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , CicatrizaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study is to contribute to the literature regarding post-acute nursing home utilization and quality indicators among Medicare beneficiaries in Puerto Rico compared with the US mainland. DESIGN: Medicare data from 2015 to 2017 was used to identify new discharges to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) using the Minimum Data Set and the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Post-acute care patients admitted to SNFs in Puerto Rico and the United States. METHODS: Our final cohort included 4,732,222 beneficiaries from Puerto Rico and the United States enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service or Medicare Advantage programs admitted to an SNF (N = 15,197) following an acute hospital stay. We compared demographic, clinical, and facility-level characteristics among patients in Puerto Rico and the United States. We also described 2 quality indicators among these groups: (1) 30-day rehospitalization rates and (2) successful discharge from the facility to the community. RESULTS: Medicare patients in Puerto Rico were physically and cognitively healthier than patients in the United States. Puerto Ricans were also more likely to be admitted to lower quality nursing homes than US patients (2.5 vs 3.4). Finally, Puerto Ricans had higher rates of successful discharge to the community [17.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.0-22.3], but higher 30-day rehospitalization rates compared with US patients (11.2, 95% CI 6.2-16.3). These differences were consistent even when comparing these quality outcomes among Puerto Ricans to US Hispanics only. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: SNFs in the United States and Puerto Rico are now receiving financial penalties for high readmission rates. Currently, Medicare does not measure readmission rates for Medicare Advantage patients-even though some states, including Puerto Rico, have a high proportion of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. As Medicare Advantage enrollment continues to increase, our results highlight the importance of measuring performance among Medicare Advantage patients and assessing disparities in quality of post-acute care among patients in Puerto Rico and the United States.
Assuntos
Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Idoso , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Humanos , Porto Rico , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many commercial and artisanal devices are utilized for temporary abdominal closure in patients being managed with an open abdomen for abdominal sepsis. The costs of materials required to treat patients with an open abdomen varies drastically. In Costa Rica, due to the lack of accurate information relating to the actual cost to manage a patient entails that the method with the least expensive materials is usually selected. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center retrospective review of 46 patients diagnosed with abdominal sepsis and successfully treated with an open abdomen and one of the three temporary abdominal closure methods during the year 2018 in a tertiary hospital was evaluated using a gross-cost pricing model developed by the authors. The three temporary abdominal closure methods were a locally manufactured Bogota Bag, and commercial abdominal negative pressure therapy dressing and negative pressure therapy with 0.9% saline solution instillation. The per-unit-costs were hospital day and intensive care day, number of surgical procedures per patient, cost negative pressure therapy kits. RESULTS: Statistically significant cost reduction was observed in the cohort treated with negative pressure therapy with instillation as compared to the other temporary abdominal closure methods. The reduction of hospital length of stay, as well as fewer number of surgeries were the main contributing factors in diminishing costs. On average, the costs to treat a patient utilizing negative pressure therapy with instillation was nearly 50% lower than using the other two temporary abdominal closure methods. CONCLUSIONS: The costs relating to managing abdominal sepsis in the septic open abdomen vary greatly according to the temporary abdominal closure utilized. If the hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay and number of surgeries required are the main parameters used in determining costs, the use of negative pressure therapy with 0.9% saline solution instillation reduces costs by nearly 50% in comparison to conventional negative pressure wound therapy and Bogota Bag. In this instance, the more expensive method at first glance, obtained a considerable cost reduction when compared to therapies that utilize less expensive materials.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the increasing popularity of alternative payment models following total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), efforts have focused on reducing post-acute care (PAC) costs, particularly patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The purpose of this study is to determine if preferentially discharging patients to high-quality SNFs can reduce bundled payment costs for primary THA and TKA. METHODS: At our institution, a quality improvement initiative for SNFs was implemented at the start of 2017, preferentially discharging patients to internally credentialed facilities, designated by several quality measures. Claims data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were queried to identify patients discharged to SNF following primary total joint arthroplasty. We compared costs and outcomes between patients discharged to credentialed SNF sites and those discharged to other sites. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2018, of a consecutive series of 8778 primary THA and TKA patients, 1284 (14.6%) were discharged to an SNF. Following initiation of the program, 498 patients were discharged to an SNF, 301 (60.4%) of which were sent to a credentialed facility. Patients at credentialed facilities had significantly lower SNF costs ($11,184 vs $8198, P < .0001), PAC costs ($18,952 vs $15,148, P < .0001), and episode-of-care costs ($34,557 vs $30,831, P < .0001), with no difference in readmissions (10% vs 12%, P = .33) or complications (8% vs 6%, P = .15). Controlling for confounding variables, being discharged to a credentialed facility decreased SNF costs by $1961 (P = .0020) and PAC costs by $3126 (P = .0031) per patient. CONCLUSION: Quality improvement efforts through partnership with selective SNFs can significantly decrease PAC costs for patients undergoing primary THA and TKA.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Idoso , Humanos , Medicare , Alta do Paciente , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Despite multiple initiatives in post-acute and long-term nursing home care settings (NHs) to improve the quality of care while reducing health care costs, research in NHs can prove challenging. Extensive regulation for both research and NHs is designed to protect a highly vulnerable population but can be a deterrent to conducting research. This article outlines regulatory challenges faced by NHs and researchers, such as protecting resident privacy as well as health information and obtaining informed consent. The article provides lessons learned to help form mutually beneficial partnerships between researchers and NHs to conduct studies that grow and advance NH research initiatives and clinical care.
Assuntos
Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Casas de Saúde , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos , Confidencialidade , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Segurança do PacienteRESUMO
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the intensity and frequency of pain, use of analgesic drugs, and the incidence of paraesthesia, urinary retention and vascular complications upon decreasing affected limb immobilisation from 4-2 hrs after sheath removal in patients submitted to transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: After sheath removal from the femoral artery following urgent or emergency PCI, patients are maintained with limb immobilisation for a mean period of 4 hr. DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial (RCT) based on the CONSORT guidelines. METHOD: Randomised clinical trial was performed in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome submitted to transfemoral PCI. The intervention group was submitted to a supine position with the head of the bed elevated (30-degree angle) with affected limb immobilisation for 2 hr after sheath removal and the control group for 4 hrs. The outcomes were pain complaints, need for analgesic drugs, incidence of paraesthesia, urinary retention and vascular complications. The outcomes were assessed immediately, 6, 12 and 24 hr after release from limb immobilisation before the patients were released from bed rest. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (75 in each group) participated in the study. No significant differences in outcomes were observed between the groups, except in relation to the haematoma formation that was higher in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: A reduced length of limb immobilisation after sheath removal following PCI does not change the frequency and intensity of pain, need of analgesic drugs, urinary retention and paraesthesia. The incidence of haematoma was higher in the intervention group, without significant clinical manifestations. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results of this study can be considered for patients submitted to elective, urgent or emergency PCI, who have a lower risk of complications, thereby allowing for decreased periods of limb immobilisation.
Assuntos
Imobilização/métodos , Extremidade Inferior , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/enfermagem , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To test for differences in patient outcomes when hospital and post-acute care (PAC) providers participate in accountable care organizations (ACOs). DATA/SETTING: Using Medicare claims, we examined changes in readmission, Medicare spending, and length of stay among patients admitted to ACO-participating hospitals and PAC providers. DESIGN: We compared changes in outcomes among patients discharged from ACO-participating hospitals/PACs before and after participation to changes among patients discharged from non-participating hospitals/PACs over the same time period. RESULTS: Patients discharged from an ACO-participating hospitals and skilled nursing facilities (SNF) had lower readmission rates (-1.7 percentage points, p-value = .03) than before ACO participation and non-participants; and lower per-discharge Medicare spending (-$940, p-value = .001), and length of stay (-3.1 days, p-value <.001) in SNF. Effects among ACO-participating hospitals without a co-participating SNF were smaller. Patients discharged from an ACO-participating hospital and home health agency had lower Medicare per-discharge spending (-$209; p-value = .06) and length of stay (-1.6 days, p-value <.001) for home health compared to before ACO participation and non-participants. Discharge from an ACO-participating hospital and inpatient rehabilitation facility did not impact patient outcomes or spending. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital and SNF participation in an ACO was associated with lower readmission rates, Medicare spending on SNF, and SNF length of stay. These results lend support to the ACO payment model.
Assuntos
Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/economia , Gastos em Saúde , Medicare/economia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos/economia , Organizações de Assistência Responsáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Semi-Intensivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Older emergency department patients are more vulnerable than younger patients, yet many risk factors that contribute to the mortality of older patients remain unclear and under investigation. This study endeavored to determine mortality and factors associated with mortality in patients over 60 years of age who were admitted to the emergency departments of two general hospitals in Mexico City. METHODS: This is a hospital cohort study involving adults over 60 years of age admitted to the emergency department and who are beneficiaries of the Mexican Institute of Social Security and residents of Mexico City. All causes of mortality from the time of emergency department admission until a follow-up home visit after discharge were measured. Included risk factors were: socio-demographic, health-care related, mental and physical variables, and in-hospital care-related. Survival functions were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived from Cox regression models in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: From the 1406 older adults who participated in this study, 306 (21.8%) did not survive. Independent mortality risk factors found in the last Cox model were age (HR = 1.02, 95% CI, 1.005-1.04; p = 0.01), length of stay in the ED (HR = 1.003, 95% CI = 0.99, 1.04; p = 0.006), geriatric care trained residents model in Hospital A (protective factor) (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.46, 0.96; p = 0.031), and the FRAIL scale (HR of 1.34 95% CI, 1.02-1.76; p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for mortality in patients treated at Mexican emergency departments are length of stay and variables related to frailty status.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitalização , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fragilidade , Nível de Saúde , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the improvement in one-year mortality prediction after adding a 2-min cognitive screening to a simple 1-min frailty detection instrument. Secondary outcomes were new activities of daily living (ADL) disability and falls. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A geriatric day-hospital for intermediate care. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 701 older adults with an acute or decompensated disease (79.5 (8.3) years, 64% female). MEASUREMENTS: A rapid and simple frailty evaluation was performed using the FRAIL questionnaire. The presence of cognitive impairment was defined by previous diagnosis of dementia or a score of five or less on an education-corrected 10-point cognitive screening tool. RESULTS: Frail participants with normal (hazard risk [HR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.73-9.25) and impaired cognition had a higher risk of death (HR 4.38, 95% CI, 1.95-9.87) than robust participants. The presence of cognitive impairment increased the risk of death in prefrail (HR 3.60, 95% CI, 1.55-8.34) and robust participants (HR 3.49, 95% CI, 1.22-9.96). Cognitive impairment was associated with an increased risk of incident ADL disability in all frailty categories. The presence of cognitive impairment was associated with a significantly higher risk of fall in robust seniors. The predictive accuracy of the FRAIL scale was lower than expected (between 0.58 and 0.69), and a small improvement was observed after adding the cognitive screening (between 0.61 and 0.72). CONCLUSION: Despite of significant results in predicting relevant clinical events, the present combination of the FRAIL and 10-CS scales may not be ideal in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/mortalidade , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Fragilidade/mortalidade , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Acidentes por Quedas , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To develop and examine the validity and reliability of a targeted geriatric assessment (TaGA) for busy healthcare settings. DESIGN: The TaGA was developed through the consensus of experts (Delphi technique), and we investigated its construct validity and reliability in a cross-sectional study. SETTING: Geriatric day hospital specializing in acute care in Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (N = 534) aged 79.5 ± 8.4, 63% female, consecutively admitted to the geriatric day hospital. MEASUREMENTS: The Frailty Index (FI), Physical Frailty Phenotype, and Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) were used to explore the TaGA's validity. External scales were used to investigate the validity of each matched TaGA domain. The interrater reliability and time to complete the instrument were tested in a 53-person subsample. RESULTS: In 3 rounds of opinion, experts achieved consensus that the TaGA should include 10 domains (social support, recent hospital admissions, falls, number of medications, basic activities of daily living, cognitive performance, self-rated health, depressive symptoms, nutritional status, gait speed). They arrived at sufficient agreement on specific tools to assess each domain. A single numerical score from 0 to 1 expressed the cumulative deficits across the 10 domains. The TaGA score was highly correlated with the FI (Spearman coefficient = 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.76-0.82) and discriminated between frail and nonfrail individuals better than the ISAR (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.84 vs 0.72; P < .001). The TaGA score also had excellent interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92, 95% CI=0.87-0.95). Mean TaGA administration time was 9.5 ± 2.2 minutes. CONCLUSION: The study presents evidence supporting the TaGA's validity and reliability. This instrument may be a practical and efficient approach to screening geriatric syndromes in fast-paced healthcare settings. Future research should investigate its predictive value and effect on care.
Assuntos
Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Hospitais , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , Estudos Transversais , Técnica Delphi , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Comparison of frailty instruments in low-middle income countries, where the prevalence of frailty may be higher, is scarce. In addition, less complex diagnostic tools for frailty are important in these settings, especially in acutely ill patients, because of limited time and economic resources. We aimed to compare the performance of 3 frailty instruments for predicting adverse outcomes after 1 year of follow-up in older adults with an acute event or a chronic decompensated disease. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Geriatric day hospital (GDH) specializing in acute care. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 534 patients (mean age 79.6 ± 8.4 years, 63% female, 64% white) admitted to the GDH. MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was assessed using the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) criteria, the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture (SOF) criteria, and the FRAIL (fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight) questionnaire. Monthly phone contacts were performed over the course of the first year to detect the following outcomes: incident disability, hospitalization, fall, and death. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed to evaluate the association of the outcomes with frailty as defined by the 3 instruments. In addition, we compared the accuracy of these instruments for predicting the outcomes. RESULTS: Prevalence of frailty ranged from 37% (using FRAIL) to 51% (using CHS). After 1 year of follow-up, disability occurred in 33% of the sample, hospitalization in 40%, fall in 44%, and death in 16%. Frailty, as defined by the 3 instruments was associated with all outcomes, whereas prefrailty was associated with disability, using the SOF and FRAIL instruments, and with hospitalization using the CHS and SOF instruments. The accuracy of frailty to predict different outcomes was poor to moderate with area under the curve varying from 0.57 (for fall, with frailty defined by SOF and FRAIL) to 0.69 (for disability, with frailty defined by CHS). CONCLUSIONS: In acutely ill patients from a low-middle income country GDH acute care unit, the CHS, SOF, and FRAIL instruments showed similar performance in predicting adverse outcomes.
Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Fragilidade/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Brasil , Estudos de Coortes , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Pobreza , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Prophylactic placement of endovascular balloon occlusion catheters has grown to be part of the surgical plans to control intraoperative hemorrhage in cases of abnormal placentation. We performed a systematic literature review to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the use of REBOA during cesarean delivery in pregnant woman with morbidly adherent placenta. METHODS: A systematic review was performed. Relevant case reports and nonrandomized studies were identified by the literature search in MEDLINE. We included studies involving pregnant woman with diagnosis of abnormal placentation who underwent cesarean delivery with REBOA placed for hemorrhage control. MINORS' criteria were used to evaluate the risk of bias of included studies. A formal meta-analysis was not performed. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in cumulative results. These studies included a total of 392 patients. Overall, REBOA was deployed in 336 patients. Six studies reported the use of REBOA as an adjunct for prophylactic hemorrhage control in pregnant woman with diagnosis of morbidly adherent placenta undergoing elective cesarean delivery. In two studies, REBOA was deployed in patients already in established hemorrhagic shock at the moment of cesarean delivery. REBOA was deployed primarily by interventional radiologists; however, one study reported a surgeon as the REBOA provider. The results from our qualitative synthesis indicate that the use of REBOA during cesarean delivery resulted in less blood loss with a low rate complications occurrence. CONCLUSION: REBOA is a feasible, safe, and effective means of prophylactic and remedial hemorrhage control in pregnant women with abnormal placentation undergoing cesarean delivery.
Assuntos
Aorta , Oclusão com Balão/métodos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Cesárea , Placenta Acreta , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Ressuscitação/métodosRESUMO
Patients with complex palliative care needs can experience delayed discharge, which causes an inappropriate occupancy of hospital beds. Post-acute care facilities (PACFs) have emerged as an alternative discharge destination for some of these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of admissions and characteristics of palliative care patients discharged from hospitals to a PACF. We conducted a retrospective analysis of PACF admissions between 2014 and 2016 that were linked to hospital discharge reports and electronic health records, to gather information about hospital-to-PACF transitions. In total, 205 consecutive patients were discharged from 6 different hospitals to our PACF. Palliative care patients were involved in 32% (n = 67) of these discharges. The most common conditions were terminal cancer (n = 42, 63%), advanced dementia (n = 17, 25%), and stroke (n = 5, 8%). During acute hospital stays, patients with cancer had significant shorter lengths of stay (13 vs 99 days, P = .004), a lower use of intensive care services (2% vs 64%, P < .001) and mechanical ventilation (2% vs 40%, P < .001), when compared to noncancer patients. Approximately one-third of discharges from hospitals to a PACF involved a heterogeneous group of patients in need of palliative care. Further studies are necessary to understand the trajectory of posthospitalized patients with life-limiting illnesses and what factors influence their decision to choose a PACF as a discharge destination and place of death. We advocate that palliative care should be integrated into the portfolio of post-acute services.
Assuntos
Hospitais Especializados/organização & administração , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Assistência Terminal/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Alta do Paciente , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Geographic variation in the use of post-acute care (PAC - skilled nursing facility and home health care) after hospital discharge is substantial, but reasons for this remain largely unexplored. PAC use in urban hospitals compared to rural hospitals may be one key contributor. We aimed to describe PAC use, explore substitution of one type of PAC for another, and identify how PAC use varies by diagnosis in urban and rural settings. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the 2012 National Inpatient Sample including adult discharges to PAC after a hospitalization. METHODS: We adjusted for differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital care provided, and hospital information, comparing use of PAC in urban and rural settings in multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Rural patients discharged from rural hospitals constituted 188,137 (12.1%) of the 1.56 million discharges in the sample. Rural discharges received less home health care (0.85; 0.80-0.90) than urban discharges, resulting in less rural PAC use overall (0.95; 0.91-0.99). Rural discharges received more overall PAC for stroke (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.19) and less PAC for sepsis (0.92; 0.86-0.98), hip fracture (0.82; 0.70-0.96), and elective joint arthroplasty, where rural discharges had 41% lower odds of receiving PAC (0.59; 0.49-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The striking differences in receipt of post-acute care in urban and rural patients may constitute a disparity. Evaluation of costs and outcomes of PAC use in these settings is urgently needed as Medicare expands bundled payments for this care.